Mind & Society

, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp 211–224 | Cite as

Can tacit knowledge fit into a computer model of scientific cognitive processes? The case of biotechnology

Original Article
  • 105 Downloads

Abstract

This paper tries to express a critical point of view on the computational turn in philosophy by looking at a specific field of study: philosophy of science. The paper starts by briefly discussing the main contributions that information and communication technologies have given to the rising of computational philosophy of science, and in particular to the cognitive modelling approach. The main question then arises, concerning how computational models can cope with the presence of tacit knowledge in science. Would it be possible to develop new ways of handling this specific type of knowledge, in order to incorporate it in computational models of scientific thinking? Or should tacit knowledge lead us to other approaches in using computer sciences to model scientific cognition? These questions are addressed by making reference to a detailed case study of a recent innovation development in the field of biotechnology.

Keywords

Biotechnology Cognitive modelling Tacit knowledge Scientific discovery 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This article is a revised version of the paper presented at the Second European Conference Computing and Philosophy (E-CAP2004), held at the University of Pavia, Italy (June 3–5, 2004) and chaired by Lorenzo Magnani.

References

  1. Agre PE (1997) Toward a critical technical practice: lessons learned in trying to reform AI. In: Bowker GC, Star SL, Turner W, Gasser L (eds) Social science, technical systems and cooperative work: beyond the great divide. Erlbaum, London, pp 131–158Google Scholar
  2. Atkinson AP, Thomas MSC, Cleeremans A (2000) Consciousness: mapping the theoretical landscape. Trends Cogn Sci 4(10):372–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bordignon C, Notarangelo LD, Nobili N, Ferrari G, Casorati G, Panina P, Mazzolari E, Maggioni D, Rossi C, Servida P, Ugazio AG, Mavilio F (1995) Gene therapy in peripheral blood lymphocytes and bone marrow for ADA-immunodeficient patients. Science 270(5235):470–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Broadbent DE, Fitzgerald P, Broadbent MH (1986) Implicit and explicit knowledge in the control of complex systems. Br J Psychol 77(1):33–50Google Scholar
  5. Cleeremans A, Destrebecqz A, Boyer M (1998) Implicit learning: news from the front. Trends Cogn Sci 2(10):406–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Collins HM (2001) Tacit knowledge, trust, and the Q of sapphire. Soc Stud Sci 31(1):71–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Collins HM (1974) The TEA set: tacit knowledge and scientific networks. Sci Stud 4(2):165–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Damasio A (1999) The feeling of what happens. Body and emotion in the making of consciousness. Harcourt, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Darden L (1990) Diagnosing and fixing fault in theories. In: Shrager J, Langley P (eds) Computational models of discovery and theory formation. Morgan Kaufman, San Mateo, pp 219–246Google Scholar
  10. Gigerenzer G (2000) Mind as a computer. The social origin of a metaphor. In: Gigerenzer G (ed) Adaptive thinking. Rationality in the real world. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 26–43Google Scholar
  11. Holyoak KJ, Thagard P (1989), Analogical mapping by constraint satisfaction. Cogn Sci 13(3):295–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kelly K (1996) The logic of reliable inquiry. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  13. Kelly K, Glymour C (1989) Convergence to the truth and nothing but the truth. Philos Sci 56(2):185–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Langley P, Simon HA, Bradshaw GL, Zytkow JM (1987) Scientific discovery. Computational explorations of the creative processes. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  15. MacKenzie D, Spinardi G (1995) Tacit knowledge, weapons design, and the uninvention of nuclear weapons. Am J Sociol 101(1):44–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Osherson D, Weinstein S (1989) Identifiable collections of countable structures. Philos Sci 56(1):94–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Polanyi M (1958) Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-critical Philosophy. Routledge and Kegan Paul, LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. Pozzali A, Viale R (2007) Cognition, types of “tacit knowledge” and technology transfer. In: Topol R, Walliser B (eds) Cognitive economics: new trends. Elsevier, Oxford (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  19. Rabinow P (1996) Making PCR: a story of biotechnology. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  20. Ravetz JR (1971) Scientific knowledge and its social problems. Clarendon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  21. Reber AS (1993) Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. an essay on the cognitive unconscious. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  22. Sloman A (1978) The computer revolution in philosophy. Harvester Press, HassocksGoogle Scholar
  23. Smolensky P, Legendre G, Miyata Y (1993) Integrating connectionist and symbolic computation for the theory of language. Curr Sci India 64(6):381–91Google Scholar
  24. Stichler RN, Hauptman R (1997) Ethics, information and technology: readings. McFarland, JeffersonGoogle Scholar
  25. Thagard P (1998) Computation and the philosophy of science. In: Bynum TW, Moor JH (eds) The digital phoenix: how computers are changing philosophy. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 48–62Google Scholar
  26. Thagard P (1989) Scientific cognition: hot or cold? In: Fuller S, De Mey M, Shinn T, Woolgar S (eds) The cognitive turn. Sociological and psychological perspectives on science. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 71–82Google Scholar
  27. Turner SP (2002) Throwing out the tacit rule book. Learning and practices. In: Turner SP (ed) Brains/practices/relativism. Social theory after cognitive science. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 23–34Google Scholar
  28. Turner SP (1989) Tacit knowledge and the problem of computer modelling cognitive processes in science. In: Fuller S, De Mey M, Shinn T, Woolgar S (eds) The cognitive turn. Sociological and psychological perspectives on science. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 83–94Google Scholar
  29. Viale R (2001) Truth, science and politics: an analysis of social epistemology. In: Viale R (ed) Knowledge and Politics. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, pp 1–61Google Scholar
  30. Viale R, Pozzali A (2003) Al di qua della razionalità: la conoscenza tacita. Sistemi Intelligenti 15(2):325–346Google Scholar
  31. Zeman A (2001) Consciousness. Brain 124(7):1263–1289CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Fondazione Rosselli 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociology and Social ResearchUniversity of Milan – BicoccaMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations