International Advances in Economic Research

, Volume 19, Issue 3, pp 289–310 | Cite as

Twin Deficits in the European Countries

Article

Abstract

Public debt is a burden on future electors and taxpayers. In the absence of constitutional constraints, the incumbent government may show the cost of some public expenditures or tax reductions toward the future by financing them via new debt. However, according to the Ricardian theorem of public debt, the burden of debt is always anticipated via increased saving. If this theorem were true, a budget deficit would not affect the current account of the balance of payment. This paper analyzes the relationship between trade deficit and budget deficit. Using yearly data for the period between 1970 and 2010 in 33 European countries, we find evidence supporting the hypothesis that a chronic and robust budget deficit generates a trade deficit. The dynamic estimates show that a 1 % decrease in the government budget surplus/GDP ratio tends to deteriorate the current account/GDP ratio of 0.37 %, confirming previous studies with a different empirical basis. Dividing the sample period into two sub-periods (1970–1991 and 1992–2010), empirical findings show that current and past values of government budget influence trade balance in the first sub-period, whilst past values of government budget affect trade balance in the most recent years. Moreover, the estimated effect of government budget on current account balance is positive and equal to 0.48 and 0.30, respectively. For the high deficit countries, a long-run relationship between these variables has been found, showing that one percentage point increase in budget surplus/GDP ratio is associated with an improvement in the current account balance of roughly 0.15 percentage point. The estimated long-run government budget elasticity is negative and statistically significant, while the estimated speed of adjustment is equal to 0.33. Finally, Granger causality tests show mixed results.

Keywords

Ricardian equivalence Twin deficits European countries Government budget Trade deficit 

JEL

F32 F41 E62 H62 

References

  1. Afonso, A. (2008). Euler testing Ricardo and Barro in the EU. Economics Bulletin, 5(16), 1–14.Google Scholar
  2. Akbostanci, E., & Tunç, G.İ. (2002). Turkish twin deficits: an error correction model of trade balance. Economic Research Center Working Papers, 01/06.Google Scholar
  3. Anoruo, E., & Ramchander, S. (1998). Current account and fiscal deficits: evidence from five developing economies of Asia. Journal of Asian Economics, 9(3), 487–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Antzoulatos, A. A. (2011). Greece in 2010: a tragedy without(?) catharsis. International Advances in Economic Research, 17, 241–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58, 277–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68, 29–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arora, H. K., & Dua, P. (1993). Budget deficits, domestic investment, and trade deficits. Contemporary Policy Issues, 11, 29–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Aschauer, D. A. (1985). Fiscal policy and aggregate demand. The American Economic Review, 75, 117–127.Google Scholar
  9. Baharumshah, A. Z., & Lau, E. (2009). Structural breaks and the twin deficits hypothesis: evidence from East Asian countries. Economics Bulletin, 29(4), 2517–2524.Google Scholar
  10. Barro, R. J. (1974). Are government bonds net wealth? Journal of Political Economy, 82, 1095–1117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Barro, R.J. (1996). Reflections on Ricardian equivalence. NBER Working Papers, 5502.Google Scholar
  12. Bartolini, L., & Lahiri, A. (2006). Twin deficits, twenty years later. Current Issues in Economics and Finance, 12(7), 1–7.Google Scholar
  13. Bernheim, B.D. (1987). Ricardian equivalence: an evaluation of theory and evidence. In S. Fischer (Ed.), NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1987, 2, The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  14. Bernheim, B. D., & Bagwell, K. (1988). Is everything neutral? Journal of Political Economy, 96(2), 308–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87, 115–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brennan, G., & Buchanan, J. M. (1980). The logic of the ricardian equivalence theorem. Finanzarchiv, 38(1), 4–16.Google Scholar
  17. Buchanan, J. M. (1958). Public principles of public debt: a defense and restatement. Illinois: Homewood.Google Scholar
  18. Buchanan, J. M. (1966). The icons of public debt. Journal of Finance, 21, 544–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Buchanan, J. M. (1976). Barro on the Ricardian equivalence theorem. Journal of Political Economy, 84, 337–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Buchanan, J. M. (1986). The economic consequences of the deficit. Economia delle scelte pubbliche, 3, 149–156.Google Scholar
  21. Buchanan, J. M. (1995). Clarifying confusion about the balanced budget amendment. National Tax Journal, 48, 347–355.Google Scholar
  22. Buchanan, J. M. (1999). The collected works of James M. Buchanan, 20 vols. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
  23. Buchanan, J. M., & Tullock, G. (1962). Logical foundations of constitutional democracy. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  24. Buchanan, J. M., & Vanberg, V. (1986). Organization theory and fiscal economics: society, state, and public debt. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 2, 215–227.Google Scholar
  25. Bussière, M., Fratzscher, M., & Müller, G. J. (2005). Productivity shocks, budget deficits and the current account. ECB Working Paper, 509.Google Scholar
  26. Chinn, M., & Prasad, E.S. (2000). Medium-term determinants of current accounts in industrial and developing countries: An empirical exploration. NBER Working Paper, 7581.Google Scholar
  27. Choi, I. (2001). Unit root tests for panel data. Journal of International Money and Finance, 20, 249–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Congressional Budget Office (1989). Policies for reducing the current account deficit. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  29. Daly, V., & Siddiki, J. U. (2009). The twin deficits in OECD countries: cointegration analysis with regime shifts. Applied Economics Letters, 16, 1155–1164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Dewald, W. G., & Ulan, M. (1990). The twin-deficit illusion. Cato Journal, 9(3), 689–707.Google Scholar
  31. Egwaikhide, F. O. (1999). Effects of budget deficit on trade balance in Nigeria: a simulation exercise. African Development Review, 11(2), 265–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Efremidze, L., & Tomohara, A. (2011). Have the implications of twin deficits changed? Sudden stops over decades. International Advances in Economic Research, 17(1), 66–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Elmendorf, D.W., & Mankiw, N.G. (1998). Government debt. Harvard Institute of Economic Research Working Papers, 1820.Google Scholar
  34. Enders, W., & Lee, B.-S. (1990). Current account and budget deficits: twins or distant cousins? The Review of Economics and Statistics, 72(3), 373–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Evans, P. (1988). Are consumers Ricardian? Evidence for the United States. Journal of Political Economy, 96(5), 983–1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Feldstein, M.S. (1992). The budget and trade deficits aren’t really twins. NBER Working Paper, 3966.Google Scholar
  37. Forte, F. (2010). Public economics. A public choice approach. Cheltenham: Elgar.Google Scholar
  38. Forte, F., & Magazzino, C. (2011). Optimal size government and economic growth in EU countries. Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, XXVIII(3), 295–321.Google Scholar
  39. Gale, W. G., & Orszag, P. R. (2003). Economic effects of sustained budget deficits. National Tax Journal, 56, 463–485.Google Scholar
  40. Giorgioni, G., & Holden, K. (2003). Does the Ricardian equivalence proposition hold in less developed countries? International Review of Applied Economics, 17(2), 209–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Griziotti, B. (1912). Considerazioni sui metodi limiti e problemi della scienza pura delle finanze e diritto finanziario. Roma.Google Scholar
  42. Gruber, J. W., & Kamin, S. B. (2007). Explaining the global pattern of current account imbalances. Journal of International Money and Finance, 26(4), 500–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hansen, H., & Tarp, F. (2001). Aid and growth regressions. Journal of Development Economics, 64, 547–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hashemzadeh, N., & Wilson, L. (2006). The dynamics of current account and budget deficits in selected countries if the Middle East and North Africa. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 5, 111–129.Google Scholar
  45. Himarios, D. (1995). Euler equation tests of Ricardian equivalence. Economics Letters, 48, 165–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hooper, P., & Mann, C.L. (1987). The U.S. external deficits: Its causes and persistence, prepared for the U.S. trade deficit: Causes, Consequences, and Cures, a conference at the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.Google Scholar
  47. Ibrahim, S. B., & Kumar, F. Y. (1996). Comovements in budget deficits, money, interest rates, exchange rates and the current account balance: some empirical evidence. Applied Economics, 28, 117–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115, 53–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kao, C., & Chiang, M. H. (2000). On the estimation and inference of a cointegrated regression in panel data. Advances in Econometrics, 15, 179–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Keynes, J. M. (1936). The general theory of interest, employment and money. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  51. Khalid, A. M., & Guan, T. W. (1999). Causality tests of budget and current account deficits: cross-country comparisons. Empirical Economics, 24, 389–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kim, C.-H., & Kim, D. (2006). Does Korea have twin deficits? Applied Economics Letters, 13(10), 675–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kim, S., & Roubini, N. (2008). Twin deficit or twin divergence? Fiscal policy, current account, and real exchange rate in the U.S. Journal of International Economics, 74, 362–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kiran, B. (2011). On the twin deficits hypothesis: evidence from Turkey. Applied Econometrics and International Development, 11, 1.Google Scholar
  55. Kouassi, E., Mougoué, M., & Kymn, K. O. (2004). Causality tests of the relationship between the twin deficits. Empirical Economics, 29, 503–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Magazzino, C. (2012). Fiscal policy, consumption and current account in the european countries. Economics Bulletin, 32(2), 1330–1344.Google Scholar
  57. Marashdeh, H., & Saleh, A. S. (2006). Revisiting budget and trade deficits in lebanon: a critique. University of Wollongong, Faculty of Commerce - Economics Working Papers, 06–07.Google Scholar
  58. Margani, P., & Ricciuti, R. (2004). Equivalenza Ricardiana in economia aperta: un’analisi empirica. SIEP Working Paper, 390.Google Scholar
  59. Modigliani, F. (1983). Government deficits, inflation and future generations. In D. W. Conklin, & T. J. Chourcene (Eds.), Deficits, how big, how bad. Ontario: Ontario Economic Research Report.Google Scholar
  60. Modigliani, F. (1987). The economics of public deficits. In A. Razin & E. Sadka (Eds.), Economic policy in theory and practice. New York: St. Martin’s.Google Scholar
  61. Modigliani, F. (1988). The role of intergenerational transfers and life cycle saving in the accumulation of wealth. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2(2), 15–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Mohammadi, H. (2000). Budget deficits and the foreign trade balance: a cross-country study. Economia Internazionale, LIII, 85–95.Google Scholar
  63. Mohammadi, H. (2004). Budget deficits and the current account balance: new evidence from panel data. Journal of Economics and Finance, 28(1), 39–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Munger, M. C. (2004). Economists and fiscal policy advice: a deficit or a deficiency. Public Choice, 118, 235–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Nickel, C., & Vansteenkiste, I. (2008). Fiscal policies, the current account and Ricardian equivalence. ECB Working Paper, 935.Google Scholar
  66. Normandin, M. (1999). Budget deficit persistence and the twin deficits hypothesis. Journal of International Economics, 49(1), 171–193.Google Scholar
  67. Onafowora, O. A., & Owoye, O. (2006). An empirical investigation of budget and trade deficits: the case of Nigeria. The Journal of Developing Areas, 39(2), 153–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Parikh, A., & Rao, B. (2006). Do fiscal deficits influence current accounts? A case study of India. Review of Development Economics, 10(3), 492–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Pattichis, C. (2004). Budget and trade deficits in Lebanon. Applied Economics Letters, 11(2), 105–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. P. (1999). Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94, 621–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Piersanti, G. (2000). Current account dynamics and expected future budget deficits: some international evidence. Journal of International Money and Finance, 19, 255–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Ratha, A. (2010). Twin deficits or distant cousins? Evidence from India. St. Cloud State University, Economics Faculty Working Papers, 5.Google Scholar
  73. Reitschuler, G., & Crespo Cuaresma, J. (2004). Ricardian equivalence revisited: evidence from OECD countries. Economics Bulletin, 5(16), 1–10.Google Scholar
  74. Ricardo, D. (1888). Essay on the funding system. In J. R. McCulloch (Ed.), The works of David Ricardo. With a notice of the life and writings of the author. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
  75. Ricciuti, R. (2003). Assessing Ricardian equivalence. Journal of Economic Surveys, 17(1), 55–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Saleh, A. S., Nair, M., & Agalewatte, T. (2005). The twin deficits problem in Sri Lanka: an econometric analysis. South Asia Economic Journal, 6(2), 221–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Seater, J. J. (1993). Ricardian equivalence. Journal of Economic Literature, 31(1), 142–190.Google Scholar
  78. Tobin, J. (1965). The burden of public debt: a review article. The Journal of Finance, 20(4), 679–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Vamvoukas, G. A. (1999). The twin deficits phenomenon: evidence from Greece. Applied Economics, 31(9), 1093–1100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Westerlund, J. (2007). Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 69, 709–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Windmeijer, F. (2005). A finite sample correction for the variance of linear efficient two-step GMM estimators. Journal of Econometrics, 126, 25–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Zietz, J., & Pemberton, D. K. (1990). The US budget and trade deficits: a simultaneous equation model. Southern Economic Journal, 57, 23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Atlantic Economic Society 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sapienza – University of RomeRomeItaly
  2. 2.Italian Society of Public EconomicsRomeItaly
  3. 3.Roma Tre UniversityRomeItaly
  4. 4.Italian Economic AssociationRomeItaly
  5. 5.Royal Economic SocietyRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations