Journal of Experimental Criminology

, Volume 7, Issue 3, pp 255–274 | Cite as

Police-monitored CCTV cameras in Newark, NJ: A quasi-experimental test of crime deterrence

  • Joel M. CaplanEmail author
  • Leslie W. Kennedy
  • Gohar Petrossian


We present a test of the crime-deterrent effect of police-monitored street-viewing CCTV cameras using viewsheds of areas that were visible by cameras via direct line-of-sight and that were digitized using easily replicable methods, Google Maps, and standard GIS tools. A quasi-experimental research design, using camera installation sites and randomly selected control sites, assessed the impact of CCTV on the crimes of shootings, auto thefts, and thefts from autos in Newark, NJ, for 13 months before and after camera installation dates. Strategically-placed cameras were not any different from randomly-placed cameras at deterring crime within their viewsheds; there were statistically significant reductions in auto thefts within viewsheds after camera installations; there were significant improvements to location quotient values for shootings and auto thefts after camera installations. There was no significant displacement and there was a small diffusion of benefits, which was greater for auto thefts than shootings. The system of cameras in Newark is not as efficient as it could be at deterring certain street crimes; some camera locations are significantly more effective than others. Results of a system-wide evaluation of CCTV cameras should not be the only basis for endorsing or contesting the use of CCTV cameras for crime control or prevention within a city. Future research should test whether the effectiveness of CCTV cameras are dependent upon the micro-level attributes of environments within which they are installed.


Camera CCTV Crime Deterrence Police Public surveillance Viewshed 



This study was funded in part by the Rutgers Center on Public Security. Special thanks to Eric Piza and the Newark Police Department for in-kind support and for providing access to data and other police resources.


