European Clinics in Obstetrics and Gynaecology

, Volume 2, Issue 2, pp 82–85 | Cite as

Treatment decisions at the threshold of viability

Clinical Review
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:
  • 13 Downloads

Abstract

The survival rate for infants born preterm has improved over the last two decades. However, the incidence of moderate and severe neurodevelopmental disability amongst the surviving infants is high, and these infants require prolonged intensive care. Many countries have developed guidelines how and when to treat these infants. Usually, these guidelines are based upon the outcome data of large studies, but social, cultural and economical factors have a major impact on these guidelines as well. Some European countries have set guidelines at when to start treatment based upon gestational age alone. However, recent data show that ethnicity, gender and birth weight are important determinants for survival and morbidity as well. Thus, policies for initiating and withdrawing intensive care for those born extremely preterm should not be based upon gestational age, but infants should have a chance of proving themselves.

Keywords

Preterm infants Withholding treatment 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    Wood NS, Marlow N, Costeloe K, Gibson AT, Wilkinson AR (2000) Neurologic and developmental disability after extremely preterm birth. EPICure Study Group. N Engl J Med 343(6):378–384 (Aug 10)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    De Leeuw R, Cuttini M, Nadai M, Berbik I, Hansen G, Kucinskas A, Lenoir S, Levin A, Persson J, Rebagliato M, Reid M, Schroell M, de Vonderweid U, EURONIC Study Group (2000) Treatment choices for extremely preterm infants: an international perspective. J Pediatr 137(5):608–616PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alexander GR, Himes JH, Kaufman RB, Mor J, Kogan M (1996) A United States national reference for foetal growth. Obstet Gynecol 87(2):163–168PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arnold CC, Kramer MS, Hobbs CA, McLean FH, Usher RH (1991) Very low birth weight: a problematic cohort for epidemiologic studies of very small or immature neonates. Am J Epidemiol 134(6):604–613PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Sharman RS, Deter RL, Park SK (1985) Estimation of foetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements-a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 151(3):333–337PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Martinez-Poyer J (1991) How accurate is second trimester foetal dating? J Ultrasound Med 10(10):557–561PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vanhaesebrouck P, Allegaert K, Bottu J, Debauche C, Devlieger H, Docx M, Francois A, Haumont D, Lombet J, Rigo J, Smets K, Vanherreweghe I, Van Overmeire B, Van Reempts P, Extremely Preterm Infants in Belgium Study Group (2004) The EPIBEL study: outcomes to discharge from hospital for extremely preterm infants in Belgium. Pediatrics 114(3):663–675PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Markestad T, Kaaresen PI, Ronnestad A, Reigstad H, Lossius K, Medbo S, Zanussi G, Engelund IE, Skjaerven R, Irgens LM, Norwegian Extreme Prematurity Study Group (2005) Early death, morbidity, and need of treatment among extremely premature infants. Pediatrics 115(5):1289–1298PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lemons JA, Bauer CR, Oh W, Korones SB, Papile LA, Stoll BJ, Verter J, Temprosa M, Wright LL, Ehrenkranz RA, Fanaroff AA, Stark A, Carlo W, Tyson JE, Donovan EF, Shankaran S, Stevenson DK (2001) Very low birth weight outcomes of the National Institute of Child health and human development neonatal research network, January 1995 through December 1996. NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Pediatrics 107(1):E1PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Van Goudoever JB (2004) Te jong on te kiezen (Too young to decide). Inaugural lecture. Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, ISBN90-9018621-2, SeptemberGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Costeloe K, Hennessy E, Gibson AT, Marlow N, Wilkinson AR (2000) The EPICure study: outcomes to discharge from hospital for infants born at the threshold of viability. Pediatrics 106(4):659–671PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Alexander GR, Kogan M, Bader D, Carlo W, Allen M, Mor J (2003) US birth weight/gestational age-specific neonatal mortality: 1995–1997 rates for whites, Hispanics, and blacks. Pediatrics 111(1):e61–e66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chan K, Ohlsson A, Synnes A, Lee DS, Chien LY, Lee SK, Canadian Neonatal Network (2001) Survival, morbidity, and resource use of infants of 25 weeks’ gestational age or less. Am J Obstet Gynecol 85(1):220–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cust AE, Darlow BA, Donoghue DA, Australian and New Zealand Neonatal Network (ANZNN) (2003) Outcomes for high risk New Zealand newborn infants in 1998–1999: a population based, national study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 88(1):F15–F22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Marlow N, Wolke D, Bracewell MA, Samara M, EPICure Study Group (2005) Neurologic and developmental disability at six years of age after extremely preterm birth. N Engl J Med 352(1):9–19PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Emsley HC, Wardle SP, Sims DG, Chiswick ML, D’Souza SW (1998) Increased survival and deteriorating developmental outcome in 23 to 25 week old gestation infants, 1990-4 compared with 1984-9. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 78(2):F99–F104PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Doyle LW, Anderson PJ; Victorian Infant Collaborative Study Group (2005) Improved neurosensory outcome at 8 years of age of extremely low birthweight children born in Victoria over three distinct eras. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 90(6):F484–F488PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Piecuch RE, Leonard CH, Cooper BA, Kilpatrick SJ, Schlueter MA, Sola A (1997) Outcome of infants born at 24–26 weeks’ gestation: II. Neurodevelopmental outcome. Obstet Gynecol 90(5):809–814PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    McGrath MM, Sullivan MC, Lester BM, Oh W (2000) Longitudinal neurologic follow-up in neonatal intensive care unit survivors with various neonatal morbidities. Pediatrics 106(6):1397–1405PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wood NS, Costeloe K, Gibson AT, Hennessy EM, Marlow N, Wilkinson AR, EPICure Study Group (2005) The EPICure study: associations and antecedents of neurological and developmental disability at 30 months of age following extremely preterm birth. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 90(2):F134–F140PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lorenz JM, Paneth N, Jetton JR, den Ouden L, Tyson JE (2001) Comparison of management strategies for extreme prematurity in New Jersey and the Netherlands: outcomes and resource expenditure. Pediatrics 108(6):1269–1274PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Finnstrom O, Gaddlin PO, Leijon I, Samuelsson S, Wadsby M (2003) Very-low-birth-weight children at school age: academic achievement, behavior and self-esteem and relation to risk factors. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 14(2):75–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Serenius F, Ewald U, Farooqi A, Holmgren PA, Hakansson S, Sedin G (2004) Short-term outcome after active perinatal management at 23–25 weeks of gestation. A study from two Swedish perinatal centres. Part 3: neonatal morbidity. Acta Paediatr 93(8):1090–7109PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ment LR, Vohr B, Allan W, Katz KH, Schneider KC, Westerveld M, Duncan CC, Makuch RW (2003) Change in cognitive function over time in very low-birth-weight infants. JAMA 289(6):705–711PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Saigal S, Stoskopf B, Streiner D, Boyle M, Pinelli J, Paneth N, Goddeeris J (2006) Transition of extremely low-birth-weight infants from adolescence to young adulthood: comparison with normal birth-weight controls. JAMA 295(6):667–675PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hoekstra RE, Ferrara TB, Couser RJ, Payne NR, Connett JE (2004) Survival and long-term neurodevelopmental outcome of extremely premature infants born at 23–26 weeks’ gestational age at a tertiary center. Pediatrics 113(1 Pt 1):e1–e6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Board and College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Neonatology, Department of PediatricsErasmus Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations