Tree Genetics & Genomes

, Volume 8, Issue 1, pp 87–96 | Cite as

Basic density of radiata pine in New Zealand: genetic and environmental factors

  • Luis A. ApiolazaEmail author
Original Paper


Wood basic density is among the selection criteria for many fast-grown tree species, including Pinus radiata D. Don in New Zealand. Basic density was assessed in 23,330 stem cores from 18 trials to study the heritability, the relevance of environmental effects and the magnitude of genotype-by-environment (GxE) interaction. Site differences in annual average temperature dominated variability in this dataset, with lower latitude and altitude (i.e. warmer) sites displaying higher average density. Between highest- and lowest-density sites there was an 18% difference (302.7 vs. 358.4 kg m − 3) for the linear mean for cores of rings 1–5 and a 39% difference (329.7 vs. 459.1 kg m − 3) for the linear mean of rings 6–10. The estimated heritabilities fluctuated between 0.28 and 0.94 (mean, 0.6); however, basic density displayed little within-site variability (phenotypic coefficient of variation, <8%). Bivariate analyses were used to estimate between-site genetic correlations as an indication of GxE interaction. Only 57 out of the 153 pairs of trials contained enough information to estimate the between-site genetic correlations and, out of those, 15 estimates were not statistically significant. Moderate to high (0.46–0.96) significant genetic correlation estimates indicated that there was little interaction for basic density, suggesting no need to modify the breeding strategy to account for differential performance in this trait. Poor connectedness between trials could be depressing estimates of genetic correlations. This situation should be considered when designing genetic testing schemes, particularly when purposely inducing imbalance as in rolling front strategies.


Genetic correlation Genotype-by-environment interaction Wood properties Connectedness Pinus radiata Basic density 



Data and funding for this project were provided by the New Zealand Radiata Pine Breeding Company (NZRPBC). Many thanks to Paul Jefferson (RPBC) for compiling the phenotypic dataset, Carolyn Raymond (Southern Cross University) for the environmental data for trial D and John C.F. Walker (University of Canterbury) for comments on the manuscript. Rowland Burdon, Tony Shelbourne and two anonymous referees contributed helpful comments that improved this article.


  1. Apiolaza LA (2009) Very early selection for solid wood quality: screening for early winners. Ann For Sci 66:601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Apiolaza LA, Garrick DJ (2001) Analysis of longitudinal data from progeny tests: some multivariate approaches. For Sci 47:129–140Google Scholar
  3. Apiolaza LA, Burdon RD, Garrick DJ (1999) Effect of univariate subsampling on the efficiency of bivariate parameter estimation and selection using half-sib progeny tests. For Genet 6:79–87Google Scholar
  4. Baltunis BS, Wu HX, Dungey HS, Mullin TJ, Brawner JT (2009) Comparisons of genetic parameters and clonal value predictions from clonal trials and seedling base population trials of radiata pine. Tree Genet Genomes 5:269–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Borralho NMG, Dutkowski GW (1998) Comparison of rolling front and discrete generation breeding strategies for trees. Can J For Res 28:987–993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bouffier L, Charlot C, Raffin A, Rozenberg P, Kremer A (2008) Can wood density be efficiently selected at early stage in maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.)? Ann For Sci 65:106p1–106p8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burdon RD (1977) Genetic correlation as a concept for studying genotype-environment interaction in forest tree breeding. Silvae Genet 26:168–175Google Scholar
  8. Carson SD (1991) Genotype x environment interaction and optimal number of progeny test sites for improving Pinus radiata in New Zealand. New Zealand J For Sci 21:32–49Google Scholar
  9. Cooper M, DeLacy IH (1994) Relationships among analytical methods used to study genotypic variation and genotype-by-environment interaction in plant breeding multi-environment experiments. Theor Appl Genet 88:561–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Costa e Silva J, Potts BM, Dutkowski GW (2006) Genotype by environment interaction for growth of Eucalyptus globulus in Australia. Tree Genet Genomes 2:61–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cown DJ (1992) New Zealand radiata pine and Douglas fir—suitability for processing. FRI Bulletin 168, Forest Research Institute, 74 pGoogle Scholar
  12. Cown DJ, McConchie DL, Young GD (1991) Radiata pine wood properties survey. FRI Bulletin 50, New Zealand Forest Research Institute, 50 pGoogle Scholar
  13. Dungey HS, Matheson AC, Kain D, Evans R (2006) Genetics of wood stiffness and its component traits in Pinus radiata. Can J For Res 36:1165–1178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dungey HS, Brawner JT, Burger F, Carson M, Henson M, Jefferson P, Matheson AC (2007) A new breeding strategy for Pinus radiata in New Zealand and New South Wales. Silvae Genet 58:28–38Google Scholar
  15. Falconer DS (1952) The problem of environment and selection. Amer Nat 86:293–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Freeman GH (1973) Statistical methods for the analysis of genotype–environment interactions. Heredity 31:339–354PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gapare WJ, Ivkovich M, Baltunis BS, Matheson AC, Wu HX (2009) Genetic stability of wood density and diameter in Pinus radiata D. Don plantation estate across Australia. Tree Genet Genomes 6:113–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gelman A, Hill J (2007) Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge University Press, New York, 625 ppGoogle Scholar
  19. Gilmour AR, Cullis BR, Welham SJ, Thompson R (2002) ASReml reference manual. New South Wales Agriculture, Orange, NSW, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  20. Goddard ME (1998) Consensus and debate in the definition of breeding objectives. J Dairy Sci 81(2):6–18PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harris JM (1965) A survey of the wood density, tracheid length, and latewood characteristics of radiata pine grown in New Zealand. FRI Technical Paper 57, New Zealand Forest Service, 31 ppGoogle Scholar
  22. Henderson CR (1975) Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model. Biometrics 31:423–447PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Houlder D, Hutchinson M, Nix H, McMahon J (2001) ANUCLIM 5.1 users guide. Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies, The Australian National University. Canberra, Australia, 85 ppGoogle Scholar
  24. Howarth JM, Goddard ME, Kinghorn BP (1997) Breeding strategies for targeting different breeding objectives. In: Proceedings 12th conference, Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics. Part One, Dubbo, NSW, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  25. Jayawickrama KJS, Carson MJ (2000) A breeding strategy for the New Zealand Radiata Pine Breeding Cooperative. Silvae Genet 49:82–90Google Scholar
  26. Johnson GR (2004) Common families across test series—how many do we need? For Genet 11:103–112Google Scholar
  27. Johnson GR, Burdon RD (1990) Family-site interaction in Pinus radiata: implications for progeny testing strategy and regionalised breeding in New Zealand. Silvae Genet 39:55–62Google Scholar
  28. Kennedy BW, Trus D (1993) Considerations on genetic connectedness between management units under an animal model. J Anim Sci 71:2341–2352PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Kimberley MO, West GG, Dean MG, Knowles LR (2005) The 300 Index—a volume productivity index for radiata pine. New Zealand J For 50:13–18Google Scholar
  30. Kumar S (2004) Genetic parameter estimates for wood stiffness, strength, internal checking, and resin bleeding for radiata pine. Can J For Res 34:2601–2610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Li L, Wu HX (2005) Efficiency of early selection for rotation-aged growth and wood density traits in Pinus radiata. Can J For Res 35:2019–2029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Li Y, Dutkowski GW, Apiolaza LA, Pilbeam DJ, Costa e Silva J, Potts BM (2007) The genetic architecture of a Eucalyptus globulus full-sib breeding population in Australia. For Genet 12:167–179Google Scholar
  33. Matheson AC, Wu HX (2005) Genotype by environment interactions in an Australia-wide radiata pine diallel mating experiment: implications for regionalized breeding. For Sci 51:29–40Google Scholar
  34. McDonald TM (2009) Making sense of genotype × environment interaction of Pinus radiata in New Zealand. Ph.D. thesis, School of Forestry, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  35. Muir W, Nyquist WE, Xu S (1992) Alternative partitioning of the genotype-by-environment interaction. Theor Appl Genet 84:193–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nicholls JWP, Morris JD, Pederick LA (1980) Heritability estimates of density characteristics in juvenile pinus radiata wood. Silvae Genet 29:54–61Google Scholar
  37. Development Core Team (2008) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria URL:
  38. Sae-Lim P, Komen H, Kause A (2010) Bias and precision of estimates of genotype-by-environment interaction. Aquaculture 310:66–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shelbourne CJA (1972) Genotype-environment interaction: its study and its implications in forest tree improvement. In: IUFRO Genetics SABRAO joint symposium, Tokyo, JapanGoogle Scholar
  40. Westcott B (1986) Some methods of analysing genotype–environment interaction. Heredity 56:243–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wielinga B, Raymond CA, James R, Matheson AC (2009) Genetic parameters and genotype by environment interactions for green and basic density and stiffness of Pinus radiata D. Don estimated using acoustics. Silvae Genet 58:112–122Google Scholar
  42. Zamudio F, Baettyg R, Vergara A, Guerra F, Rozenberg P (2002) Genetic trends in wood density and radial growth with cambial age in a radiata pine progeny test. Ann For Sci 59:541–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ForestryUniversity of CanterburyChristchurchNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations