Analysis of the genetic variation in growth, ecophysiology, and chemical and metabolomic composition of wood of Populus trichocarpa provenances
- 572 Downloads
Populus trichocarpa is a biological model and a candidate species for bioethanol production. Although intraspecific variation is recognized, knowledge about genetic variation underlying the properties of its lignocellulosic biomass is still incomplete. Genetic variation is fundamental for continuing genetic improvement. In this study, we carried out a comprehensive phenotypic characterization of this species, analyzing a suite of quantitative traits associated with growth performance and wood quality. Traits involved growth rate (height, diameter), phenology (bud flush), and ecophysiology (leaf carbon and nitrogen content and isotopic composition), along with the chemical composition (contents of sugars and lignin) and metabolome of wood. We utilized 460 clones, representing 101 provenances collected from Oregon and Washington. These genotypes were planted in California, in 2009, and sampled after three growing seasons. Trait characterization was carried out by direct measurements, determination of stable isotopes (leaf samples), and technologies based on mass spectrometry (wood samples). A significant clonal effect was observed for most of the traits, explaining up to 76.4 % of total variation. Estimates of “broad-sense heritability” were moderate to high, reaching 0.96 (for date of bud flush). Phenotypic and genetic correlations varied extensively depending on specific traits. In addition, metabolomic analyses quantified 632 metabolites. Twenty-eight of these varied significantly with experimental factors, showing low to moderate heritability and correlation estimates. The results support the presence of significant clonal variation and inheritance for the assessed traits, required for response to genetic selection.
KeywordsPopulus trichocarpa Growth Stable isotopes Lignin Cellulose Wood metabolome
This study was funded by the Advanced Hardwood Biofuels Northwest Project, supported by Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive Grant no. 2011-68005-30407, from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture. Additional support was provided through the California Agricultural Experiment Station.
Data archiving statement
Data used in this manuscript were submitted to the TreeGenes database (http://dendrome.ucdavis.edu/treegenes/) under the accession number TGDR050.
- Al Afas N, Pellis A, Niinemets Ü, Ceulemans R (2005) Growth and production of a short rotation coppice culture of poplar. II. Clonal and year-to-year differences in leaf and petiole characteristics and stand leaf area index. Biomass Bioenergy 28:536–547. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2004.11.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Benjamini Y, Yekutieli D (2001) The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. The Annals of Statistics. 1165-1188. doi: 10.1214/aos/1013699998
- Dillen SY, Marron N, Koch B, Ceulemans R (2008) Genetic variation of stomatal traits and carbon isotope discrimination in two hybrid poplar families (Populus deltoides ‘S9-2’ x P. nigra ‘Ghoy’ and P. deltoides ‘S9-2’ x P. trichocarpa ‘V24’). Ann Bot 102:399–407. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcn107 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Easlon HM, Nemali KS, Richards JH, Hanson DT, Juenger TE, McKay JK (2014) The physiological basis for genetic variation in water use efficiency and carbon isotope composition in Arabidopsis thaliana. Photosynth Res 119:119–129. doi: 10.1007/s11120-013-9891-5 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ellis B, Jansson S, Strauss SH, Tuskan GA (2010) Why and how Populus became a “model tree”. In: Jansson S, Bhalerao R, Groover A (eds) Genetics and genomics of Populus, vol 8, Plant genetics and genomics: crops and models. Springer, New York, pp 3–14. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-1541-2_10 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Groover AT, Nieminen K, Helariutta Y, Mansfield SD (2010) Wood formation in Populus. In: Jansson S, Bhalerao R, Groover A (eds) Genetics and Genomics of Populus, vol 8, Plant genetics and genomics: crops and models. Springer, New York, pp 201–224. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-1541-2_10 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Miller R, Keller M (2009) The DOE BioEnergy Science Center-A U.S. Department of Energy Bioenergys Research Center. In: Tomes D, Lakshmanan P, Songstad D (eds) Biofuels. Global impact on renewable energy, production agriculture, and technological advancements. Springer, New York, pp 9-18. doi:DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-7145-6Google Scholar
- Ozel HB, Ertekin M, Tunctaner K (2010) Genetic variation in growth traits and morphological characteristics of eastern cottonwood (Populus deltoides Bartr.) hybrids at nursery stage. Sci Res Essays 5:962–969Google Scholar
- Robinson A, Mansfield SD (2011) Metabolomics in poplar. In: Genetics, genomics and breeding of poplar. Science Publishers, pp 166-191. doi: 10.1201/b10819-14
- Scaracia-Mugnozza GE, Ceulemans R, Heilman PE, Isebrands JG, Stettler RF, Hinckley TM (1997) Production physiology and morphology of Populus species and their hybrids grown under short rotation. II. Biomass components and harvest index of hybrid and parental species clones. Can J Forest Res 27:285–294. doi: 10.1139/x96-180 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Slavov GT, Zhelev P (2010) Salient biological features, systematics, and genetic variation of Populus. In: Jansson S, Bhalerao RP, Groover A (eds) Genetics and genomics of Populus, vol 8. Plant genetics and genomics: crops and models. pp 15-38Google Scholar
- Soolanayakanahally RY, Guy RD, Silim SN, Drewes EC, Schroeder WR (2009) Enhanced assimilation rate and water use efficiency with latitude through increased photosynthetic capacity and internal conductance in balsam poplar (Populus balsamifera L.). Plant Cell Environ 32:1821–1832. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02042.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stanton BJ, Neale D, Li S (2010) Populus breeding: from the classical to the genomic approach. In: Jansson S, Bhalerao R, Groover A (eds) Genetics and genomics of Populus, vol 8, Plant genetics and genomics: crops and models. Springer, New York, pp 309–348. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-1541-2_10 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Stettler RF, Bradshaw HD, Heilman P, Hinckley T (1996) Biology of Populus and its implications for management and conservation. NRC Research Press. doi: 10.1139/9780660165066