Developing a reporting guideline for social and psychological intervention trials
Social and psychological interventions are often complex. Understanding randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of these complex interventions requires a detailed description of the interventions tested and the methods used to evaluate them; however, RCT reports often omit, or inadequately report, this information. Incomplete and inaccurate reporting hinders the optimal use of research, wastes resources, and fails to meet ethical obligations to research participants and consumers.
In this paper, we explain how reporting guidelines have improved the quality of reports in medicine, and describe the on-going development of a new reporting guideline for RCTs: CONSORT-SPI (an extension for social and psychological interventions).
Results and conclusions
We invite readers to participate in the project by visiting our website, in order to help us reach the best-informed consensus on these guidelines (http://tinyurl.com/CONSORT-study).
KeywordsRandomised controlled trial RCT CONSORT-SPI Reporting guideline Reporting standards
- Abraham, C.. (2009). Wider recommendations to improve reporting of the content of behaviour change interventions. (For the Workgroup for Intervention Development and Evaluation Research). Retrieved November 14, 2012 from http://interventiondesign.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/wider-recommendations.pdf
- Boutron, I., Moher, D., Altman, D. G., Schulz, K., Ravaud, P., & for the CONSORT group. (2008b). Methods and processes of the CONSORT group: Example of an extension for trials assessing nonpharmacologic treatments. Annals of Internal Medicine, 148(4), W60–W67.Google Scholar
- Campbell Collaboration. (2013). Retrieved 26 April 2013 from http://campbellcollaboration.org/.
- Cochrane Collaboration. (2013). Retrieved 26 April 2013 from http://www.cochrane.org/.
- Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: a synthesis of the literature. Tampa: University of South Florida.Google Scholar
- Fraser, M. W., Galinsky, M. J., Richman, J. M., & Day, S. H. (2009). Intervention Research: Developing Social Programs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Goldbeck, L., & Vitiello, B. (2011). Reporting clinical trials of psychosocial interventions in child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 5(4).Google Scholar
- Grant, S., Montgomery, P., & Mayo-Wilson, E. (2012). Development of a CONSORT extension for interventions in public health and related disciplines. The Lancet, 380(Supp. 3), p. S14. Retrieved 26 April 2013 from http://www.thelancet.com/abstracts/public-health-science.
- Henggeler, S. W., Schoenwald, S. K., Rowland, M. D., & Cunningham, P. B. (2002). Serious emotional disturbances in children and adolescents: Multisystemic therapy. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Ivers, N., Jamtvedt, G., Flottorp, S., Young, J. M., Odgaard-Jensen, J., French, S. D., et al. (2012). Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 6, CD000259.Google Scholar
- Littell, J. H., Campbell, M., Green, S., & Toews, B. (2009). Multisystemic Therapy for social, emotional, and behavioral problems in youth aged 10-17. Cochrane Library of Systematic Reviews, 4, CD004797.Google Scholar
- Medical Research Council. (2008). A framework for development and evaluation of RCTs for complex interventions to improve health. London: Medical Research Council.Google Scholar
- Medical Research Council. (2011). Using natural experiments to evaluate population health interventions: guidance for producers and users of evidence. London: Medical Research Council.Google Scholar
- Moore, L. (2002). Research design for the rigorous evaluation of complex educational interventions: lessons from health services research. Building Research Capacity, 1, 4–5.Google Scholar
- Murphy, M. K., Black, N. A., Lamping, D. L., McKee, C. M., Sanders, C. F. B., Askham, J., et al. (1998). Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development. Health Technology Assessment, 2(3).Google Scholar
- Pawson, R., Greenhalgh, T., Harvey, G., & Walshe, K. (2004). Realist Synthesis: An Introduction. (University of Manchester: ESRC Research Methods Programme)Google Scholar
- Prescott, R. J., Counsell, C. E., Gillespie, W. J., Grant, A. M., Russell, I. T., Kiauka, S., et al. (1999). Factors that limit the quality, number and progress of randomised controlled trials. Health Technology Assessment, 3(20).Google Scholar
- Semaan, S., Kay, L., Strouse, D., Sogolow, E., Mullen, P. D., Neumann, M. S., et al. (2002). A profile of U.S.-based trials of behavioral and social interventions for HIV risk reduction. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 30, S30–S50.Google Scholar
- Turner, L., Shamseer, L., Altman, D. G., Weeks, L., Peters, J., Kober, T., et al. (2012). Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 11, MR000030.Google Scholar
- von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gotzsche, P. C., & Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2007). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Annals of Internal Medicine, 147(8), 573–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar