Advertisement

Atlantic Economic Journal

, Volume 47, Issue 3, pp 361–371 | Cite as

Extreme Credence and Imaginary Goods

  • Robert B. EkelundJrEmail author
  • Mark Thornton
Article

Abstract

The division of goods into types or characteristics has a long history in economics, but it has achieved new importance in the last 50 years. This paper presents a novel pedagogical differentiation of goods into search, experience and credence categories, in part by adding a new goods designation. We argue that there is an important class of meta-credence goods for which there is no possible means of verification in any standard Popperian sense, meaning that the probability of fraud is greatly increased. Despite this fact, markets and prices exist. Assurances of some kind, whether self-generated or provided by experts, substitute for evidence. We propose using examples, some drawn from neoclassical economist Carl Menger, that such a characterization is useful in analyzing such markets.

Keywords

Goods classification Cultural economics Religion Art 

JEL

D0 Z1 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to John D. Jackson, Kathy White, Richard Higgins and the late Robert Tollison for comments on the central idea of this paper. Comments of the reviewer and editor were also helpful. Naturally we assume complete responsibility for our work.

References

  1. Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The market for 'Lemons': Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84, 488–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Association of Independent Readers & Rootworkers (AIRR). (2019). http://www.readersandrootworkers.org/wiki/Category:Magical_Coaching_and_Spiritual_Advice. Accessed 13 Dec 2018.
  3. Che, Y. K. (1996). Consumer return politics for experience goods. Journal of Industrial Economics, 44, 17–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Crain, W. M., & Goff, B. L. (1988). Televised legislatures: Political information technology and public choice. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Darby, M., & Karni, E. (1973). Free competition and the optimal amount of fraud. Journal of Law and Economics, 16, 67–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ekelund, R. B., Mixon, F. G., & Ressler, R. W. (1995). Advertising and information: An empirical study of search, experience and credence goods. Journal of Economic Studies, 22, 33–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ekelund, R. B., Hébert, R. F., & Tollison, R. D. (2006). The marketplace of Christianity. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ekelund, R. B., Jackson, J. D., & Tollison, R. D. (2017). The economics of American art: Issues, artists and market institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ekelund, Robert B., Richard Higgins and John D. Jackson. (2019). ART as meta-credence: Authentication and the role of experts, Journal of Cultural Economics (forthcoming: 1–17).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-019-09354-3.
  10. Emons, W. (1997). Credence goods and fraudulent experts. RAND Journal of Economics, 28, 107–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gottschalk, Felix. (2018). What characterizes credence goods? A critical look at the literature, pp. 1–23 https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3114257. Accessed 13 Dec 2018.
  12. Hoving, T. (1996). False impressions: The hunt for big-time art Fales. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  13. Laband, D. N. (1986). Advertising as information: An empirical note. Review of Economics and Statistics, 68, 517–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Laband, D. N. (1991). An objective measure of search versus experience goods. Economic Inquiry, 29, 497–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lancaster, K. J. (1966). A new approach to consumer theory. Journal of Political Economy, 74, 132–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lewis, B. (2019). The last Leonardo: The secret lives of the World’s Most expensive painting. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
  17. Menger, Carl (1871) 1950. Principles of Economics. Translated and edited by James Dingwall and Bert F. Hoselitz, with an introduction by frank knight. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  18. Mixon, F. G. (1995). Advertising as information: Further evidence. Southern Economic Journal, 61, 1213–1218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mixon, F. G. (1999). Customer return policies for experience goods: The impact of product Price and search costs on seller-provided informational cues. Applied Economics, 31, 331–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mixon, F. G., Ressler, R. W., & Troy Gibson, M. (2009). False advertising and experience goods: The case of political Services in the U. S. Senate. Public Choice, 138, 83–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nelson, P. (1970). Information and consumer behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 78, 311–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nelson, P. (1974). Advertising as information. Journal of Political Economy, 82, 729–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nelson, P. (1976). Political information. Journal of Law and Economics, 19, 315–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Popper, K. (2002). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Raynold, Prosper. (2018). An economic theory of violent religious extremism, working paper presented at the 2018 Western economic association international conference.Google Scholar
  26. Stigler, G. (1961). The economics of information. Journal of Political Economy, 69, 213–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Telser, L. G. (1976). Political information: Comment. Journal of Law and Economics, 19, 337–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Thaw, Eugene V. (2004). The authentic will win out, Ronald D. Spencer (ed.), 2004. The Expert vs the Object. Judging Fakes and False Attributions in the Visual Arts. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 73–78.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Atlantic Economic Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Auburn UniversityAuburnUSA
  2. 2.Mises InstituteAuburnUSA

Personalised recommendations