Mind & Society

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 193–214 | Cite as

Refusing to budge: a confirmatory bias in decision making?

Original Article

Abstract

Confirmatory bias, defined as the tendency to misinterpret new pieces of evidence as confirming previously held hypotheses, can lead to implacable, even incorrect decision making. It is one of the biases, along with anchoring, framing, and other judgment heuristic errors, that may lead to non-optimal behavior. This paper tests for the existence of confirmatory bias behavior in a uniquely economic setting (tax policy) and in a context relatively lacking in ambiguity. It also tests whether the confirmatory bias phenomenon can be prevalent enough to affect aggregate outcomes, a characteristic important in economic models in particular. The results indicate not only that confirmatory bias exists, but that the confirmatory bias effect may be stronger for evidence relating to losses than for comparable evidence relating to gains.

Keywords

Confirmatory bias Rationality Judgment Heuristics Tax policy 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Many special thanks to Rob Fleck, Dino Falaschetti, Susan Feigenbaum, Scott Plous, Ron Harstad, David Mandy, Jeff Milyo, Ken Troske, and two anonymous reviewers for their insight, criticism, support, and advice.

References

  1. Akerlof GA (1989) The economics of illusion. Econ Pol 1(1):1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arkes HR, Wartmann RL, Saville PD, Harkness AR (1981) Hindsight bias among phyicians weighing the likelihood of diagnoses. J Appl Psychol 66(2):252–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ausubel LM (1991) The failure of competition in the credit card market. Am Econ Rev 81(1):50–81Google Scholar
  4. Babcock L, Loewenstein G (1997) Explaining bargaining impasse: the role of self-serving biases. J Econ Perspect 11(1):109–126Google Scholar
  5. Barber BM, Odean T (2001) Boys will be boys: gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment. Q J Econ 116(1):261–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baumann AO, Deber RB, Thompson GG (1991) Overconfidence among physicians and nurses: the ‘Micro-Certainty, Macro-Uncertainty’ phenomenon. Soc Sci Med 32(2):167–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Borum R, Otto R, Golding S (1993) Improving clinical judgment and decision making in forensic evaluation. J Psychol Law 21(1):35–76Google Scholar
  8. Bruner JS, Potter MC (1964) Interference in visual recognition. Science 144(3617):424–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Camerer CF (1997) Progress in behavioral game theory. J Econ Perspect 11(4):167–188Google Scholar
  10. Camerer CF, Lovallo D (1999) Overconfidence and excess entry: an experimental approach. Am Econ Rev 89(1):306–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cameron JA, Trope Y (2004) Stereotype-biased search and processing of information about group members. Soc Cogn 22(6):650–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cross P (1977) Not can but will college teaching be improved. New Dir High Ed 17:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dardenne B, Leyens JP (1995) Confirmation bias as a social skill. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 21(11):1229–1239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Darley JM, Gross PH (1983) A hypothesis-confirming bias in labeling effects. J Pers Soc Psychol 44(1):20–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dillman DA (2000) Mail and internet surveys: the tailored design method, 2nd edn, Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Dougherty TW, Turban DB, Callender JC (1994) Confirming first impressions in the employment interview: a field study of interviewer behavior. J Appl Psychol 79(5):659–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Downs A (1957) An economic theory of democracy. Harper and Row Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Dubra J (2004) Optimism and overconfidence in search. Rev Econ Dyn 7:198–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dunning D, Meyerowitz JA, Holzberg AD (1989) Ambiguity and self-evaluation: the role of idiosyncratic trait definitions in self-serving assessments of ability. J Pers Soc Psychol 57(6):1082–1090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Eales JS, Engel BK, Hauser RJ, Thompson SR (1990) Grain price expectations of Illinois farmers and grain merchandisers. Am J Agric Econ 72(3):701–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ganguly AR, Kagel JH, Moser DV (2000) Do asset market prices reflect traders’ judgment biases? J Risk Uncertain 20(3):219–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Golec J, Tamarkin M (1995) Do betters prefer long shots because they are risk-lovers, or are they just overconfident? J Risk Uncertain 11:51–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Griffin D, Tversky A (1992) The weighing of evidence and the determinants of confidence. Cognit Psychol 24(3):411–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Haverkamp BE (1993) Confirmatory bias in hypothesis testing for client-identified and counselor self-generated hypotheses. J Couns Psychol 40(3):303–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hvide HK (2002) Pragmatic beliefs and overconfidence. J Econ Behav Organ 48:15–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kahneman D, Tversky A (1973) On the psychology of prediction. Psychol Rev 80(4):237–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A (eds) (1982) Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Keren G (1987) Facing uncertainty in the game of bridge: a calibration study. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 39(1):98–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Keren G (1988) On the ability of monitoring non-veridical perceptions and uncertain knowledge: some calibration studies. Acta Psychol 67(2):95–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Klayman J, Ha YW (1987) Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing. Psychol Rev 94(2):211–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Libecap GD, Hansen ZK (2000) ‘Rain Follows the Plow’ and dryfarming doctrine: the climate information problem and homestead failure in the Upper Great Plains, 1890–1925. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, Historical Paper 127Google Scholar
  32. Lord CG, Ross L, Lepper MR (1979) Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: the effect of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. J Pers Soc Psychol 37(11):2098–2109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lord CG, Lepper MR, Preston E (1984) Considering the opposite: a corrective strategy for social judgment. J Pers Soc Psychol 47(6):1231–1243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Madsen JB (1994) Tests of rationality versus an ‘Over Optimist’ bias. J Econ Psychol 15:587–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Miller AG, McHoskey JW, Bane CM, Dowd TG (1993) The attitude polarization phenomenon: role of response measure, attitude extremity, and behavioral consequences of reported attitude change. J Pers Soc Psychol 64(4):561–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nelson P (1994) Voting and imitative behavior. Econ Inq 32:92–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nickerson RS (1998) Confirmation bias: a ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Rev Gen Psychol 2(2):175–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nisbett RE, Ross L (1980) Human inference: strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Prentice Hall, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  39. The Office of Planning and Analysis, Montana State University-Bozeman (2003) Common Data Set. The Thomson Corporation and US News and World ReportGoogle Scholar
  40. Peltzman S (1980) The growth of government. J Law Econ 23(2):209–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Plous S (1991) Biases in the assimilation of technological breakdowns: do accidents make us safer? J Appl Soc Psychol 21(13):1058–1082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Preston CE, Harris S (1965) Psychology of drivers in traffic accidents. J Appl Psychol 49(4):284–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rabin M (1998) Psychology and economics. J Econ Lit 36(1):11–46Google Scholar
  44. Rabin M, Schrag J (1999) First impressions matter: a model of confirmatory bias. Q J Econ 114(1):37–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Snyder M, Swann WB (1978) Behavioral confirmation in social interaction: from social perception to social reality. J Exp Soc Psychol 14:148–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Strohmer DC, Shivy VA (1994) Bias in counselor hypothesis testing: testing the robustness of counselor confirmatory bias. J Couns Dev 73:191–197Google Scholar
  47. Svenson O (1981) Are we all less risky and more skillful than our fellow driver? Acta Psychol 47:233–250Google Scholar
  48. Swann WB, Snyder M (1980) On translating beliefs into action: theories of ability and their application in an institutional setting. J Pers Soc Psychol 38(6):879–888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Taylor SE, Brown JD (1988) Illusion and well-being: a social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychol Bull 103(2):193–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Trope Y, Mackie DM (1987) Sensitivity to alternatives in social hypothesis-testing. J Exp Soc Psychol 23:445–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Trope Y, Thompson EP (1997) Looking for truth in all the wrong places? Asymmetric search of individuating information about stereotyped group members. J Pers Soc Psychol 73(2):229–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tweney RD, Doherty ME, Worner WJ, Pliske DB, Mynatt CR (1980) Strategies of rule discovery in an inference task. Q J Exp Psychol 32:109–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wason PC (1960) On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Q J Exp Psychol 12:129–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Watson A, Rodgers T, Dudek D (1998) The human nature of management consulting: judgment and expertise. Manage Dec Econ 19(7–8):495–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Fondazione Rosselli 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of Missouri—St LouisSt LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations