Skip to main content
Log in

Expectations and social decision-making: biasing effects of prior knowledge on Ultimatum responses

  • Published:
Mind & Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Psychological studies have long demonstrated effects of expectations on judgment, whereby the provision of information, either implicitly or explicitly, prior to an experience or decision can exert a substantial influence on the observed behavior. This study extended these expectation effects to the domain of interactive economic decision-making. Prior to playing a commonly-used bargaining task, the Ultimatum Game, participants were primed to expect offers that would be either relatively fair (a roughly equal split of an endowed amount) or unfair (an unequal split, to the participant’s disadvantage). A third group played the Game without receiving any prior information about expected offers. As predicted, these expectations had a large effect on decisions made by participants in the Ultimatum Game, with those with expectations of fairness rejecting significantly more unfair offers than those participants who expected low offers. Implications for models of fairness and equity are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison RI, Uhl KP (1964) Influence of beer brand identification on taste perception. J Marketing Res 1:36–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amanzio M, Benedetti F (1999) Neuropharmacological dissection of placebo analgesia: expectation-activated opioid systems versus conditioning-activated specific subsystems. J Neurosci 19:484–494

    Google Scholar 

  • Blount S (1995) When social outcomes aren’t fair: the effect of causal attributions on preferences. Organ Behav Hum Dec 63:131–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohnet I, Zeckhauser R (2004) Social comparisons in ultimatum bargaining. Scand J Econ 106:495–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton G, Ockenfels A (2000) ERC: a theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. Am Econ Rev 90:166–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton GE, Zwick R (1995) Anonymity versus punishment in ultimatum bargaining. Game Econ Behav 10:95–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calder AJ, Lawrence AD, Young AW (2001) Neuropsychology of fear and loathing. Nat Rev Neurosci 2:352–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camerer CF (2003) Behavioral game theory. Princeton, Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Cason TN, Mui VL (1998) Social influence in the sequential Dictator game. J Math Psychol 42:248–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charness G, Rabin M (2002) Understanding social preferences with simple tests. Q J Econ 117:817–870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Critchley HD, Elliott R, Mathias CJ, Dolan RJ (2000) Neural activity relating to generation and representation of galvanic skin conductance responses: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurosci 20:3033–3040

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado MR, Frank RH, Phelps EA (2005) Perceptions of moral character modulate the neural systems of reward during the trust game. Nat Neurosci 8:1611–1618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derbyshire SW, Jones AKP, Gyulai F (1997) Pain processing during three levels of noxious stimulation produces differential patterns of central activity. Pain 73:431–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckel C, Grossman P (2001) Chivalry and solidarity in ultimatum games. Econ Inq 39:171–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk A, Fischbacher U (2006) A theory of reciprocity. Game Econ Behav 54:293–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr E, Schmidt KM (1999) A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Q J Econ 114:817–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guth W, Schmittberger R, Schwarz B (1982) An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. J Econ Behav Organ 3:376–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harle K, Sanfey AG (2007) Sadness biases social economic decisions in the ultimatum game. Emotion 7:876–881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klaaren KJ, Hodges SD, Wilson TD (1994) The role of affective expectations in subjective experience and decision-making. Soc Cognition 12:77–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Knez MJ, Camerer CF (1995) Outside options and social comparison in three-player ultimatum game experiments. Game Econ Behav 10:65–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koenigs M, Tranel D (2007) Irrational economic decision-making after ventromedial prefrontal damage: evidence from the ultimatum game. J Neurosci 27:951–956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kopelman S, Rosette AS, Thompson L (2006) The three faces of Eve: strategic displays of positive, negative, and neutral emotions in negotiations. Organ Behav Hum Dec 99:81–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee L, Frederick S, Ariely D (2006) Try it, you’ll like it: the influence of expectation, consumption, and revelation on preferences for beer. Psychol Sci 17:1054–1058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • List JA, Cherry TL (2000) Learning to accept in ultimatum games: evidence from an experimental design that generates low offers. Exp Econ 3:11–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Loewenstein GF, Thompson L, Bazerman MH (1989) Social utility and decision making in interpersonal contexts. J Pers Soc Psychol 57:426–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe K, Houser D, Ryan L, Smith V, Trouard T (2001) A functional imaging study of cooperation in two-person reciprocal exchange. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:11832–11835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClure SM, Li J, Tomlin D, Cypert K, Montague L, Montague P (2004) Neural correlates of behavioral preference for culturally familiar drinks. Neuron 44:379–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak MA, Page KM, Sigmund K (2000) Fairness versus reason in the ultimatum game. Science 289:1773–1775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pillutla MM, Murnighan JK (1996) Unfairness, anger, and spite: emotional rejections of ultimatum offers. Organ Behav Hum Dec 68:208–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plassman H, O’Doherty J, Shiv B, Rangel A (2008) Marketing actions can modulate neural representations of experienced pleasantness. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:1050–1054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rilling JK, Gutman DA, Zeh TR, Pagnoni G, Berns GS, Kilts CD (2002) A neural basis for social cooperation. Neuron 35:395–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanfey AG, Rilling JK, Aronson JA, Nystrom LE, Cohen JD (2003) The neural basis of economic decision-making in the ultimatum game. Science 300:1755–1758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanfey AG, Loewenstein G, McClure SM, Cohen JD (2006) Neuroeconomics: cross-currents in research on decision-making. Trends Cogn Sci 10:108–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiv B, Carmon Z, Ariely D (2005) Placebo effects of marketing actions: consumers may get what they pay for. J Marketing Res 42:383–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slovic P (1995) The construction of preference. Am Psychol 50:364–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Kleef GA, De Dreu CKW, Manstead ASR (2004) The interpersonal effects of anger and happiness in negotiations. J Pers Soc Psychol 86:57–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1947) Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton, Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao E, Houser D (2005) Emotion expression in human punishment behavior. P Natl Acad Sci USA 102:7398–7401

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author is grateful for the assistance of K. Martin and L. Suchoski, and for the comments of N. Bonini, R. Viale, and three anonymous reviewers. This research was supported by NIMH R03MH077058.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alan G. Sanfey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sanfey, A.G. Expectations and social decision-making: biasing effects of prior knowledge on Ultimatum responses. Mind Soc 8, 93–107 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11299-009-0053-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11299-009-0053-6

Keywords

Navigation