Journal of Experimental Criminology

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 189–212 | Cite as

Results from experimental trials testing participant responses to White, Hispanic and Black suspects in high-fidelity deadly force judgment and decision-making simulations

Article

Abstract

Objective

Advance the methodological techniques used to examine the influence of suspect race and ethnicity on participant decisions to shoot in an experimental setting.

Methods

After developing and testing a novel set of 60 realistic, high definition video deadly force scenarios based on 30 years of official data on officer-involved shootings in the United States, three separate experiments were conducted testing police (n = 36), civilian (n= 72) and military (n = 6) responses (n = 1,812) to the scenarios in high-fidelity computerized training simulators. Participants’ responses to White, Black and Hispanic suspects in potentially deadly situations were analyzed using a multi-level mixed methods strategy. Key response variables were reaction time to shoot and shooting errors.

Results

In all three experiments using a more externally valid research method than previous studies, we found that participants took longer to shoot Black suspects than White or Hispanic suspects. In addition, where errors were made, participants across experiments were more likely to shoot unarmed White suspects than unarmed Black or Hispanic suspects, and were more likely to fail to shoot armed Black suspects than armed White or Hispanic suspects. In sum, this research found that participants displayed significant bias favoring Black suspects in their decisions to shoot.

Conclusions

The results of these three experiments challenge the results of less robust experimental designs and shed additional light on the broad issue of the role that status characteristics, such as race and ethnicity, play in the criminal justice system. Future research should explore the generalizability of these findings, determine whether bias favoring Black suspects is a consequence of administrative measures (e.g., education, training, policies, and laws), and identify the cognitive processes that underlie this phenomenon.

Keywords

Police Decision making Suspect race Suspect ethnicity 

References

  1. Alpert, G., & Dunham, R. (2010). Policy and training recommendations related to police use of CEDs: overview of findings from a comprehensive national study. Police Quarterly, 13(3), 235–259.Google Scholar
  2. Amodio, D. M., Harmon-Jones, E., & Devine, P. G. (2003). Individual differences in the activation and control of affective race bias as assessed by startle eyeblink response and self-report. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 738–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amodio, D. M., Harmon-Jones, E., Devine, P. G., Curtin, J. J., Hartley, S. L., & Covert, A. E. (2004). Neural signals for the detection of unintentional race bias. Psychological Science, 15(2), 88–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, J., & Langan, P. (2001). Policing and Homicide, 1976–98: Justifiable Homicide by Police, Police Officers Murdered by Felons. U.S. Department of Justice. Washington: Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar
  5. Campbell, D., & Stanley, J. (1963). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  6. Cooper, M. (February 5, 1999). “Officers in Bronx Fire 41 Shots, And an Unarmed Man Is Killed.” The New York Times.Google Scholar
  7. Correll, J., Urland, G. L., & Ito, T. A. (2006). Event-related potentials and the decision to shoot: the role of threat perception and cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 120–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Correll, J., Park, B., Judd, C. M., Wittenbrink, B., Sadler, M. S., & Keesee, T. (2007a). Across the thin blue line: police officers and racial bias in the decision to shoot. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1006–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Correll, J., Park, B., Judd, C. M., & Wittenbrink, B. (2007b). Stereotypes and racial bias in the decision to shoot. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(6), 1102–1117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Deakin, T. (1988). Police Professionalism: The Renaissance of American Law Enforcement. Springfield, Ill.; Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
  11. Eberhardt, J. L., Goff, P. A., Purdie, V. J., & Davies, P. G. (2004). Seeing black: race, crime, and visual processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 876–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Federal Bureau of Investigation, Criminal Justice Information Services Division. (2006). Violent Encounters: A Study of Felonious Assaults on Our Nation’s Law Enforcement Officers. Washington: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  13. Fyfe, J. J. (1978). Shots Fired: An Analysis of New York City Police Firearms Discharges. PhD dissertation, State University of New York at Albany.Google Scholar
  14. Fyfe, J. J. (1982). Blind justice: police shootings in Memphis. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 73, 702–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fyfe, J. (2000). Urban Policing in Australia and the United States, In Policing Issues, Issue #1, pp. 1–12Google Scholar
  16. Geller, W. A. (1982). Deadly force: what we know. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 10, 151–177.Google Scholar
  17. Goldkamp, J. S. (1976). Minorities as victims of police shootings: interpretations of racial disproportionality and police use of deadly force.”. Justice System Journal, 2, 169–183.Google Scholar
  18. Ho, T. (1993). Individual and situational determinants of the use of deadly force: a simulation. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 18(1), 41–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Honig, A. & Roland, J. (1998). “Shots Fired: Officer Involved.” The Police Chief.Google Scholar
  20. Inn, A., Wheeler, A., & Sparling, C. (1977). The effects of suspect race and situation hazard on police officer shooting behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 7(1), 27–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jacobs, D., & O’Brien, R. (1998). The determinants of deadly force: a structural analysis of police violence. The American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 837–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. James, G. R., & Pasquale-Styles, M. (2009). Firearm Deaths by Law Enforcement. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 54(1), 185–188 (Blackwell Publishing Limited).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Klinger, D. (2004). Into the Kill Zone: A Cop’s Eye View of Deadly Force. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  24. Klinger, D. (2005). Social Theory and the Street Cop: The Case of Deadly Force. Ideas in American Policing, No. 7. Washington, D.C: Police Foundation.Google Scholar
  25. Klinger, D., & Brunson, R. (2009). Police officers perceptual distortions during lethal force situations: informing the reasonableness standard. Criminology and Public Policy, 8(1), 117–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kobler, A. (1975). Figures (and perhaps some facts) on police killing of civilians in the United States 1965–1969. Journal of Social Issues, 31(1), 185–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Liska, A., & Yu, J. (1992). Specifying and Testing the Threat Hypothesis: Police Use of Deadly Force. In A. E. Liska (Ed.), Social Threat and Social Control (pp. 53–68). Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  28. Lopez, R.J. “No evidence Ruben Salazar was targeted in killing, report says.” Los Angeles Times, February 19, 2011.Google Scholar
  29. MacDonald, J., Kaminski, R., Alpert, G., & Tennenbaum, A. (2001). The temporal relationship between police killings of civilians and criminal homicide: a refined version of the danger-perception theory. Crime & Delinquency, 47, 155–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Meyer, M. (1980). Police shootings of minorities: the case of Los Angeles. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 452, 98–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Payne, B. K. (2001). Prejudice and perception: the role of automatic and controlled processes in misperceiving a weapon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Payne, B. K., Lambert, A. J., & Jacoby, L. L. (2002). Best laid plans: effects of goals on accessibility bias and cognitive control in race-based misperceptions of weapons. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 384–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Perrow, C. (1984). Normal Accidents: Living With High Risk Technologies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Plant, E. A., & Peruche, B. M. (2005). The consequences of race for police officers’ responses to criminal suspects. Psychological Science, 16, 180–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Plant, E. A., Peruche, B. M., & Butz, D. A. (2005). Eliminating automatic racial bias: making race non-diagnostic for responses to criminal suspects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 141–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Robin, G. D. (1963). Justifiable homicide by police officers. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, 54, 225–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sherman, L., & Langworthy, R. (1979). Measuring Homicide by Police Officers. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 70, 546–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Solomon, R. M., & Horn, J. M. (1986). Post-Shooting Traumatic Reactions: A Pilot Study. In J. T. Reese & H. A. Goldstein (Eds.), Psychological Services for Law Enforcement. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  39. Sorenson, J., Marquart, J., & Brock, D. (1993). Factors relating to killings of felons by police officers: a test of the community violence and conflict hypotheses. Justice Quarterly, 10(3), 417–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stone, C., Carter, Z., Belfiore, T., Bully-Cummings, E., Daughtry, H., Farrell, M., Gascon, G., Rice, A., Rice, L. & Hewitt, D. (2010). Reducing Inherent Danger: Report of the Task Force on Police-on-police Shootings. New York State Task Force on Police-on-Police Shootings.Google Scholar
  41. Takagi, P. (1974). A garrison state in a “democratic” society. Crime and Scholarly Justice, 1, 27–33.Google Scholar
  42. U.S. Department of Justice. (2001). Policing and homicide, 1976–98: Justifiable homicide by police, police officers murdered by felons (NCJ180987). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar
  43. U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Killed in the Line of Duty: A Study of Selected Felonious Killings of Law Enforcement Officers (Washington, DC, 1992).Google Scholar
  44. U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, In the Line of Fire: Violence Against Law Enforcement (Washington, DC, 1997).Google Scholar
  45. US-House-Committee-on-the-Judiciary-Subcommittee-on-Criminal-Justice. (1989). Police Use of Deadly Force. Hearing…May 8, 1987. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  46. Walker, S., Spohn, C., DeLone, M. (2004). The Color of Justice: Race, Ethnicity and Crime in America. 3rd edn. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/ThompsonGoogle Scholar
  47. White, M. D. (2001). Controlling police decisions to use deadly force: reexamining the importance of administrative police. Crime & Delinquency, 47(1), 131–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. White, M. D. (2002). Identifying situational predictors of police shootings using multivariate analysis. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 25(4), 726–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Washington State UniversitySpokaneUSA

Personalised recommendations