Atlantic Economic Journal

, Volume 44, Issue 3, pp 335–361 | Cite as

Effects of Foreign Direct Investment on Firm-level Technical Efficiency: Stochastic Frontier Model Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing Firms

Article

Abstract

It has been recognized that multinational corporations can spill over to non-affiliated firms in host economies. Existing studies of foreign direct investment (FDI) and productivity growth often assume firms are perfectly efficient. Our paper relaxes this assumption and explores how FDI affects a firm’s technical efficiency improvement as well as its technical progress in a stochastic frontier model. The stochastic frontier model estimates a firm’s production frontier given a set of production inputs. The deviation of a firm’s actual output level from its maximum level of output is defined as technical inefficiency. Using data from more than 12,000 Chinese manufacturing firms, we find that FDI in a firm's own industry (horizontal FDI) does not necessarily improve the firm’s technical efficiency. However, firms with a larger absorptive capacity tend to benefit more from horizontal FDI than others. We also find that foreign presence in a firm’s downstream industries helps improve the firm’s technical efficiency, while foreign presence in upstream industries does not. In addition, a generalized Malmquist index decomposition shows that foreign affiliates achieve a higher productivity growth than domestic firms mainly through a faster improvement in technical efficiency rather than through technical progress.

Keywords

Foreign direct investment Horizontal and vertical spillovers Technical efficiency Stochastic frontier model Malmquist productivity index 

JEL

F21 

References

  1. Aigner, D. J., Lovell, C. A. K., & Schmitdt, P. (1977). Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Econometrics, 6(1), 21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aitken, B. J., & Harrison, A. E. (1999). Do domestic firms benefit from direct foreign investment? Evidence from Venezuela. American Economic Review, 89(3), 605–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alfaro, L., Kalemli-Ozcan, S., & Sayek, S. (2009). FDI, productivity and financial development. The World Economy, 32(1), 111–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bai, C., Lu, J., & Tao, Z. (2009). How does privatization work in China? Journal of Comparative Economics, 37(3), 453–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Balsvik, R. (2011). Is labor mobility a channel for spillovers from multinationals? Evidence from Norwegian manufacturing. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(1), 285–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Battese, G., & Coelli, T. (1995). A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. Empirical Economics, 20(2), 325–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blalock, G., & Gertler, P. (2008). Welfare gains from foreign direct investment from technology transfer to local suppliers. Journal of International Economics, 74(2), 402–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blalock, G., & Gertler, P. (2009). How firm capabilities affect who benefits from foreign technology. Journal of Development Economics, 90(2), 192–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Caves, R. (1974). Multinational firms, competition and productivity in host-country markets. Economica, 41(162), 176–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Charoenrat, T., & Harvie, C. (2014). The Efficiency of SMEs in Thai manufacturing: a stochastic frontier analysis. Economic Modelling, 43, 372–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Charoenrat, T., Harvie, C., & Amornkitvikai, Y. (2013). Thai manufacturing small and medium sized enterprise technical efficiency: evidence from firm-level industrial census data. Journal of Asian Economics, 27, 42–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. China National Bureau of Statistics (2006). Input-Output table of China 2002. Beijing: China Statistics Press.Google Scholar
  13. Crespo, N., & Fontoura, M. (2007). Determinant factors of FDI spillovers – what do we really know? World Development, 35(3), 410–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Driffield, N. (2004). Regional policy and spillovers from FDI in the UK. Annals of Regional Science, 38(4), 579–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dunning, J. H. (1977). Trade, location of economic activity and the MNE: a search for an eclectic approach. In B. Ohlin, P. O. Hesselborn, & P. M. Wijkman (Eds.), The international allocation of economic activity (pp. 395–418). London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Glass, A. J., & Saggi, K. (2002). Multinational firms and technology transfer. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 104(4), 495–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hanousek, J., Kocenda, E., & Masika, M. (2012). Firm efficiency: domestic owners, coalitions, and FDI. Economic Systems, 36(4), 471–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Javorcik, B. (2004). Does foreign direct investment increase the productivity of domestic firms? In search of spillovers through backward linkages. American Economic Review, 94(3), 605–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Javorcik, B. (2008). Can survey evidence shed light on spillovers from foreign direct investment? The World Bank Research Observer, 23(2), 139–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kathuria, V. (2001). Foreign firms, technology transfer and knowledge spillovers to Indian manufacturing firms – a stochastic frontier analysis. Applied Economics, 33(5), 625–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kumbhakar, S., Ghosh, S., & McGuckin, T. (1991). A generalized production frontier approach for estimating determinants of inefficiency in U.S. dairy farms. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 9(3), 279–286.Google Scholar
  22. Lall, S. (1980). Vertical inter-firm linkages in LDCs: an empirical study. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 42(3), 203–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Levinsohn, J., & Petrin, A. (2003). Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables. Review of Economic Studies, 70(2), 317–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lovell, C. A. K. (2003). The decomposition of Malmquist productivity indexes. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 20(3), 437–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Malmquist, S. (1953). Index numbers and indifference curves. Trabajos de Estadística, 4(2), 209–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Merlevede, B., Schoors, K., & Spatareanu, M. (2014). FDI spillovers and time since foreign entry. World Development, 56, 108–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Oczkowski, E., & Sharma, K. (2005). Determinants of efficiency in least developed countries: further evidence from Nepalese manufacturing firms. Journal of Development Studies, 41(4), 617–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Olley, S., & Pakes, A. (1996). The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry. Econometrica, 64(6), 1263–1298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rodríguez-Clare, A. (1996). Multinationals, linkages, and economic development. American Economic Review, 86(4), 852–873.Google Scholar
  30. Suyanto, A., Salim, R. A., & Bloch, H. (2009). Does foreign direct investment lead to productivity spillovers? Firm level evidence from Indonesia. World Development, 37(12), 1861–1876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Suyanto, A., Salim, R. A., & Bloch, H. (2014). Which firms benefit from foreign direct investment? Empirical evidence from Indonesia manufacturing. Journal of Asian Economics, 33, 16–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. World Bank (2005). World Bank Enterprise Survey Data. China, 2005 .Available from http://www.enterprisesurveys.org/dataAccessed 18 August 2012
  33. World Bank (2012). 2012 World Bank Enterprise Survey Data, China. Accessed 8 January 2016.Available from http://www.enterprisesurveys.org/data
  34. World Bank (2013). Doing Business 2013: smarter regulations for small and medium-size enterprises. Washington: World Bank.Google Scholar
  35. Yaşar, M., & Paul, M. C. J. (2009). Size and foreign ownership effects on productivity and efficiency: an analysis of Turkish motor vehicle and parts plants. Review of Development Economics, 13(4), 576–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhang, Y., Li, Y., & Li, H. (2014). FDI spillovers over time in an emerging market: the roles of entry tenure and barriers to imitation. Academy of Management Journal, 57(3), 698–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhao, S. (2013). Privatization, FDI inflow and economic growth: evidence from China's provinces, 1978-2008. Applied Economics, 45(15), 2127–2139.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Atlantic Economic Society 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of San FranciscoSan FranciscoUSA
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsUniversity of San FranciscoSan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations