Journal of Experimental Criminology

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 179–206 | Cite as

Mentoring programs to affect delinquency and associated outcomes of youth at risk: A comprehensive meta-analytic review

  • Patrick H. TolanEmail author
  • David B. Henry
  • Michael S. Schoeny
  • Peter Lovegrove
  • Emily Nichols



To conduct a meta-analytic review of selective and indicated mentoring interventions for effects for youth at risk on delinquency and key associated outcomes (aggression, drug use, academic functioning). We also undertook the first systematic evaluation of intervention implementation features and organization and tested for effects of theorized key processes of mentor program effects.


Campbell Collaboration review inclusion criteria and procedures were used to search and evaluate the literature. Criteria included a sample defined as at risk for delinquency due to individual behavior such as aggression or conduct problems or environmental characteristics such as residence in a high-crime community. Studies were required to be random assignment or strong quasi-experimental design. Of 163 identified studies published from 1970–2011, 46 met criteria for inclusion.


Mean effects sizes were significant and positive for each outcome category (ranging from d = 0.11 for academic achievement to d = 0.29 for aggression). Heterogeneity in effect sizes was noted for all four outcomes. Stronger effects resulted when mentor motivation was professional development but not by other implementation features. Significant improvements in effects were found when advocacy and emotional support mentoring processes were emphasized.


This popular approach has significant impact on delinquency and associated outcomes for youth at risk for delinquency. While evidencing some features may relate to effects, the body of literature is remarkably lacking in details about specific program features and procedures. This persistent state of limited reporting seriously impedes understanding about how mentoring is beneficial and ability to maximize its utility.


Delinquency Mentoring At-risk youth Prevention 


  1. Achenbach, T. M. (1991). Manual for Child Behavior Checklist/ 4-18 and 1991 Profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Dept. of Psychiatry.Google Scholar
  2. Aos, S., Lieb, R., Mayfield, J., Miller, M., & Pennucci, A. (2004). Benefits and costs of prevention and early intervention programs for youth. Olympia: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.Google Scholar
  3. Bailey, K. R. (1987). Inter-study differences: How should they influence the interpretation and analysis of results? Statistics in Medicine, 6, 351–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chinn, S. (2000). A simple method for converting an odds ratio to effect size for use in meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 19, 3127–3131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Davidson, W. S., & Redner, R. (1988a). The prevention of juvenile delinquency: Diversion from the juvenile justice system. In R. H. Price, E. L. Cowen, R. P. Lorion, & J. Ramos-McKay (Eds.), Fourteen ounces of prevention: Theory, research, and prevention (pp. 123–137). New York: Pergamon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Deutsch, N., & Spencer, R. (2009). Capturing the magic: Assessing the quality of youth mentoring relationships. New Directions in Youth Development: Theory, Practice and Research, 121, 47–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. DuBois, D. L., Holloway, B. E., Valentine, J. C., & Cooper, H. M. (2002). Effectiveness of mentoring programs for youth: A meta-analytic review. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30, 157–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. DuBois, d L., & Karcher, J. J. (2005). Youth mentoring: Theory, research, and practice. In D. L. DuBois & M. J. Karcher (Eds.), Handbook of youth mentoring (pp. 2–12). Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. DuBois, D. L., Portillo, N., Rhodes, J. E., Silverthorn, N., & Valentine, J. C. (2011). How effective are mentoring programs for youth? A systematic assessment of the evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(2), 57–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Duval, S. & Tweedie, R. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56, 455–463.Google Scholar
  11. Egger, M., Davey Smith, G., Schneider M., & Minder, C. (1997). Bias in metaanalysisdetected by a simple, graphical test. British Medical Journal, 315, 629–634.Google Scholar
  12. Farrington, D. P. (2003). Developmental and life-course criminology: Key theoretical and empirical issues. Criminology, 41, 221–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grossman, J. B., & Tierney, J. P. (1998a). Does mentoring work? An impact study of the Big brothers Big sisters program. Evaluation Review, 22, 403–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haegerich, T., & Tolan, P. H. (2009). Core competencies and prevention of adolescent substance use. In N. G. Guerra, C. Bradshaw, R. Larson, & L. A. Jensen (Eds.), Youth at risk: Core competencies to prevent problem behaviors and promote positive youth development. New directions in child development (pp. 47–61). New York: Josey-Bass.Google Scholar
  15. Hall, J. C. (2003). Mentoring and young people: A literature review. Glasgow: The SCRE Centre, University of Glasgow.Google Scholar
  16. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  17. Hedges, L. V., & Pigott, T. D. (2004). The power of statistical tests for moderators in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 9, 426–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hieronymus, A. N., Lindquist, E. F. & Hoover, H. D. (1986). Iowa tests of basic skills: Early primary battery. Chicago: Riverside.Google Scholar
  19. Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. British Medical Journal, 327, 557–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (2nd ed.). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  21. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (1998). Effective intervention for serious juvenile offenders: A synthesis of research. In R. Loeber & D. Farrington (Eds.), Serious and violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions (pp. 313–341). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McCord, J. (1978a). A thirty-year follow-up of treatment effects. American Psychologist, 33(3), 284–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McCord, J. (1979a). Following up on Cambridge-Somerville: Response to Paul Wortman. American Psychologist, 34(8), 727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McCord, J. (1992). The Cambridge–Somerville study: A pioneering longitudinal experimental study of delinquency prevention. In J. McCord & R. J. Tremblay (Eds.), Preventing antisocial behavior: Interventions from birth through adolescence (pp. 196–206). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  26. MENTOR/National Mentoring Partnership. (2006). Mentoring in America 2005: A snapshot of the current state of mentoring. Alexandria: Author.Google Scholar
  27. MENTOR/National Mentoring Partnership. (2009). Elements of effective practice for mentoring (3rd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Author. Retrieved from
  28. Morgan, G., & Henrion, M. (1990). Uncertainty: A guide to dealing with uncertainty in quantitative risk and policy analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Raudenbush, S. W. (1994). Random effects models. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Reynolds, C. R., & Kamphaus, R. W. (1992). Behavior assessment system for children\ (BASC). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
  31. Rhodes, J. E. (2002). Stand by me: The risks and rewards of mentoring today’s youth. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Rhodes, J. E. (2005). A theoretical model of youth mentoring. In D. L. DuBois & M. A. Karcher (Eds.), Handbook of youth mentoring (pp. 30–43). Thousand Oakes: Sage Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rhodes, J. E., Bogat, G. A., Roffman, J., Edelman, P., & Galasso, L. (2002). Youth mentoring in perspective: Introduction to special issue. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30, 149–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rhodes, J. E., Spencer, R., Keller, T. E., Liang, B., & Noam, G. (2006). A model for the influence of mentoring relationships on youth development. Journal of Community Psychology, 34(6), 691–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tolan, P. H. (2002). Crime prevention: Focus on youth. In J. Q. Wilson & J. Petersilia (Eds.), Crime (pp. 109–128). Oakland: Institute for Contemporary Studies Press.Google Scholar
  36. Tolan, P. H., & Brown, C. H. (1998). Methods for evaluating intervention and prevention efforts. In. P. K. Trickett & C. Schellenbach (Eds.), Violence against children in the family and the community (pp. 439–464). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  37. Tolan, P.H., & Gorman-Smith, D. (2003). What violence prevention can tell us about developmental psychopathology. Developmental and Psychopathology Google Scholar
  38. Tolan, P. H., & Guerra, N. G. (1994). What works in reducing adolescent violence: An empirical review of the field. Boulder: University of Colorado, Center for the Study and Prevention of Youth Violence.Google Scholar
  39. Viechtbauer W (2010). Metafor: Meta-Analysis Package for R. R package version 1.4-0.
  40. Wilson, S.J., & Lipsey, M.J. (2007). Effectiveness of school-based intervention programs on aggressive behavior: Update of a meta-analysis. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 33(Suppl. 2), S130–S143.Google Scholar
  41. Wilson, D. B., Gottfredson, D. C., & Najaka, S. S. (2001). School-based prevention of problem behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 17(3), 247–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References for studies included in systematic review

  1. Abbott, D. A., Meredith, W. H., Self-Kelly, R., & Davis, M. E. (1997). The influence of a Big brothers program on the adjustment of boys in single-parent families. Journal of Psychology, 131, 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aiello, H. S. (1988). Assessment of a mentor program on self-concept and achievement variables of middle school underachievers. (Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1988). Dissertation Abstracts International, 49(07), 1699A.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, P. S. (1977). Volunteers in criminal justice: A three-year evaluation of the Clark County, Washington program. Vancouver: Health and Welfare Planning Council.Google Scholar
  4. Aseltine, R. H., Dupre, M., & Lamlein, P. (2000). Mentoring as a drug prevention strategy: An evaluation of across ages. Adolescent and Family Health, 1(1), 11–20.Google Scholar
  5. Barnoski, R. (2002). Preliminary findings for the juvenile rehabilitation administration’s mentoring program. Olympia: Washington State Institute for Public Policy. WSIPP Doc # 02-07-1202.Google Scholar
  6. Berger, R. J., & Gold, M. (1978). An evaluation of a juvenile court volunteer program. Journal of Community Psychology, 6, 328–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bernstein, L., Rappaport, C., Olsho, L., Hunt, D. & Levin, M. (2009) Impact evaluation of the US Department of Education’s student mentoring program. National Center for educational evaluation and regional assistanceGoogle Scholar
  8. Blechman, E. A., Maurice, A., Buecker, B., & Helberg, C. (2000). Can mentoring or skill training reduce recidivism? Observational study with propensity analysis. Prevention Science, 1(3), 139–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brooks, L. J. (1995). An evaluation of the VCU mentoring program (Doctoral dissertation, Virginia commonwealth university, 1995). Dissertation Abstracts International, 57(04), 1481A.Google Scholar
  10. Buman, B., & Cain, R. (1991). The impact of short term, work oriented mentoring on the employability of low-income youth. Minneapolis: Minneapolis Employment and Training Program. Available from Minneapolis Employment and Training Program, 510 Public Service Center, 250 S. 4th St., Minneapolis, MN 55415.Google Scholar
  11. Cavell, T. A., & Hughes, J. N. (2000). Secondary prevention as context for assessing change processes in aggressive children. School Psychology, 38(3), 199–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clarke, L. (2009). Effects of a school-based adult mentoring intervention on low income, urban high school freshman judged to be at risk for drop out: a replication and extension. New Jersey: PhD Dissertation, The State University of New Jersey, United States.Google Scholar
  13. Converse, N., & Lignugaris, K. B. (2009). Evaluation of a school-based mentoring program for at-risk middle school youth. Remedial and special education, 30.Google Scholar
  14. Davidson, W. S., II. (1976). The diversion of juvenile delinquents: An examination of the processes and relative efficacy of childhood advocacy and behavioral contracting. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1976). Dissertation Abstracts International, 37(01), 601. University Microfilms No. AAT 7616113.Google Scholar
  15. Davidson, W. S., II, & Redner, R. (1988b). Prevention of juvenile delinquency: Diversion from the juvenile justice system. In R. H. Price, E. L. Cowen, R. P. Lorion, & J. Ramos-McKay (Eds.), Fourteen ounces of prevention: A casebook for practitioners (pp. 123–137). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Davidson, W. S., II, Amdur, R. L., Mitchell, C. M., & Redner, R. (1990). Alternative treatments for troubled youth: The case of diversion from the justice system. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Davidson, W. S., Seidman, E., Rappaport, J., Berck, P. L., Rapp, N. A., Rhodes, W., & Herring, J. (1977). Diversion program for juvenile offenders. Social Work Research and Abstracts, 13(2), 40–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Davidson, W. S., & Redner, R. (1988c). The prevention of juvenile delinquency: Diversion from the juvenile justice system. In R. H. Price, E. L. Cowen, R. P. Lorion, & J. Ramos-McKay (Eds.), Fourteen ounces of prevention: Theory, research, and prevention (pp. 123–137). Washington D.C: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Davis, H. (1988). A mentor program to assist in increasing academic achievement and attendance of at-risk ninth grade students (Doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, 1988). Dissertation Abstracts International, 50(03), 0580A.Google Scholar
  20. Dicken, C., Bryson, R., & Kass, N. (1977). Companionship therapy: A replication of experimental community psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45(4), 637–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Flaherty, B. P. (1985). An experiment in mentoring for high school students assigned to basic courses. (Doctoral dissertation, Boston University, 1985). Dissertation Abstracts International, 46(02), 0352A.Google Scholar
  22. Fo, W. S. O., & O’Donnell, C. R. (1972). The buddy system model: Community-based delinquency prevention utilizing indigenous nonprofessionals as behavior change agents. Washington: Department of Health, Education & Welfare Office of Education. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 074–394.Google Scholar
  23. Fo, W. S. O., & O’Donnell, C. R. (1979). The buddy system: Relationship and contingency conditions in a community intervention program for youth with nonprofessionals as behavior change agents. In J. S. Stumphauzer (Ed.), Progress in behavior therapy with delinquents (pp. 302–316). Springfield: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
  24. Fo, W. S. O., & O’Donnell, C. R. (1975). The buddy system: Effect of community intervention on delinquent offenses. Behavior Therapy, 6, 522–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Grant, C. (2010). Grounded in your culture: The hidden key to promoting academic achievement among African American adolescent males. Minneapolis: PhD Dissertation Capella University, United States.Google Scholar
  26. Grossman, J. B., & Tierney, J. P. (1998b). Does mentoring work? An impact study of the Big Brothers Big Sisters Program. Evaluation Review, 22(3), 403–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Grossman, J. B., & Rhodes, J. E. (2002). The test of time: Predictors and effects of duration in youth mentoring relationships. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30(2), 199–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hanlon, T. E., Bateman, R. W., Simon, B. D., O’Grady, K. E., & Carswell, S. B. (2002). An early community-based intervention for the prevention of substance abuse and other delinquent behavior. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31(6), 459–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Harmon, M. A. (1995). Reducing drug use among pregnant and parenting teens: A program evaluation and theoretical examination. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland at College Park, 1995). Dissertation Abstracts International, 56(08), 3319A.Google Scholar
  30. Hayes, G. L. (1998). An evaluation of a staff mentor program for at-risk students in an Oregon high school: CAKE (Caring About Kids Effectively). (Doctoral dissertation, Portland State University, 1998). Dissertation Abstracts International, 59(05), 1517A.Google Scholar
  31. Herrera, C., Grossman, J., Kaugh, T., Feldman, A., & McMaken, J. (2007). Making a difference in schools: The big brothers big sisters school based mentoring impact study. Philadelphia: Public/Private Ventures.Google Scholar
  32. Holt, L., Bry, B., & Johnson, V. (2008). Enhancing school engagement in at-risk, urban minority adolescents through a school-based, adult mentoring intervention. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 30(4), 297–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Johnson, A. W. (1997). Mentoring at-risk youth: A research review and evaluation of the impacts of the Sponsor-A-Scholar Program on student performance (Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, 1997). Dissertation Abstracts International, 58(03), 813A.Google Scholar
  34. Karcher, M. (2008). The study of mentoring in the learning environment (SMILE): A randomized evaluation of the effectiveness of school-based mentoring. Prevention Science, 9, 99–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Keating, L. M. (1996). Mentorship as prevention of juvenile delinquency (Doctoral dissertation, California School of Professional Psychology, San Diego, 1996). Dissertation Abstracts International, 57(04), 2869. University Microfilms No. AAT 9626966.Google Scholar
  36. Keating, L. M., Tomishima, M. A., Foster, S., & Alessandri, M. (2002). The effects of a mentoring program on at-risk youth. Adolescence, 37(148), 717–734.Google Scholar
  37. Kelley, T. M. (1973). I. Student volunteer effectiveness in a delinquency prevention experiment. II. Validation of a selection device for volunteer probation officers. (Doctoral dissertation, Wayne State University, 1972). Dissertation Abstracts International, 33(11), 140.Google Scholar
  38. Kelley, T. M., Kiyak, H. A., & Blak, R. A. (1979). The effectiveness of college student companion therapists with predelinquent youths. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 7(7), 186–195.Google Scholar
  39. Kemple, J. J., & Scott-Clayton, J. (2004). Career academies: Impacts on labor market outcomes and educational attainment. New York: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation.Google Scholar
  40. Ku, R., & Blew, C. H. (1977). A University’s approach to delinquency prevention: The adolescent diversion project: An exemplary project. Rockville: National Institute of Justice. NCJRS Document Reproduction Service No. 38510.Google Scholar
  41. Lattimore, C. B., Mihalic, S. F., Grotpeter, J. K., & Taggart, R. (1998). Blueprints for violence prevention, book four: The quantum opportunities program. Boulder: Center for the Study and Prevention of Violence.Google Scholar
  42. LoSciuto, L., Rajala, A. K., Townsend, T. N., & Taylor, A. S. (1996). An outcome evaluation of across ages: An intergenerational mentoring approach to drug prevention. Journal of Adolescent Research, 11(1), 116–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Maxfield, M., Schirm, A., & Rodriguez-Planas, N. (2003). The quantum opportunity program demonstration: Implementation and short-term impacts. MPR Reference No. 8279–093. Washington: Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.Google Scholar
  44. McCord, J. (1978b). A thirty-year follow-up of treatment effects. American Psychologist, 33(3), 284–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McCord, J. (1979b). Following up on Cambridge-Somerville: Response to Paul Wortman. American Psychologist, 34(8), 727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Moore, R. H., & Levine, D. (1974). Evaluation research of a community-based probation program. Lincoln: University of Nebraska at Lincoln, Department of Psychology. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 132497.Google Scholar
  47. Moore, R. H. (1987). Effectiveness of citizen volunteers functioning as counselors for high-risk young male offenders. Psychological Reports, 61, 823–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Newton, F. R. (1994). A study of the effectiveness of using collegiate mentors to reduce violent behavior, improve self concept, and increase academic success in an urban middle school (at risk). (Doctoral dissertation, The College of William and Mary, 1994). Dissertation Abstracts International, 55(06-A), 1440.Google Scholar
  49. O’Donnell, C. R., Lydgate, T., & Fo, W. S. O. (1979b). The buddy system: Review and follow-Up. Child Behavior Therapy, 1(2), 161–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Polit, D., Kahn, J., & Stevens, D. (1985). Final impacts from project redirection: A program for pregnant and parenting teens. New York: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation.Google Scholar
  51. Quint, J. (1991). Project redirection: Making and measuring a difference. Evaluation and Program Planning, 14, 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Reyes, O., & Jason, L. A. (1991). An evaluation of a high school dropout prevention program. Journal of Community Psychology, 19, 221–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rhodes, J., Grossman, J., & Resch, N. (2000). Agents of change: Pathways through which mentoring relationships influence adolescents’ academic adjustment. Child Development, 71(6), 1662–1671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rowland, R. G. (1992). An evaluation of the effects of a mentoring program on at-risk students in selected elementary schools in the north east independent school district. (Doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University, 1991). Dissertation Abstracts International, 53(1), 0039A.Google Scholar
  55. Royse, D. (1998). Mentoring high-risk minority youth: Evaluation of the brothers project. Adolescence, 33(129), 145–158.Google Scholar
  56. Schinke, S. P., Cole, K. C., & Poulin, S. R. (2000). Enhancing the educational achievement of at-risk youth. Prevention Science, 1(1), 51–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Seidman, E., Rappaport, J., & Davidson, W. S., II. (1980). Adolescents in legal jeopardy: Initial success and replication of an alternative to the criminal justice system. In R. R. Ross & P. Gendreau (Eds.), Effective correctional treatment (pp. 103–123). Toronto: Butterworth.Google Scholar
  58. Taylor, A. S., LoSciuto, L., Fox, M., Hilbert, S. M., & Sonkowsky, M. (1999). The mentoring factor: Evaluation of the Across Ages’ intergenerational approach to drug abuse prevention. In V. S. Kuehne (Ed.), Intergenerational programs: Understanding what we have created (pp. 77–99). New York: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
  59. Taylor, A. S., LoSciuto, L., Fox, M., Hilbert, S. M., & Sonkowsky, M. (1990). The mentoring factor: Evaluation of the across ages’ intergenerational approach to drug abuse prevention. Child Youth Services, 20(1/2), 77–99.Google Scholar
  60. Watson, S. H. (1996). A study on the effects of four different types of mentoring plans using retired community individuals and college students as mentors on Hispanic “at risk” students’ grades and attendance (Master’s thesis, Stephen F. Austin State University, 1996). Masters Abstracts International, 35(05), 1133.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patrick H. Tolan
    • 1
    Email author
  • David B. Henry
    • 2
  • Michael S. Schoeny
    • 3
  • Peter Lovegrove
    • 1
  • Emily Nichols
    • 1
  1. 1.University of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA
  2. 2.University of IllinoisChicagoUSA
  3. 3.University of ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations