Atlantic Economic Journal

, Volume 35, Issue 1, pp 43–57 | Cite as

The Determinants of Price in Internet Auctions of Used Cars

  • Thomas Andrews
  • Cynthia BenzingEmail author


This study analyzes how auction, seller, and product factors influence the price premium in an eBay used car auction market. In auctions with at least one bid, the reputation of the seller, title status, and the time the auction ended influenced the price premium on the highest bid. For auctions that resulted in a sale, cars with clear title and dealers were able to secure significantly greater price premiums, but seller reputation had no significant effect. Using a binary logit model, cars had a greater probability of selling if the seller had a better reputation. The quality of the presentation and number of pictures did not enhance the price premium in any of the models.


car auctions internet auctions pricing factors 

JEL Classifications

D44 D82 L14 


  1. Akerlof, G. (1970). The market for ‘lemons’: Quality under uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(8), 488–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Angwin, J. (2003). Used-car auctioneers, dealers meet online. Wall Street Journal, November 20, B1 and B13.Google Scholar
  3. Ba, S., & Pavlou, P. A. (2002). Evidence of the effect of trust building technology in electronic markets: Price premium and buyer behavior. MIS Quarterly, 26(3), 243–268 (September).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bajari, P., & Hortacsu, A. (2004). Economic insights from internet auctions. Journal of Economic Literature, 42(2), 457–486 (June).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barney, J., & Hansen, M. (1994). Trustworthiness as a source of competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 175–190.Google Scholar
  6. Choi, S. Y., Stahl, D. O., & Whinston, A. B. (1997). The economics of electronic commerce (pp. 50–85). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Macmillan Technical Publishing.Google Scholar
  7. Dewan, S., & Hsu, V. (2004). Adverse selection in electronic markets: Evidence from online stamp auctions. Journal of Industrial Economics, 52(4), 497–516 (December).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Doney, P. M., & Cannon, P. (1997). An examination of the nature of trust in buyer–seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 61(2), 35–51 (April).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Economist. (2004a). E-commerce takes off. Vol. 371, issue 8375, May 15.Google Scholar
  10. Economist. (2004b). A perfect market. Vol. 371, issue 8375, May 15.Google Scholar
  11. Ederington, L. H., & Dewally, M. (2003). A comparison of reputation, certification, warranties, and information disclosure as remedies for information asymmetries: Lessons from the on-line comic book market. Working paper, Price College of Business, University of Oklahoma, cited in Bajari and Hortacsu [2004].Google Scholar
  12. Ganesan, S. (1994). Determinants of long-term orientation in buyer–seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 58(2), 1–19 (April).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510 (November).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Horstman, I., & LaCasse, C. (1997). Secret reserve prices in a bidding model with resale option. American Economic Review, 87(4), 663–684 (September).Google Scholar
  15. Houser, D., & Wooders, J. (2006). Reputation in auctions: Theory and evidence from eBay. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 15(2), 353–369 (Summer).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jarvenpaa, S. L., Tractinsky, N., & Vitale, M. (2000). Consumer trust in an internet store. Information Technology and Management, 1(1–2), 45–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jin, G. Z., & Kato, A. (2002). Blind trust online: Experimental evidence from baseball cards. Working paper, U. of Maryland, cited in Bajari and Hortacsu [2004].Google Scholar
  18. Kim, Y. (2005). The effects of buyer and product traits with seller reputation on price premiums in e-auction. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 46(1), 79–91 (Fall).Google Scholar
  19. Krause Fund Research. (2003). Analysis of eBay. November 24.Google Scholar
  20. Lee, H. G. (1998). Do electronic marketplaces lower the price of goods? Communications of the ACM, 41(1), 73–80 (January).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lucking-Reiley, D., Bryan, D., Prasad, N., & Reeves, D. (2000). Pennies from eBay: The determinants of price in online auctions. Mimeo, Vanderbilt University, Working Paper No. 00-W03.Google Scholar
  22. Mathews, T., & Katzman, B. (2006). The role of varying risk attitudes in an auction with a buyout option. Economic Theory, 27(3), 597–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McDonald, C. G., & Slawson Jr., V. C. (2002). Reputation in an internet auction market. Economic Inquiry, 40(4), 633–650 (October).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Melnik, M., & Alm, J. (2005). Seller reputation, information signals, and prices for heterogeneous coins on eBay. Southern Economic Journal, 72(2), 305–328 (October).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mishra, D. P., Heide, J. B., & Cort, S. G. (1998). Information asymmetry and levels of agency relationships. Journal of Marketing Research, 35(3), 277–295 (August).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mullaney, T. (2004). The web 20: Bruised but still strong. Business Week, 13(3899), 106 (September).Google Scholar
  27. Ottaway, T. A., Bruneau, C. L., & Evans, G. E. (2003). The impact of auction item image and buyer/seller feedback rating on electronic auctions. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 43(3), 56–60 (Spring).Google Scholar
  28. Resnick, P., & Zeckhauser, R. (2002). Trust among strangers in internet transactions: Empirical analysis of eBay’s reputation system. In M. R. Baye (Ed.), The economics of internet and e-commerce, volume 11 of advances in applied microeconomics (pp. 127–158). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
  29. Standifird, S. S. (2001). Reputation and e-commerce: eBay auctions and the asymmetrical impact of positive and negative ratings. Journal of Management, 27(3), 279–295 (October).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Swan, J. E., & Nolan, J. J. (1985). Gaining customer trust: A conceptual guide for the salesperson. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 5(2), 39–48 (November).Google Scholar
  31. Walden, E. (2000). Some value propositions of online communities. Electronic Markets, 10(4), 244–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Walley, M. J. C., & Fortin, D. R. (2005). Behavioral outcomes from online auctions: Reserve price, reserve disclosure, and initial bidding influences in the decision process. Journal of Business Research, 58(10), 1409–1418 (October).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Weinberg, B. D., & Davis, L. (2005). Exploring the WOW in online-auction feedback. Journal of Business Research, 58(11), 1609–1621 (November).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Williamson, O. E. (1993). Calculativeness, trust, and economic organization. Journal of Law & Economics, 36, 453–486 (April).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Willis, J. L. (2004). What impact will e-commerce have on the U.S. economy? Economic Review, 89(2), 53–71 (Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, April).Google Scholar
  36. Yin, P. L. (2003). Information dispersion and auction prices. Working paper, Harvard Business School, cited in Bajari and Hortacsu [2004].Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Atlantic Economic Society 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Economics and Finance DepartmentWest Chester UniversityWest ChesterUSA

Personalised recommendations