Advertisement

Public Support for Innovation in Russian Firms: Looking for Improvements in Corporate Performance Quality

  • Yuri Simachev
  • Mikhail KuzykEmail author
  • Vera Feygina
Article

Abstract

This research focuses on the efficiency of Russia’s policy to foster innovation. We conduct an empirical analysis of how policy instruments impact firms’ behavior. The analytical data are obtained from a survey of more than 650 Russian industrial firms in 2012. The analysis shows that state support for innovation clearly targets successful companies and does not target laggard or insider (i.e., partially state-owned) firms. Comparing innovation effects on firms with and without state support, we found no strong improvement in corporate performance as a result of state-supported innovation. A significant positive correlation with state support existed for only one characteristic of firm performance: export volume. Considering specific effects of tax incentives and public subsidies on companies’ innovation behavior, we found out that direct public funding was more likely to mitigate risk and facilitate the launch of new innovative projects. Simultaneously, both tools lead to public funds crowding out private funds.

Keywords

Innovation Firm behavior Tax incentives Public subsidies and grants Government innovation policy 

JEL Classification

D21 L25 O10 O31 O57 

References

  1. Aschhoff, B. (2010). Who gets the money? the dynamics of R&D project subsidies in Germany. Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik), 230(5), 522–546.Google Scholar
  2. Bérubé, C., & Mohnen, P. (2009). Are firms that receive R&D subsidies more innovative? Canadian Journal of Economics, 42(1), 206–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Busom, I., Corchuelo, B., and Ros, E. (2012). Tax Incentives or Subsidies for R&D? (No. 2012–156). UNU-MERIT Working Paper Series. United Nations University, Maastricht Economic and social Research and training centre on Innovation and Technology. http://collections.unu.edu/eserv/UNU:143/wp2012-056.pdf. Accessed 24 September 2014.
  4. Cappelen, A., Raknerud, A., & Rybalka, M. (2012). The effects of R&D tax credits on patenting and innovations. Research Policy, 41(2), 334–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Catozzella, A. and Vivarelli, M. (2011). Assessing the Impact of Public Support on Innovative Productivity (No. 77). DISCE Working Paper. Universita Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Dipartimenti e Istituti di Scienze Economiche. http://www.unicatt.it/dipartimenti/DISES/allegati/dises1177.pdf. Accessed 31 August 2014.
  6. Colombo, M., Grilli, L., & Murtinu, S. (2011). R&D subsidies and the performance of high-tech start-ups. Economics Letters, 112(1), 97–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crespi, G., Maffiolli, A., and Melendez, M. (2011). Public Support to Innovation: the Colombian COLCIENCIAS’ Experience (No. IDB-TN-264). Inter-American Development Bank, Social Sector Science and Technology Division. http://www.iadb.org/wmsfiles/products/publications/documents/35940030.pdf. Accessed 24 September 2014.
  8. Czarnitzki, D., Hanel, P., & Rosa, J. (2011). Evaluating the impact of R&D tax credits on innovation: a microeconometric study on Canadian firms. Research Policy, 40(2), 217–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. David, P., Hall, B., & Toole, A. (2000). Is public R&D a complement or a substitute for private R&D? a review of the econometric evidence. Research Policy, 29(4–5), 497–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fier, A., and Heneric, O. (2005). Public R&D Policy: The Right Turns of the Wrong Screw? The Case of the German Biotechnology Industry (No. 05–60). ZEW Discussion Papers. ZEW - Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung. http://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/24156/1/dp0560.pdf. Accessed 24 September 2014.
  11. Frye, T. (2002). Capture or exchange? business lobbying in Russia. Europe-Asia Studies, 54(7), 1017–1036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Garcia, A., and Mohnen, P. (2010). Impact of government support on R&D and innovation (No. 210–034). UNU-MERIT Working Paper Series. United Nations University, Maastricht Economic and social Research and training centre on Innovation and Technology. http://www.merit.unu.edu/publications/wppdf/2010/wp2010-034.pdf. Accessed 31 July 2014.
  13. Gok, A., & Edler, J. (2012). The use of behavioural additionality evaluation in innovation policy making. Research Evaluation, 21(4), 306–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Guellec, D., & Van Pottlesberghe, B. (2003). The impact of public R&D expenditure on business R&D. Economics of Innovation and New Technologies, 12(3), 225–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hanel, P. (2003). Impact of government support programs on innovation by Canadian manufacturing firms (No. 04–02). Working Papers, Université de Sherbrooke, Faculté des lettres et sciences humaines. http://gredi.recherche.usherbrooke.ca/wpapers/04_02_ph.pdf Accessed 24 September 2014
  16. Ivanov, D., Kuzyk, M., & Simachev, Y. (2012). Fostering innovation performance of Russian manufacturing enterprises: New opportunities and limitations. Foresight-Russia, 6(2), 18–41 (in Russian).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jaumotte, F., and Pain, N. (2005). An Overview of Public Policies to Support Innovation (No. 456). OECD Economics Department Working Papers, doi:  10.1787/18151973.
  18. Klette, T., Moen, J., & Griliches, Z. (2000). Do subsidies to commercial R&D reduce market failures? microeconometric evaluation studies. Research Policy, 29(4–5), 471–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Köhler, C, Rammer, C., and Larédo, P. (2012). The Impact and Effectiveness of Fiscal Incentives for R&D (No. 12/01). Nesta Working Paper Series. http://www.nesta.org.uk/sites/default/files/the_impact_and_effectiveness_of_fiscal_incentives.pdf. Accessed 24 September 2014.
  20. Lach, S. (2002). Do R&D subsidies stimulate or displace private R&D? evidence from Israel. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 50(4), 369–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lööf, H. and Hesmati, A. (2005). The Impact of Public Funding on Private R&D Investment. New Evidence from a Firm Level Innovation Study (No. 3.2005). MTT Discussion papers, MTT Agrifood Research Finland. http://purl.umn.edu/11862. Accessed 24 September 2014.
  22. Lopez-Acevedo, G. and Tan, H. (2010). Impact Evaluation of SME Programs in Latin America and Caribbean (Report No. 52668-LAC). The World Bank. http://www10.iadb.org/intal/intalcdi/pe/2010/05674.pdf. Accessed 24 September 2014.
  23. OECD (2006). Government R&D Funding and Company Behaviour: Measuring Behavioural Additionality. OECD Publising, doi:  10.1787/9789264025851-en
  24. OECD (2012). OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2012. OECD Publishing, doi:  10.1787/sti_outlook-2012-en
  25. Simachev, Y., Kuzyk, M., & Kuznetsov, B. (2010). Otsenka vozdejstviya razlichnykh antikrizisnykh mer na predpriyatiya obrabatyvayushhej promyshlennosti (evaluation of the effects of different anti-crisis policy tools on manufacturing firms). Ekonomicheskaya politika, 1, 122–134 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  26. Wanzenbock, I., Scherngell, T., and Manfred, F. (2011). How do distinct firm characteristics affect behavioural additionalities of public R&D subsidies? Evidence for the Austrian transport sector. Technovation, doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2012.11.006.

Copyright information

© International Atlantic Economic Society 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Interdepartmental Analytical CenterMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations