Advertisement

Tree Genetics & Genomes

, 15:26 | Cite as

Phylogenetic and evolutionary applications of analyzing endocarp morphological characters by classification binary tree and leaves by SSR markers for the characterization of olive germplasm

  • G. C. Koubouris
  • E. V. Avramidou
  • I. T. Metzidakis
  • P. V. Petrakis
  • C. K. Sergentani
  • A. G. DoulisEmail author
Original Article
  • 47 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Evolution

Abstract

Seed (endocarp) morphology is useful for genotype discrimination and cultivar classification. Over a 20-year period, 504 olive trees (Olea europaea subsp. europaea) previously assigned to different cultivars originating from Greece (n = 37), Spain (n = 2), and Italy (n = 2) as well as one accession of Olea europaea subsp. cuspidata were evaluated employing 11 endocarp morphological markers and 9 SSR markers. A matrix of 42 morphotypes in total was subjected to classification binary tree (CBT) analysis. In addition, cultivars were fingerprinted employing 9 microsatellite (SSR) markers and placed on a similarity dendrogram. All 41 olive cultivars and one accession of Olea europaea subsp. cuspidata employed in the present study yielded different morphological profiles produced by the 11 endocarp traits. In the resulting CBT, the total reduction in error, that is, the total information in the set of all 42 morphotypes, was 100%. This meant that the set of 11 morphological characters—having 28 different states in all—was sufficient to remove all data noise and to correctly classify all examined olive cultivars. In addition, all olive cultivars were successfully discriminated by the 9 SSR markers employed. It is suggested that cultivars with large seeds—and concomitantly large fruits—are more distant from the wild forms and probably more evolved compared to cultivars with small seeds. In corroboration to the above, based on seed shape, some of the olive cultivars showed high resemblance to wild olives leading thus to the hypothesis that they were produced or selected during the early ages of olive domestication.

Keywords

Cluster Cultivar Germplasm management Olea europaea subsp. europaea Olea europaea subsp. cuspidata 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors express their gratitude to Ms Angelina Zapolska and Dr. Vasilios Ziogas for their assistance in image capture and processing. Continuous support by Georgios Kostelenos Nurseries is also acknowledged. Last but not least thanks to the numerous colleagues who contributed to endocarp measurements during the past two decades and more.

Funding information

Financial support from H.A.O. DEMETER and several projects is appreciated, first among all, the Resgen project CT—1996–1997 and the International Olive Council. This work was also partially funded—for the SSR part—by the Greek Secretariat for Research and Technology (GSRT), project Regional Innovation Pole of Crete, “i4Crete, A8—Integrated system of olive oil fingerprinting control and promotion—11RIPC06” to AGD and to ITM which was coordinated by the Heraklion Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.

Data archiving statement

All relevant raw data will be freely available to any scientist wishing to use them for non-commercial purposes. No nucleic acid sequences, protein sequences, genetic maps, SNPs, expression data, etc. were produced in this study. All morphological data used for morphometric analysis and CBT construction, along with all names of analyzed cultivars, are presented in Table 1 of this paper.

References

  1. Agiomyrgianaki A, Petrakis PV, Dais P (2012) Influence of harvest year, cultivar and geographical origin on Greek extra virgin olive oils composition: a study by NMR spectroscopy and biometric analysis. Food Chem 135:2561–2568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aksehirli-Pakyurek M, Koubouris G, Petrakis P, Hepaksoy S, Metzidakis I, Yalcinkaya E, Doulis A (2017) Cultivated and wild olives in Crete, Greece—genetic diversity and relationships with major Turkish cultivars revealed by SSR markers. Plant Mol Biol Report 35:575–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alba V, Montemurro C, Sabetta W, Pasqualone A, Blanco A (2009) SSR-based identification key of cultivars of Olea europaea L. diffused in Southern-Italy. Sci Hortic 123:11–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baldoni L, Cultrera NG, Mariotti R, Ricciolini C, Arcioni S, Vendramin GG, Buonamici A, Porceddu A, Sarri V, Ojeda MA, Trujillo I, Rallo L, Belaj A, Perri E, Salimonti A, Muzzalupo I, Casagrande A, Lain O, Messina R, Testolin R (2009) A consensus list of microsatellite markers for olive genotyping. Mol Breed 24:213–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bandelj D, Jakše J, Javornik B (2002) DNA fingerprinting of olive varieties by microsatellite markers. Food Technol Biotechnol 40:185–190Google Scholar
  6. Barranco D, Cimato A, Fiorino P, Rallo L, Touzani A, Castaneda C, Serafıni F, Trujillo I (2000) World catalogue of olive varieties. International Olive Oil Council, Madrid. http://www.internationaloliveoil.org/store/view/79-world-catalogue-of-olive-varieties-english. Accessed August 2018Google Scholar
  7. Bartolini G (2008) Olea databases. http://www.oleadb.it/. Accessed August 2018
  8. Belaj A, León L, Satovic Z, de la Rosa R (2011) Variability of wild olives (Olea europaea subsp. europaea var. sylvestris) analyzed by agro-morphological traits and SSR markers. Sci Hortic 129:561–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bervillé AJ, Breton CM (2014) Genetic and environmental features for oil composition in olive varieties. OCL 21:D504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beyaz A, Özkaya MT, Duygu İD (2017) Identification of some Spanish olive cultivars using image processing techniques. Sci Hortic 225:286–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blazakis NK, Kosma M, Kostelenos G, Baldoni L, Bufacchi M, Kalaitzis P (2017) Description of olive morphological parameters by using open access software. Plant Methods 13:111.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-017-0261-8
  12. Bourgeon O, Pagnoux C, Mauné S, Vargas EG, Ivorra S, Bonhomme V, Ater M, Moukhli A, Terral JF (2018) Olive tree varieties cultivated for the great Baetican oil trade between the 1st and the 4th centuries ad: morphometric analysis of olive stones from Las Delicias (Ecija, Province of Seville, Spain). Veg Hist Archaeobotany 27:463–476.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00334-017-0648-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Breiman L, Friedman J, Olshen R, Stone C (1984) Classification and decision trees. Wadsworth, BelmontGoogle Scholar
  14. Cervantes E, Martín JJ, Saadaoui E (2016) Updated methods for seed shape analysis. Scientifica  https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5691825
  15. Crespan M (2004) Evidence on the evolution of polymorphism of microsatellite markers in varieties of Vitis vinifera L. Theor Appl Genet 108:231–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. De’ath G, Fabricius KE (2000) Classification and regression trees: a powerful yet simple technique for ecological data analysis. Ecology 81:3178–3192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Díez CM, Trujillo I, Barrio E, Belaj A, Barranco D, Rallo L (2011) Centennial olive trees as a reservoir of genetic diversity. Ann Bot 108:797–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Diez CM, Trujillo I, Martinez-Urdiroz N, Barranco D, Rallo L, Marfil P, Gaut BS (2015) Olive domestication and diversification in the Mediterranean Basin. New Phytol 206:436–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Doveri S, O’Sulliva DM, Lee D (2006) Non-concordance between genetic profiles of olive oil and fruit: a cautionary note to the use of DNA markers for provenance testing. J Agric Food Chem 54:9221–9226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ercisli S, Ipek A, Barut E (2011) SSR marker-based DNA fingerprinting and cultivar identification of olives (Olea europaea). Biochem Genet 49:555–561.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10528-011-9430-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. FAOSTAT (2018) Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations. Statistics division. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC. Accessed 09.02.18
  22. Gros-Balthazard M, Newton C, Ivorra S, Pierre M-H, Pintaud J-C, Terral J-F (2016) The domestication syndrome in Phoenix dactylifera seeds: toward the identification of wild date palm populations. PLoS One 11(3):e0152394.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152394 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Hannachi H, Breton C, Msallem M, El Hadj SB, El Gazzah M, Bervillé A (2008) Differences between native and introduced olive cultivars as revealed by morphology of drupes, oil composition and SSR polymorphisms: a case study in Tunisia. Sci Hortic 116:280–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hannachi H, Martín Gómez JJ, Saadaoui E, Cervantes E (2017) Stone diversity in wild and cultivated olive trees (Olea europaea L.). Dendrobiology 77:19–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ho A, Costea M (2018) Diversity, evolution and taxonomic significance of fruit in Cuscuta (dodder, Convolvulaceae); the evolutionary advantages of indehiscence. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 32:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jacques F, Zhou Z (2010) Geometric morphometrics: a powerful tool for the study of shape evolution in Menispermaceae endocarps. Taxon 59:881–895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kalinowski ST, Taper ML, Marshall TC (2007) Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol Ecol 16:1099–1106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Linos A, Nikoloudakis N, Katsiotis A, Hagidimitriou M (2014) Genetic structure of the Greek olive germplasm revealed by RAPD, ISSR and SSR markers. Sci Hortic 175:33–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Loh WY (2011) Classification and regression trees. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Data Min Knowl Discov 1:14–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Margaritis E (2013) Distinguishing exploitation, domestication, cultivation and production: the olive in the third millennium Aegean. Antiquity 87:746–757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Moisen G (2008) Classification and regression trees. In: Jørgensen SE, Fath BD (editor-in-chief) Encyclopedia of ecology, vol 1. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 582–588Google Scholar
  32. Muzzalupo I, Stefanizzi F, Salimonti A, Falabella R, Perri E (2009) Microsatellite markers for identification of a group of Italian olive accessions. Sci Agric 66:685–690.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162009000500014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ninot A, Howad W, Aranzana MJ, Senar R, Romero A, Mariotti R, Baldoni L, Belaj A (2018) Survey of over 4, 500 monumental olive trees preserved on-farm in the northeast Iberian Peninsula, their genotyping and characterization. Sci Hortic 231:253–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6:288–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Petrakis PV, Agiomyrgianaki A, Christophoridou S, Spyros A, Dais P (2008) Geographical characterization of Greek virgin olive oils (cv. Koroneiki) using 1H and 31P NMR fingerprinting with canonical discriminant analysis and classification binary trees. J Agric Food Chem 56:3200–3207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. R Core Team (2017) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. https://www.R-project.org/. Accessed August 2018Google Scholar
  37. Reboredo-Rodríguez P, González-Barreiro C, Cancho-Grande B, Simal-Gándara J, Trujillo I (2018) Genotypic and phenotypic identification of olive cultivars from north-western Spain and characterization of their extra virgin olive oils in terms of fatty acid composition and minor compounds. Sci Hortic 232:269–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ripley B (2017) Package ‘tree’. R language routine. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/tree/tree.pdf. Accessed August 2018
  39. Rohlf F (2000) NTSYSpc: numerical taxonomy and multivariate system. Version 2.21s Exeter Software Applied Biostatics Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. Roubos K, Moustakas M, Aravanopoulos F (2010) Molecular identification of Greek olive (Olea europaea) cultivars based on microsatellite loci. Genet Mol Res 9:1865–1876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sebastiani L, Busconi M (2017) Recent developments in olive (Olea europaea L.) genetics and genomics: applications in taxonomy, varietal identification, traceability and breeding. Plant Cell Rep 36:1345–1360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sneath PHA, Sokal RR (1973) Numerical taxonomy: the principles and practice of numerical classification. W.H. Freeman and Company, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  43. Terral J-F et al (2010) Evolution and history of grapevine (Vitis vinifera) under domestication: new morphometric perspectives to understand seed domestication syndrome and reveal origins of ancient European cultivars. Ann Bot 105:443–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Therneau TM, Atkinson B, Ripley B (2018) Package ‘rpart’: R language routine. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/rpart/rpart.pdf. Accessed August 2018
  45. Timofeev R (2004) Classification and regression trees (CART) theory and applications, a master thesis presented by Roman Timofeev (188778) to Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Hardle. CASE - Center of Applied Statistics and Economics, Humboldt University, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  46. Trujillo I, Ojeda MA, Urdiroz NM, Potter D, Barranco D, Rallo L, Diez CM (2014) Identification of the Worldwide Olive Germplasm Bank of Córdoba (Spain) using SSR and morphological markers. Tree Genet Genomes 10:141–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. UPOV - International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (2011) Technical guideline for the conduct of tests for distinctness, homogeneity, and stability Olive, UPOV Code: OLEAA_EUR, Olea europaea TG/099/4 Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  48. Wilkinson L (1995) Mobiles. Department of Statistics, Northwestern University, EvanstonGoogle Scholar
  49. Xanthopoulou A, Ganopoulos I, Koubouris G, Tsaftaris A, Sergendani C, Kalivas A, Madesis P (2014) Microsatellite high-resolution melting (SSR-HRM) analysis for genotyping and molecular characterization of an Olea europaea germplasm collection. Plant Genet Resour 12:273–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zhang H (1998) Classification trees for multiple binary responses. J Am Stat Assoc 93:180–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. C. Koubouris
    • 1
  • E. V. Avramidou
    • 2
  • I. T. Metzidakis
    • 1
  • P. V. Petrakis
    • 3
  • C. K. Sergentani
    • 1
  • A. G. Doulis
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.Institute of Olive Tree, Subtropical Crops & Viticulture, Laboratory of Olive CultivationHellenic Agricultural Organization (H.A.O.) “Demeter” (ex. N.AG.RE.F.)ChaniaGreece
  2. 2.Institute of Mediterranean Forest Ecosystems, Athens, Laboratory of Silviculture, Forest Genetics and BiotechnologyHellenic Agricultural Organization (H.A.O.) “Demeter” (ex NAGREF)AthensGreece
  3. 3.Institute of Mediterranean Forest Ecosystems, Laboratory of Forest EntomologyHellenic Agricultural Organization (H.A.O.) “Demeter” (ex. NAGREF)AthensGreece
  4. 4.Institute of Olive Tree, Subtropical Crops & Viticulture, Laboratory of Plant Biotechnology and Genomic ResourcesHellenic Agricultural Organization “Demeter” (ex. NAGREF)HeraklionGreece

Personalised recommendations