Advertisement

Tree Genetics & Genomes

, Volume 4, Issue 3, pp 509–518 | Cite as

Preliminary results from five generations of a western redcedar (Thuja plicata) selection study with self-mating

  • J. H. RussellEmail author
  • D. C. Ferguson
Original Paper

Abstract

A western redcedar selection study with self-mating was initiated using an accelerated breeding cycle, such that five generations were completed in 10 years. Thirty random and 30 selected lines for height, from 15 unrelated full-sib families (S0; inbreeding coefficient F = 0) were the founders for the subsequent selfed lines (S1 to S4; F = 0.5 to 0.9375, respectively). Of the original 60 lines, 50 were still in existence at the S4 generation. Random extinct lines and replacement seedlings resulted either from a lack of mature cones or filled seed, whereas selected line extinctions and replacements were mostly due to a lack of filled seed. Approximately 47% of parent-trees in the S4 generation displayed temporal separation of male and female function, as opposed to 7% in the S0. Observed response to selection in height was approximately 21% after four generations. There were no significant reductions in seed weight or vigor across generations, and these traits were not correlated with selection height. Results are discussed in relation to the general influences of inbreeding and random genetic drift on response to the selection and incorporation of selfing into tree-breeding strategies.

Keywords

Seed Weight Inbreeding Depression Random Genetic Drift Mature Cone Selfed Generation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Barker JE, Libby J (1974) The use of selfing in selection of forest trees. J Genet 61:152–168Google Scholar
  2. Barrett SCH (2003) Mating strategies in flowering plants: the outcrossing-selfing paradigm and beyond. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 358(1434):991–1004PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barrett SCH, Charlesworth D (1991) Effects of a change in the level of inbreeding on the genetic load. Nature 352:522–524PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bertin RI (1993) Incidence of monoecy and dichogamy in relation to self-fertilization in angiosperms. Am J Bot 80:557–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonnet-Masimbmert TA, Zaerr JB (1987) The role of plant growth regulators in promotion of flowering. Plant Growth Regul 6(1–2):13–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burdon RD, Namkoong G (1983) Multiple populations and sublines. Silvae Genet 32:221–222Google Scholar
  7. Carr DE, Dudash MR (1997) The effects of five generations of enforced selfing on potential male and female function in Mimulus guttatus. Evolution 51:1797–1807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B (1987) Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Ann Rev Ecolog Syst 18:237–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cherry ML (1995) Genetic variation in western redcedar (Thuja plicata Donn) seedlings. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BCGoogle Scholar
  10. Comai L, Henikoff S (2006) TILLING: practical single-nucleotide mutation discovery. Plant J 45(4):684–694PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dudash MR, Carr DE, Fenster CB (1997) Five generations of enforced selfing and outcrossing in Mimulus guttatus: inbreeding depression at the population and family level. Evolution 51:54–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Durel CE, Bertin P, Kremer A (1996) Relationship between inbreeding depression and inbreeding coefficient in maritime pine (Pinus pinaster). Theor Appl Genet 92:347–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Edwards JW, Lamkey KR (2002) Quantitative genetics of inbreeding in a synthetic maize population. Crop Sci 42:1094–1104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. El-Kassaby YA (1999) Phenotypic plasticity in western redcedar. For Genet 6(4):235–240Google Scholar
  15. El-Kassaby YA, Russell J, Ritland K (1994) Mixed mating in an experimental population of western red cedar, Thuja plicata. J Heredity 85:227–231Google Scholar
  16. Falconer DS, MacKay TFC (1996) Introduction to quantitative genetics, 4th ed. Longman, Harlow, UKGoogle Scholar
  17. Fu YB (1999) Patterns of the purging of deleterious genes with synergistic interactions in different breeding schemes. Theor Appl Genet 98:337–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fu YB, Namkoong G, Carlson JE (1998) Comparison of breeding strategies for purging inbreeding depression via simulation. Conserv Biol 12:856–864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Griffin AR, Cotterill PP (1988) Genetic variation in growth of outcrossed, selfed and open-pollinated progenies of Eucalyptus regnans and some implications for breeding strategy. Silvae Genet 37:124–131Google Scholar
  20. Hackett WP (1985) Juvenility, maturation, and rejuvenation in woody plants. Hortic Rev 7:109–155Google Scholar
  21. Hallauer RA, Miranda JB (1988) Quantitative genetics in breeding. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IAGoogle Scholar
  22. Hardner CM, Potts BM (1994) Inbreeding depression and changes in variation after selfing in Eucalyptus globulus ssp. globulus. Silvae Genet 44:46–54Google Scholar
  23. Hedrick PW (1994) Purging inbreeding depression and the probability of extinction: full-sib mating. Heredity 73:363–372PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hill WG, Caballero A (1992) Artificial selection experiments. Ann Rev Ecolog Syst 23:287–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Husband BC, Schemske DW (1996) Evolution of the magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in plants. Evolution 50:54–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kristensen TN, Sorensen AC, Sorensen D, Pedersen KS, Sorensen JG, Loeschcke V (2005) A test of quantitative genetic theory using Drosophila—effects of inbreeding and rate of inbreeding on heritabilities and variance components. J Evol Biol 18:763–770PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lande R, Schemske DW (1985) The evolution of self fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. I. Genetic models. Evolution 39:24–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lindgren D (1975) Use of selfed material in forest tree improvement. Royal College of Forestry, Stockholm, Research Notes 15Google Scholar
  29. Lynch M, Walsh B (1998) Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer, Sunderland, MAGoogle Scholar
  30. Mackay IJ, Gibson JP (1993) The effect of gametic-phase disequilibrium on the prediction of response to recurrent selection in plants. Theor Appl Genet 87:152–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McCallum CM, Comai L, Greene EA, Henikoff S (2000) Targeted screening for induced mutations. Nat Biotechnol 18:455–457PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McKeand SE, Bridgwater FE (1998) A strategy for the third breeding cycle of loblolly pine in the Southeastern US. Silvae Genet 47:223–234Google Scholar
  33. O’Connell LM, Viard F, Russell J, Ritland K (2001) The mating system in natural populations of western redcedar (Thuja plicata). Can J Bot 79:753–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Orr-Ewing AL (1965) Inbreeding and single crossing in Douglas-fir. For Sci 11:279–290Google Scholar
  35. Orr-Ewing AL (1976) Inbreeding Douglas-fir to the S3 generation. Silvae Genet 25(5/6):179Google Scholar
  36. Owens JN, Colangeli AM, Morris SJ (1990) The effect of self-, cross-, and no pollination on ovule, embryo, seed, and cone development in western red cedar (Thuja plicata). Can J For Res 20:66–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pharis RP (1974) Precocious flowering in conifers: the role of plant hormones. In: Ledig FT (ed) Toward the future forest: applying physiology and genetics to the domestication of trees. Yale Univesity School of Forestry and Environmental Studies Bulletin No. 85, pp 51–80 (Invited paper)Google Scholar
  38. Pharis RP (1976) Manipulation of flowering in conifers through the use of plant hormones. In: Miksche JP (ed) Modern methods in forest genetics. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  39. Pharis RP, Morf W (1968) Physiology of gibberellin-induced flowering in conifers. In: Wightman EF (ed) Biochemistry and physiology of plant growth substances. Runge, Ottawa, ON, pp 1341–1356Google Scholar
  40. Pharis RP, Morf W, Owens JN (1969) Development of the gibberellin induced ovulate strobilus of western redcedar: quantitative requirement for long day→short day→long day. Can J Bot 47:415–420Google Scholar
  41. Pharis RP, Ruddat MDE, Glenn JL, Morf W (1970) A quantitative requirement for long day induction of staminate strobili by gibberellin in conifer Cupressus arizonica. Can J Bot 48(3):653–658Google Scholar
  42. Pharis RP, King RW (1985) Gibberellins and reproductive development in seed plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 36:517–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ritland K (1996) Inferring the genetic basis of inbreeding depression in plants. Genome 39:1–8CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Ritland K, Brown P, Wigmore B, Russell J (2004) Controlling selfing rates in seed orchard populations of western redcedar. In: Forest Genetic Council of BC Tree Improvement Program Project Report 2003/2004Google Scholar
  45. Routley MB, Bertin RI, Husband BC (2004) Correlated evolution of dichogamy and self-incompatibility: a phylogenetic perspective. Int J Plant Sci 165(6):983–993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rudolph TD (1981) Four-year height growth variation among and within S0, S1, XS1, S1 open-pollinated and S2 inbred jack pine families. Can J For Res 11:654–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Russell JH (2006) Western redcedar breeding program. Operational Tree improvement Program Annual Report, B.C. Ministry of Forests, Victoria, BCGoogle Scholar
  48. Russell JH (2007) Deployment of deer resistant western redcedar seedlots. Proceedings of Forest Nursery Association of B.C. and Western Forestry Conservation and Nursery Association (in press)Google Scholar
  49. Russell JH, Burdon R, Yanchuk AD (2003) Inbreeding depression and variance structures for height and adaptation in self- and outcross Thuja plicata families in varying environments. For Genet 10(3):171–184Google Scholar
  50. SAS Institute Inc (1999) SAS/STAT Software: Version 8. SAS Institute, Cary, NCGoogle Scholar
  51. Shaw DV (1997) Trait mean depression for second-generation inbred strawberry populations with and without parental selection. Theor Appl Genet 95:261–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sniezko RA, Zobel BJ (1988) Seedling height and diameter variation of various degrees of inbred and outcross progenies of loblolly pine. Silvae Genet 37:50–59Google Scholar
  53. Sorensen FC, Miles RS (1982) Inbreeding depression in height, height growth and survival of Douglas-fir, ponderosa pine and noble fir to 10 years of age. For Sci 28:283–292Google Scholar
  54. Souza CL, Geraldi IO, Vencovsky R (2000) Response to selection under small effective population size. Genet Mol Biol 23(4):841–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wang TL, Hagqvist R, Tigerstedt PMA (1996) Growth performance of hybrid families by crossing selfed lines of Betula pendula Roth. Theor Appl Genet 92:471–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wang T, Hagqvist R, Tigerstedt PMA (1999) Inbreeding depression in three generations of selfed families of silver birch (Betula pendula). Can J For Res 29:662–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wang T, Russell JH (2006) Evaluation of selfing effects on western redcedar growth in operational plantations using tree and stand simulator (TASS). For Sci 52(3):281–289Google Scholar
  58. Williams CG, Savolainen O (1996) Inbreeding depression in conifers: Implications for breeding strategy. For Sci 42(1):102–117Google Scholar
  59. Woods JH, Heaman JC (1989) Effect of different inbreeding levels on filled seed production in Douglas-fir. Can J For Res 19(1):54–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wright S (1977) Evolution and the genetics of populations. III. Experimental results and evolutionary deductions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  61. Wu HX, Owen JV, Abarquez A, Matheson AC (2004) Inbreeding in Pinus radiata—V. The effects of inbreeding on fecundity. Silvae Genet 53(2):80–87Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research BranchBritish Columbia Ministry of Forests and LandsMesachie LakeCanada

Personalised recommendations