Atlantic Economic Journal

, Volume 38, Issue 2, pp 183–196 | Cite as

Know Thyself: Competence and Self-awareness

Article

Abstract

Economic analysis of asymmetric information typically starts with the assumption that individuals know more about their own characteristics than outside observers. This assumption implies that individuals can accurately assess their own competence in a given domain. However, individuals can only judge their competence if they are sufficiently competent. Results from field experiments contradict predictions from economic theories that assume self-aware agents, but are consistent with predictions from theories that incorporate a positive correlation between competence and self-awareness in a given domain. This correlation explains some of the overconfidence observed among economic agents and implies a structure on decision errors that can be exploited to make novel predictions in important areas of economics.

Keywords

Overconfidence Competence Asymmetric information Gender Economic experiment 

JEL

C93 D82 

Supplementary material

11293_2010_9226_MOESM1_ESM.doc (54 kb)
ESM 1(DOC 53 kb)

References

  1. Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2001). Boys will be boys: gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 261–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bernardo, A., & Welch, I. (2001). On the evolution of overconfidence and entrepreneurs. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 10(3), 301–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Camerer, C., & Lovallo, D. (1999). Overconfidence and excess entry: an experimental approach. American Economic Review, 89(1), 306–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cawley, J., & Philipson, T. (1999). An empirical examination of information barriers to trade in insurance. American Economic Review, 89(4), 827–846.Google Scholar
  5. Daniel, K. D., Hirshleifer, D., & Subrahmanyam, A. (1998). Investor psychology and security market under- and over-reactions. Journal of Finance, 53(5), 1839–1886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gervais, S., & Odean, T. (2001). Learning to be overconfident. Review of Financial Studies, 14(1), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Golec, J. H., & Tamarkin, M. (1995). Do bettors prefer longshots because they are risk-lovers or are they just overconfident? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 11, 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Harrison, G., & List, J. (2004). Field experiments. Journal of Economic Literature, 42(4), 1009–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hvide, H. K. (2002). Pragmatic beliefs and overconfidence. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 48, 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Krueger, J. I., & Mueller, R. A. (2002). Unskilled, unaware, or both? The contribution of social perceptual skills and statistical regression to self-enhancement biases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(2), 180–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1121–1134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (2002). Unskilled and unaware—But why? A reply to Krueger and Mueller. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(2), 189–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kyle, A. S., & Wang, F. A. (1997). Speculation Duopoly with agreement to disagree: can overconfidence survive the market test? Journal of Finance, 52(5), 2073–2090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Odean, T. (1999). Do investors trade too much? American Economic Review, 89, 1279–1298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rothschild, M. D., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1976). Equilibrium in Competitive Insurance Markets: an essay in the economics of imperfect information. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 90(4), 629–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Svenson, O. (1981). Are we all less risky and more skillful than our fellow drivers? Acta Psychologica, 47, 143–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Atlantic Economic Society 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics, Andrew Young School of Policy StudiesGeorgia State UniversityAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations