Ecological Research

, Volume 28, Issue 2, pp 131–132 | Cite as

Preface

Special Feature New insights into mechanism and evolution of mast flowering: feedback between theory and experiment
  • 464 Downloads

Plant flowering behaviors vary widely among taxa. Some plants are annuals that flower only once in their life cycle and then die. By contrast, perennials live for many years and flower repeatedly. Among perennials, many woody plants exhibit a large year-to-year variation in flowering or fruiting. Understanding why and how such diversity in flowering behavior emerges is a central aim in ecology and evolutionary biology.

Recent advances in genomics and molecular biology using a model plant species Arabidopsis thaliana, an annual herb, can benefit ecology by facilitating the study of genetic basis that contributes to evolution of diverse flowering behavior in nature. The gene regulatory model of floral transition describes the complex interactions between environmental signals (photoperiod and temperature) and endogenous cues (e.g., size, leaf number, or age) (Bäurle and Dean 2006; Andrés and Coupland 2012). Analysis of a large number of accessions across multiple environments showed that two genes in the cold-sensing pathway (called vernalization), FRIGIDA (FRI) and FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC), are major factors generating variations in cold requirement (Stinchcombe et al. 2004; Lempe et al. 2005; Shindo et al. 2005), and have allowed evolution of summer annuals (that complete flowering and seed production before winter comes) from winter annuals (in which flowering is strongly delayed unless plants experience winter; Koornneef et al. 2004; Sung and Amasino 2004; Scarcelli et al. 2007; Michaels et al. 2003; Werner et al. 2005).

Applications of these findings from A. thaliana to crops, such as rice, barley, maize, tomatoes, sunflowers, and sugar beet, have suggested the rapid evolution in the regulatory pathways controlling flowering responses to environmental cues even among closely related species, while functions of some genes controlling the time to flower are highly conserved (Andrés and Coupland 2012). One of the universal factors for floral induction is FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT), which is made in the companion cells of the leaves and is transported from the leaves to the meristem through phloem (Kardailsky et al. 1999; Kobayashi et al. 1999). FT is called the floral pathway integrator that unifies multiple signals including two major environmental signals, photoperiod and temperature.

These findings from model plant species and crops provide new insight into the mechanism and evolution of mast flowering or masting. Masting is characterized by a large year-to-year variation in flowers/fruits and synchrony in reproduction among different individuals (Kelly 1994). Various hypotheses have been proposed to explain the evolutionary and physiological mechanisms of masting (Kelly 1994; Kelly and Sork 2002). In recent years, the role of internal resource dynamics as one of the proximate factors for masting has attracted much attention (Crone et al. 2009; Smail et al. 2011) with strong theoretical support from the resource budget model (Isagi et al. 1997; Satake and Iwasa 2000, 2002a, 2002b). The resource budget model assumes that plants accumulate resources every year, set flowers when the stored resources exceed some threshold level, and set seeds and fruits at a rate limited by pollen or pollinator availability. The model demonstrates that fluctuation of reproductive efforts can be induced by resource depletion after heavy flowering, and synchrony emerges in a self-organized fashion by coupling through pollen or pollinators (Tachiki et al. 2010).

In addition to temperature and photoperiod, the importance of carbohydrate and nitrogen availability in determining the incidence of flowering has been reported in many plant species (Bernier et al. 1993; Corbesier et al. 2002; Miyazaki et al. 2002; Corbesier and Coupland 2006, Yasumura et al. 2006; Han et al. 2008; Smail et al. 2011). Thus, it is likely that these resources play essential roles in the initiation of flowering in masting species. If this is the case, the expression of key flowering genes, such as FT, would be influenced by resource levels, and might show annual fluctuation when the levels of resource vary between years. Thus, expression analysis of key flowering genes in masting species would be useful to explore the role of resource availability as well as other environmental factors in flower initiation and development. Besides, uncovering gene regulatory pathways in masting species and comparing regulatory pathways between different species may give an in-depth understanding on the evolution of masting. Moreover, it will enable us to test the fundamental assumption of the resource budget model, the enhancement of flower initiation by increased resource availability.

This special feature challenges to link the physiological and molecular studies about masting. We hope that this Special Feature will provide readers with a useful overview of this field, and inspire new directions for future investigation regarding studies of plant reproductive ecology. Genetic understanding of flowering phenology is especially important in facing climate warming. Thus, advances in genomics and molecular biology in flowering timing can benefit applied ecology as well as basic ecology by enabling genetic-informed prediction on the phenological changes in response to future climatic change.

References

  1. Andrés F, Coupland G (2012) The genetic basis of flowering responses to seasonal cues. Nat Rev Genet 13:627–639PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bäurle I, Dean C (2006) The timing of developmental transitions in plants. Cell 125:655–664PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bernier G, Havelange A, Houssa C, Petitjean A, Lejeune P (1993) Physiological signals that induce flowering. Plant Cell 5:1147–1155PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Corbesier L, Bernier G, Perilleux C (2002) C:N ratio increases in the phloem sap during floral transition of the long-day plants Sinapis alba and Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol 43:684–688PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Corbesier L, Coupland G (2006) The quest for florigen: a review of recent progress. J Exp Bot 57:3395–3403PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crone E, Miller E, Sala A (2009) How do plants know when other plants are flowering? Resource depletion, pollen limitation and mast-seeding in a perennial wildflower. Ecol Lett 12:1119–1126PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Han Q, Kabeya D, Iio A, Kakubari Y (2008) Masting in Fagus crenata and its influence on the nitrogen content and dry mass of winter buds. Tree Physiol 28:1269–1276PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Isagi Y, Sugimura K, Sumida A, Ito H (1997) How does masting happen and synchronize? J Theor Biol 187:231–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kardailsky I, Shukla VK, Ahn JH, Dagenais N, Christensen SK, Nguyen JT, Chory J, Harrison MJ, Weigel D (1999) Activation tagging of the floral inducer FT. Science 286:1962–1965PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kelly D (1994) The evolutionary ecology of mast seeding. Trends Ecol Evol 9:465–470PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kelly D, Sork VL (2002) Mast seeding in perennial plants: why, how, where? Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33:427–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kobayashi Y, Kaya H, Goto K, Iwabuchi M, Araki T (1999) A pair of related genes with antagonistic roles in mediating flowering signals. Science 286:1960–1962PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Koornneef M, Alonso-Blanco C, Vreugdenhil D (2004) Naturally occurring genetic variation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 55:141–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lempe J, Balasubramanian S, Sureshkumar S, Singh A, Schmid M, Weigel D (2005) Diversity of flowering responses in wild Arabidopsis thaliana strains. PLoS Genet 1:109–118PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Michaels SD, He Y, Scortecci KC, Amasino RM (2003) Attenuation of FLOWERING LOCUS C activity as a mechanism for the evolution of summer-annual flowering behavior in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:10102–10107PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Miyazaki Y, Hiura T, Kato E, Funada R (2002) Allocation of resources to reproduction in Styrax obassia in a masting year. Ann Bot 89:767–772PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Satake A, Iwasa Y (2000) Pollen coupling of forest trees: forming synchronized and periodic reproduction out of chaos. J Theor Biol 203:63–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Satake A, Iwasa Y (2002a) Spatially limited pollen exchange and a long-range synchronization of trees. Ecology 83:993–1005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Satake A, Iwasa Y (2002b) The synchronized and intermittent reproduction of forest trees is mediated by the Moran effect, only in association with pollen coupling. J Ecol 90:830–838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Scarcelli N, Cheverud JM, Schaal BA, Kover PX (2007) Antagonistic pleiotropic effects reduce the potential adaptive value of the FRIGIDA locus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:16986–16991PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shindo C, Aranzana MJ, Lister C, Baxter C, Nicholls C, Nordborg M, Dean C (2005) Role of FRIGIDA and FLOWERING LOCUS C in determining variation in flowering time of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 138:1163–1173PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Smail JS, Clinton PW, Allen RB, Davis MR (2011) Climate cues and resources interact to determine seed production by a masting species. J Ecol 99:870–877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Stinchcombe JR, Weinig C, Ungerer M, Olsen KM, Mays C, Halldorsdottir SS, Purugganan M, Schmitt J (2004) A latitudinal cline in flowering time in Arabidopsis thaliana modulated by the flowering time gene FRIGIDA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:4712–4717Google Scholar
  24. Sung S, Amasino RM (2004) Vernalization in Arabidopsis thaliana is mediated by the PHD finger protein VIN3. Nature 427:159–164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tachiki Y, Iwasa Y, Satake A (2010) Pollinator coupling can induce synchronized flowering in different plant species. J Theor Biol 267:153–163PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Werner JD, Borevitz JO, Uhlenhaut NH, Ecker JR, Chory J, Weigel D (2005) FRIGIDA-Independent variation in flowering time of natural Arabidopsis thaliana accessions. Genetics 170:1197–1207PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Yasumura Y, Hikosaka K, Hirose T (2006) Resource allocation to vegetative and reproductive growth in relation to mast seeding in Fagus crenata. For Ecol Manage 229:228–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Ecological Society of Japan 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Environmental ScienceHokkaido UniversitySapporoJapan

Personalised recommendations