Advertisement

International Advances in Economic Research

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 1–18 | Cite as

Institutional Constraints and the Forest Transition in Tropical Developing Countries

  • Edward B. BarbierEmail author
Article

Abstract

The forest transition describes a reversal or turnaround in long-run land-use trends for a country or region from a period of net forest area loss to net gain. Following North, this paper constructs a model to show that effective institutions may impose additional costs on a representative economic agent converting forests to agriculture in a tropical developing country. The main outcome to emerge from the model is that an improvement in institutions accelerates the onset of a forest transition. This hypothesis is tested by examining the probability of a forest transition occurring for 101 tropical developing countries over 1990 to 2015. The empirical results suggest that the hypothesis cannot be fully rejected. However, not all the institutional indicators analyzed affect the likelihood of the forest transition, and one economy-wide indicator appears to delay the transition. Nevertheless, the results illustrate the importance of understanding how institutional indicators affect the decisions of economic agents concerning land clearing as well as forest management practices and policies.

Keywords

Developing countries Forest policy Forest transition Tropical deforestation 

JEL Classification

Q23 Q24 O13 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Paper presented at the 85th International Atlantic Economic Conference, London, United Kingdom, 14-17 March 2018. I am grateful for comments provided by Keisaku Higashida, Don Larson and session participants.

Supplementary material

11294_2019_9725_MOESM1_ESM.docx (18 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 18 kb)

References

  1. Agrawal, A., Chhatre, A., & Hardin, R. (2008). Changing governance of the world’s forests. Science, 320(5882), 1460–1462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Angelsen, A., & Rudel, T. K. (2013). Designing and implementing effective REDD+ policies: A Forest transition approach. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 7(1), 91–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barbier, E. B. (2002). Institutional constraints and deforestation: An application to Mexico. Economic Inquiry, 40(3), 508–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barbier, E. B., Damania, R., & Leonard, D. (2005). Corruption, trade, and resource conversion. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 50(2), 276–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barbier, E. B., Delacote, P., & Wolfersberger, J. (2017). The economic analysis of the forest transition: A review. Journal of Forest Economics, 27(April), 10–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Busch, J., & Ferretti-Gallon, K. (2017). What drives deforestation and what stops it? A meta-analysis. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 11(1), 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carrasco, L. R., Nghiem, T. P. L., Chen, Z., & Barbier, E. B. (2017). Unsustainable development pathways caused by tropical deforestation. Science Advances, 3(7), e1602602 http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/advances/3/7/e1602602.full.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chomitz, K. M., Buys, P., De Luca, G., Thomas, T. S., & Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S. (2007). At loggerheads? Agricultural expansion, poverty reduction, and environment in the tropical forests. Washington DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  9. Cropper, M., Puri, J., & Griffiths, C. (2001). Predicting the location of deforestation: The role of roads and protected areas in North Thailand. Land Economics, 77(2), 172–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Damania, R., Russ, J., Wheeler, D., & Barra, A. F. (2018). The road to growth: Measuring the tradeoff between economic growth and ecological destruction. World Development, 101(January), 351–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Deng, X., Huang, J., Uchida, E., Rozelle, S., & Gibson, J. (2011). Pressure cookers or pressure valves: Do roads lead to deforestation in China? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 61(1), 79–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2015). Global forest resources assessment 2015. FAO, Rome. http://www.fao.org/forest-resources-assessment/past-assessments/fra-2015/en/ Accessed 1 Feb 2018.
  13. Gibbs, H. K., Ruesch, A. S., Achard, F., Clayton, M. K., Holmgren, P., Ramankutty, N., & Foley, J. A. (2010). Tropical forests were the primary sources of new agricultural lands in the 1980s and 1990s. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(38), 16732–16737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hosonuma, N., Herold, M., De Sy, V., DeFries, R. S., Brockhaus, M., Verchot, L., Angelsen, A., & Romijn, E. (2012). An assessment of deforestation and forest degradation drivers in developing countries. Environmental Research Letters, 7(4), 044009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi,M. (2010). The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and analytical issues. World Bank policy research working paper No. 5430, The World Bank, Washington D.C. http://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/3913/WPS5430.pdf?sequence=1
  16. Keenan, R. J., Reams, G. A., Achard, F., de Freitas, J. V., Grainger, A., & Lindquist, E. (2015). Dynamics of global forest area: Results from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015. Forest Ecology and Management, 352(September), 9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kuusela, O.-P., & Amacher, G. S. (2016). Changing political regimes and tropical deforestation. Environmental and Resource Economics, 64(3), 445–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lambin, E. F., & Meyfroidt, P. (2011). Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(9), 3465–3472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Liscow, Z. (2013). Do property rights promote investment but cause deforestation? Quasi-experimental evidence from Nicaragua. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 65(2), 241–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mather, A. S. (1992). The forest transition. Area, 24(4), 367–379.Google Scholar
  21. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), Trade and Agriculture Directorate. (2018). Country risk classification. OECD, Paris. http://www.oecd.org/tad/xcred/crc.htm. Accessed 1 Feb 2018.
  23. Pfaff, A., Robalino, J., Walker, R., Aldrich, S., Caldas, M., Reis, E., Perz, S., Bohrer, C., Arima, E., Laurance, W., & Kirby, K. (2007). Road investments, spatial spillovers, and deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Journal of Regional Science, 47(1), 109–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rudel, T. K. (2007). Changing agents of deforestation: From state initiated to enterprise driven processes, 1970-2000. Land Use Policy, 24(1), 35–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wolfersberger, J., Delacote, P., & Garcia, S. (2015). An empirical analysis of forest transition and land-use change in developing countries. Ecological Economics, 119(November), 241–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. World Bank. (2016). Worldwide Governance Indicators. World Bank Washington, D.C. http://databank.worldbank.org/data/reports.aspx?source=worldwide-governance-indicators. Accessed 2 Feb 2018.
  27. World Bank. (2018). World Development Indicators. World Bank, Washington, D.C. http://databank.worldbank.org/data/reports.aspx?source=world-development-indicators. Accessed 2 Feb 2018.

Copyright information

© International Atlantic Economic Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsColorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA

Personalised recommendations