Advertisement

Journal of Experimental Criminology

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 169–187 | Cite as

A randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of multisystemic therapy in the Netherlands: post-treatment changes and moderator effects

  • Jessica J. AsscherEmail author
  • Maja Deković
  • Willeke A. Manders
  • Peter H. van der Laan
  • Pier J. M. Prins
  • Dutch MST Cost-Effectiveness Study Group4
Article

Abstract

Objective

In the present randomized controlled trial, the effectiveness of multisystemic therapy (MST) in The Netherlands was examined. Moderator tests were conducted for ethnicity, age and gender.

Methods

The sample consisted of N = 256 adolescents, referred because of conduct problems, and randomized to MST or treatment as usual (TAU). Assessments (questionnaires and observational ratings) took place before and immediately after the treatment.

Results

MST was more effective than TAU in decreasing externalizing behavior, ODD, CD and property offences, but not for violence. Findings were mixed for adolescents’ and parental cognitions: the MST group, compared to TAU, showed an improvement in parental sense of competence, and a decrease in adolescents’ hostility, but no change in self-esteem and an increase in personal failure. MST was effective for positive dimensions of parenting and associations with prosocial peers, but not for relationships with deviant peers. MST was equally effective for adolescents of different ages and with different ethnicities. However, MST showed larger (and more positive) effects for adolescent cognitions for boys than for girls.

Conclusions

Effects of MST in The Netherlands are generally comparable to the positive findings reported in American and Norwegian trials. MST seems equally effective across age and ethnic minority groups, but some gender moderator effects were found for adolescent cognitions.

Keywords

Effectiveness Multisystemic therapy (MST) Externalizing behavior problems Parenting Cognitions Peers 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) and The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMW). We thank the therapists and staff of De Waag and Yorneo for their cooperation, and the adolescents and families who participated in the project.

References

  1. Abidin, R. R. (Ed.). (1983). Parenting stress index manual. Charlottesville: Pediatric Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  2. Achenbach, T. M. (1991). Manual for the youth self-report and 1991 profile. Burlington: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.Google Scholar
  3. Aos, S., Lieb, R., Mayfield, J., Miller, M., & Pennucci. (2004). Benefits and costs of prevention and early intervention programs for youth. Olympia: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.Google Scholar
  4. Asscher, J. J., Deković, M., Van der Laan, P. H., Prins, P. J. M., & Van Arum, S. (2007). Implementing randomized experiments in criminal justice settings: an evaluation of multisystemic therapy (MST) in The Netherlands. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 3, 113–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barber, B. K. (2002). Intrusive parenting. How psychological control affects children and adolescents. Washington, DC: APAO.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barnes, H., & Olson, D. H. (1985). Parent-adolescent communication and the circumplex model. Child Development, 56, 438–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barriga, A. Q., Gibbs, J. C., Potter, G. B., & Liau, A. K. (2001). Test manual for the how I think questionnaire. Champaign: Research Press.Google Scholar
  8. Beck, A. T. (1999). Prisoners of hate. The cognitive basis of anger, hostility, and violence. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  9. Blokland, A., Grimbergen, K., Bernasco, W., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2010). Criminaliteit en etniciteit. Criminele carrieres van autochtone en allochtone jongeren uit het geboortecohort 1984. Tijdschrift voor Criminologie, 52, 122–152 [Criminality and ethnicity: criminal careers of Dutch and migrant juveniles from birth cohort 1984].Google Scholar
  10. Blom, M., & van der Laan, A.M. (2006). Monitor Jeugd Terecht. Retrieved November, 24, 2009 from http://www.wodc.nl/onderzoeksdatabase/monitor-jeugd-terecht-2006.aspx.
  11. Borduin, C. M., Schaefer, C. M., & Heiblum, N. (2009). A randomized clinical trial of multisystemic therapy with juvenile sex offenders: effects on youth social ecology and criminal activity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77, 26–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brown, B. B., Mounts, N., Lamborn, S. D., & Steinberg, L. (1993). Parenting practices and peer group affiliation in adolescence. Child Development, 64, 467–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brunk, M., Henggeler, S. W., & Whelan, J. P. (1987).Comparison of multisystemic therapy and parent trainingin the brief treatment of child abuse and neglect. Journalof Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 171–178.Google Scholar
  14. Butler, S., Baruch, G., Hickey, N., & Fonagy, P. (2011). A randomized controlled trial of multisystemic therapy and a statutory therapeutic intervention for young offenders. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 50, 1220–1235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Coleman, P. K., & Karraker, K. H. (1997). Self-efficacy and parenting quality: findings and future applications. Developmental Review, 18, 47–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cunningham, A. J. (2002). One step forward: lessons learned from a randomized study of multisystemic therapy in Canada. Praxis: Research from the Centre for Children & Families in the Justice System. June 2002.Google Scholar
  18. Curtis, N. M., Ronan, K. R., & Borduin, C. M. (2004). Multisystemic treatment: a meta-analysis of outcome studies. Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 411–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Deković, M., Janssens, J. M. A. M., & van As, N. M. C. (2003). Family predictors of antisocial behavior in adolescence. Family Process, 42, 223–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Deković, M., Asscher, A. A., Hermanns, J., Reitz, E., Prinzie, P., van den Akker, A. L. (2010).Tracing changes in families who participated in the Home-Start Parenting Program: parental sense of competence as mechanism of change. Prevention Science, 11, 263–274Google Scholar
  21. Donnellan, M. B., Trzeniewski, K. H., Robins, R. W., Moffitt, T. E., & Caspi, A. (2005). Low self-esteem is related to aggression, antisocial behavior, and delinquency. Psychological Science, 16, 328–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Donovan, W. L., Leavitt, L. A., & Walsh, R. O. (1990). Maternal self-efficacy. Illusory control and its effect on susceptibility to learned helplessness. Child Development, 61, 1638–1647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Emeka, T. Q., & Sorensen, J. R. (2009). Female juvenile risk: is there a need for gendered assessment instruments? Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 7, 313–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Furman, W. (1996). The measurement of friendship perceptions: Conceptual and methodological issues. In W. M. Bukowski & A. F. Newcomb (Eds.), The company they keep: friendship in childhood and adolescence. Cambridge studies in social and emotional development (pp. 41–65). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Gerris, J. R. M., et al. (1993). Parents, adolescents, and young adults in dutch families: a longitudinal study. Nijmegen: University of Nijmegen.Google Scholar
  26. Gibbs, J. C. (2003). Moral development and reality. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Graham, J. W. (2009). Missing data analysis: making it work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 549–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Harter, S. (1985). Manual for the self-perception profile for children. Denver: University of Denver.Google Scholar
  29. Henggeler, S. W. (2011). Efficacy studies to large-scale transport: the development and validation of multisystemic therapy programs. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 7, 351–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Henggeler, S. W., & Borduin, C. M. (1992). Multisystemic therapy adherence measures. Unpublished Instrument. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina.Google Scholar
  31. Henggeler, S. W., & Lee, T. G. (2003). Multisystemic treatment of serious clinical problems. In A. E. Kazdin & J. R. Weisz (Eds.), Evidence-based psychotherapies for children and adolescents (pp. 301–322). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  32. Henggeler, S. W., & Schaeffer, C. M. (2010). Treating serous emotional and behavioral problems using multisystemic therapy. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 31, 149–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Henggeler, S. W., Melton, G. B., & Smith, L. A. (1992). Family preservation using multisystemic therapy: an effective alternative to incarcerating serious juvenile offenders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60, 953–961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Henggeler, S. W., Melton, G. B., Brondino, M. J., Scherer, D. G., & Hanley, J. H. (1997). Multisystemic therapy with violent chronic juvenile offenders and their families: the role of treatment fidelity in successful dissemination. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 821–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Henggeler, S. W., Clingempeel, W. G., Brondino, M. J., & Pickrel, S. G. (2002). Four-year follow-up of multisystemic therapy with substance abusing and substance dependent juvenile offenders. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 41, 868–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Huey, S. J., Henggeler, S. W., Brondino, M. J., & Pickrel, S. G. (2000). Treatment Adherence Measure (TAM). Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  37. Kerr, M., & Stattin, H. (2000). What parents know, how they know it, and several forms of adolescent adjustment: further support for a reinterpretation of monitoring. Developmental Psychology, 36, 366–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Leschied, A. W., & Cunningham, A. (2002). Seeking effective interventions for serious young offenders. Interim results of a four-year randomized study of multisystemic therapy in Ontario, Canada. London (CA): Centre for children and families in the justice system of the London Family Court Clinic.Google Scholar
  39. Letourneau, E. J., Sheidow, A. J., & Schoenwald, S. K. (2002). Structure and reliability of the MST therapist adherence scale in a large community sample. Family Services Research Center, Medical University of South Carolina.Google Scholar
  40. Lipsey, M. W. (1999). Can intervention rehabilitate serious delinquents? Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Research, 564, 142–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Littell, J. H., Popa, M., & Forsythe, B. (Eds.). (2005). Multisystemic therapy for social, emotional, and behavior problems in youth age 10–17. Cochrane Library, issue 3. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
  42. Mason, W. A. (2001). Self-esteem and delinquency revisited (again): a test of Kaplan’s self-derogation theory of delinquency using latent growth curve modeling. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 30, 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. MST services (2011). Multisystemic therapy (MST). Brief description, retieved from http://www.mstservices.com/pa_mst_medicaid_standard.doc, January 2011.
  44. Nada Raja, S., McGee, R., & Stanton, W. R. (1992). Perceived attachments to parents and peers and psychological well-being in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 21, 471–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ogden, T., & Halliday-Boykins, C. A. (2004). Multisystemic treatment of antisocial adolescents in Norway: replication of clinical outcomes outside of the US. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 9, 77–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Oosterlaan, J., Scheres, A., Antrop, I., Roeyers, H., & Sergeant, J. A. (2000). Vragenlijst voor Gedragsproblemen bij Kinderen (VvGK). Handleiding. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
  47. Potier, J., & Day, C. (2007). Childhood onset conduct problems: a preliminary investigation into the role of mothers’ interpersonal schemas and their relationship to parenting behaviour. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 35, 457–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rowland, M. D., Halliday-Boykins, C. A., Henggeler, S. W., Cunningham, P. B., Lee, T. G., Kruesi, M. J. P., et al. (2005). A randomized trial of multisystemic therapy with Hawaii’s Felix Class Youths. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 13, 13–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schaeffer, C. M., & Borduin, C. M. (2005). Long-term follow-up to a randomized clinical trial of multisystemic therapy with serious and violent juvenile offenders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 445–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schneider, M. J., & Leitenberg, H. (1989). A comparison of aggressive and withdrawn children’s self-esteem, optimism and pessimism, and causal attributions for success and failure. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 17, 133–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schniering, C. A., & Rapee, R. M. (2004). The structure of negative self-statements in children and adolescents: a confirmatory factor-analytic approach. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 32, 95–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schoenwald, S. K., Henggeler, S. W., Brondino, M. J., & Rowland, M. D. (2000). Multisystemic therapy: monitoring treatment fidelity. Family Process, 39, 83–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schoenwald, S. K., Sheidow, A. J., Letourneau, E. J., & Liao, J. G. (2003). Transportability of multisystemic therapy: evidence for multi-level influences. Mental Health Services Research, 5, 223–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schoenwald, S. K., Sheidow, A. J., & Letourneau, E. J. (2004). Toward effective quality assurance in evidence-based practice: links between expert consultation, therapist fidelity, and child outcomes. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 33, 94–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schoenwald, S. K., Letourneau, E. J., & Halliday-Boykins, C. A. (2005). Predicting adherence to a transported family-based treatment for youth. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 34, 658–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Simpson, D. D., & McBride A. A. (1992). Family, friends, and self (FFS) assessment scales for Mexican American youth. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 14, 327–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Slater, M. A., & Power, T. G. (1987). Multidimensionalassessment of parenting in single-parent families. Advances in Family Intervention, Assessment, andTheory, 4, 197–228.Google Scholar
  58. Sundell, K., Hansson, K., Löfholm, C. A., Olsson, T., Gustle, L. H., & Kadesjö, C. (2008). The transportability of multisystemic therapy to Sweden: short-term results from a randomized trial of conduct-disordered youths. Journal of Family Psychology, 22, 550–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Timmons-Mitchell, J., Bender, M. B., Kishna, M. A., & Mitchell, C. C. (2006). An independent effectiveness trial of multisystemic therapy with juvenile justice youth. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 35, 227–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Van der Put, C. E., Deković, M., Stams, G. J. J. M., Van der Laan, P. H., Hoeve, M., & Van Amelsfort, L. (2011). Changes in risk factors during adolescence: implications for risk assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 248–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Van Vugt, E. S., Hendriks, J., Stams, G. J. J. M., Van Exter, F., Bijleveld, C., van der Laan, P., & Asscher, J. J. (2011). Moral judgment, cognitive distortions and moral reasoning in juvenile sex offenders. Forensic Psychiatry, & Psychology, 22, 603–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Verhulst, F., & Van der Ende, J. (1992). Agreement between parents’ and adolescents’ self-reports of problem behavior. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 33, 1011–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Verhulst, F., Koot, J. M., Akkerhuis, G. W., & Veerman, J. W. (1990). Praktische handleiding voor de CBCL. [CBCL manual] Van Gorcum, Assen/Maastricht.Google Scholar
  64. Webster-Stratton, C. (1998). Preventing conduct problems in head start children: strengthening parenting competencies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 715–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Weerman, F. M., & Smeenk, W. H. (2005). Peer similarity in delinquency of different types of friends: a comparison using two measurement methods. Criminology, 43, 499–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Welsh, B. C., Lipsey, M. W., Rivara, F. P., Hawkins, J. D., Aos, S., & Hollis-Peel, M. E. (2012). Promoting change, changing lives: Effective prevention and intervention to reduce serious offending. In R. Loeber & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), From juvenile delinquency to adult crime: criminal careers, justice policy, and prevention (pp. 245–277). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Zahn, M. A., Day, J. C., Mihalic, S. F., & Tichavsky, L. (2009). Determining what works for girls in the Juvenile justice system a summary of evaluation evidence. Crime & Delinquency, 55, 266–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jessica J. Asscher
    • 1
    Email author
  • Maja Deković
    • 2
  • Willeke A. Manders
    • 2
  • Peter H. van der Laan
    • 3
  • Pier J. M. Prins
    • 4
  • Dutch MST Cost-Effectiveness Study Group4
    • 5
  1. 1.Forensic Child and Youth Care SciencesUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamNetherlands
  2. 2.Utrecht UniversityUtrechtNetherlands
  3. 3.Free University Amsterdam/NSCRAmsterdamNetherlands
  4. 4.Child Clinical Psychology, University of AmsterdamAmsterdamNetherlands
  5. 5.Groningen UniversityGroningenNetherlands

Personalised recommendations