Tree Genetics & Genomes

, Volume 8, Issue 1, pp 15–25 | Cite as

Interactions of Fr genes and mixed-pathogen inocula in the loblolly pine-fusiform rust pathosystem

  • Fikret Isik
  • Henry V. Amerson
  • Ross W. Whetten
  • Saul A. Garcia
  • Steven E. McKeand
Original Paper

Abstract

Open-pollinated loblolly pine seedlings derived from seven maternal parents were inoculated in a greenhouse with 10 different bulked inocula of the fusiform rust fungus and assessed for disease incidence. The maternal parents are heterozygous (Rr) for one or two of nine known pathotype-specific Fr genes (fusiform rust resistance genes). Progeny were genotyped to identify carriers of known R and r alleles inherited from the maternal parents. The R alleles condition resistance to specific genotypes of the fungal pathogen, while r alleles do not condition for resistance. Interactions were tested among different host genotypes and different bulked inocula. Significant differences in virulence against R genotypes were observed in the bulked inocula. Likewise, the inocula were significantly different with regard to their ability to incite disease at the family level and in r genotypes. Across the inocula, disease levels differed significantly among families. Within each family, r genotype seedlings typically exhibited higher disease rates than did R genotype seedlings. The magnitude of difference (odds ratio) between the R versus r genotypes for disease incidence within each family varied from 1 to 32 times. Significant interactions between host and pathogen genotypes were observed in four of the seven families. These greenhouse assessments using bulked inocula sources revealed wide ranges of pathogen virulence levels against the different R alleles. Barring virulence masking by unknown resistance genes, similar virulence assessments should be effective guides for the field deployment of seedlings carrying specific R alleles to regions where inocula samples show low or no corresponding virulence.

Keywords

Pinus taeda Disease resistance Gene-for-gene resistance Tree improvement Virulence assessment 

References

  1. Amerson HV, Kubisiak TL, Garcia SA, Kuhlman GC, Nelson CD, McKeand SE, Mullin TJ, Li B (2005) Interacting genes in the pine-fusiform rust forest pathosystem. In: Proceedings of the 28th biennial southern forest tree improvement conference, June 21–23, 2005. Raleigh, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, p. 60. Available at http://www.treesearch.fs.fed.us/pubs/25641
  2. Bent AF, Mackey D (2007) Elicitors, Effectors, and R Genes: The New Paradigm and a Lifetime Supply of Questions. Annu Rev Phytopathol 45:399–436PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bridgwater F, Kubisiak T, Byram T, McKeand S (2005) Risk management with current deployment strategies for genetically improved loblolly and slash pines. South J Appl For 29(2):80–87Google Scholar
  4. Crute IR (1992) The role of resistance breeding in the integrated control of downy mildew (Bremia lactuca) in protected lettuce. Euphytica 63:95–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cubbage F, Pye J, Holmes T, Wagner J (2000) An economic analysis of fusiform rust protection research. South J Appl For 24:77–85Google Scholar
  6. Geron CD, Hafley LH (1988) Impact of fusiform rust on product yields of loblolly pine plantations. South J Appl For 12:226–231Google Scholar
  7. Hulbert SH, Webb CA, Smith SM, Sun Q (2001) Resistance gene complexes: Evolution and Utilization. Annu Rev Phytopathol 39:285–312PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Isik F, Amerson HV, Whetten RW, Garcia SA, Li B, McKeand S (2008) Resistance Assessments of Elite Loblolly Pine Families to Fusiform Rust Inocula in Greenhouse Testing. Can J For Res 38:2687–2696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jordan AP (1997) Fusiform rust disease resistance and genomic mapping in loblolly pine. MS thesis. N.C. State Univ. Raleigh, NC. 105 ppGoogle Scholar
  10. Kinloch BB Jr, Walkinshaw CH (1991) Resistance to fusiform rust in southern pines: How is it inherited? In: Hiratsuka Y, Samoil JK, Blenis PV, Crane PE, Laishley BL (eds) Proceedings of the IUFRO Rusts of Forest Trees Working Party Conference; Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. Northwest Region Information Report NOR-X-317: 219–228Google Scholar
  11. Knighten JL, Young CH, McCartney TC, Anderson RL (1988) Resistance screening center procedures manual: a step by step guide used in the operational screening of southern pines for resistance to fusiform rust. USDA Forest Service Forest Pest Management. Report 83-1-18 (Revised 1988) 62 pGoogle Scholar
  12. Kubisiak TL, Amerson HV, Nelson CD (2005) Genetic interaction of the fusiform rust fungus with resistance gene Fr1 in loblolly pine. Phytopathology 95:376–380PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kubisiak TL, Anderson CL, Amerson HV, Smith JA, Davis JM, Nelson CD (2011) A genomic map enriched for markers linked to Avr1 in Cronartium quercuum f.sp. fusiforme. Fungal Genet Biol 48:266–274PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kuhlman EG, Matthews FR (1993) Variation in virulence among single-aeciospore isolates from single-gall isolates of Cronartium quercuum f.sp. fusiforme. Can J For Res 23:67–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kuhlman EG, Amerson HV, Jordan AP, Pepper WP (1997) Inoculum density and expression of major gene resistance to fusiform rust disease in loblolly pine. Plant Dis 81:597–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Li H (2003) Major gene detection for fusiform rust resistance using segregation analysis and linkage analysis in loblolly pine. Ph.D. Thesis N.C. State Univ. Raleigh, N.C. 130pGoogle Scholar
  17. Li H, Ghosh S, Amerson H, Li B (2006) Major gene detection for fusiform rust resistance using Bayesian complex segregation analysis in loblolly pine. Theor Appl Genet 113:921–929PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD, Schabenberger O (2006) SAS for mixed models, 2nd edn. SAS Institute, Cary, p 814Google Scholar
  19. McDonald BA, Linde C (2002) Pathogen population genetics, evolutionary potential, and durable resistance. Ann Rev Phytopathol 40:349–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McIntosh RA (1992) Preemptive breeding to control wheat rusts. Euphytica 63:103–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Millar CI, Kinloch, BB (1991) Taxonomy, phylogeny, and coevolution of pines and their stem rusts. In: Hiratsuka, Y., Samoil, J.K., Blenis, P.V., Crane, P.E., Laishley, B.L., eds., Proceedings of the IUFRO Rusts of Forest Trees Working Party Conference; Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. Northwest Region Information Report NOR-X-317: 1–38Google Scholar
  22. Myburg H, Morse AM, Amerson HV, Kubisiak TL, Huber D, Osborne JA, Garcia SA, Nelson CD, Davis JM, Covert SF, van Zyl LM (2006) Differential gene expression in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) challenged with the fusiform rust fungus, Cronartium quercuum f.sp. fusiforme. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 68:79–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nelson CD, Doudrick RL, Nance WL, Hamaker JM, Capo B (1993) Specificity of host:pathogen genetic interaction for fusiform rust disease on slash pine. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Southern Forest Tree Improvement Conference, June 14–17, 1993, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, pp 403–411Google Scholar
  24. Nelson CD, Amerson HV, Kubisiak TL (2010) Unraveling and managing fusiform rust disease: a model approach for coevolved forest tree pathosystems. For Path 40:67–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Powers HR Jr, Kraus JF (1986) A comparison of fusiform rust-resistant loblolly pine seed sources. South J Appl For 10:230–232Google Scholar
  26. SAS Institute (2010) SAS/STAT version 92: Help and Documentation. SAS Institute, CaryGoogle Scholar
  27. Stelzer HE, Doudrick RL, Kubisiak TL, Nelson CD (1999) Prescreening Slash Pine and Cronartium Pedigrees for Evaluation of Complementary Gene Action in Fusiform Rust Disease. Plant Dis 83:385–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Walkinshaw CH, Bey CF (1981) Reaction of field-resistant slash pine to selected isolates of Cronartium quercuum f.sp. fusiforme. Phytopathology 71:1090–1092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wilcox PL, Amerson HV, Kuhlman EG, Liu BH, O’Malley DM, Sederoff RR (1996) Detection of a major gene for resistance to fusiform rust disease in loblolly pine by genomic mapping. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:3859–3864PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fikret Isik
    • 1
  • Henry V. Amerson
    • 2
  • Ross W. Whetten
    • 1
  • Saul A. Garcia
    • 1
  • Steven E. McKeand
    • 1
  1. 1.Cooperative Tree Improvement Program, Department of Forestry and Environmental ResourcesNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA
  2. 2.Department of Forestry and Environmental ResourcesNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA

Personalised recommendations