Ecological Research

, Volume 31, Issue 3, pp 353–366 | Cite as

Neighbourhood abundance and small-tree survival in a lowland Bornean rainforest

Original Article

Abstract

Conspecific effects of neighbours on small-tree survival may have a role in tree population dynamics and community composition of tropical forests. This notion was tested with data from two 4-ha plots in lowland forest at Danum, Sabah (Borneo), for a 21-year interval (censuses at 1986, 1996, 2001, 2007). Species with ≥45 focal trees 10 to <100 cm stem girth per plot in 1986 were selected. Logistic regressions fitted mean focal tree size and mean inverse-distance-weighted basal area abundance of neighbours (within 20 m), for the periods over which each focus tree was alive. Coefficients of variation of neighbourhood basal area abundance, both spatially and temporally, quantified the changing environment of each focus tree. Fits were critically and individually evaluated, with corrections for spatial autocorrelation. Conspecific effects at Danum was generally very weak or non-existent: species’ mortality rates varied also across plots. The main reasons appear to be that (1) species were not dense enough to interact despite frequent although weak spatial aggregation, and their neighbourhoods were highly differing in species composition; and (2) these neighbourhoods were highly variable temporally, meaning that focus trees experienced stochastically fluctuating neighbourhood environments. Only one species, Dimorphocalyx muricatus, showed strong conspecific effects (varying between plots) which can be explained by its distinct ecology. This understorey species is highly aggregated on ridges and is drought-tolerant. That this functionally and habitat-specialized species, has implied intraspecific density-dependent feedback in its dynamics is a remarkable indication of the overall processes maintaining stability of the Danum forest.

Keywords

Lowland rainforest Conspecific neighbourhood Spatial aggregation Tree survival Understorey species 

Supplementary material

11284_2016_1345_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (98 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 98 kb)
11284_2016_1345_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (1.8 mb)
Supplementary material 2 (PDF 1805 kb)
11284_2016_1345_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (189 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (PDF 190 kb)

References

  1. Ahumada JA, Hubbell SP, Condit R, Foster RB (2004) Long-term tree survival in a neotropical forest: the influence of local biotic effect. In: Losos EC, Leigh EG (eds) Tropical forest diversity and dynamism. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 408–432Google Scholar
  2. Baddeley A, Rubak E, Turner R (2015) Spatial point patterns: methodology and applications with R. Chapman and Hall/CRC PressGoogle Scholar
  3. Bivand RS, Pebesma E, Gomez-Rubio V (2013) Applied statistical data analysis with R, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Canham CD, Kobe RK, Latty EF, Chazdon RL (1999) Interspecific and intraspecific variation in tree seedling survival: effects of allocation to roots versus carbohydrate reserves. Oecologia 121:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cannell MGR, Dewar RC (1994) Carbon allocation in trees: a review of concepts for modeling. Adv Ecol Res 25:59–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carr D, Lewin-Koh N, Maechler M, Sarkar D (2014) Hexbin: an R package of hexagonal binning routines (version 1.27). R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  7. Clarke JS (2007) Models for ecological data: and introduction. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  8. Cliff AD, Ord JK (1981) Spatial processes: models and applications. Pion, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Comita LS, Muller-Landau HC, Aguilar S, Hubbell SP (2010) Asymmetric density dependence shapes species abundances in a tropical tree community. Science 329:330–332CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Condit R, Hubbell SP, Foster RB (1994) Density dependence in two understory tree species in a neotropical forest. Ecology 75:671–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Condit R, Ashton PS, Baker P, Bunyavejchewin S, Gunatilleke S, Gunatilleke N, Hubbell SP, Foster RB, Itoh A, LaFrankie JV, Lee HS, Losos E, Manokaran N, Sukumar R, Yamakura T (2000) Spatial patterns in the distribution of tropical tree species. Science 288:1414–1418CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Connell JH, Tracey JG, Webb LJ (1984) Compensatory recruitment, growth, and mortality as factors maintaining rain forest tree diversity. Ecol Monogr 54:141–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dale MRT, Fortin M-J (2014) Spatial analysis: a guide for ecologists, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dybzinski R, Farrior C, Wolf A, Reich PB, Pacala SW (2011) Evolutionarily stable strategy carbon allocation to foliage, wood, and fine roots in trees competing for light and nitrogen: an analytically tractable, individual-based model and quantitative comparisons to data. Am Nat 177:153–166CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Franklin O, Johansson J, Dewar RC, Dieckmann U, McMurtrie RE, Brannstrom A, Dybzinski R (2012) Modeling carbon allocation in trees: a search for principles. Tree Physiol 32:648–666CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Gibbons JM, Newbery DM (2003) Drought avoidance and the effect of local topography on trees in the understorey of Bornean lowland rain forest. Plant Ecol 164:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hubbell SP, Ahumada JA, Condit R, Foster RB (2001) Local neighborhood effects on long-term survival of individual trees in a neotropical forest. Ecol Res 16:859–875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kobe RK (1997) Carbohydrate allocation to storage as a basis of interspecific variation in sapling survivorship and growth. Oikos 80:226–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lieberman M, Lieberman D (2007) Nearest-neighbor tree species combinations in tropical forest: the role of chance, and some consequences of high diversity. Oikos 116:377–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lingenfelder M, Newbery DM (2009) On the detection of dynamic responses in a drought-perturbed tropical rainforest in Borneo. Plant Ecol 201:267–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Negrete-Yankelevitch S, Fox GA (2015) Spatial variation and linear modeling of ecological data. In: Fox GA, Negrete-Yankelevitch S, Sosa VJ (eds) Ecological statistics: contemporary theory and application. OUP, Oxford, pp 228–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Newbery DM, Lingenfelder M (2004) Resistance of a lowland rain forest to increasing drought intensity in Sabah, Borneo. J Trop Ecol 20:613–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Newbery DM, Lingenfelder M (2009) Plurality of tree species responses to drought perturbation in Bornean tropical rain forest. Plant Ecol 201:147–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Newbery DM, Stoll P (2013) Relaxation of species-specific neighborhood effects in Bornean rain forest under climatic perturbation. Ecology 94:2838–2851CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Newbery DM, Campbell EJF, Lee YF, Ridsdale CE, Still MJ (1992) Primary lowland dipterocarp forest at Danum Valley, Sabah, Malaysia: structure, relative abundance and family composition. Philos T R Soc B 335:341–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Newbery DM, Campbell EJF, Proctor J, Still MJ (1996) Primary lowland dipterocarp forest at Danum Valley, Sabah, Malaysia. Species composition and patterns in the understorey. Vegetatio 122:193–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Newbery DM, Kennedy DN, Petol GH, Madani L, Ridsdale CE (1999) Primary forest dynamics in lowland dipterocarp forest at Danum Valley, Sabah, Malaysia, and the role of the understorey. Philos T R Soc B 354:1763–1782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Newbery DM, Lingenfelder M, Poltz KF, Ong RC, Ridsdale CE (2011) Growth responses of understorey trees to drought perturbation in tropical rainforest in Borneo. For Ecol Manag 262:2095–2107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Payne RW, Harding SA, Murray DA, others (2011) The Guide to GenStat Release 14, Part 1: Syntax and data management. Part 2: Statistics. VSN International, Hemel HempsteadGoogle Scholar
  30. Peters HA (2003) Neighbour-regulated mortality: the influence of positive and negative density dependence on tree populations in species-rich tropical forests. Ecol Lett 6:757–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pinheiro JC, Bates DM (2000) Mixed-effects models in S and S-plus. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. R Development Core Team [RDCT] (2008) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  33. Stoll P, Newbery DM (2005) Evidence of species-specific neighborhood effects in the Dipterocarpaceae of a Bornean rain forest. Ecology 86:3048–3062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stoll P, Murrell DM, Newbery DM (2015) Effect sizes and standardization in neighbourhood models of forest stands: potential biases and misinterpretations. Method Ecol Evol 6:1117–1125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Uriarte M, Condit R, Canham CD, Hubbell SP (2004) A spatially explicit model of sapling growth in a tropical forest: does the identity of neighbours matter? J Ecol 92:348–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Uriarte M, Hubbell SP, John R, Condit R, Canham C (2005) Neighbourhood effects on sapling growth and survival on a neotropical forest and the ecological-equivalence hypothesis. In: Burslem D, Pinard MA, Hartley S (eds) Biotic interactions in the tropics. CUP, Cambridge, pp 89–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Venables WN, Ripley BD (2002) Modern applied statistics with S, 4th edn. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Walsh RPD, Newbery DM (1999) The ecoclimatology of Danum, Sabah, in the context of the world’s rainforest regions, with particular reference to dry periods and their impact. Philos T R Soc B 354:1869–1883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wills C, Condit R (1999) Similar non-random processes maintain diversity in two tropical rainforests. P R Soc B 266:1445–1452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wills C, Condit R, Foster RB, Hubbell SP (1997) Strong density- and diversity-related effects help to maintain tree species diversity in a neotropical forest. Proc Natl Acad Sci 94:1252–1257CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Wright SJ (2002) Plant diversity in tropical forests: a review of mechanisms of species coexistence. Oecologia 130:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhu Y, Comita LS, Hubbell SP, Ma K (2015) Conspecific and phylogenetic density-dependent survival differs across life stages in a tropical forest. J Ecol 103:957–966CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Ecological Society of Japan 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Section for Vegetation Ecology, Institute of Plant SciencesUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland
  2. 2.Department of BotanyNaturalis Biodiversity CentreLeidenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations