Examining the validity of the modified Taylor competitive reaction time test of aggression

  • Christopher J. FergusonEmail author
  • Stephanie M. Rueda


The use of behavioral tests of aggression has been a source of controversy for decades. Many critics of such measures note that validity studies for these measures are generally lacking. This manuscript describes two studies designed to test the validity of one of the most commonly used behavioral aggression measures, the modified Taylor competitive reaction time test (TCRTT). Participants in both studies were college undergraduates who were individually administered the TCRTT in a laboratory setting. In the first study (n = 103), results on a standardized version of the modified TCRTT were examined for their convergent validity with expected measures of trait aggression and violent acts, including violent criminal behaviors and domestic violence. The second study (n = 101) examined the validity of the modified TCRTT against neuropsychological outcomes that are predictive of impulsive violence. Both studies raised serious validity problems for the modified TCRTT. It is recommended that this measure not be adopted clinically as a behavioral measure of aggression and that other similar measures be more rigorously tested. Its use in research should be undertaken under advisement that results should not be generalized to serious acts of aggression or violence.


Aggression Assessment Mass media Personality assessment Violent behavior 


  1. Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. (1996). Psychological testing. New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (1997). External validity of “trivial” experiments: The case of laboratory aggression. Review of General Psychology, 1, 19–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, C., & Dill, K. (2000). Video games and aggressive thoughts, feelings and behavior in the laboratory and in life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 772–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson, C., & Murphy, C. (2003). Violent video games and aggressive behavior in young women. Aggressive Behavior, 29, 423–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson, C. A., Lindsay, J. J., & Bushman, B. J. (1999). Research in the psychological laboratory: Truth or triviality? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Archer, J., & Coyne, S. (2005). An integrated review of indirect, relational and social aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 212–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Atkins, M., Stoff, D., Osborne, M., & Brown, K. (1993). Distinguishing instrumental and hostile aggression: Does it make a difference? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. Retrieved 2/8/07 from
  8. Baron, R., & Richardson, D. (1994). Human aggression. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bartholow, B., Bushman, B., & Sestir, M. (2006). Chronic violent video game exposure and desensitization to violence: Behavioral and event-related brain potential data. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 532–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buss, A. (1961). The psychology of aggression. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Buss, A. H., & Warren, W. L. (2000). Aggression Questionnaire manual. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
  12. Carnagey, N., & Anderson, C. (2005). The effects of reward and punishment in violent video games on aggressive affect, cognition and behavior. Psychological Science, 16, 882–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cohen, J. (1994). ‘The earth is round (p < .05).’. American Psychologist, 49, 997–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. D’Esposito, M., Alexander, M., Fischer, R., McGlinchey-Berroth, R., & O’Connor, M. (1996). Recovery of memory and executive function following anterior communicating artery aneurysm rupture. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 2, 565–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Donovan, W., & Ferraro, R. (1999). Frontal lobe deficits in domestic violence offenders. Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs, 125, 71–102.Google Scholar
  16. Elliot, A., & Mirsky, A. (2002). Cognitive antecedents of violence and aggression. In J. Glicksohn (Ed.), The Neurobiology of Criminal Behavior. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  17. Elliot, D., Huizinga, D., & Ageton, S. (1985). Explaining delinquency and drug use. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Epstein, S., & Taylor, S. (1967). Instigation to aggression as a function of degree of defeat and perceived aggressive intent of the opponent. Journal of Personality, 35, 265–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Felsten, G., & Hill, V. (1999). Aggression Questionnaire hostility scale predicts anger in response to mistreatment. Behavior Research and Therapy, 37, 87–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ferguson, C. J. (2007). Evidence for publication bias in video game violence effects literature: A meta-analytic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 470–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ferguson, C. J., & Negy, C. (2006). Development and preliminary validation of a defendant and offender screening tool for psychopathology in inmate populations. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 33, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ferguson, C. J., Rueda, S., Cruz, A., Ferguson, D., Fritz, S., & Smith, S. (2008). Violent video games and aggression: Causal relationship or byproduct of family violence and intrinsic violence motivation? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 311–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Garcia-Leon, A., Reyes, G., Vila, J., Perez, N., Robles, H., & Ramos, M. (2002). The Aggression Questionnaire: A validation study in student samples. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 5, 45–53.Google Scholar
  24. Giancola, P. R., & Zeichner, A. (1995). Construct validity of a competitive reaction-time aggression paradigm. Aggressive Behavior, 21, 199–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Giancola, P. R., & Chermack, S. T. (1998). Construct validity of laboratory aggression paradigms: A response to Tedeschi and Quigley (1996). Aggression and Violent Behavior, 3, 237–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Golden, C., & Freshwater, S. (1998). Stroop color and word test: A manual for clinical and experimental uses. Wood Dale, IL: Stoelting.Google Scholar
  27. Grimes, T., Anderson, J., & Bergen, L. (2008). Media violence and aggression: Science and ideology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Hare, R. (1993). Without conscience. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  29. Hathaway, S., & McKinley, J. (1989). MMPI-2: Manual for administration and scoring. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  30. Konijn, E. A., Nije Bijvank, M., & Bushman, B. J. (2007). I wish I were a warrior: The role of wishful identification in effects of violent video games on aggression in adolescent boys. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1038–1044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kumari, V., Aasen, I., Taylor, P., Ffytche, D., Das, M., Barkataki, M., et al. (2006). Neural dysfunction and violence in schizophrenia: An fMRI investigation. Schizophrenia Research, 84, 144–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Leininger, I., Gramling, S., & Farrell, A. (1990). Neuropsychological deficits in symptomatic minor head injury patients after concussion and mild concussion. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 53, 293–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lezak, M. (1983). Neuropsychological assessment. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Reitan, R., & Wolfson, D. (1985). The Halstead-Reitan neuropsychological test battery. Tucson, AZ: Neuropsychology Press.Google Scholar
  35. Ritter, D., & Eslea, M. (2005). Hot sauce, toy guns and graffiti: A critical account of current laboratory aggression paradigms. Aggressive Behavior, 31, 407–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Savage, J. (2004). Does viewing violent media really cause criminal violence? A methodological review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10, 99–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Soderstrom, H., Hultin, L., Tullberg, M., Wikkelso, C., Ekholm, S., & Forsman, A. (2002). Reduced frontotemporal perfusion in psychopathic personality. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 114, 81.94.Google Scholar
  38. Spreen, O., & Strauss, E. (1998). A compendium of neuropsychological tests. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Straus, M., Hamby, S., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. (1996). The revised Conflict-Tactics Scale: Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 283–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Surette, R. (2007). Media crime and criminal justice: Images, realities and policies. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  41. Taylor, S. P. (1967). Aggressive behavior and physiological arousal as a function of provocation and the tendency to inhibit aggression. Journal of Personality, 35, 297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tedeschi, J., & Quigley, B. (1996). Limitations of laboratory paradigms for studying aggression. Aggression & Violent Behavior, 2, 163–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tedeschi, J., & Quigley, B. (2000). A further comment on the construct validity of laboratory aggression paradigms: A response to Giancola and Chermack. Aggression & Violent Behavior, 5, 127–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wechsler, D. (1997). WAIS-III: Administration and scoring manual. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Behavioral, Applied Sciences and Criminal JusticeTexas A&M International UniversityLaredoUSA

Personalised recommendations