Mind & Society

, Volume 5, Issue 2, pp 173–197 | Cite as

Symposium on ‘‘Cognition and Rationality: Part I’’ Relationships between rational decisions, human motives, and emotions

  • Cristiano Castelfranchi
  • Francesca Giardini
  • Francesca Marzo
Original Article

Abstract

In the decision-making and rationality research field, rational decision theory (RDT) has always been the main framework, thanks to the elegance and complexity of its mathematical tools. Unfortunately, the formal refinement of the theory is not accompanied by a satisfying predictive accuracy, thus there is a big gap between what is predicted by the theory and the behaviour of real subjects. Here we propose a new foundation of the RDT, which has to be based on a cognitive architecture for reason-based agents, acting on the basis of their beliefs in order to achieve their goals. The decision process is a cognitive evaluation of conflicting goals, based on different beliefs and values, but also on emotions and desires. We refer to a cognitive analysis of emotions and we integrate them in this more general RDT.

Keywords

Rational decision theory Decision-making Rationality Emotions Cognition 

References

  1. Bacharach M (1988) Preferenze razionali e descrizioni. In: Galavotti MC, Gambetta G (eds) Epistemologia ed economia. CLUEB, Bologna, pp 43–63Google Scholar
  2. Bacharach M (2003) Framing and cognition in economics: the bad news and the good. In: Basili M, Dimitri N, Gilboa I (eds) Cognitive processes and economic behavior. Routledge, London pp 63–74Google Scholar
  3. Bacharach M, Gambetta D (1997) Trust in signs. In: Cook K (eds) Trust and social structure. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp 148–184Google Scholar
  4. Bagozzi RP, Baumgartner H, Pieters R (1998) Goal-directed emotions. Cogn Emotion 12:1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bargh JA (1994) The four horsemen of automaticity: awareness, efficiency, intention, and control in social cognition. In: Wyer RS, Srull TK (eds) Handbook of social cognition: applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp 1–39Google Scholar
  6. Bazerman MH, Baron J, Shonk K (2002) You can’t enlarge the pie: the psychology of ineffective government. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Beach LR, Mitchell TR, Paluchowski TF, van Zeeet EH (1992) Image theory: decision framing and decision deliberation. In: Heller F (eds) Decision making and leadership. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 172–188Google Scholar
  8. Binmore KG (1994) Game theory and the social contract. MIT, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  9. Binmore KG, Gale J, Samuelson L (1995) Learning to be imperfect: the ultimatum game. Games Econ Behav 8:56–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boudon R (2003) Beyond rational choice theory. Ann Rev Sociol 29:1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bower GH, Cohen PR (1982) Emotion influences in memory and thinking: data and theory. In: Clark MS, Fiske ST (eds) Affect and cognition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp 291–331Google Scholar
  12. Brandenburger AM (2003) On the existence of a “complete” possibility structure. In: Basili M, Dimitri N, Gilboa I (eds) Cognitive processes and economic behavior. Routledge, London, pp 30–34Google Scholar
  13. Bratman ME (1987) Intentions, plans and practical reason. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  14. Brehm JW, Self E (1989) The intensity of motivation. Ann Rev Psychol 40:109–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brothers L (1990) The social brain: a project for integrating primate behavior and neurophysiology in a new domain. Concepts Neurosci 1:27–61Google Scholar
  16. Castelfranchi C (1988) Che figura. Emozioni e immagine sociale. Il Mulino, BolognaGoogle Scholar
  17. Castelfranchi C (2000) Affective appraisal vs cognitive evaluation in social emotions and interactions. In: Paiva A (eds) Affective interactions. Towards a new generation of computer interfaces. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, New York, pp 76–106Google Scholar
  18. Castelfranchi C (2003) For a “cognitive program”: explicit mental representations for Homo oeconomicus (the case of trust). In: Basili M, Dimitri N, Gilboa I (eds) Cognitive processes and economic behavior. Routledge, London, pp 168–208Google Scholar
  19. Conte R, Castelfranchi C (1995) Cognitive and social action. UCL, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Damasio AR (1994) Descartes’ error. Putnam’s Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. De Sousa R (2003) Emotions. In: The Stanford encyclopaedia of philosophy. http://www.plato.stanford.edu/entries/emotion
