Advertisement

Tree Genetics & Genomes

, Volume 7, Issue 3, pp 587–596 | Cite as

Nuclear genetic markers indicate Danish origin of the Norwegian beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) populations established in 500–1,000 AD

Original Paper

Abstract

The northernmost range of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) is in southern Norway and consists of two distinct and isolated distributions, a single population at Seim in West Norway and several adjacent populations in Vestfold, East Norway. The modest beech pollen deposits beyond these main distributions suggest that the Norwegian beech distribution has never been an extension of the south Scandinavian range. We used genetic markers and historical sources to trace the ancestor populations for the beech at Seim and Vestfold, hypothesising Denmark as the most likely source. Nuclear inter-simple sequence repeat markers, amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), were applied to estimate genetic distances between beech populations in Norway, England and Denmark. The variation in chloroplast DNA polymorphism was estimated using PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism. The nuclear genetic data indicate Denmark as a source for the beech in Norway, although the data are less certain in the case of Seim than in that of Vestfold. The populations from South England were genetically different from most Scandinavian populations. The genetic variation within Norwegian populations was only slightly lower than that of the English and Danish populations, questioning birds as vectors for dispersal. Thus, the pollen data and our results are in accordance with the intentional introduction and documented human migrations across Skagerrak before and during the Viking Age.

Keywords

Genetic distance Genetic diversity Human introduction ISSR Scandinavia RFLP 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Hugh Milner and co-workers (UK), J.S. Jensen, B. Ditlevsen (Denmark), E. Finne, C. Kierulf, Å. Østgård and S. Øen (Norway) for organising the collection and shipment of beech buds. We also wish to thank K.E. Henningsmoen, H.I. Høeg, D. Skre and B. Myhre for valuable literature and discussions. J. Hubert, M. Sætersdal, T. Skrøppa and R. Sørensen have critically reviewed the paper, for which we are very grateful. J. Hubert also checked the English. We thank anonymous reviewers for constructive comments that substantially improved this manuscript. This work was supported by grants from the Norwegian Committee on Forest Genetic Resources and the Norwegian Forest and Landscape Institute.

Ethical standards

This work complies with the current laws in the countries in which it has been done.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Supplementary material

11295_2010_358_MOESM1_ESM.doc (36 kb)
Supplementary material, S1 (DOC 35 kb)
11295_2010_358_MOESM2_ESM.doc (84 kb)
Supplementary material, S2 (DOC 84 kb)
11295_2010_358_MOESM3_ESM.doc (71 kb)
Supplementary material, S3 (DOC 71 kb)
11295_2010_358_MOESM4_ESM.doc (60 kb)
Supplementary material, S4 (DOC 60 kb)

References

  1. Aizawa M, Yoshimaru H, Saito H, Katsuki T, Kawahara T, Kitamura K, Shi F, Sabirov R, Kaji M (2009) Range-wide genetic structure in a north-east Asian spruce (Picea jezoensis) determined using nuclear microsatellite markers. J Biogeogr 36:996–1007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Austerlitz F, Mariette S, Machon N, Gouyon P-H, Godelle B (2000) Effects of colonisation processes on genetic diversity: differences between annual plants and tree species. Genetics 154:1309–1321PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Arcade A, Anselin F, Rampant PF, Lesage MC, Paques LE, Prat D (2000) Application of AFLP, RAPD and ISSR markers to genetic mapping of European larch and Japanese larch. Theor Appl Genet 100:299–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bately J (2007) Text and translation: the three parts of the known world and the geography of Europe north of the Danube according to Orosius' Historiae and its Old English version. In: Bately J, Englert A (eds) Othere's voyages, a late 9th-century account of voyages along the coasts of Norway and Denmark and its cultural context. Viking ship Museum, Roskilde, pp 46–47Google Scholar
  5. Benz P-G (1988) Norsk fuglehåndbok. Aschehoug, OsloGoogle Scholar
  6. Björkman L (1996) Long-term population dynamics of Fagus sylvatica at the northern limits of its distribution in southern Sweden: a paleoecological study. Holocene 6:225–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Björkman L (1999) The establishment of Fagus sylvatica at the stand scale in southern Sweden. Holocene 9:237–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bonde N, Christensen AE (1993) Dendrochronological dating of the Viking Age ship burial at Oseberg, Gokstad and Tune, Norway. Antiquity 67:575–583Google Scholar
  9. Bradshaw RHW (2004) Past anthropogenic influence on European forests and some possible genetic consequences. For Ecol Manage 197:203–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bradshaw RHW, Lindbladh M (2005) Regional spread and stand-scale establishment of Fagus sylvatica and Picea abies in Scandinavia. Ecology 86:1679–1686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Comps B, Gömöry D, Letouzey J, Thiebaut B, Petit RJ (2001) Diverging trends between heterozygosity and allelic richness during postglacial colonization in the European beech. Genetics 157:389–397PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Danielsen A (1970) Pollen-analytical late Quaternary studies in the Ra district of Østfold, southeastern Norway. Årbok for Universitetet i Bergen (1969, no. 14), Norwegian University PressGoogle Scholar
  13. Demesure B, Sodzi N, Petit RJ (1995) A set of universal primers for amplification of polymorphic non-coding regions of mitochondrial and chloroplast DNA in plants. Mol Ecol 1:129–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Demesure B, Comps B, Petit RJ (1996) Chloroplast DNA phylogeography of the common beech (Fagus sylvatica L) in Europe. Evolution 50:2515–2520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dumolin-Lapegue S, Pemonge MH, Petit RJ (1997) An enlarged set of consensus primers for the study of organelle DNA in plants. Mol Ecol 4:393–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eckert CG, Samis KE, Lougheed SC (2008) Genetic variation across species' geographic ranges: the central-marginal hypothesis and beyond. Mol Ecol 17:1170–1188PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. EUFORGEN (2009) Distribution map of beech (Fagus sylvatica). http://www.euforgen.org/distribution_maps.html, accessed 18 November 2010
  18. Fægri K (1954) On age and origin of the beech forest (Fagus sylvatica L) at Lygrefjorden, near Bergen (Norway). Danm Geol Unders II rk 80:230–249Google Scholar
  19. Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK (2003) Inference of population structure: extensions to linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 164:1567–1587PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Giesecke T, Hickler T, Kunkel T, Sykes MT, Bradshaw RHW (2007) Towards an understanding of the Holocene distribution of Fagus sylvatica L. J Biogeogr 34:118–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Godinho R, Crespo EG, Ferrand N (2008) The limits of the mtDNA phylogeography: complex patterns of population history in highly structured Iberian lizard only revealed by the use of nuclear markers. Mol Ecol 17:4670–4683PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gömöry D, Paule L, Shvadchak IM, Popescu F, Suskowska M, Hynek V, Longauer R (2003) Spatial patterns of the genetic differentiation in European beech (Fagus sylvatica L) at allozyme loci in the Carpathians and the adjacent regions. Silvae Genet 52:78–83Google Scholar
  23. Grivet D, Heinze B, Vendramin GG, Petit RJ (2001) Genome walking with consensus primers: application to the large single copy region of chloroplast DNA. Mol Ecol Notes 1:345–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hafsten U (1956) Pollen-analytical investigations on the late Quaternary development in the inner Oslofjord area. Årbok for Universitetet i Bergen, AS John Griegs trykkeriGoogle Scholar
  25. Hamrick JL, Nason JD (1996) Consequences of dispersal in plants. In: Rhodes E, Chesser RK, Smith MH (eds) Population dynamics in ecological space and time. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  26. Henningsmoen KE (1988) The beech forest in Larvik—a pollen analytic investigation. Blyttia 46:203–207Google Scholar
  27. Hewitt GM (1999) Post-glacial re-colonisation of European biota. Biol J Linn Soc 68:87–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hilfiker K, Gugerli F, Schütz J-P, Rotach P, Holdegger R (2004) Low RAPD variation and female-based sex ratio indicate genetic drift in small populations of the dioecious conifer Taxus baccata in Switzerland. Conservat Genet 5:357–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Holsinger KE, Lewis PO (2003) Software for analysis of geographic structure in genetic data. Hickory v 0.8. http://darwin.eeb.uconn.edu/hickory/software.html, accessed 18 November 2010
  30. Holsinger KE, Wallace LE (2004) Bayesian approaches for the analysis of population genetic structure: an example from Platanthera leucophaea (Orchidaceae). Mol Ecol 13:887–894PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Höltken AM, Tähtinen J, Pappinen A (2003) Effects of discontinuous marginal habitats on the genetic structure of common ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.). Silvae Genet 52:206–212Google Scholar
  32. Hultén E (1971) Atlas of the distribution of vascular plants in northwestern Europe. Generalstabens Litagrafiska Anstalts Förlag, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  33. Hultén E, Fries M (1986) Atlas of North European vascular plants north of the Tropic of Cancer. Koeltz Scientific Books, KönigsteinGoogle Scholar
  34. Ilkjær J (2000) Den første Norgeshistorien. Illerupfunnet: Ny innsikt i skandinavisk romertid. Kulturhistorisk Forlag ASGoogle Scholar
  35. Jerpåsen GB (1996) Gunnerød En arkeologisk landskapsanalyse Varia 35. Universitetets Oldsaksamling, OsloGoogle Scholar
  36. Johnson WC, Adkisson CS, Crow TR, Dixon MD (1997) Nut caching by blue jays (Cyanocitta cristata L.): implications for tree demography. Am Midl Nat 138:357–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jump AS, Penuelas J (2007) Extensive spatial genetic structure revealed by AFLP but not SSR molecular markers in the wind-pollinated tree, Fagus sylvatica. Mol Ecol 16:925–936PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kalinowski ST (2009) How well do evolutionary trees describe genetic relationships between populations? Heredity 102:506–513PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Karhu A, Hurme P, Karjalainen M, Karvonen P, Kärkkäinen K, Neale D, Savolainen O (1996) Do molecular markers reflect patterns of differentiation in adaptive traits of conifers? Theor Appl Genet 93:215–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Keene D (1976) The late Saxon ‘Burh’. In: Biddle M (ed) Winchester Studies I. Winchester in the early Middle Ages. Claredon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  41. Krag C (2003) The early unification of Norway. In: Helle K (ed) The Cambridge history of Scandinavia, volume I. Cambridge University Press, pp 186–188Google Scholar
  42. Kunstler T, Curt T, Lepart J (2004) Spatial pattern of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) and oak (Quercus pubescens) seedlings in natural pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) woodlands. Eur J For Res 123:331–337Google Scholar
  43. Küster H (1997) The role of farming in the postglacial expansion of beech and hornbeam in the oak woodlands of central Europe. Holocene 7:239–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Larsen AB (1996) Genetic structure of populations of beech (Fagus sylvatica L) in Denmark. Scand J For Res 11:220–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Magri D (2008) Patterns of post-glacial spread and the extent of glacial refugia of European beech (Fagus sylvatica). J Biogeogr 35:450–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Magri D, Vendramin GG, Comps B, Dupanloup I, Geburek T, Gömöry D, Latalowa M, Litt T, Paule L, Roure JM, Tantau I, van der Knaap WO, Petit RJ, de Beaulieu JL (2006) A new scenario for the quaternary history of European beech populations: palaeobotanical evidence and genetic consequences. New Phytol 171:199–221PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Miller MP (1997) Tools for population genetic analysis (TFPGA) 1.3: a Windows program for the analysis of allozyme and molecular population genetic data. http://www.marksgeneticsoftware.net, accessed 18 November 2010
  48. Mort ME, Crawford DJ, Santos-Guerra A, Francisco-Ortega J, Esselman EJ, Wolfe AD (2003) Relationships among the Macaronesian members of Tolpis (Asteraceae: Lactuceae) based upon analyses of inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers. Taxon 52:511–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nei M (1973) Analysis of genetic diversity in subdivided populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 70:3321–3323PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nei M (1978) Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89:583–590PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Nei M, Maruyama T, Chakraborty R (1975) The bottleneck effect and genetic variability in populations. Evolution 29:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Nilsson SG (1985) Ecological and evolutionary interactions between reproduction of beech Fagus sylvatica and seed eating animals. Oikos 44:157–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Øyen BH (2010) Høydebonitet og produksjonsevne ved konvertering mellom gran, ask, bøk, eik, platanlønn og svartor i Sør-Norge. Forskning fra Skog og landskap (in press)Google Scholar
  54. Page RDM (1996) TREEVIEW: an application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Comput Appl Biosci 12:357–358PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Peterken GF (1996) Natural woodland: ecology and conservation in northern temperate regions. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  56. Petit RJ, Duminil J, Fineschi S, Hampe A, Salvini D, Vendramin GG (2005) Comparative organisation of chloroplast, mitochondrial and nuclear diversity in plant populations. Mol Ecol 14:689–701PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Skre D (2007) Towns and markets, kings and central places in south-western Scandinavia c. AD 800–950. In: Skre D (ed) Kaupang in Skiringssal. Kaupang excavation project publication series, volume I; Norske Oldfunn XXII. Aarhus University Press, Aarhus, pp 445–470Google Scholar
  59. Sørensen R, Henningsmoen KE, Høeg HI, Stabell B, Bukholm KM (2007) Geology, soils, vegetation and sea levels in the Kaupang area. In: Skre D (ed) Kaupang in Skiringssal. Kaupang excavation project publication series, volume I; Norske Oldfunn XXII. Aarhus University Press, Aarhus, pp 251–272Google Scholar
  60. Sturluson S (1941) Heimskringla (Íslenzk fornrit) XXVI bindi Heimskringla I. Aðalbjarnarson, ReykjavikGoogle Scholar
  61. Taberlet PT, Fumagalli L, Wust-Saucy AG, Cosson JF (1998) Comparative phylogeography and postglacial colonisation routes in Europe. Mol Ecol 7:453–464PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Tamaki I, Setsuko S, Tomaru N (2008) Genetic variation and differentiation in populations of a threatened tree, Magnolia stellata: factors influencing the level of within-population genetic variation. Heredity 100:415–423PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tantasawat P, Trongchuen J, Prajongjai T, Seehalak W, Jittayasothorn Y (2010) Variety identification and comparative analysis of genetic diversity in yardlong bean (Vigna unguiculata spp. sesquipedalis) using morphological characters, SSR and ISSR analysis. Sci Hortic 124:204–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tsumura Y, Ohba K, Strauss SH (1996) Diversity and inheritance of inter-simple sequence repeat polymorphisms in Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) and sugi (Cryptomeria japonica). Theor Appl Genet 92:40–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Vander Wall SB (2001) The evolutionary ecology of nut dispersal. Bot Rev 67:74–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Vornam B, Herzog S (2004) Spatial distribution of genetic variation in a natural beech stand (Fagus sylvatica L) based on microsatellite markers. Conservat Genet 5:561–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Yap IV, Nelson RJ (1996) WINBOOT: a program for performing bootstrap analysis of binary data to determine the confidence limits of UPGMA-based dendrograms. IRRI discussion paper series no. 14, International Rice Research Institute, Manila. http://www.riceworld.org/science/software/winboot.asp, accessed 18 November 2010
  68. Yeh FC, Yang RC, Boyle T (1999) POPGENE version 1.31. Microsoft Windows-based freeware for population genetic analysis. Quick user guide. University of Alberta and Centre for International Forestry Research. http://www.ualberta.ca/∼fyeh/popgene.pdf, accessed 18 November 2010
  69. Yin T, Zhang X, Huang M, Wang M, Zhuge Q, Tu S, Zhu LH, Wu R (2002) Molecular linkage maps of the Populus genome. Genome 45:541–555PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Forest Biology and EnvironmentNorwegian Forest and Landscape InstituteBergenNorway
  2. 2.Department of Forest Biology and EnvironmentNorwegian Forest and Landscape InstituteÅsNorway
  3. 3.CMS—Centre for Medieval StudiesUniversity of BergenBergenNorway

Personalised recommendations