Advertisement

Journal of Experimental Criminology

, Volume 4, Issue 3, pp 267–287 | Cite as

Policing Australia’s ‘heroin drought’: using an agent-based model to simulate alternative outcomes

  • Anne DrayEmail author
  • Lorraine Mazerolle
  • Pascal Perez
  • Alison Ritter
Article

Abstract

Our paper examines how street-level drug markets adapt to a macro-level disruption to the supply of heroin, under three experimental conditions of street-level drug law enforcement: random patrol, hot-spot policing and problem-orientated policing. We utilize an agent-based model to explore the relative impact of abstractions of these three law enforcement strategies after simulating an ‘external shock’ to the supply of heroin to the street-level drug market. We use 3 years of data, which include the period of the ‘heroin drought’ in Melbourne (Australia) that commenced in late 2000 and early 2001, to measure changes in a selected range of crime and harm indicators under the three policing conditions. Our results show that macro-level disruptions to drug supply have a limited impact on street-level market dynamics when there is a ready replacement drug. By contrast, street-level police interventions are shown to vary in their capacity to alter drug market dynamics. Importantly, our laboratory abstraction of problem-orientated policing is shown to be the optimal strategy to disrupt street-level injecting-drug markets, reduce crimes and minimize harm, regardless of the type of drug being supplied to the market.

Keywords

Agent-based simulation model Australia Heroin drought Illicit drug Law enforcement 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper was supported by a grant from the Colonial Foundation Trust to the National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre (with sub-contracts to Griffith University, Australian National University and Turning Point Drug and Alcohol Centre). The authors are part of the Drug Policy Modelling Program (DPMP) team and wish to thank Gabriele Bammer, Jonathan Caulkins, Paul Dietze, Tim Moore and Peter Reuter for their contributions to this paper.

References

  1. AFP, Annual report 2000–01: Australian Federal Police, Annual Report 2000–2001 (Australian Federal Police, Canberra, 2001).Google Scholar
  2. Agar, M. (2005). Agents in living color: towards emic agent-based models. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 8(1).Google Scholar
  3. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2004). Criminal courts 2002–03, Cat No. 5413.0. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
  4. Baveja, A., Feichtinger, G., Hartl, R. F., & Haunschmeid, J. L. (2000). A resource-constrained optimal control model for crackdown on illicit drug markets. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 249, 53–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bousquet, F., Bakam, I., Proton, H., & Le Page, C. (1998). CORMAS: common-pool resources and multi-agent systems. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 1416, 826–837.Google Scholar
  6. Brantingham, P. J., & Brantingham, P. L. (2004). Computer simulation as a tool for environmental criminologists. Security Journal, 17, 21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bush, W., Roberts, M., & Trace, M. (2004). Upheavals in the Australian drug market: heroin drought, stimulant flood. The Beckley Foundation drug policy program. Drugscope Briefing Paper, No 4.Google Scholar
  8. Caulkins, J. P., & Reuter, P. (2006). Illicit drug markets and economic irregularities. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 40, 1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.seps.2004.08.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Caulkins, J. P., Behrens, D. A., Knoll, C., Tragler, G., & Zuba, D. (2004). Modeling dynamic trajectories of initiation and demand: the case of the US cocaine epidemic. Health Care Management Science, 7(4), 319–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Day, C., Topp, L., Rouen, D., Darke, S., Hall, W., & Dolan, K. (2003). Decreased heroin availability in Sydney in early 2001. Addiction, 98, 93–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dietze, P., Hickman, M., & Kimber, J. (2005). Monograph No. 03: Estimating the prevalence of problematic heroin use in Melbourne. DPMP Monograph Series. Fitzroy: Turning Point Alcohol and Drug Centre.Google Scholar
  12. Dietze, P., Miller, P., Clemens, S., Matthews, S., Gilmour, S., & Collins, L. (2004). The course and consequences of the heroin shortage in Victoria. NDLERF Monograph, No 6, Adelaide: Australasian Centre for Policing Research.Google Scholar
  13. Dray, A., Mazerolle, L., Perez, P., & Ritter, A. (2008). Drug law enforcement in an agent-based model: simulating the disruption to street-level drug markets. In: Liu, L. & Eck, J. (Eds.), Artificial crime analysis systems: using computing simulations and geographic information systems. Information Science Reference Publisher.Google Scholar
  14. Eck, J. E. (1998). A general model of the geography of illicit retail market places. In D. Weisburd, & J. Eck (Eds.), Crime prevention studies, vol. 4. Monsey (NY): Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
  15. Epstein, J. M., & Axtell, R. (1996). Growing artificial societies: social science from the bottom up. MIT Press/Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  16. Ferber, J. (1999). Multi-agent systems. Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  17. Goldstein, H. (1990). Problem-oriented policing. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  18. Gordon (Jan. 2002): Sandy Gordon, “Drug drought can be sourced to good policing” in Sydney Morning Herald, Wednesday 23 January 2002, p.11.Google Scholar
  19. Janssen, M. A. (ed.) (2002). Complexity and ecosystem management: the theory and practice of multi-agent systems. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishers.Google Scholar
  20. Mazerolle, L., Soole, D., & Rombouts, S. (2006). Street-level drug law enforcement: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology. Issue 2, pp 409–435.Google Scholar
  21. Miller, P., Fry, C., & Dietze, P. (2001). A study of the impact of the heroin “Drought” in Melbourne: results of the drug availability monitoring project (DAMP). Fitzroy: Turning Point Drug and Alcohol Centre, Inc.Google Scholar
  22. Moore, T. J. (2005). Monograph No. 01: What is Australia’s “drug budget”? The policy mix of illicit drug-related government spending in Australia. DPMP Monograph Series. Fitzroy: Turning Point Alcohol and Drug Centre.Google Scholar
  23. Moore, T. J., Caulkins, J. P., Ritter, A., Dietze, P., Monagle, S., & Pruden, J. (2005). Monograph No. 09: Heroin markets in Australia: current understandings and future possibilities. DPMP Monograph Series. Fitzroy: Turning Point Alcohol and Drug Centre.Google Scholar
  24. National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre (2002). Changes in patterns of drug use associated with the reduced availability of heroin. Drug trends bulletin. Sydney: National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre.Google Scholar
  25. Perez, P., & Batten, D. (2006). Complex science for a complex world: an introduction. In: Perez, P. & Batten, D. (Eds.), Complex science for a complex world. Exploring human ecosystems with agents (pp. 3–20). Canberra, Australia, ANU E Press.Google Scholar
  26. Perez, P., & Dray, A. (2005). Monograph No. 11: SimDrug: exploring the complexity of heroin use in Melbourne. DPMP Monograph Series. Fitzroy: Turning Point Alcohol and Drug Centre, ISBN 1740011724.Google Scholar
  27. Perez, P., Dray, A., Ritter, A., Dietze, P., Moore, T., & Mazerolle, L. (2006). SimDrug: tackling the complexity of illicit drug markets. In: Complex Science for a Complex World, Exploring Human Ecosystems with Agents. Edited by D Batten and P. Perez, ANU E-Press.Google Scholar
  28. Rengert, G., Chakravorty, S., Bole, T., & Henderson, K. (2000). A geographic analysis of illegal drug markets. In M. Natarajan, & M. Hough (Eds.), Illegal drug markets: from research to prevention policy. Monsey, New York: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
  29. Rengert, G., Ratcliffe, J., & Chakravorty, S. (2005). Policing illegal drug markets: geographic approaches to crime reduction. Monsey, New York: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
  30. Scott, M. S. (2000). Problem-oriented policing: reflections on the first 20 years. Washington DC: Office of Community-Oriented Policing Services, U.S Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  31. Teesson, M., Ross, J., Darke, S., Lynsky, M., Ali, R., & Ritter, A. (2006). One year outcomes for heroin dependence: findings from the Australian Treatment Outcome Study (ATOS). Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 83(2), 174–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Unger, J. B., Baezconde-Garbanati, L., Shakib, S., Palmer, P. H., Nezami, E., & Mora, J. (2004). A cultural psychology approach to drug abuse prevention. Substance Use & Misuse, 39(10–12), 1779–1820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. UNODC (2007). World Drug Report 2007. United Nations Publications, Office of Drugs and Crime, Vienna, Austria, 274 p.Google Scholar
  34. Weatherburn, D., Jones, C., Freeman, K., & Makkai, T. (2001). The Australian heroin drought and its implications for drug policy. Crime and justice bulletin, Contemporary Issues in Crime and Justice, Number 59. NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research.Google Scholar
  35. Weisburd, D., & Green, L. (1995). Policing drug hotspots: findings from the Jersey City DMA Experiment. Justice Quarterly, 12(4), 711–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anne Dray
    • 1
    Email author
  • Lorraine Mazerolle
    • 2
  • Pascal Perez
    • 1
  • Alison Ritter
    • 3
  1. 1.RMAP/RSPAS, Coombs BuildingAustralian National UniversityCanberraAustralia
  2. 2.ARC Centre of Excellence in Policing and Security (CEPS) & School of Criminology and Criminal JusticeGriffith University, Mt Gravatt CampusBrisbaneAustralia
  3. 3.Drug Policy Modelling Program, National Drug and Alcohol Research CentreUniversity of New South WalesSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations