Advertisement

Mind & Society

, Volume 16, Issue 1–2, pp 81–94 | Cite as

Disability, economic agency, and embodied cognition

  • Thomas AbramsEmail author
Article

Abstract

In this paper, I combine the actor-network economic sociology of disability with recent developments in phenomenological, embodied cognitive science, to discuss how ability, calculative agency, and meaning are distributed throughout materially situated sociocognitive systems. I begin by outlining the actor-network approach to disability, market formation, and economic agency. Next, I turn to the cognitive sciences, and describe the emergence of consciousness and meaning in embodied human being. With an operative synthesis of the two projects in place, I turn to government-organized disability savings plans in Canada. I suggest that the low uptake of these plans can be explained using the theoretical synthesis provided in the first two sections of this paper, giving a robust account of the threefold distribution of ability, calculative agency, and meaning.

Keywords

Disability Actor-network theory Economic rationality Phenomenology Extended cognition Embodiment 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada generously supported this research. Thanks to Carlos Novas and James A. Shaw for their helpful comments on an earlier draft of this paper.

References

  1. Abrams T (2015) From homines inhabiles to homo economicus and back again: Michel Callon, distributed agency and the Ontario disability support program’s employment supports. J Cult Econ 8:101–114. doi: 10.1080/17530350.2013.870085 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Çalışkan K, Callon M (2009) Economization, part 1: shifting attention from the economy to processes of economization. Econ Soc 38:369–398. doi: 10.1080/03085140903020580 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Çalışkan K, Callon M (2010) Economization, part 2: a research program for the study of markets. Econ Soc 39:1–32. doi: 10.1080/03085140903424519 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Callon M (1998) The laws of the markets. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  5. Callon M (2008) Economic markets and the rise of interactive agencements: from prosthetic agencies to habilitated agencies. In: Pinch T, Swedberg R (eds) Living in a material world: economic sociology meets science and technology studies. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 29–56Google Scholar
  6. Callon M, Rabeharisoa V (2008) The growing engagement of emergent concerned groups in political and economic life: lessons from the French association of neuromuscular disease patients. Sci Technol Hum Val 33:230–261. doi: 10.1177/0162243907311264 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Canada (2012) T2201 disability tax credit certificate 2012. Canada Revenue Agency, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  8. Canada Revenue Agency (2014) Guide RC 4460, Registered Disability Savings Plan. Canada Revenue Agency, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  9. Carel H (2011) Phenomenology and its application in medicine. Theor Med Bioeth 32:33–46. doi: 10.1177/0162243907311264 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chalmers D (1995) Facing up to the problem of consciousness. J Conscious Stud 2:200–219Google Scholar
  11. Clark A, Chalmers D (1998) The extended mind. Analysis 58:7–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crooks VA (2006) “I Go On The Internet; I Always, You Know, Check To See What’s New”: chronically ill women’s use of online health information to shape and inform doctor-patient interactions in the space of care provision. ACME Int J Crit Geogr 5:50–69Google Scholar
  13. Goffman E (1961) Asylums: essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. Anchor Books, Garden CityGoogle Scholar
  14. Hanna R, Thompson E (2003) The mind-body-body problem. Theoria et Historia Scientarium 7:23–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Heidegger M (1996) Being and time (Trans: J. Stambaugh). State University of New York Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Hughes B, Paterson K (1997) The social model of disability and the disappearing body: towards a sociology of impairment. Disabil Soc 12:325–340. doi: 10.1080/09687599727209 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hutchins E (1995) Cognition in the wild. The MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  18. Jensen RT (2009) Motor intentionality and the case of Schneider. Phenomenol Cogn Sci 8:371–388. doi: 10.1007/s11097-009-9122-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Latour B (1986) Visualization and cognition: thinking with eyes and hands. In: Kuklick H, Long E (eds) Knowledge and society: studies in the sociology of culture past and present. JAI Press, London, pp 1–40Google Scholar
  20. Latour B (1996) Cogito Ergo Sumus! Or psychology swept inside out by the fresh air of the upper deck. Mind Cult Act 3:54–63. doi: 10.1207/s15327884mca0301_5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Latour B (2004) Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Leder D (1990) The absent body. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  23. Leonardi M, Bickenbach J, Ustun TB, Kostanjsek N, Chatterji S (2006) The definition of disability: what is in a name? Lancet 368:1219–1221. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69422-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Martiny KM (2015) How to develop a phenomenological model of disability. Med Health Care Philos 18:553–565. doi: 10.1007/s11019-015-9625-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McFeat T (2015, February 27) Registered disability savings plans: why don’t more have them? http://www.cbc.ca/1.1042380. Accessed 9 June 2015
  26. Merleau-Ponty M (1962) Phenomenology of perception (Trans: Colin Smith). Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Moser I, Law J (1999) Good passages, bad passages. In: Law J, Hassard J (eds) Actor-network theory and after. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 196–219Google Scholar
  28. Nersessian NJ (2006) The cognitive-cultural systems of the research laboratory. Organ Stud 27:125–145. doi: 10.1177/0170840606061842 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Øberg GK, Normann B, Gallagher S (2015) Embodied-enactive clinical reasoning in physical therapy. Physiother Theory Pract 31:244–252. doi: 10.3109/09593985.2014.1002873 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Oliver M (1990) The politics of disablement. MacMillan, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ryle G (1949) The concept of mind. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  32. Schillmeier M (2007) Dis/abling spaces of calculation: blindness and money in everyday life. Environ Plann D 25:594–609. doi: 10.1068/d4173 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schillmeier M (2010) Rethinking disability: bodies, senses, things. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Shakespeare T (2012) Still a health issue. Disab Health J 5:129–131. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2012.04.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Simon HA (2000) Bounded rationality in social science: today and tomorrow. Mind Soc 1:25–39. doi: 10.1007/BF02512227 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Thompson E (2007) Mind in life: biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  37. Thompson E, Stapleton M (2009) Making sense of sense-making: reflections on enactive and extended mind theories. Topoi-Int Rev Philos 28:23–30. doi: 10.1007/s11245-008-9043-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Titchkosky T (2001) From the field—coming out disabled: the politics of understanding. Disabil Stud Q 21:131–139. http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/325/398
  39. Turner BS (2001) Disability and the sociology of the body. In: Albrecht G, Seelman K, Bury M (eds) Handbook of disability studies. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 252–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vick A, Lightman E (2010) Barriers to employment among women with complex episodic disabilities. J Disabil Policy Stud 21:70–80. doi: 10.1177/1044207309358588 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wilson A (2012) The dys-appearing body: understanding the lived experience of women with fibromylagia. Masters Thesis. Carleton University, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  42. Winance M (2006) Trying out the wheelchair: the mutual shaping of people and devices through adjustment. Sci Technol Hum Val 31:52–72. doi: 10.1177/0162243905280023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social Justice EducationOntario Institute for Studies in Education/University of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations