Advertisement

Board Diversity and Performance of Philippine Firms: Do Women Matter?

  • Angelo A. UniteEmail author
  • Michael J. Sullivan
  • Ailyn A. Shi
Article
  • 10 Downloads

Abstract

The issue of gender diversity on corporate boards is attracting research interest because of purported contributions of women directors, including improved monitoring, ethical focus, and democratic leadership. This rationale forms part of the economic case for women’s participation on corporate boards, as opposed to alternative arguments based on social or equality considerations. In this study, we examined the effect of board diversity for Philippine firms during the period 2003 to 2014. Using an unbalanced panel of 2648 firm-years, we found that greater board diversity did not significantly affect either short-term firm performance or long-term firm value. Our findings show that female and male corporate leaders have comparable competency levels and that increasing women’s presence on corporate boards has no discernible effect on firm performance.

Keywords

Gender diversity Boards of directors Corporate governance Firm performance Emerging markets 

JEL Classification

G15 G30 O53 

Notes

References

  1. Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahern, K., & Dittmar, A. (2012). The changing of the boards: The impact on firm valuation of mandated female board representation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127(1), 137–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amaram, D. I. (2007). Cultural diversity: Implications for workplace management. Journal of Diversity Management, 2(4), 1–6.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. The Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1301–1328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barontini, R., & Caprio, L. (2006). The effect of family control on firm value and performance: Evidence from continental Europe. European Financial Management, 12(5), 689–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berger, P. G., & Ofek, E. (1995). Diversification’s effect on firm value. Journal of Financial Economics, 37(1), 39–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blau, P. M. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bureau van Dijk. (2003-2014). Osiris Database. https://www.bvdinfo.com/en-gb/our-products/data/international/osiris. Accessed October 2015.
  9. Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2003). Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. Financial Review, 38(1), 33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Catalyst. (2017). Quick take: Women on corporate boards globally. New York: Catalyst https://www.catalyst.org/knowledge/women-corporate-boards-globally. Accessed 15 May 2017.Google Scholar
  11. Choudhury, B. (2014). New rationales for women on boards. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 34(3), 511–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Claessens, S., & Yurtoglu, B. B. (2013). Corporate governance in emerging markets: A survey. Emerging Markets Review, 15, 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Claessens, S., Djankov, S., & Lang, L. (2000). The separation of ownership and control in east Asian corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1–2), 81–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 448–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Darmadi, S. (2011). Board diversity and firm performance: The Indonesian evidence. Corporate Ownership and Control Journal, 8, 450–467.Google Scholar
  16. Dobbin, F., & Jung, J. (2010). Corporate board gender diversity and stock performance: The competence gap or institutional investor bias. North Carolina Law Review, 89, 809–838.Google Scholar
  17. Erhardt, N. L., Werbel, J. D., & Shrader, C. B. (2003). Board of director diversity and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11(2), 102–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ernst, & Young. (2015). Women on US Boards: What are we seeing? EY Center for Boards Matter: Ernst & Young LLP Available at https://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/EY_-_Women_on_US_boards:_what_are_we_seeing/$FILE/EY-women-on-us-boards-what-are-we-seeing.pdf. Accessed 4 March 2015.
  19. Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Farrell, K. A., & Hersch, P. L. (2005). Additions to corporate boards: The effect of gender. Journal of Corporate Finance, 11(1–2), 85–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fogel, K., Ma, L., & Morck, R. (2014). Powerful independent directors. National Bureau of Economic Research, Available at: https://www.nber.org/papers/w19809.
  22. Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (2003). Boards of directors as an endogenously determined institution: A survey of the economic literature. Economic Policy Review, 9(1) April 2003.Google Scholar
  23. Jaggi, B., Leung, S., & Gul, F. (2009). Family control, board independence and earnings management: Evidence based on Hong Kong firms. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 28(4), 281–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. LaPorta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. The Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Li, J., Lam, K., & Fu, P. P. (2000). Family-oriented collectivism and its effect on firm performance: A comparison between overseas Chinese and foreign firms in China. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 8(4), 364–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Loderer, C., & Waelchli, U. (2010). Firm age and performance. MPRA Paper No 26450 https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/26450/1/MPRA_paper_26450.pdf, Accessed 30 April 2010.
  27. Millstein, I., & MacAvoy, P. (1998). The active board of directors and performance of the large publicly traded corporation. Columbia Law Review, 98(5), 1283–1322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Palvia, A., Vähämaa, E., & Vähämaa, S. (2015). Are female CEOs and chairwomen more conservative and risk averse? Evidence from the banking industry during the financial crisis. Journal of Business Ethics, 131(3), 577–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Philippines Stock Exchange. (2003-2014a). Annual Reports, http://edge.pse.com.ph/companyDisclosures/form.do?cmpy_id=29, Accessed July 2015.
  30. Philippines Stock Exchange. (2003-2014b). Ownership Reports, http://edge.pse.com.ph/companyDisclosures/form.do?cmpy_id=29, Accessed July 2015.
  31. Rajan, R. G., & Zingales, L. (2003). The great reversals: The politics of financial development in the twentieth century. Journal of Financial Economics, 69(1), 5–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Roodman, D. (2006). How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. The Stata Journal, 9(1), 86–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rose, C. (2007). Does female board representation influence firm performance? The Danish evidence. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(2), 404–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shannon, C. E. (2001). A mathematical theory of communication. ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review, 5(1), 3–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Singh, V., & Vinnicombe, S. (2004). Why so few women directors in top UK boardrooms? Evidence and theoretical explanations. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12(4), 479–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Solal, I., Snellman, K. E., & Uhlmann, E. L. (2015). Women Don’t mean business? Gender penalty in board appointments. In Academy of Management Proceedings, 2015(1), Academy of Management. New York: Briarcliff Manor.Google Scholar
  37. Thomas, A. (2001). Women at the top in British retailing: A longitudinal analysis. Service Industries Journal, 21(3), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Unite, A. A., Sullivan, M. J., Brookman, J., Majadillas, M. A., & Taningco, A. (2008). Executive pay and firm performance in the Philippines. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 16(5), 606–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Unite, A. A., Sullivan, M. J., & Shi, A. A. (2015). Women on top: Diversity in gender and education profiles of top management and board of directors of Philippine publicly traded firms. Angelo King Institute Working Paper Series, 34 https://dlsu-aki.weebly.com/uploads/1/0/2/2/102266760/2015-33.pdf. Accessed Dec 2015.
  40. Yang, C., & Chen, K. (2009). Are small firms less efficient? Small Business Economics, 32, 375–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yermack, D. (1996). Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 40(2), 185–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Atlantic Economic Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EconomicsDe La Salle UniversityManilaPhilippines
  2. 2.Lee Business SchoolUniversity of Nevada, Las VegasLas VegasUSA

Personalised recommendations