Evaluation of new IRAP markers of pear and their potential application in differentiating bud sports and other Rosaceae species
- 388 Downloads
Inter-retrotransposon amplified polymorphisms (IRAP) are one of the main components of the retrotransposon-based molecular marker system, but currently have no applications in pear. In this context, new IRAP markers were developed and used to study the genetic polymorphism of pear cultivars and bud mutants. In total, eight polymorphic IRAP markers were selected in ten genotypes of pear with a wide variation in genetic backgrounds and for further genotypic identification of cultivars and bud sports. A total of 76 alleles with an average of 9.5 per locus were amplified and 96.05 % showed polymorphism. Through genetic structure analysis, 62 pear cultivars were divided into two groups, i.e., Oriental and Occidental pears, with a few samples showing a distinct admixed genetic background. When polymorphic IRAP markers were tested on a total of 33 bud sports and their corresponding parent cultivars, the genetic similarity coefficient ranged from 0.54 to 0.96. Each bud mutation was separated from its original variety, and 92.3 % of bud sports clustered perfectly with their original varieties. Furthermore, the transferability of pear IRAP to apples and other Rosaceae species was very high, ranging from 87.5 to 100 %. Our results demonstrate that IRAP markers are an excellent tool for the study of genetic relationships and comparative genomics analysis in pear and Rosaceae species.
KeywordsPear (Pyrus L.) Retrotransposons IRAP Bud sport Genetic polymorphism Transferability
The work was financially supported by the Jiangsu Agriculture Science and Technology Innovation Fund (JASTIF) (CX (14) 2020), National Science Foundation of China (31372045), Ministry of Education Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (NCET-13-0864).
Conflict of interests
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.
Data archiving statement
We followed standard Tree Genetics and Genomes policy. We archived the contigs in the FASTA format from the sequences which are available at our genome website http://peargenome.njau.edu.cn.
- Dondini L, Sansavini S, Venturi S, De Franceschi P (2007) Retrotransposon based markers to discriminate sports in pear. XII EUCARPIA Symposium Fruit Breeding Genet 814:701–704Google Scholar
- Kawakami T, Dhakal P, Katterhenry AN, Heatherington CA, Ungerer MC (2011) Transposable element proliferation and genome expansion are rare in contemporary sunflower hybrid populations despite widespread transcriptional activity of LTR retrotransposons. Genome Biol Evol 3:156–167CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liu MJ, Zhao J, Cai QL, Liu GC, Wang JR, Zhao ZH, Liu P, Dai L, Yan GJ, Wang WJ, Li XS, Chen Y, Sun YD, Liu ZG, Lin MJ, Xiao J, Chen YY, Li XF, Wu B, Ma Y, Jian JB, Yang W, Yuan Z, Sun XC, Wei YL, Yu LL, Zhang C, Liao SG, He RJ, Guang XM, Wang Z, Zhang YY, Luo LH (2014) The complex jujube genome provides insights into fruit tree biology. Nature Communications 5Google Scholar
- Lombard PB, Westwood MN (1987) Pear rootstocks, p. 145–183. In: Romand RC, Carlson RF (eds). Rootstocks for fruit crops. Wiley, New York. Ma J, Bennetzen JL (2004) Rapid recent growth and divergence of rice nuclear genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101 (34):12404–12410Google Scholar
- Montanari S, Saeed M, Knäbel M, Kim Y, Troggio M, Malnoy M, Velasco R, Fontana P, Won K, Durel C-E (2013) Identification of Pyrus single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and evaluation for genetic mapping in European pear and interspecific Pyrus hybrids. PLoS One 8(10):e77022CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- NTSYS-pc RF (2000) Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system, version2.1. Exeter Publishing, SetauketGoogle Scholar
- Pan Z, Kawabata S, Sugiyama N, Sakiyama R, Cao Y (2001) Genetic diversity of cultivated resources of pear in north China. In: International Symposium on Asian Pears, Commemorating the 100th Anniversary of Nijisseiki Pear 587:187–194Google Scholar
- Petersen R (2014) Molecular genetic causes of columnar growth in apple (Malus x domestica). Mainz, Univ, DissGoogle Scholar
- Tignon M, Kettmann R, Watillon B (1998) AFLP: use for the identification of apple cultivars and mutants. In: XXV International Horticultural Congress, part 11. Appl Biotechnol Mol Biol Breeding-Gene 521:219–226Google Scholar
- Wessler SR (2006) Eukaryotic transposable elements: teaching old genomes new tricks. The implicit genome 138–165Google Scholar
- Yeh FC, Yang R, Boyle T, Ye Z, Mao JX (1999) POPGENE, version 1.32: the user friendly software for population genetic analysis. Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, CanadaGoogle Scholar
- Yin H, Du J, Li L, Jin C, Fan L, Li M, Wu J, Zhang S (2014) Comparative genomic analysis reveals multiple long terminal repeats, lineage-specific amplification, and frequent interelement recombination for Cassandra retrotransposon in pear (Pyrus bretschneideri Rehd.). Genome Biol Evol 6(6):1423–1436CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhao G, Dai H, Chang L, Ma Y, Sun H, He P, Zhang Z (2010) Isolation of two novel complete Ty1-copia retrotransposons from apple and demonstration of use of derived S-SAP markers for distinguishing bud sports of Malus domestica cv. Fuji. Tree Genet Genomes 6(1):149–159Google Scholar
- Zhao Y, Lin H, Guo Y, Liu Z, Guo X, Li K (2013) Genetic linkage maps of pear based on srap markers. Pak J Botany 45(4):1265–1271Google Scholar