Tree Genetics & Genomes

, Volume 9, Issue 3, pp 669–681 | Cite as

Population genetic structure of Picea engelmannii, P. glauca and their previously unrecognized hybrids in the central Rocky Mountains

Original Paper

Abstract

Areas of geographic overlap between potentially hybridizing species provide the opportunity to study interspecific gene flow and reproductive barriers. Here we identified hybrids between Picea engelmannii and P. glauca by their genetic composition at 17 microsatellite markers, and determined the broad-scale geographic distribution of hybrids in the central Rocky Mountains of North America, a geographic region where hybrids and isolation between species had not previously been studied. Parameter estimates from admixture models revealed considerable variation in ancestry within and among collection sites, suggesting that within this area of geographic overlap, the interaction of the two species varies extensively. The results document a previously unrecognized patchy distribution of hybrids between P. engelmannii and P. glauca, including locations where hybrids were not known or expected to exist. Further, the ancestry of many hybrids was consistent with multiple generations of hybridization, with probable directional backcrossing to P. engelmannii, suggesting a relatively porous species boundary. The identification and characterization of hybridization between these spruce in this region raises the question of what factors maintain barriers to gene flow in these long-lived forest trees. The current research lays the groundwork for future study of the ecological and evolutionary contexts of their hybridization, as well as of differential introgression and permeability of species boundaries.

Keywords

Admixture Geographic overlap Hybridization Spruce Picea 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank P. Haselhorst for assisting in the field, C. Wilcox (Coronado National Forest), P. Stankowski and W. Parker (Lakehead University, Ontario, Canada), D. Wolf and N. Takebayashi (University of Alaska–Fairbanks) for collecting needles from parental populations, Z. Gompert for assistance with statistical analyses, the Buerkle lab, three anonymous reviewers and Associate Editor S. Aitken for valuable comments on the manuscript, and the Nevada Genomics Center at the University of Nevada for providing high quality and rapid genotyping services. This research was funded by the Wyoming Native Plant Society, John W. Marr Memorial Fund, Shoshone National Forest, H. T. Northen Summer Fellowship in Botany, and UW-NPS Research Center.

Supplementary material

11295_2012_583_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (80 kb)
(PDF 79.6 KB)

References

  1. Adams WT, Griffin AR, Moran GF (1992) Using paternity analysis to measure effective pollen dispersal in plant populations. Am Nat 140(5):762–780PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aldridge G (2005) Variation in frequency of hybrids and spatial structure among Ipomopsis (Polemoniaceae) contact sites. New Phytol 167(1):279–288PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aldridge G, Campbell D (2009) Genetic and morphological patterns show variation in frequency of hybrids between Ipomopsis (Polemoniaceae) zones of sympatry. Heredity 102:257–265PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson E, Hubricht L (1938) Hybridization in Tradescantia. III. The evidence for introgressive hybridization. Am J Bot 25:396–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arnold ML (1997) Natural hybridization and evolution. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Barton NH (2000) Estimating multilocus linkage disequilibria . Heredity 84:373–389PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barton NH (2001) The role of hybridization in evolution. Mol Ecol 10(3):551–568PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barton NH, Hewitt GM (1985) Analysis of hybrid zones. Ann Rev Ecolog Syst 16:113–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barton NH, Hewitt GM (1989) Adaptation, speciation and hybrid zones. Nature 341:497–503PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bennuah S, Wang T, Aitken S (2004) Genetic analysis of the Picea sitchensis x glauca introgression zone in British Columbia. For Ecol Manag 197(1–3):65–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Berch SM, Brockley RP, Battigelli J, Hagerman S (2009) Impacts of repeated fertilization on fine roots, mycorrhizas, mesofauna, and soil chemistry under young interior spruce in central British Columbia. Can J For Res 39(5):889–896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bonnicksen TM (2000) America’s ancient forests: from the ice age to the age of discovery. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
  13. Bousquet J, Isabel N, Pelgas B, Cottrell J, Rungis D, Ritland K (2007) Spruce. In: Kole C (ed)Forest trees. Genome mapping and molecular breeding in plants, vol 7. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 93–114Google Scholar
  14. Boutin-Ganache I, Raposo M, Raymond M, Deschepper C (2001) M13-tailed primers improve the readability and usability of microsatellite analyses performed with two different allele-sizing methods. BioTechniques 31(1):24PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Bower AD, Aitken SN (2008) Ecological genetics and seed transfer guidelines for Pinus albicaulis (Pinaceae). Am J Bot 95(1): 66–76PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bridle JR, Vass-De-Zomba J, Butlin RK (2002) Fine-scale ecological and genetic variation in a Chorthippus grasshopper hybrid zone. Ecol Entomol 27(4):499–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Buerkle CA (2005) Maximum-likelihood estimation of a hybrid index based on molecular markers. Mol Ecol Notes 5:684–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Buerkle CA, Lexer C (2008) Admixture as the basis for genetic mapping. Trends Ecol Evol 23(12):686–694PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Burgarella C, Lorenzo Z, Jabbour-Zahab R, Lumaret R, Guichoux E, Petit RJ, Soto A, Gil L (2009) Detection of hybrids in nature: application to oaks (Quercus suber and Q. ilex). Heredity 102(5):442–452PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Carlsson J (2008) Effects of microsatellite null alleles on assignment testing. J Heredity 99(6):616–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Coates K, Haeussler S, Lindeburgh S, Pojar R, Stock A (1994) Ecology and siliviculture of interior spruce in British Columbia. FRDA report 220, Canada-British Columbia Partnership Agreement on Forest Resource DevelopmentGoogle Scholar
  22. Cullings K (1992) Design and testing of a plant-specific PCR primer for ecological and evolutionary studies. Mol Ecol 1:233–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dakin EE, Avise JC (2004) Microsatellite null alleles in parentage analysis. Heredity 93:504–509PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Daubenmire R (1968) Some geographic variations in Picea sitchensis and their ecological interpretation. Can J Bot 46:787–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Daubenmire R (1974) Taxonomic and ecologic relationships between Picea glauca and Picea engelmannii. Can J Bot 52(7):1545– 1560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Doyle JJ, Doyle J (1987) A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull 19:11–15Google Scholar
  27. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14(8):2611–2620PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Everitt B, Hothorn T (2011a) Multidimensional scaling. Springer, New York, pp 105–134Google Scholar
  29. Everitt B, Hothorn T (2011b) Principal components analysis. Springer, New York, pp 61–103Google Scholar
  30. Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK (2003) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 164:1567–1587PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Field DL, Ayre DJ, Whelan RJ, Young AG (2008) Relative frequency of sympatric species influences rates of interspecific hybridization, seed production and seedling performance in the uncommon Eucalyptus aggregata. J Ecol 96(6):1198–1210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Field DL, Ayre DJ, Whelan RJ, Young AG (2011) The importance of pre-mating barriers and the local demographic context for contemporary mating patterns in hybrid zones of Eucalyptus aggregata and Eucalyptus rubida. Mol Ecol 20(11):2367–2379PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Fowler D, Roche L (1977) Genetics of Engelmann spruce. Research paper WO–30, U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest ServiceGoogle Scholar
  34. Gay L, Crochet PA, Bell DA, Lenormand T (2008) Comparing clines on molecular and phenotypic traits in hybrid zones: a window on tension zone models. Evolution 62(11):2789–2806PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gompert Z, Lucas LK, Nice CC, Fordyce JA, Forister ML, Buerkle CA (2012) Genomic regions with a history of divergent selection affect fitness of hybrids between two butterfly species. Evolution 66(7):2167–2181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Goudet J (1995) FSTAT (version 1.2): a computer program to calculate F-statistics. J Heredity 86(6):485–486Google Scholar
  37. Griffin A, Burgess I, Wolf L (1988) Patterns of natural and manipulated hybridisation in the genus Eucalyptus. Aust J Bot 36(1):41–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Guillot G (2005) GENELAND: a computer package for landscape genetics. Contributed R packageGoogle Scholar
  39. Guillot G, Santos F, Estoup A (2008) Analysing georeferenced population genetics data with GENELAND: a new algorithm to deal with null alleles and a friendly graphical user interface. Bioinformatics 24(11):1406–1407PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Habeck JR, Weaver TW (1969) A chemosystematic analysis of some hybrid spruce (Picea) populations in Montana. Can J Bot 47(10):1565–1570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hamilton JA, Lexer C, Aitken SN (2012) Genomic and phenotypic architecture of a spruce hybrid zone (Picea sitchensis x P. glauca). Molecular Ecology p. Early ViewGoogle Scholar
  42. Hampe A, Petit RJ (2005) Conserving biodiversity under climate change: the rear edge matters. Ecol Lett 8(5):461–467PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Harrison RG (1986) Pattern and process in a narrow hybrid zone. Heredity 56:337–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Harrison RG (1990) Hybrid zones: windows on evolutionary process. Oxf Surv Evol Biol 7:69–128Google Scholar
  45. Harrison RG (1993) Hybrids and hybrid zones: historical perspective, chap 1. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 3–12Google Scholar
  46. Heuertz M, De Paoli E, Källma T, Larsson H, Jurma I, Morgante M, Lascoux M, Gyllenstrand N (2006) Multilocus patterns of nucleotide diversity, linkage disequilibrium and demographic history of norway spruce [Picea abies (l.) karst]. Genetics 174(4):2095–2105PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hewitt GM (1988) Hybrid zones—natural laboratories for evolution studies. Trends Ecol Evol 3:158–166PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hubisz MJ, Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK (2009) Inferring weak population structure with the assistance of sample group information. Mol Ecol Res 9(5):1322–1332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Jaramillo-Correa JP, Beaulieu J, Bousquet J (2001) Contrasting evolutionary forces driving population structure at expressed sequence tag polymorphisms, allozymes and quantitative traits in white spruce. Mol Ecol 10(11):2729–2740PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Jaramillo-Correa JP, Beaulieu J, Khasa DP, Bousquet J (2009) Inferring the past from the present phylogeographic structure of North American forest trees: seeing the forest for the genes. Can J For Res 39(2):286–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Khasa P, Dancik B (1996) Rapid identification of White-Engelmann spruce species by RAPD markers. Theor Appl Genet 92(1): 46–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Krutovskii KV, Bergmann F (1995) Introgressive hybridization and phylogenetic relationships between Norway, Picea abies (L.) Karst., and Siberian, P. obovata Ledeb., spruce species studied by isozyme loci. Heredity 74:464–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lanner RM, Phillips AMI (1992) Natural hybridization and introgression of pinyon pines in northwestern Arizona. Int J Plant Sci 153(2):250–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lavergne S, Mouquet N, Thuiller W, Ronce O (2010) Biodiversity and climate change: integrating evolutionary and ecological responses of species and communities. Annu Rev Ecol Evol System 41(1):321–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ledig FT, Hodgskiss PD, Johnson DR (2006) The structure of genetic diversity in Engelmann spruce and a comparison with blue spruce. Can J Bot 84(12):1806–1828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ledig TF, Hodgskiss PD, Krutovskii KV, Neale DB, Eguiluz-Piedra T (2004) Relationships among the spruces (Picea, Pinaceae) of Southwestern North America. Syst Bot 29(2):275–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lepais O, Petit R, Guichoux E, Lavabre J, Alberto F, Kremer A, Gerber S (2009) Species relative abundance and direction of introgression in oaks. Mol Ecol 18:2228–2242PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lexer C, Fay MF, Joseph JA, Nica MS, Heinze B (2005a) Barrier to gene flow between two ecological divergent Populus species, P. alba (white poplar) and P. tremula (European aspen): the role of ecology and life history in gene introgression. Mol Ecol 14:1045–1057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lexer C, Heinze B, Alia R, Rieseberg LH (2004) Hybrid zones as a tool for identifying adaptive genetic variation in outbreeding forest trees: lessons from wild annual sunflowers (Helianthus spp.)For Ecol Manag 197:49–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Lexer C, Joseph JA, van Loo M, Barbará T, Heinze B, Bartha D, Castiglione S, Fay MF, Buerkle CA (2010) Genomic admixture analysis in European Populus spp. reveals unexpected patterns of reproductive isolation and mating. Genetics 186(2): 699–712PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lexer C, Rosenthal DM, Raymond O, Donovan LA, Rieseberg LH (2005b) Genetics of species differences in the wild annual sunflowers, Helianthus annuus and H. petiolaris. Genetics 169:2225–2239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Lindtke D, Buerkle CA, Barbará T, Heinze B, Castiglione S, Bartha D, Lexer C (2012) Recombinant hybrids retain heterozygosity at many loci: new insights into the genomics of reproductive isolation in Populus. Mol Ecol 21(20):5042– 5058PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Major JE, Mosseler A, Johnsen KH, Rajora OP, Barsi DC, Kim KH, Park JM, Campbell M (2005) Reproductive barriers and hybridity in two spruces, Picea rubens and Picea mariana, sympatric in Eastern North America. Can J Bot 83:163–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Mallet J (2005) Hybridization as an invasion of the genome. Trends Ecol Evol 20(5):229–237PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Martinsen GD, Whitham TG, Turek RJ, Keim P (2001) Hybrid populations selectively filter introgression between species. Evolution 55:1325–1335PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Meirmans P, Tienderen PV (2004) GENOTYPE and GENODIVE: two programs for the analysis of genetic diversity of asexual organisms. Mol Ecol Notes 4:792–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Minder AM, Rothenbuehler C, Widmer A (2007) Genetic structure of hybrid zones between Silene latifolia and Silene dioica (Caryophyllaceae): evidence for introgressive hybridization. Mol Ecol 16:2504–2516PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Mir C, Toumi L, Jarne P, Sarda V, Di Giusto F, Lumaret R (2006) Endemic North African Quercus afares Pomel originates from hybridisation between two genetically very distant oak species (Q. suber L. and Q. canariensis Willd.): evidence from nuclear and cytoplasmic markers. Heredity 96:175–184PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Moore WS (1977) An evaluation of narrow hybrid zones in vertebrates. Q Rev Biol 52:263–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Morgenstern EK (1996) Geographic variation in forest trees: genetic basis and application of knowledge in silviculture. UBC Press, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  71. Neale DB, Savolainen O (2004) Association genetics of complex traits in conifers. Trends Plant Sci 9(7):325–330PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Nkongolo K, Michael P, Demers T (2005) Application of ISSR, RAPD, and cytological markers to the certification of Picea mariana, P. glauca, and P. engelmannii trees, and their putative hybrids. Genome 48(2):302–311PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Novembre J, Stephens M (2008) Interpreting principal component analyses of spatial population genetic variation. Nat Genet 40:646–649PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Owens JN, Molder M (1977) Bud development in Picea glauca. II. Cone differentiation and early development. Can J Bot 55(21):2746–2760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Owens JN, Molder M (1984) The reproductive cycle of interior spruce. Tech. rep., Ministry of Forests, British ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
  76. Owens JN, Simpson SJ, Caron GE (1987) The pollination mechanism of Engelmann spruce (Picea engelmannii). Can J Bot 65(7):1439–1450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Pavy N, Namroud MC, Gagon F, Isabel N, Bousquet J (2012) The heterogeneous levels of linkage disequilibrium in white spruce genes and comparative analysis with other conifers. Heredity 108: 273–284PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Pelgas B, Beauseigle S, Achere V, Jeandroz S, Bousquet J, Isabel N (2006) Comparative genome mapping among Picea glauca, P. mariana x P. rubens and P. abies and correspondence with other Pinaceae. Theor Appl Genet 113(8):1371–1393PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Perron M, Bousquet J (1997) Natural hybridization between black spruce and red spruce. Mol Ecol 6(8):725–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Perry D, Bousquet J (1998) Sequence-tagged-site (STS) markers of arbitrary genes: development, characterization and analysis of linkage in black spruce. Genetics 149(2):1089–1098PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Pfeiffer A, Olivieri A, Morgante M (1997) Identification and characterization of microsatellites in Norway spruce (Picea abies k). Genome 40(4):411–419PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. R Development Core Team (2012) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, ISBN 3-900051-07-0Google Scholar
  84. Rajora O, Dancik B (2000) Population genetic variation, structure, and evolution in Engelmann spruce, white spruce, and their natural hybrid complex in Alberta. Can J Bot 78(6):768–780Google Scholar
  85. Rajora OP, Mann IK, Shi YZ (2005) Genetic diversity and population structure of boreal white spruce (Picea glauca) in pristine conifer-dominated and mixedwood forest stands. Can J Bot 83(9):1096–1105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Ran JH, Wei XX, Wang XQ (2006) Molecular phylogeny and biogeography of Picea (Pinaceae): implications for phylogeographical studies using cytoplasmic haplotypes. Mol Phylogenet Evol 41(2):405–419PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Rehfeldt G (1994) Adaptation of Picea engelmannii populations to the heterogeneous environments of the intermountain west. Can J Bot 72(8):1197–1208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Rehfeldt G (2004) Interspecific and intraspecific variation in Picea engelmannii and its congeneric cohorts: biosystematics, genecology and climate change. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-134, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research.Fort Collins, COGoogle Scholar
  89. Rhymer JM, Simberloff D (1996) Extinction by hybridization and introgression. Ann Rev Ecolog Syst 27:83–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Rieseberg LH (1995) The role of hybridization in evolution: old wine in new skins. Am J Bot 82(7):944–953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Roche L (1969) A genecological study of genus Picea in British Columbia. New Phytol 68(2):505–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Ross CL, Harrison RG (2002) A fine-scale spatial analysis of the mosaic hybrid zone between Gryllus firmus and Gryllus pennsylvanicus. Evolution 56(11):2296–2312PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Rungis D, Berube Y, Zhang J, Ralph S, Ritland C, Ellis B, Douglas C, Bohlmann J, Ritland K (2004) Robust simple sequence repeat markers for spruce (Picea spp.) from expressed sequence tags. Theor Appl Genet 109(6):1283–1294PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Schaid DJ (2004) Linkage disequilibrium testing when linkage phase is unknown. Genetics 166(1):505–512PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Schubert R, Mueller-Starck G, Riegel R (2001) Development of EST-PCR markers and monitoring their intrapopulational genetic variation in Picea abies (l.) karst. Theor Appl Genet 103(8): 1223–1231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Scotti I, Magni F, Fink R, Powell W, Binelli G, Hedley P (2000) Microsatellite repeats are not randomly distributed within Norway spruce (Picea abies K.) expressed sequences. Genome 43(1):41–46PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Scotti I, Magni F, Paglia G, Morgante M (2002a) Trinucleotide microsatellites in Norway spruce (Picea abies): their features and the development of molecular markers. Theor Appl Genet 106(1):40–50Google Scholar
  98. Scotti I, Paglia G, Magni F, Morgante M (2002b) Efficient development of dinucleotide microsatellite markers in Norway spruce (Picea abies Karst.) through dot-blot selection. Theor Appl Genet 104(6–7):1035–1041Google Scholar
  99. Strong WL, Hills LV (2006) Taxonomy and origin of present-day morphometric variation in Picea glauca (x engelmannii) seed-cone scales in North America. Can J Bot 84:1129–1141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Sutton BCS, Pritchard SC, Gawley JR, Newton CH, Kiss GK (1994) Analysis of Sitka spruce–interior spruce introgression in British Columbia using cytoplasmic and nuclear DNA probes. Can J For Res 24(2):278–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Swenson NG, Howard DJ (2005) Clustering of contact zones, hybrid zones, and phylogeographic breaks in North America. Am Nat 166(5):581–591PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Szymura JM, Barton NH (1986) Genetic analysis of a hybrid zone between the fire-bellied toads, Bombina bombina and B. variegata, near Cracow in southern Poland. Evolution 40:1141– 1159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Talbot P, Thompson SL, Schroeder W, Isabel N (2011) An efficient single nucleotide polymorphism assay to diagnose the genomic identity of poplar species and hybrids on the Canadian prairies. Can J For Res 41(5):1102–1111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Taylor T (1959) The taxonomic relationship between Picea glauca (Moench) Voss and P. engelmannii Parry. Madroño 15(4):111– 115Google Scholar
  105. Temesgen B, Brown G, Harry D, Kinlaw C, Sewell M, Neale D (2001) Genetic mapping of expressed sequence tag polymorphism (ESTP) markers in Loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.)Theor Appl Genet 102(5):664–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Thomas DT, Ahedor AR, Williams CF, dePamphilis C, Crawford DJ, Xiang QJ (2008) Genetic analysis of a broad hybrid zone in Aesculus (Sapindaceae): is there evidence of long distance pollen dispersal?Int J Plant Sci 169(5):647–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Thompson SL, Lamothe M, Meirmans PG, Périnet P, Isabel N (2010) Repeated unidirectional introgression towards Populus balsamifera in contact zones of exotic and native poplars. Mol Ecol 19(1):132–145PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Valbuena-Carabana M, Gonzalez-Martinez S (2005) Gene flow and hybridisation in a mixed oak forest (Quercus pyrenaica willd. and Quercus petraea (matts.) liebl.) in Central Spain. Heredity 95:457–465PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. van Loo M, Joseph J, Heinze B, Fay M, Lexer C (2008) Clonality and spatial genetic structure in Populus \(\times \) canescens and its sympatric backcross parent P. alba in a Central European hybrid zone. New Phytol 177:506–516PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. Wang XR, Szmidt AE (1990) Evolutionary analysis of Pinus densata (Masters), a putative Tertiary hybrid. Theor Appl Genet 80(5):641–647Google Scholar
  111. Weir BS (1979) Inferences about linkage disequilibrium. Biometrics 35:235–254PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population-structure. Evolution 38(6):1358–1370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Weng C, Jackson S (2000) Species differentiation of North American spruce (Picea) based on morphological and anatomical characteristics of needles. Can J Bot 78:1367–1383Google Scholar
  114. Whitham T (1989) Plant hybrid zones as sinks for pests. Science 244:1490–1493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Whittemore AT, Schaal BA (1991) Interspecific gene flow in sympatric oaks. Proc Natl Acad Sci 88(6):2540–2544PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Yansa CH (2006) The timing and nature of late quaternary vegetation changes in the northern great plains, USA and Canada: a re-assessment of the spruce phase. Quat Sci Rev 25(3–4):263–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Zaykin DV, Pudovkin A, Weir BS (2008) Correlation-based inference for linkage disequilibrium with multiple alleles. Genetics 180(1):533–545PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Zeng YF, Liao WJ, Petit RJ, Zhang DY (2011) Geographic variation in the structure of oak hybrid zones provides insights into the dynamics of speciation. Mol Ecol 20(23):4995–5011PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Botany & Program in EcologyUniversity of WyomingLaramieUSA

Personalised recommendations