  22. Dolan RJ (2002) Emotion, cognition, and behavior. Science 298:1191–1194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Frijda N (1986) The emotions. Studies in emotion and social interaction. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Geanakoplos J, Pearce D, Stacchetti E (1989) Psychological games and sequential rationality. Games Econ Behav 1:60–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gigerenzer G, Todd PM, the ABC Research Group (1999) Simple heuristics that make us smart. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Gleicher F, Boninger DS, Strathman A, Armor D, Hetts J, Ahn M (1995) With an eye toward the future: the impact of counterfactual thinking on affect, attitudes, and behaviour. In: Roese NJ, Olson MM (eds) What might have been: the social psychology of counterfactual thinking. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, pp 283–304Google Scholar
  27. Kahneman D, Frederick S (2002) Representativeness revisited: attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In: Gilovich T, Griffin D, Kahneman D (eds) Heuristics and biases: the psychology of intuitive judgment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 49–81Google Scholar
  28. Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47:263–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A (eds) (1982) Judgement under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Lazarus RS (1991) Emotion and adaptation. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. LeDoux J (1996) The emotional brain. The mysterious underpinnings of emotional life. Simon and Schuster, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Loewenstein G (1996) Out of control: visceral influences on behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 65:272–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Loewenstein G, Schkade D (1999) Wouldn’t it be nice? Predicting future feelings. In: Kahneman D, Diener E, Schwarz N (eds) Well-being. The foundations of hedonic psychology. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp 85–108Google Scholar
  34. McFadden D (1999) Rationality for economists? J Risk Uncertain 19:73–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Miceli M, Castelfranchi C (2002a) Modelling motivational representations. Cogn Sci Q 2:233–247Google Scholar
  36. Miceli M, Castelfranchi C (eds) (2002b) Special issue on “Desires, goals, intentions, and values: computational architectures”. Cogn Sci Q 2(3–4)Google Scholar
  37. Oatley K (1992) Best laid schemes. The psychology of emotions. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  38. Payne JW, Bettman JR, Johnson EJ (1992) Behavioral decision research: a constructive processing perspective. Ann Rev Psychol 43:87–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Payne JW, Bettman JR, Johnson EJ (1993) The adaptive decision maker. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  40. Rabin M (1998) Psychology and economics. J Econ Lit 36:11–46Google Scholar
  41. Rolls ET (1999) The brain and emotion. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  42. Roth AE (1995) Bargaining experiments. In: Kagel JH, Roth AE (eds) Handbook of experimental economics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 253–348Google Scholar
  43. Ruffle B (1999) Gift-giving with emotions. J Econ Behav Organ 39:399–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Scherer KR (1984) On the nature and function of emotion: a component process approach. In: Scherer KR, Ekman P (eds) Approaches to emotion. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London, pp 293–317Google Scholar
  45. Simon H (1986) Rationality in psychology and economics. In: Hogarth R, Reder MW (eds) Rational choice: the contrast between economics and psychology. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 25–40Google Scholar
  46. Simon H (1991) Cognitive architectures and rational analysis: comment. In: Van Lehen K (eds) Architectures for intelligence. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp 155–186Google Scholar
  47. Sloman SA (1966) The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychol Bull 119:3–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Slovic P, Finucane ML, Peters E, MacGregor DG (2002) The affect heuristics. In: Gilovich T, Griffin D, Kahneman D (eds) Heuristics and biases: the psychology of intuitive judgment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 397–420Google Scholar
  49. Sugden R (2000) The motivating power of expectation. In: Nida-Rümelin J, Sphon W (eds) Rationality, rules, and structure. Kluwer, Berlin, pp 103–129Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Fondazione Rosselli 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cristiano Castelfranchi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Francesca Giardini
    • 1
  • Francesca Marzo
    • 1
  1. 1.Consiglio Nazionale della Ricerche (CNR)Istituto di Scienze e Tecnologie Della CognizioneRomeItaly
  2. 2.Dipartimento di Scienze della ComunicazioneUniversità di SienaSienaItaly

Personalised recommendations