  1. Akers, R. L., & Sellers, C. S. (2009). Criminological Theories: Introduction, Evaluation, and Application. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Andresen, M. A. (2009). Crime specialization across the Canadian provinces. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 51(1), 31–53.Google Scholar
  3. Armitage, R., Smythe, G., & Pease, K. (1999). Burnley CCTV evaluation. In K. Painter & N. Tilley (Eds.), Crime Prevention Studies, Vol. 10 (pp. 225–251). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice PressGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowers, K. J., & Johnson, S. D. (2003). Measuring the Geographical Displacement and Diffusion of Benefit Effects of Crime Prevention Activity. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 19, 275–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brantingham, P. J., & Brantingham, P. L. (1981). Environmental Criminology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Brantingham, P., & Brantingham, P. (1995). Criminality of Place: Crime Generators and Crime Attractors. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 3, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brantingham, P. L., & Brantingham, P. J. (1998). Mapping crime for analytic purposes: location quotients, counts, and rates. In D. Weisburd & T. McEwen (Eds.), Crime Prevention Studies (Volume 8) (pp. 263–288). St. Louis: Willow Tree Press.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, B. (1995). CCTV in town centres: Three case studies. London: Home Office Police Department.Google Scholar
  9. Caplan, J. M., Kennedy, L. W., Miller, J. (2010, online) Risk terrain modeling: Brokering criminological theory and GIS methods for crime forecasting. Justice Quarterly.Google Scholar
  10. Clarke, R. V. (Ed.). (1997). Situational Crime Prevention: successful case studies (2nd ed.). New York: Harrow and Heston.Google Scholar
  11. Clarke, R. V., & Eck, J. (2003a). Become a Problem-Solving Crime Analyst. Jill Dando Institute of Crime Science. London: University College London.Google Scholar
  12. Clarke, R.V. and Eck, J.E. (2003b). Crime analysis for problem solvers in 60 small steps. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services. Step 51. Google Scholar
  13. Cohen, L. E. & Felson, M. (1979). Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach. American Sociological Review , 44, 588–605.Google Scholar
  14. Cornish, D., & Clarke, R. V. (1986). Introduction. In D. Cornish & R. V. Clarke (Eds.), The Reasoning Criminal (pp. 1–16). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  15. Ditton, J., & Short, E. (1999). Yes, it works, no, it doesn’t: Comparing the effects of open-street CCTV in two adjacent Scottish town centres. Crime Prevention Studies, 10, 201–223.Google Scholar
  16. Eck, J. E. (1995). A general model of the geography of illicit retail marketplaces. In J. E. Eck & D. Weisburd (Eds.), Crime and place: Crime Prevention Studies (Vol. 4) (pp. 67–95). Monsey, NJ: Willow Tree Press.Google Scholar
  17. Eck, J. E. (2001). Policing and crime event concentration. In R. Meier, L. Kennedy, & V. Sacco (Eds.), The process and structure of crime: Criminal events and crime analysis (pp. 249–276). New Brunswick, NJ: Transactions.Google Scholar
  18. Eck, J. E., Chainey, S., Cameron, J. G., Leitner, M., & Wilson, R. E. (2005). Mapping Crime: Understanding Hot Spots. Washington, D. C.: National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
  19. Farrington, D. P., Gill, M., Waples, S. J., & Argomaniz, J. (2007). The effects of closed-circuit television on crime: meta-analysis of an English national quasi-experimental multi-site evaluation. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 3, 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Felson, M. (1995). Those who discourage crime. In J. E. Eck & D. Weisburd (Eds.), Crime and Place: Crime Prevention Studies (Vol. 4). Washington, D.C.: Police Executive Research Forum.Google Scholar
  21. Fern, E. F., & Monroe, K. B. (1996). Effect-Size Estimates: Issues and Problems in Interpretation. Journal of Consumer Research, 23(2), 89–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gill, M., & Spriggs, A. (2005). Assessing the Impact of CCTV. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  23. Gill, M., Rose, A., Collins, K., & Hemming, M. (2006). Redeployable CCTV and drug-related crime: A case of implementation failure. Drugs: Education, prevention and Policy, 13, 451–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Goold, B. J. (2003). Public area surveillance and police work: The impact of CCTV on police behaviour and autonomy. Surveillance & Society, 1, 191–203.Google Scholar
  25. Groff, E. R. (2007a). Simulation for Theory Testing and Experimentation: An Example Using Routine Activity Theory and Street Robbery. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 23, 75–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Groff, E. R. (2007b). 'Situating' Simulation to Model Human Spatio-Temporal Interactions: An Example Using Crime Events. Transactions in GIS, 11(4), 507–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Groff, E. R., & La Vigne, N. G. (2001). Mapping an opportunity surface of residential burglary. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 38, 257–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Harries, K. (1999). Mapping Crime: Principles and Practice, National Hills, CA.Google Scholar
  29. Harris, C., Jones, P., Hillier, D., & Turner, D. (1998). CCTV surveillance systems in town and city centre management. Property Management, 16(3), 160–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Isnard, A. (2001). Can surveillance cameras be successful in preventing crime and controlling anti-social behaviours? Paper presented at The Character, Impact and Prevention of Crime in Regional Australia Conference. Australia: Townsville.Google Scholar
  31. Kennedy, L. W., Caplan, J. M., Piza, E. (2010, online first). Risk clusters, hotspots, and spatial intelligence: Risk Terrain Modeling as an Algorithm for Police Resource Allocation Strategies. Journal of Quantitative Criminology. Google Scholar
  32. King, J., Mulligan, D. K., & Raphael, S. (2008). CITRIS report: The San Francisco community safety camera program. Berkely, CA: Center for Information Technology Research in the Interest of Society.Google Scholar
  33. Mazerolle, L., Hurley, D. C., & Chamlin, M. (2002). Social behavior in public space: An analysis of behavioral adaptations to CCTV. Security Journal, 15(3), 59–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mazerolle, L., Kadleck, C., & Roehl, J. (2004). Differential police control at drug-dealing places. Security Journal, 17, 1–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Miethe, T., & Meier, R. (1994). Crime and its Social Context: Toward an Integrated Theory of Offenders, Victims, and Situations. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  36. Phillips, C. (1999). A review of CCTV evaluations: Crime reduction effects and attitudes towards its use. In K. Painter & N. Tilley (Eds.), Surveillance of Public Space: CCTV, Street Lighting and Crime Prevention (Crime Prevention Studies (pp, Vol. 10, pp. 123–155). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
  37. Ratcliffe, J. H., Taniguchi, T., & Taylor, R. B. (2009). The Crime Reduction Effects of Public CCTV Cameras: A Multi-Method Spatial Approach. Justice Quarterly, 26(4), 747–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ratcliffe, J. H., & Rengert, G. F. (2008). Near repeat patterns in Philadelphia shootings. Security Journal, 21, 58–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Robinson, J. B. (2008). Crime and regeneration in urban communities; The case of the big dig in Boston, Massachusetts. Built Environment, 34, 46–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Salkind, N. (2008). Statistics for people who (think they) hate statistics. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  41. Shaw, C. R., & McKay, H. D. (1969). Juvenile Delinquency and Urban Areas. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  42. Sherman, L. W., Gartin, P. R., & Buerger, M. E. (1989). Hot spots of predatory crime: Routine activities and the criminology of place. Criminology, 27, 821–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Short, E., & Ditton, J. (1996). Does CCTV Prevent Crime? An Evaluation of The Use of CCTV Surveillance Cameras in Airdrie Town Centre. Edinburgh: Scottish Office Central Research Unit.Google Scholar
  44. Sivarajasingam, V., Shepherd, J. P., & Matthews, K. (2003). Effect of urban closed circuit television on assault injury and violence detection. Injury Prevention, 9, 312–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Squires, P. (1998). An evaluation of the Ilford Town Centre CCTV system. Brighton, UK: Health and Social Policy Research Centre.Google Scholar
  46. Squires, P. (2000). CCTV and crime reduction in Crawley. Brighton, UK: Health and Social Police Research Center.Google Scholar
  47. Taylor, R. B. (1988). Human Territorial Functioning. New York: University of Cambridge Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Taylor, K. W., & Frideres, J. (1972). Issues versus controversies: Substantive and statistical significance. American Sociological Review, 37, 464–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Taylor, R. B., & Harrell, A. V. (1996). Physical Environment and Crime. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
  50. Weisburd, D. (2008). Place-Based Policing (Ideas in American Policing Series, Number 9). Washington, D.C.: Police Foundation.Google Scholar
  51. Weisburd, D., & Eck, J. E. (2004). What can police do to reduce crime, disorder, and fear? The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 593(1), 42–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Weisburd, D., Bushway, S., Lum, C., & Yang, S. (2004). Crime Trajectories at Places: A Longitudinal Study of Street Segments in the City of Seattle. Criminology, 42(2), 283–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Weisburd, D., Morris, N. A., & Ready, J. (2008). Risk Focused Policing at Places: An Experimental Evaluation. Justice Quarterly, 25(1), 163–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Weisburd, D., Bernasco, W., & Bruinsma, G. (2009a). Units of Analysis in Geographic Criminology: Historical Development, Critical Issues, and Open Questions. In D. Weisburd, W. Bernasco, & G. Bruinsma (Eds.), Putting Crime in its Place: Units of Analysis in Geographic Criminology (pp. 3–33). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Weisburd, D., Morris, N. A., & Groff, E. R. (2009b). Hot Spots of Juvenile Crime: A Longitudinal Study of Arrest Incidents at Street Segments in Seattle, Washington. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 25, 443–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wells, H., Allard, T., & Wilson, P. (2006). Crime and CCTV in Australia: Understanding the relationship. Canberra, Australia: Australian Research Council.Google Scholar
  57. Welsh, B. C., & Farrington, D. P. (2002). Crime prevention effects of closed circuit television: A systematic review. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  58. Welsh, B. C., & Farrington, D. P. (2009). Public Area CCTV and Crime Prevention: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Justice Quarterly, 26, 716–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Williamson, D., & McLafferty, S. (2000). The effects of CCTV on crime in public housing: An application of GIS and spatial statistics. San Francisco, California: Paper presented at the American Society of Criminology meeting.Google Scholar
  60. Zurawski, N. (2007). Video surveillance and everyday life: Assessments of closed-circuit television and the cartography of socio-spatial imaginations. International Criminal Justice Review, 17, 269–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joel M. Caplan
    • 1
    Email author
  • Leslie W. Kennedy
    • 1
  • Gohar Petrossian
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Criminal JusticeRutgers UniversityNewarkUSA

Personalised recommendations