Ecological Research

, Volume 31, Issue 6, pp 963–967 | Cite as

On-site filtration of water samples for environmental DNA analysis to avoid DNA degradation during transportation

  • Hiroki Yamanaka
  • Hiromu Motozawa
  • Satsuki Tsuji
  • Ryohei C. Miyazawa
  • Teruhiko Takahara
  • Toshifumi Minamoto
Technical Report


Environmental DNA (eDNA) analysis is an innovative tool for determining the distribution or abundance of aquatic macroorganisms. However, because eDNA degrades rapidly in water, long delays between sampling and analysis may hinder eDNA quantification. In the present study, we developed a portable filtration system that enables on-site (and on-the-road) filtration of water samples. Degradation rates of eDNA within 6 h were compared using water from an outdoor pond that was subjected to (1) on-site filtration, (2) transportation of water on ice, and (3) transportation of water at ambient temperature. Groups 2 and 3 were filtered in the laboratory 6 h after sampling. The concentration of eDNA was determined as the copy number of the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene of two fish species using real-time polymerase chain reaction. The portable filtration system offers the following benefits: (1) the eDNA concentration is preserved as is at the time of sampling, permitting higher accuracy of eDNA quantification, (2) use of a disposable sealed plastic bag reduces the risk of contamination and ensures on-the-road filtration, (3) time is saved because filtration can be accomplished when driving between sampling sites.


DNA degradation Environmental DNA On-site filtration Reduce sample contamination Time-saving sampling 



This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant 26840152 and 16K18610. This study was partially supported by the Environment Research and Technology Development Fund of the Ministry of the Environment (4RF-1302), the CREST program from the Japan Science and Technology Agency, and the Ryukoku University Technology Fund.

Supplementary material

11284_2016_1400_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (130 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 129 kb)


  1. Bustin SA, Benes V, Garson JA, Hellemans J, Huggett J, Kubista M, Mueller R, Nolan T, Pfaffl MW, Shipley GL, Vandesompele J, Wittwer CT (2009) The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. Clin Chem 55:611–622. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2008.112797 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Deiner K, Walser JC, Mächler E, Altermatt F (2015) Choice of capture and extraction methods affect detection of freshwater biodiversity from environmental DNA. Biol Conserv 183:53–63. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.11.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ficetola GF, Miaud C, Pompanon F, Taberlet P (2008) Species detection using environmental DNA from water samples. Biol Lett 4:423–425. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2008.0118 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Goldberg CS, Pilliod DS, Arkle RS, Waits LP (2011) Molecular detection of vertebrates in stream water: a demonstration using Rocky Mountain tailed frogs and Idaho giant salamanders. PLoS One 6:e22746. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022746 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Jerde CL, Mahon AR, Chadderton WL, Lodge DM (2011) “Sight-unseen” detection of rare aquatic species using environmental DNA. Conserv Lett 4:150–157. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2010.00158.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Maruyama A, Nakamura K, Yamanaka H, Kondoh M, Minamoto T (2014) The release rate of environmental DNA from juvenile and adult fish. PLoS One 9:e114639. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114639 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Minamoto T, Naka T, Moji K, Maruyama A (2016) Techniques for the practical collection of environmental DNA: filter selection, preservation, and extraction. Limnology 17:23–32. doi: 10.1007/s10201-015-0457-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Miya M, Sato Y, Fukunaga T, Sado T, Poulsen JY, Sato K, Minamoto T, Yamamoto S, Yamanaka H, Araki H, Kondoh M, Iwasaki W (2015) MiFish, a set of universal PCR primers for metabarcoding environmental DNA from fishes: detection of more than 230 subtropical marine species. R Soc Open Sci 2:150088. doi: 10.1098/rsos.150088 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Piaggio AJ, Engeman R, Hopken MW (2014) Detecting an elusive invasive species: a diagnostic PCR to detect Burmese python in Florida waters and an assessment of persistence of environmental DNA. Mol Ecol Resour 14:374–380. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12180 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Takahara T, Minamoto T, Doi H (2013) Using environmental DNA to estimate the distribution of an invasive fish species in ponds. PLoS One 8:e56584. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056584 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. R Core Team (2013) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria.
  12. Thomsen PF, Kielgast J, Iversen LL, Møller PR, Rasmussen M, Willerslev E (2012) Detection of a diverse marine fish fauna using environmental DNA from seawater samples. PLoS One 7:e41732. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041732 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Yamanaka H, Minamoto T (2016) The use of environmental DNA of fishes as an efficient method of determining habitat connectivity. Ecol Indic 62:147–153. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.11.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Ecological Society of Japan 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hiroki Yamanaka
    • 1
  • Hiromu Motozawa
    • 2
  • Satsuki Tsuji
    • 2
  • Ryohei C. Miyazawa
    • 1
  • Teruhiko Takahara
    • 3
  • Toshifumi Minamoto
    • 4
  1. 1.Faculty of Science and TechnologyRyukoku UniversityOtsuJapan
  2. 2.Graduate School of Science and TechnologyRyukoku UniversityOtsuJapan
  3. 3.Faculty of Life and Environmental ScienceShimane UniversityMatsueJapan
  4. 4.Graduate School of Human Development and EnvironmentKobe UniversityKobeJapan

Personalised recommendations