Tree Genetics & Genomes

, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 101–110 | Cite as

Castanea sativa: genotype-dependent recovery from chestnut blight

  • Marin Ježić
  • Ljiljana Krstin
  • Igor Poljak
  • Zlatko Liber
  • Marilena Idžojtić
  • Marija Jelić
  • Jasenka Meštrović
  • Marko Zebec
  • Mirna Ćurković-PericaEmail author
Original Paper


In Lovran (coastal Croatia), a unique forest/orchard of evenly mixed grafted marrons and naturally growing nongrafted sweet chestnut trees exists. This old chestnut population has been devastated by chestnut blight, caused by an aggressive introduced pathogenic fungus, Cryphonectria parasitica. However, initial observations indicated recovery of naturally growing chestnut trees in that area, mediated by Cryphonectria-associated hypovirus (Cryphonectria hypovirus 1 (CHV-1)). Such recovery was not observed on grafted trees. Genotyping both, we confirmed the clonal origin of the grafted ones—marrons. No significant difference was observed between fungal strains isolated from naturally growing trees and the ones from marrons regarding fungal vegetative compatibility types or the prevalence of CHV-1. A strong correlation was observed between the types of canker: active/deep-expanding versus healing callus or superficial necrosis and the absence or presence of CHV-1 in the fungal isolates, sampled from naturally growing trees (Spearman rho 0.686, p value 7.81 × 10−5, Kendall tau 0.686, p value 5.18 × 10−7). Such correlation was not observed on marrons (Spearman rho 0.236, p value 0.235, Kendall tau 0.236, p value 0.084), because, unexpectedly, active/deep-expanding cankers were often associated with hypovirulent fungal isolates. These data indicate that the lack or unequal distribution of naturally occurring hypovirulence were not the cause of substantial marron decay in Lovran. Ecological and age-dependant differences were ruled out because all sampled trees are growing in close proximity and are of similar age. The results imply that the marron genotype is especially vulnerable and its ability to recover is limited even when the hypovirulent strain of the fungus is present in the canker.


Biological control Cryphonectria parasitica Genotyping Hypovirus Marron Recovery 



We thank Silvia Dingwall for the final English editing. This research was supported by Swiss National Science Foundation (SCOPES project IZ7370-12792/1) and the Croatian Ministry of Science Education and Sport.

Data Archiving Statement

Genotypes of the chestnut trees in Lovran are given in Supplementary 847 materials. 848.

Supplementary material

11295_2013_667_MOESM1_ESM.doc (133 kb)
ESM 1 (DOC 133 kb)


  1. Agapow PM, Burt A (2001) Indices of multilocus linkage disequilibrium. Mol Ecol Notes 1:101–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allemann C, Hoegger P, Heiniger U, Rigling D (1999) Genetic variation of Cryphonectria hypoviruses (CHV1) in Europe, assessed using restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) markers. Mol Ecol 8:843–854PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anagnostakis SL (1987) Chestnut blight: the classical problem of an introduced pathogen. Mycologia 79:23–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anagnostakis SL (1988) Cryphonectria parasitica, cause of chestnut blight. Adv Plant Pathol 6:123–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anagnostakis SL (1992) Measuring resistance of chestnut trees to chestnut blight. Can J Forest Res 22:567–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anagnostakis SL, Day PR (1979) Hypovirulence conversion in Endothia parasitica. Phytopathology 69:1226–1229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Anagnostakis SL, Hau B, Kranz J (1986) Diversity of vegetative compatibility groups of Cryphonectria parasitica in Connecticut and Europe. Plant Dis 70:536–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bazzigher G, Miller GA (1991) Blight-resistant chestnut selections of Switzerland: a valuable germplasm resource. Plant Dis 75:5–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Biraghi A (1946) Il cancro del castagno causato da Endothia parasitica. L'Italia Agricola 7:406Google Scholar
  10. Biraghi A (1953) Possible active resistance of Endothia parasitica in Castanea sativa. 11th Rep Congr Int Union For Res Org, Rome, pp 643–645.Google Scholar
  11. Bissegger M, Rigling D, Heiniger U (1997) Population structure and disease development of Cryphonectria parasitica in European chestnut forests in the presence of natural hypovirulence. Phytopathology 87:50–59PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Breuillin F, Dutech C, Robin C (2006) Genetic diversity of the chestnut blight fungus Cryphonectria parasitica in four French population assessed by microsatellite markers. Mycol Res 110:288–296PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Buck EJ, Hadonou M, James CJ, Blakesley D, Russell K (2003) Isolation and characterization of polymorphic microsatellites in European chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.). Mol Ecol Notes 3:239–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Choi GH, Nuss DL (1992) Hypovirulence of chestnut blight fungus conferred by an infectious viral cDNA. Science 257:800–803PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cortesi P, Milgroom MG, Bisiach M (1996) Distribution and diversity of vegetative compatibility types in subpopulations of Cryphonectria parasitica in Italy. Mycol Res 100:1087–1093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cortesi P, Rigling D, Heiniger U (1998) Comparison of vegetative compatibility types in Italian and Swiss subpopulations of Cryphonectria parasitica. Europ J Forest Pathol 28:167–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cortesi P, McCulloh CE, Song H, Lin H, Milgroom MG (2001) Genetic control of horizontal virus transmission in the chestnut blight fungus, Cryphonectria parasitica. Genetics 159:107–118PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Diskin M, Steiner KC, Hebard FV (2006) Recovery of American chestnut characteristics following hybridization and backcross breeding to restore blight-ravaged Castanea dentata. Forest Ecol Manag 223:439–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Elliston JE (1985) Characteristics of dsRNA-free and dsRNA-containing strains of Endothia parasitica in relation to hypovirulence. Phytopathology 75:151–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gobbin D, Hohl L, Conza L, Jermini M, Gessler C, Conedera M (2007) Microsatellite-based characterization of the Castanea sativa cultivar heritage of southern Switzerland. Genome 50:1089–1103PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Goudet J (1995) FSTAT, version 1.2, a computer program to calculate F-statistics. J Heredity 86:485–486Google Scholar
  22. Graves AH (1950) Relative blight resistance in species and hybrids of Castanea. Phytopathology 49:1125–1131Google Scholar
  23. Grente J (1965) Les formes Hypovirulentes d'Endothia parasitica et les espoirs de lutte contre le chancre du châtaignier. Acad Agric France 51:1033–1037Google Scholar
  24. Grente J, Sauret S (1969) L'hypovirulence exclusive phenomene original en pathologie vegetale. C R Hebd Seances Acad Sci Ser D 268:2347–2350Google Scholar
  25. Grünwald NJ, Stephen BG, Milgroom MG, Fry WE (2003) Analysis of genotypic diversity data for populations of microorganisms. Phytopathology 93:738–46PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Halambek M (1986) Chestnut blight in Yugoslavia. EPPO Bull 16:533–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Halambek M (1988) Istraživanje virulentnosti gljive Endothia parasitica Murr./And. uzročnika raka kore pitomog kestena (Castanea sativa Mill.). Dissertation, Faculty of Forestry, University of Zagreb.Google Scholar
  28. Heiniger U, Rigling D (1994) Biological control of chestnut blight in Europe. Annu Rev Phytopathol 32:581–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hillman BI, Shapira R, Nuss DL (1990) Hypovirulence-associated suppression of host functions in Cryphonectria parasitica can be partially relieved by high light intensity. Phytopathology 80:950–956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hogan EP, Griffin GJ (2002) Incomplete movement of Cryphonectria hypovirus 1 within a vegetative compatibility type of Cryphonectria parasitica in natural cankers on grafted American chestnut trees. Forest Pathol 6:331–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Huang H, Dane F, Kubisiak TL (1998) Allozyme and RAPD analysis of the genetic diversity and geographic variation in wild populations of the American chestnut (Fagaceae). Am J Bot 85:1013–1021PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Idžojtić M, Zebec M, Poljak I, Liber Z, Šatović Z, Vahčić N (2010) Očuvanje genofonda maruna. In: Jasprica N, Pandža M, Milović M (eds) Treći hrvatski botanički kongres, knjiga sažetaka, Murter, 24–26 September 2010, pp 92–93.Google Scholar
  33. Ježić M, Krstin L, Rigling D, Ćurković-Perica M (2012) High diversity in populations of the introduced plant pathogen, Cryphonectria parasitica, due to encounters between genetically divergent genotypes. Mol Ecol 21:87–99PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jurc D (2002) An overview of the history of chestnut blight epidemic in Slovenia. Zbornik gozdarstva in lesarstva 68:33–59Google Scholar
  35. Kišpatić J (1956) Rak kestenove kore (Endothia parasitica Anders.). Zavod za zaštitu bilja, Zagreb. Uputstva iz zaštite bilja 19:1–12Google Scholar
  36. Krstin L, Novak-Agbaba S, Rigling D, Ćurković-Perica M (2011) Diversity of vegetative compatibility types and mating types of Cryphonectria parasitica in Slovenia and occurrence of associated Cryphonectria hypovirus 1. Plant Pathol 60:752–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Krstin L, Novak-Agbaba S, Rigling D, Krajačić M, Ćurković-Perica M (2008) Chestnut blight fungus in Croatia: diversity of vegetative compatibility types, mating types and genetic variability of associated Cryphonectria hypovirus 1. Plant Pathol 57:1086–1096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kubisiak TL, Hebard FV, Nelson CD, Zhang J, Bernatzky R, Huang H, Anagnostakis SL, Doudrick RL (1997) Molecular mapping of resistance to blight in an interspecific cross in the genus Castanea. Phytopathology 87:751–759PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Marinoni D, Akkak A, Bounous G, Edwards KJ, Botta R (2003) Development and characterization of microsatellite markers in Castanea sativa (Mill.). Mol Breed 11:127–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Martin MA, Alvarez JB, Mattioni C, Cherubini M, Villani F, Martin LM (2009) Identification and characterization of traditional chestnut varieties of southern Spain using morphological and simple sequence repeats SSR markers. Ann Appl Biol 154:389–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Martin MA, Mattion C, Cherubini M, Taurchini D, Villani F (2010a) Genetic characterization of traditional chestnut varieties in Italy using microsatellites (simple sequence repeats) markers. Ann Appl Biol 157:37–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Martin MA, Mattioni C, Cherubini M, Taurchini D, Villani F (2010b) Genetic diversity in European chestnut populations by means of genomic and genic microsatellite markers. Tree Genet Genomes 6:735–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Martin MA, Mattioni C, Molina JR, Alvarez JB, Cherubini M, Herrera MA, Villani F, Martin LM (2011) Landscape genetic structure of chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill). in Spain. Tree Genet Genomes 8:127–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McManus PS, Ewers FW, Fulbright DW (1989) Characterization of the chestnut blight canker and the localization and isolation of the pathogen Cryphonectria parasitica. Can J Bot 67:3600–3607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Medak J, Perić S (2007) Šume pitomog kestena u Hrvatskoj-fitocenološke, ekološke i gospodarske karakteristike. In: Britvec M, Škvorc, Ž (eds), Zbornik sažetaka 2. botaničkog kongresa. Zagreb, 20–22 September 2007, pp 89–90.Google Scholar
  46. Medak J, Idžojtić M, Novak-Agbaba S, Ćurković-Perica M, Mujić I, Poljak I, Juretić D, Prgomet Ž (2009) Croatia. In: Avanzato D (ed) Following chestnut footprints (Castanea spp.)—cultivation and culture, folklore and history, traditions and use. Scripta Horticult 9:40–43Google Scholar
  47. Meštrović Š, Fabijanić G (1995) Forest management planning manual. Republic of Croatia, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Zagreb, Croatia, pp 322–323 (in Croatian)Google Scholar
  48. Milgroom MG, Cortesi P (2004) Biological control of chestnut blight with hypovirulence: a critical analysis. Annu Rev Phytopathol 42:311–338PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Milgroom MG, Lipari SE (1995) Spatial analysis of nuclear and mitochondrial RFLP genotypes in populations of chestnut blight fungus, Cryphonectria parasitica. Mol Ecol 4:633–642PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Milgroom MG, Sotirovski K, Spica D, Davis JE, Brewer MT, Milev M, Cortesi P (2008) Clonal population structure of the chestnut blight fungus in expanding ranges in southeastern Europe. Mol Ecol 17:4446–4458PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Novak-Agbaba S, Liović B, Pernek M (2000) Prikaz sastojina pitomog kestena (Castanea sativa Mill.) u Hrvatskoj i zastupljenost hipovirulentnih sojeva gljive Cryphonectria parasitica (Murr.) Barr. Radovi Šumarskog instituta Jastrebarsko 35(1):91–110Google Scholar
  52. Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) GENALEX 6: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6:288–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Perica MĆ, Šola I, Urbas L, Smrekar F, Krajačić M (2009) Separation of hypoviral double-stranded RNA on monolithic chromatographic supports. J Chromatogr A 13:2712–2716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Peever TL, Liu Y-C, Cortesi P, Milgroom MG (2000) Variation in tolerance and virulence in the chestnut blight fungus–hypovirus interaction. Appl Environ Microbio 66:4863–4869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Prospero S, Conedera M, Heiniger U, Rigling D (2006) Saprophytic activity and sporulation of Cryphonectria parasitica on dead chestnut wood in forests with naturally established hypovirulence. Phytopathology 96:1337–1344PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Raymond M, Rousset (1995) GENEPOP (Version 1.2): Population genetic software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 86:248–249Google Scholar
  57. Robin C, Lanz S, Soutrenon A, Rigling D (2010) Dominance of natural over released biological control agents of the chestnut blight fungus Cryphonectria parasitica in south-eastern France is associated with fitness-related traits. Biol Control 53:55–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Robin C, Heiniger U (2001) Chestnut blight in Europe: diversity of Cryphonectria parasitica, hypovirulence and biocontrol. For Snow Land Res 76:361–367Google Scholar
  59. Rousset (2008) GENEPOP 007: a complete reimplementation of the GENEPOP software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Resour 8:103–106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sotirovski K, Milgroom MG, Rigling D, Heiniger U (2006) Occurrence of Cryphonectria hypovirus 1 in the chestnut blight fungus in Macedonia. Forest Pathol 36:136–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sotirovski K, Rigling D, Heiniger U, Milgroom MG (2011) Variation in virulence of Cryphonectria hypovirus 1 in Macedonia. Forest Pathol 41:59–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wagner HW, Sefc KM (1999) IDENTITY 1.0. Centre for Applied Genetics, University of Agricultural Sciences, ViennaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marin Ježić
    • 1
  • Ljiljana Krstin
    • 2
  • Igor Poljak
    • 3
  • Zlatko Liber
    • 1
  • Marilena Idžojtić
    • 3
  • Marija Jelić
    • 2
  • Jasenka Meštrović
    • 2
  • Marko Zebec
    • 3
  • Mirna Ćurković-Perica
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Division of Biology, Faculty of ScienceUniversity of ZagrebZagrebCroatia
  2. 2.Department of BiologyUniversity of J. J. Strossmayer in OsijekOsijekCroatia
  3. 3.Department of Forest Genetics, Dendrology and Botany, Faculty of ForestryUniversity of ZagrebZagrebCroatia

Personalised recommendations