Mind & Society

, 8:209 | Cite as

Investigating the force multiplier effect of citizen event reporting by social simulation

  • Mark A. Kramer
  • Roger Costello
  • John Griffith


Citizen event reporting (CER) attempts to leverage the eyes and ears of a large population of “citizen sensors” to increase the amount of information available to decision makers. When deployed in an environment that includes hostile elements, foes can exploit the system to exert indirect control over the response infrastructure. We use an agent-based model to relate the utility of responses to population composition, citizen behavior, and decision strategy, and measure the result in terms of a force multiplier. We show that CER can lead to positive force multipliers even with a majority of hostile elements in the population. When reporter identity is known, a reputation system that keeps track of trustworthy reporters can further increase the force multipliers.


Agent based modeling Civil violence Neighborhood watch Citizen event reporting 


  1. Associated Press (2008) False tip blamed in attack that killed Afghan civilians. September 15, 2008, World News Network.
  2. Beaumont C (2008) Mumbai attacks: Twitter and Flickr used to break news. November 27, 2008,
  3. Doran J (2006) Modelling a typical guerrilla war. IEEE workshop on distributed intelligent systems: collective intelligence and its applications, June 2006, pp 285–290Google Scholar
  4. Epstein JM, Steinbruner JD, Parker MT (2001) Modeling civil violence: an agent based computational approach. Center on Social and Economic Dynamics, Working Paper no. 20. The Brookings Institution, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  5. Gamel K (2008) More weapons caches turning up in Iraq. Associated Press, June 19, 2008.
  6. Georgia Division of Public Health (2008) Georgia’s Notifiable Disease Emergency Reporting Hotline, Georgia Epidemiology Report 24(2), Feb. 2008Google Scholar
  7. Goh CK, Quek HY, Tan KC, Abbass HA (2006) Modeling civil violence: an evolutionary multi-agent, game-theoretic approach. IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Vancouver, BC, Canada, July 2006, pp 1624–1631Google Scholar
  8. Groff E, Birks D (2008) Simulating crime prevention strategies: a look at the possibilities. Policing Advance access, policing. Published online on June 20, 2008. doi: 10.1093/police/pan020
  9. Kinkade S, Verclas K (2008) Wireless technology for social change. UN Foundation-Vodafone Group Foundation Partnership, Washington, DC and Bershire, UKGoogle Scholar
  10. Schellong A (2006) Increasing social capital for disaster through social networking services: a case study of Japanese local Government SNS. Occasional Paper, University of Tokyo 21st Century COE program “Invention of Policy Systems in Advanced Countries”Google Scholar
  11. Stojanovic D (2004) False tip leads to deadly ambush; at least 29 killed. Stars and Stripes, Mideast edition 2(263), December 30, 2004Google Scholar
  12. Vasconcelos E, Furtado V (2005) Using explanations of agents to increase understanding of simulations for tutoring police allocation. Fifth IEEE international conference on advanced learning technologies, July 2005, pp 895–897. doi: 10.1109/ICALT.2005.299

Copyright information

© Fondazione Rosselli 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark A. Kramer
    • 1
  • Roger Costello
    • 1
  • John Griffith
    • 1
  1. 1.The MITRE CorporationBedfordUSA

Personalised recommendations