Advertisement

Tree Genetics & Genomes

, Volume 8, Issue 5, pp 957–973 | Cite as

Dehydrins in maritime pine (Pinus pinaster) and their expression related to drought stress response

  • Tania Velasco-Conde
  • Igor Yakovlev
  • Juan Pedro Majada
  • Ismael Aranda
  • Øystein Johnsen
Original Paper

Abstract

Maritime pine (Pinus pinaster) is an important commercial species throughout its Atlantic distribution. With the anticipated increase in desiccation of its habitat as a result of climate change, the selection of genotypes with increased survival and growth capability under these conditions for breeding programs is of great interest for this species. We aimed to study the response to a realistic drought stress under controlled conditions, looked for a method to measure dehydration resistance, and analyzed dehydrin expression in drought-resistant and drought-sensitive clones from different ecotypes. We report here the sequence characteristics and the expression patterns of five dehydrins from P. pinaster, along with the physiological characterization of drought stress responses in different genotypes (clonally replicated plants), originating from a broad geographical distribution across France and Spain (provenances). In total, we distinguished five different dehydrin genes in silico, grouped into two types—K2 and SKn. Three of the dehydrin genes had several sequence variants, differing by multiple or single amino acid substitutions. Only two of the dehydrins (PpinDhn3 and PpinDhn4) showed an increase in transcription with increased drought stress which was dependent on provenance and genotype, suggesting their involvement in drought resistance. The other dehydrins showed decreased expression trends with increased severity of the drought stress. The lack of close association between the drought stress and expression patterns of these dehydrin genes suggest that they could have other functions and not be involved in drought resistance. Our results suggest large differences in function between different dehydrin genes.

Keywords

Dehydrins Drought tolerance Pinus pinaster qRT-PCR Water potential 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported in part by the project “Heterogeneidad ambiental y adaptabilidad en respuesta a la sequía en colecciones clonales de Pinus pinaster”, Ref. RTA2007-00084-00-00. T. Velasco was granted an INIA scholarship, Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia of Spain. The authors would like to thank Antonio Fernández, Angelo K. Dantas (Servicio Regional de Investigación y Desarrollo Agroalimentario (SERIDA), Spain), and Inger Heldal (Skogoglandskap, Norway) for their valuable contributions and to Ronnie Lendrum who revised the English.

Supplementary material

11295_2012_476_MOESM1_ESM.doc (58 kb)
ESM 1 (DOC 58 kb)
11295_2012_476_MOESM2_ESM.doc (32 kb)
ESM 2 (DOC 31 kb)
11295_2012_476_MOESM3_ESM.doc (77 kb)
ESM 3 (DOC 77 kb)
11295_2012_476_MOESM4_ESM.doc (3.8 mb)
ESM 4 (DOC 3870 kb)

References

  1. Alía R, Martín S (2003) EUFORGEN Technical guidelines for genetic conservation and use for maritime pine (Pinus pinaster). International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, Italy. 6 pp. http://www.bioversityinternational.org/fileadmin/bioversity/publications/pdfs/857.pdf
  2. Alía R, Gil L, Pardos JA (1995) Performance of 43 Pinus pinaster provenances on 5 locations in Central Spain. Silvae Genetic 44:75–81Google Scholar
  3. Aranda I, Alia R, Ortega U, Dantas AK, Majada J (2010) Intra-specific variability in biomass partitioning and carbon isotopic discrimination under moderate drought stress in seedlings from four Pinus pinaster populations. Tree Gen Genom 6:169–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arora R, Wisniewski ME (1994) Cold acclimation in genetically related (sibling) deciduous and evergreen peach (Prunus persica [L.] Batsch) II. A 60-kilodalton bark protein in cold-acclimated tissues of peach 1 s heat stable and related to the dehydrin family of proteins. Plant Physiol 105:95–101PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Artlip T, Wisniewski M (1997) Tissue-specific expression of a dehydrin gene in one-year-old ‘Rio Oso Gem’ peach trees. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 122:784–787Google Scholar
  6. Artlip TS, Callahan AM, Bassett CL, Wisniewski ME (1997) Seasonal expression of a dehydrin gene in sibling deciduous and evergreen genotypes of peach (Prunus persica [L.] Batsch). Plant Mol Biol 33:61–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bassett C, Wisniewski M, Artlip T, Richart G, Norelli J, Farrell R (2009) Comparative expression and transcript initiation of three peach dehydrin genes. Planta 230:107–118PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Battaglia M, Olvera-Carrillo Y, Garciarrubio A, Campos F, Covarrubias AA (2008) The enigmatic LEA proteins and other hydrophilins. Plant Physiol 148:6–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bhattarai T, Fettig S (2005) Isolation and characterization of a dehydrin gene from Cicer pinnatifidum, a drought-resistant wild relative of chickpea. Physiol Plant 123:452–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bies-Ethève N, Gaubier-Comella P, Debures A, Lasserre E, Jobet E, Raynal M, Cooke R, Delseny M (2008) Inventory, evolution and expression profiling diversity of the LEA (late embryogenesis abundant) protein gene family in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Mol Biol 67:107–124PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blum A (2005) Drought resistance, water-use efficiency, and yield potential—are they compatible, dissonant, or mutually exclusive? Aust J Agric Res 56:1159–1168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Borovskii GB, Stupnikova IV, Antipina AI, Vladimirova SV, Voinikov VK (2002) Accumulation of dehydrin-like proteins in the mitochondria of cereals in response to cold, freezing, drought and ABA treatment. BMC Plant Biol 2:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brunner AM, Yakovlev IA, Strauss SH (2004) Validating internal controls for quantitative plant gene expression studies. BMC Plant Biol 4(14):1–7Google Scholar
  14. Campbell SA, Close TJ (1997) Dehydrins: genes, proteins, and associations with phenotypic traits. New Phytol 137:61–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Caruso A, Morabito D, Delmotte F, Kahlem G, Carpin S (2002) Dehydrin induction during drought and osmotic stress in Populus. Plant Physiol Biochem 40:1033–1042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cellier F, Coneéjéro G, Breitler JC, Casse F (1998) Molecular and physiological responses to water deficit in drought-tolerant and drought-sensitive lines of sunflower1: accumulation of dehydrin transcripts correlates with tolerance. Plant Physiol 116:319–328PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cellier F, Conéjéro G, Casse F (2000) Dehydrins transcript fluctuations during a day/night cycle in drought-stressed sunflower. J Exp Bot 51:299–304PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Close TJ (1996) Dehydrins: emergence of a biochemical role of a family of plant dehydration proteins. Physiol Plant 97:795–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Close TJ (1997) Dehydrins: a commonalty in the response of plants to dehydration and low temperature. Physiol Plant 100:291–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Close TJ, Kortt AA, Chandler PM (1989) A cDNA-based comparison of dehydration-induced proteins (dehydrins) in barley and corn. Plant Mol Biol 13:95–108PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Close TJ, Fenton RD, Moonan F (1993) A view of plant dehydrins using antibodies specific to the carboxy terminal peptide. Plant Mol Biol 23:279–286PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Corpet F (1988) Multiple sequence alignment with hierarchical clustering. Nucl Acids Res 16:10881–10890PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Deng Z, Wang Y, Jiang K, Liu X, Wu W, Gao S, Lin J, Sun X, Tang K (2006) Molecular cloning and characterization of a novel dehydrin gene from Ginkgo biloba. Biosci Rep 26:203–215PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Erez A, Faust M, Line MJ (1998) Changes in water status in peach buds on induction, development and release from dormancy. Sci Hort 73:111–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Eveno E, Collada C, Guevara MA, Léger