Important processes during differentiation and early development of somatic embryos of Norway spruce as revealed by changes in global gene expression
- 381 Downloads
The aim of this study has been to identify important processes that regulate early stages of embryo development in conifers. Somatic embryogenesis in Picea abies has become a model system for studying embryology in conifers, providing a well-characterized sequence of developmental stages, resembling zygotic embryogeny, which can be synchronized by specific treatments, making it possible to collect a large number of somatic embryos at specific developmental stages. We have used this model to analyze global changes in gene expression during early stages of embryo development by generating an expression profile of 12,536 complementary DNA clones. This has allowed us to identify molecular events regulating putative processes associated with pattern formation during the earliest stages of embryogenesis which have not been identified on the molecular level in conifers before. We recognize notable changes in the expression of genes involved in regulating auxin biosynthesis and auxin response, gibberellin-mediated signaling, signaling between the embryo and the female gametophyte, tissue specification including the formation of boundary regions, and the switch from embryonic to vegetative development. In addition, our results confirm the involvement of previously described processes, including stress, differentiation of a protoderm, and programmed cell death.
KeywordsConifer Early embryogeny Late embryogeny Microarray Norway spruce Somatic embryogenesis
We are grateful to Robin Buell at TIGR for conducting microarray assays and to Adam Ameur for helping with the microarray analysis. The work was supported by grants from the Swedish Research Council, the Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning (SvA), and National Science Foundation (No 0543503, JC).
- Kunieda T, Mitsuda N, Ohme-Takagi M, Takeda S, Aida M, Tasaka M, Kondo M, Nishimura M, Hara-Nishimura I (2008) NAC family proteins NARS1/NAC2 and NARS2/NAM in the outer integument regulate embryogenesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 20:2631–2642. doi: 10.1105/tpc.108.060160 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Navarro C, Efremova N, Golz JF, Rubiera R, Kuckenberg M, Castillo R, Tietz O, Saedler H, Schwarz-Sommer Z (2004) Molecular and genetic interactions between STYLOSA and GRAMINIFOLIA in the control of Antirrhinum vegetative and reproductive development. Development 131:3649–3659PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sahlén K (1992) Anatomical and physiological ripening of Pinus sylvestris L. seeds in northern Fennoscandia. Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet, UppsalaGoogle Scholar
- Singh H (1978) Embryology of conifers. In: Zimmermann O, Carlquist S, Ozenda P, Wulff HD (eds) Handbuch der Pflanzenanatomie. Gerbruder Borntraeger, Berlin, pp 187–241Google Scholar
- van Zyl L, von Arnold S, Bozhkov P, Chen Y, Egertsdotter U, Mackay J, Sederoff RR, Shen J, Zelena L, Clapham DH (2002) Heterologous array analysis in pinaceae: hybridization of Pinus taeda cDNA arrays with cDNA from needles and embryogenic cultures of P. taeda, P. sylvestris or Picea abies. Comp Funct Genomics 3:306–318. doi: 10.1002/cfg.199 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Vandesompele J, De Preter K, Pattyn F, Poppe B, Van Roy N, De Paepe A, Speleman F (2002) Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol 3:RESEARCH0034Google Scholar
- Wadenbäck J, von Arnold S, Egertsdotter U, Walter MH, Grima-Pettenati J, Goffner D, Gellerstedt G, Gullion T, Clapham D (2008) Lignin biosynthesis in transgenic Norway spruce plants harboring an antisense construct for cinnamoyl CoA reductase (CCR). Transgenic Res 17:379–392. doi: 10.1007/s11248-007-9113-z PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wiweger M, Farbos I, Ingouff M, Lagercrantz U, Von Arnold S (2003) Expression of Chia4-Pa chitinase genes during somatic and zygotic embryo development in Norway spruce (Picea abies): similarities and differences between gymnosperm and angiosperm class IV chitinases. J Exp Bot 54:2691–2699. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erg299 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar