Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

A Survey and a Theoretical Model of Distance Education Programs

  • 53 Accesses

  • 2 Citations


In search of a distance education program’s crucial success factors, this research was conducted through a designed survey and evaluation instrument, for a predominantly doctoral program at DE University (DEU, an adopted name). Also, the survey has identified some challenging factors along with students’ most crucial reasons for adopting distance education programs. The author has presented a Testable theoretical model of distance education programs. The top four success factors were revealed to be program quality, general recognition and academic integrity, students’ satisfaction, and students’ progress toward the ultimate goal of graduation. Lack of time and worries about the degree recognition by prospective academic and nonacademic employers were the most crucial challenging factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Cifuentes, Lauren; Hughey, Jane. “The Interactive Effects of Computer Conferencing and Multiple Intelligences on Expository Writing,” Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4, 1, 2003, pp. 15–30.

  2. Commission on Technology and Adult Learning. A Vision of E-Learning for America’s Workforce, Alexandria, VA, Washington, DC, June 2001.

  3. Gharajedaghi, J. Systems Thinking: Managing Chaos and Complexity, Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1999.

  4. Greer, Michael. The Project Manager’s Partner, 2nd ed., American Management Association, 2002.

  5. Gregory, Vicki L. “Students Perceptions of the Effectiveness of Web-Based Distance Education,” New Library World, 104, 10, 2003, pp. 426–31.

  6. Gwartney, James D.; Stroup, Richard L.; Sobel, Russell S. Economics: Private and Public Choice, 9th ed., 2000, pp. 668–9.

  7. Hamzaee, Reza G. “Teaching Effectiveness and Student Evaluations of the Faculty,” Regional Business Review, Maryville, MO: Northwest Missouri State University, 1992, pp. 95–102.

  8. Lovitts, Barbara E. Leaving the Ivory Tower: The Causes and Consequences of Departure from Doctoral Study, Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, 2001.

  9. Marsh, Herbert W.; Rowe, Kenneth J.; Martin, Andrew. “Ph.D. Students’ Evaluations of Research Supervision: Issues, Complexities, and Challenges in a Nationwide Australian Experiment In Benchmarking Universities,” The Journal of Higher Education, 73, 3, May–June 2002, pp. 313–48.

  10. McWilliam, Erica; Singh, Parlo; Taylor, Peter G. “Doctoral Education, Danger and Risk Management,” Higher Research and Development, 21, 2, January 2002, pp. 119–29.

  11. Monk, D. H. “Education Productivity Research: An Update and Assessment of Its Role In Education Finance Reform,” Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14, 1992, pp. 307–32.

  12. Pallof, R. M.; Pratt, K. Building Learning Communities is Cyberspace: Effective Strategies for the Online Classroom, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1999.

  13. Roberts, J. “The Story of Distance Education: A Practitioner’s Perspective,” Journal of American Society for Information Science, 22, November 1996, pp. 37–52.

  14. UCLA Graduate Division. “Doctoral Recipients Rate Their Dissertation Chairs: Analysis by Gender,” Graduate Focus, February 2000, p. 2.

  15. Vasigh, Bijan; Hamzaee, Reza G. “Testing Sensitivity of Student Enrollment with Respect to Tuition at an Institution of Higher Education,” International Advances in Economic Research, 10, 2, May 2004, pp. 133–49.

  16. Verduin, J. R.; Clark, T. A. Distance Education: The Foundation of Effective Practice, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1991, p. 8.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Reza G. Hamzaee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hamzaee, R.G. A Survey and a Theoretical Model of Distance Education Programs. Int Adv Econ Res 11, 215–229 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11294-005-3017-6

Download citation


  • I20