Potentials and limitations of the cross-species transfer of nuclear microsatellite marker in six species belonging to three sections of the genus Populus L.
- 291 Downloads
The genus Populus is classified into six different sections, and depending on the declaration of hybrids, the number of species varies between 22 and 85. Species within one section, and sometimes between sections, are crossable to each other, resulting in many naturally but also artificially produced hybrids. Morphological attributes for a clone characterisation are often difficult to evaluate when different poplar species or even hybrids are crossed; thus, molecular markers are needed to characterise the different species. Taking advantage of the large microsatellite resource developed for Populus trichocarpa, however, amplification of these microsatellite markers in other Populus species either often fails, or in the case of amplification, unrelated genomic regions are amplified. To meet this obvious problem of the species transferability of microsatellite markers, in total, 305 microsatellite loci, mainly from P. trichocarpa but also few from Populus tremuloides and Populus nigra, were tested for their transferability to diverse genotypes of six species belonging to three sections of the genus Populus. Ultimately, 209 microsatellite loci could be amplified with varying sizes in the different species. The PCR products of selected loci were separated in a polyacrylamide gel and sequenced to assure that the expected loci were derived from the database genome of P. trichocarpa. The present results constitute a large study for microsatellite transferability for Populus species. The documented microsatellite loci can be applied to species-, hybrid- and clone-specific diagnostic approaches or as universal markers for comprehensive ecological studies.
KeywordsPopulus tremula P. nigra Cross-species amplification DNA sequencing Molecular marker Poplar
We like to thank our technical assistants Katrin Groppe for the in silico analyses and Caren Heitmann for the realisation of the PAA gels as well as Dr. Mirko Liesebach, Dr. Georg von Wühlisch and our other colleagues for the collection of different poplar material. Further, we are grateful to Dr. Birgit Kersten (Thünen-Institute of Forest Genetics Grosshansdorf) and Doreen Pahlke (MPI for Molecular Plant Physiology, Potsdam, Germany) for data integration into GabiPD (www.gabipd.org) and sequence submission to the NCBI GenBank database.
- Anonymous (2012) Die Pappel - Klone, Klonmischungen und Familieneltern. Bundesanstalt für Landwirtschaft und ErnährungGoogle Scholar
- Cervera M, Storme V, Ivens B, Gusmao J, Liu B, Hostyn V, Van Slycken J, Van Montagu M, Boerjan W (2001) Dense genetic linkage maps of three Populus species (Populus deltoides, P. nigra and P. trichocarpa) based on AFLP and microsatellite markers. Genet 158:787–809Google Scholar
- Cervera MT, Sewell MM, Faivre-Rampant P, Storme V, Boerjan W (2004) Genome mapping in Populus. In: Kumar S, Fladung M (eds) Molecular genetics and breeding of forest trees. Food Products Press, New York, pp 387–410Google Scholar
- Eckenwalder JE (1996) Systematics and evolution of Populus. In: Stettler RF, Bradshaw HD, Heilman PE et al (eds) Biology of Populus and its implications for management and conservation. NRC Research Press, Ottawa, pp 7–32Google Scholar
- Floate KD (2004) Extent and patterns of hybridization among the three species of Populus that constitute the riparian forest of southern Alberta, Canada. Can J Bot 82:253–264Google Scholar
- Gomez A, Manzanera JA, Aguiriano E, Grau JM, Bueno MA (2003) SSR markers for monitoring an in vitro core collection of Populus tremula. Silvae Genet 52:5–6Google Scholar
- Hancock JM (1999) Microsatellites and other simple sequences: genomic context and mutational mechanisms. In: Goldstein DB, Schlötterer C (eds) Microsatellites—evolution and applications, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 1–9Google Scholar
- Hofmann M (1998) Bewirtschaftung schnellwachsender Baumarten auf landwirtschaftlichen Flächen im Kurzumtrieb. Forschungsinstitut für schnellwachsender Baumarten Hann. Münden, Merkblatt 11Google Scholar
- Kibbe WA (2007) OligoCalc: an online oligonucleotide properties calculator. Nucleic Acids Res 35(Web Server Issue):W43–W46Google Scholar
- Liesebach M (2012) Anbauerfahrung aus einem 35-jährigen Versuch mit Populus deltoides in Norddeutschland und deren künftige Nutzung als Kreuzungselter. Forstarchiv 83:66–70Google Scholar
- Orlovic S, Galovic V, Zoric M, Kovacevic B, Pilipovic A, Zoran G (2009) Evaluation of interspecific DNA variability in poplars using AFLP and SSR markers. Afr J Biotechnol 8:5241–5247Google Scholar
- Pakull B (2010) Genetische Kartierung und Untersuchungen zur Geschlechtsdeterminierung in Espen (P. tremula L./P. tremuloides Michx.). Dissertation, University of Hamburg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
- Schroeder H, Fladung M (2010) SSR and SNP markers for the identification of clones, hybrids and species within the genus Populus. Silvae Genet 59:257–263Google Scholar