V, Soto A, Díaz L, Léger P, González-Martínez SC, Cervera MT, Plomion C, Garnier-Geré PG (2008) Contrasting patterns of selection at Pinus pinaster Ait. drought stress candidate genes as revealed by genetic differentiation analyses. Mol Biol Evol 25:417–437PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fernández M, Gil L, Pardos JA (1999) Response of Pinus pinaster Ait. provenances at early age to water supply. I. Water relation parameters. Ann For Sci 56:179–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fernández M, Gil L, Pardos JA (2000) Effects of water supply on gas exchange in Pinus pinaster Ait. provenances during their first growing season. Ann For Sci 57:9–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. González-Martínez SC, Mariette S, Ribeiro MM, Burban C, Raffin A, Chambel MR, Ribeiro CAM, Aguiar A, Plomion C, Alía R, Gil L, Vendramin GG, Kremer A (2004) Genetic resources in maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Aiton): molecular and quantitative measures of genetic variation and differentiation among maternal lineages. For Ecol Manag 197:103–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. González-Martínez SC, Gil L, Alía R (2005) Genetic diversity estimates of Pinus pinaster in the Iberian Peninsula: a comparison of allozymes and quantitative traits. Investig Agrar: Sist Recur For 14(1):1–10Google Scholar
  30. Grivet D, Sebastiani F, Alía R, Bataillon T, Torre S, Zabal-Aguirre M, Vendramin GG, González-Martínez SC (2011) Molecular footprints of local adaptation in two Mediterranean conifers. Mol Biol Evol 28(1):101–116PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hara M (2010) The multifunctionality of dehydrins: an overview. Plant Sign Behav 5:503–508Google Scholar
  32. Hara M, Shinoda Y, Tanaka Y, Kuboi T (2009) DNA binding of citrus dehydrin promoted by zinc ion. Plant Cell Envir 32:532–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hinniger C, Caillet V, Michoux F, Ben Amor M, Tanksley S, Lin C, McCarthy J (2006) Isolation and characterization of cDNA encoding three dehydrins expressed during Coffea canephora (Robusta) grain development. Ann Bot 97:755–765PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ismail AM, Hall AE, Close TJ (1999) Purification and partial characterization of a dehydrin involved in chilling tolerance during seedling emergence of cowpea1. Plant Physiol 120:237–244PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Johnsen Ø, Fossdal CG, Nagy NE, Mølmann J, Dæhlen OG, Skrøppa T (2005a) Climatic adaptation in Picea abies progenies is affected by the temperature during zygotic embryogenesis and seed maturation. Plant Cell Environ 28:1090–1102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Johnsen Ø, Dæhlen OG, Østreng G, Skrøppa T (2005b) Daylength and temperature during seed production interactively affect adaptive performance of Picea abies progenies. New Phytol 168:589–596PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Joosen RV, Lammers M, Balk PA, Brønnum P, Konings MC, Perks M, Stattin E, van Wordragen MF, van der Geest AL (2006) Correlating gene expression to physiological parameters and environmental conditions during cold acclimation of Pinus sylvestris, identification of molecular markers using cDNA microarrays. Tree Physiol 26:1297–313PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kalberer SR, Wisniewski M, Arora R (2006) Deacclimation and reacclimation of cold-hardy plants: current understanding and emerging concepts. Plant Sci 171:3–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Karlson DT, Zeng Y, Stirm VE, Joly RJ, Ashworth EN (2003) Photoperiodic regulation of a 24-kd dehydrin-like protein in red-osier dogwood (Cornus sericea l.) in relation to freeze-tolerance. Plant Cell Physiol 44:25–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Khurana P, Vishnudasan D, Chhibbar AK (2008) Genetic approaches towards overcoming water deficit in plants-special emphasis on LEAs. Physiol Mol Biol Plant 14(4):277–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kontunen-Soppela S, Taulavuori K, Taulavuori E, Lähdesmäki P, Laine K (2000) Soluble proteins and dehydrins in nitrogen-fertilized Scots pine seedlings during deacclimation and the onset of growth. Physiol Plant 109:404–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kosová K, Vítámvás P, Prášil IT (2007) The role of dehydrins in plant response to cold. Biol Plant 51(4):601–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, Valentin F, Wallace IM, Wilm A, Lopez R, Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Higgins DG (2007) ClustalW and ClustalX version 2. Bioinformatics 23(21):2947–2948PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lee SC, Lee MY, Kim SJ, Jun SH, An G, Kim SR (2005) Characterization of an abiotic stress-inducible dehydrin gene, OsDhn1, in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Mol Cells 19(2):212–218PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Mehta PA, Rebala KC, Venkataraman G, Parida A (2009) A diurnally regulated dehydrin from Avicennia marina that shows nucleo-cytoplasmic localization and is phosphorylated by casein kinase II in vitro. Plant Physiol Biochem 47:701–709PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Miguel Pérez I, González Martínez SC, Alía Miranda R, Gil Sánchez L (2002) Growth phenology and mating system of maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Aiton) in Central Spain. Investig Agrar: Sist Recur For 11(1):193–204Google Scholar
  47. Muthalif MM, Rowland LJ (1994) Identification of dehydrin-like proteins responsive to chilling in floral buds of blueberry (Vaccinium, section Cyanococcus). Plant Physiol 104:1439–1447PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nguyen-Queryens A, Bouchet-Lannat F (2003) Osmotic adjustment in three-year-old seedlings of five provenances of maritime pine (Pinus pinaster) in response to drought. Tree Physiol 23:397–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nguyen-Queyrens A, Costa P, Loustau D, Plomion C (2002) Osmotic adjustment in Pinus pinaster cuttings in response to a soil drying cycle. Ann For Sci 59:795–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Notredame C, Higgins DG, Heringa J (2000) T-coffee: a novel method for fast and accurate multiple sequence alignment. J Mol Biol 302:205–217PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Olave-Concha N, Ruiz-Lara S, Muñoz X, Bravo LA, Corcuera LJ (2004) Accumulation of dehydrin transcripts and proteins in response to abiotic stresses in Deschampsia antarctica. Antarct Sci 16(2):175–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ouvrard O, Cellier F, Ferrare K, Tousch D, Lamaze T, Dupuis JM, Casse-Delbard F (1996) Identification and expression of water stress and abscisic acid-regulated genes in drought-tolerance sunflower genotype. Plant Mol Biol 31:819–829PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Palmé AE, Pyhäjärvi T, Wachowiak W, Savolainen O (2009) Selection on nuclear genes in a Pinus phylogeny. Mol Biol Evol 26(4):893–905PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Porat R, Pasentsis K, Rozentzvieg D, Gerasopoulos D, Falara V, Samach A, Luriea S, Kanellisc AK (2004) Isolation of a dehydrin cDNA from orange and grapefruit citrus fruit that is specifically induced by the combination of heat followed by chilling temperatures. Physiol Plant 120:256–264PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pulla RK, Kim YJ, Kim MK, Senthil KS, In JG, Yang DC (2008) Isolation of a novel dehydrin gene from Codonopsis lanceolata and analysis of its response to abiotic stresses. BMB Rep 41(4):338–343PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pyhäjärvi T, García-Gil MR, Knürr T, Mikkonen M, Wachowiak W, Savolainen O (2007) Demographic history has influenced nucleotide diversity in European Pinus sylvestris populations. Genetics 177:1713–1724PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rampino P, Pataleo S, Gerardi C, Mita G, Perrotta C (2006) Drought stress response in wheat: physiological and molecular analysis of resistant and sensitive genotypes. Plant Cell Environ 29:2143–2152PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Richard S, Morency MJ, Drevet C, Jouanin L, Séguin A (2000) Isolation and characterization of a dehydrin gene from white spruce induced upon wounding, drought and cold stresses. Plant Mol Biol 43:1–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rinne PLH, Kaikuranta PLM, van der Plas LHW, van der Schoot C (1999) Dehydrins in cold-acclimated apices of birch (Betula pubescens Ehrh.): production, localization and potential role in rescuing enzyme function during dehydration. Planta 209:377–388PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ritchie G, Hinckley TM (1975) The pressure chamber as an instrument for ecological research. In: MacFayden A (ed) Advanced in ecological research. Academic Press London, New York, pp 165–201, 9Google Scholar
  61. Rorat T, Szabala BM, Grygorowicz WJ, Wojtowicz B, Yin Z, Rey P (2006) Expression of SK3-type dehydrin in transporting organs is associated with cold acclimation in Solanum species. Planta 224:205–221PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rowland LJ, Arora R (1997) Proteins related to endodormancy (rest) in woody perennials. Plant Sci 126:119–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rozen S, Skaletsky HJ (2000) Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. In: Krawetz S, Misener S (eds) Bioinformatics methods and protocols: methods in molecular biology. Humana Press, Totowa, pp 365–386Google Scholar
  64. Sánchez-Gómez D, Majada J, Alía R, Feito I, y Aranda I (2010) Intraspecific variation in growth and allocation patterns in seedlings of Pinus pinaster. Ait submitted to contrasting watering regimes: can water availability explain regional variation? Annals For Sci 67. DOI:  10.1051/forest/2010007
  65. Scholander PF, Hammel HT, Bradstreet ED, Hemmingsen EA (1965) Sap pressure in vascular plants. Sci 148:339–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Suprunova T, Krugman T, Fahima T, Chen G, Shams I, Korol A, Nevo E (2004) Differential expression of dehydrin genes in wild barley, Hordeum spontaneum, associated with resistance to water deficit. Plant Cell Environ 27:1297–1308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Taiz L, Zeiger E (2006) Plant physiology, 4th edn. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, p 764Google Scholar
  68. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S (2007) MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol 24:1596–1599PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Tommasini L, Svensson J, Rodriguez E, Wahid A, Malatrasi M, Kato K, Wanamaker S, Resnik J, Close T (2008) Dehydrin gene expression provides an indicator of low temperature and drought stress: transcriptome-based analysis of Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Funct Integr Genomic 8:387–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tompa P, Kovacs D (2010) Intrinsically disordered chaperones in plants and animals. Biochem Cell Biol 88:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Topp GC, Davis JL (1985) Measurement of soil water content using time-domain reflectometry (TDR): a field evaluation. Soil Sci Soc Am J 49:19–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Topp GC, Davis JL, Annan AP (1980) Electromagnetic determination of soil water content: measurements in coaxial transmission lines. Water Resour Res 16:574–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Tschaplinski TJ, Tuskan GA, Gebre GM, Todd DE (1998) Drought resistance of two hybrid Populus clones grown in a large-scale plantation. Tree Physiol 18:653–658PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Turner NC (1988) Measurements of plant water status by the pressure chamber technique. Irrig Sci 9:289–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Vaseva II, Grigorova BS, Simova-Stoilova LP, Demirevska KN, Feller U (2010) Abscisic acid and late embryogenesis abundant protein profile changes in winter wheat under progressive drought stress. Plant Biol 12:698–707PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Volaire F (2002) Drought survival, summer dormancy and dehydrin accumulation in contrasting cultivars of Dactylis glomerata. Physiol Plant 116:42–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Volaire F (2003) Seedling survival under drought differs between an annual (Hordeum vulgare) and a perennial grass (Dactylis glomerata). New Phytol 160:501–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Volaire F, Norton MR, Norton GM, Lelièvrè F (2005) Seasonal patterns of growth, dehydrins and water-soluble carbohydrates in genotypes of Dactylis glomerata varying in summer dormancy. Ann Bot 95:981–990PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Vornam B, Gailing O, Derory J, Plomion C, Kremer A, Finkeldey R (2011) Characterisation and natural variation of a dehydrin gene in Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. Plant Biol DOI:  10.1111/j.1438-677.2011.00446.x
  80. Wahid N, González-Martínez SC, El Hadrami I, Boulli A (2006) Variation of morphological traits in natural populations of maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) in Morocco. Ann For Sci 63:83–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Welling A, Rinne P, Viherä-Aarnio A, Kontunen-Soppela S, Heino P, Palva ET (2004) Photoperiod and temperature differentially regulate the expression of two dehydrin genes during overwintering of birch (Betula pubescens Ehrh.). J Exp Bot 55(396):507–516PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Wilkins O, Waldron L, Nahal H, Provart NJ, Campbell MM (2009) Genotype and time of day shape the Populus drought response. Plant J 60:703–715PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Wisniewski M, Close T, Artlip T, Arora R (1996) Seasonal patterns of dehydrins and 70-kDa heat-shock proteins in bark tissues of eight species of woody plants. Physiol Plant 96:496–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Wisniewski M, Webb R, Balsamo R, Close TJ, Yu XM, Griffith M (1999) Purification, immunolocalization, cryoprotective, and antifreeze activity of PCA60: a dehydrin from peach (Prunus persica). Physiol Plant 105:600–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wisniewski ME, Bassett CL, Renaut J, Farrell R Jr, Tworkoski T, Artlip TS (2006) Differential regulation of two dehydrin genes from peach (Prunus persica) by photoperiod, low temperature and water deficit. Tree Physiol 26:575–584PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Wisniewski M, Bassett C, Norelli J, Macarisin D, Artlip T, Gasic K, Korban S (2008) Expressed sequence tag analysis of the response of apple (Malus x domestica 'Royal Gala') to low temperature and water deficit. Physiol Plant 133:298–317PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Yakovlev IA, Fossdal CG, Johnsen Ø, Junttila O, Skrøppa T (2006) Analysis of gene expression during bud burst initiation in Norway spruce via ESTs from subtracted cDNA libraries. Tree Genet Genom 2:39–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Yakovlev IA, Asante DKA, Fossdal CG, Partanen J, Junttila O, Johnsen Ø (2008) Dehydrins expression related to timing of bud burst in Norway spruce. Planta 228:459–472PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Yakubov B, Barazani O, Shachack A, Rowland LJ, Shoseyov O, Golan-Goldhirsh A (2005) Cloning and expression of a dehydrin-like protein from Pistacia vera L. Trees 19:224–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Zhu B, Choi DW, Fenton R, Close TJ (2000) Expression of the barley dehydrin multigene family and the development of freezing tolerance. Mol Gen Genet 246:145–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tania Velasco-Conde
    • 1
  • Igor Yakovlev
    • 2
  • Juan Pedro Majada
    • 1
  • Ismael Aranda
    • 3
  • Øystein Johnsen
    • 4
  1. 1.Servicio Regional de Investigación y Desarrollo Agroalimentario, SERIDAGradoSpain
  2. 2.The Norwegian Forest and Landscape InstituteÅsNorway
  3. 3.Departamento de Sistemas y Recursos Forestales, CIFORInstituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología AgrariaMadridSpain
  4. 4.Department of Plant and Environmental SciencesNorwegian University of Life SciencesÅsNorway

Personalised recommendations