Advertisement

Ecological Research

, Volume 28, Issue 3, pp 373–385 | Cite as

Determination of the gas exchange phenology in an evergreen coniferous forest from 7 years of eddy covariance flux data using an extended big-leaf analysis

  • Yoshiko KosugiEmail author
  • Satoru Takanashi
  • Masahito Ueyama
  • Shinjiro Ohkubo
  • Hiroki Tanaka
  • Kazuho Matsumoto
  • Natsuko Yoshifuji
  • Mioko Ataka
  • Ayaka Sakabe
Original Article

Abstract

We defined gas exchange phenology as the seasonality of the gas exchange characteristics of a forest canopy, and investigated how the gas exchange phenology could be directly detected from an eddy covariance (EC) dataset and its influence on the canopy fluxes within an evergreen Japanese cypress forest. For the detection of gas exchange phenology, we derived three bulk parameters of the extended big-leaf model (Kosugi et al. 2005) inversely from EC flux data over a 7-year period: surface conductance (g c), maximum rate of carboxylation of the “big leaf” (V CMAX), and intercellular CO2 concentration of the “big leaf” (C I). The relationship between g c and the vapor pressure deficit declined in winter and spring. The relationship between the daily ecosystem respiration and air temperature was greater in the spring than in the other seasons. The temperature dependence curve of V CMAX decreased substantially in the winter and was different from that of an evergreen broadleaved forest. A decrease in C I was occasionally coupled with the decrease in canopy gross primary production during April and August, indicating that stomatal closure was responsible for a decline in canopy photosynthesis. Gas exchange phenology should be quantified when understanding the determining factors of the seasonality of canopy fluxes at evergreen coniferous forests.

Keywords

Evergreen conifer Phenology Eddy covariance Canopy conductance VCMAX 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Eddy covariance and meteorological observations were conducted along with Mr. Masato Yano, Mr. Tatsuya Katayama, Mr. Takumi Wada, Mr. Tomonori Mitani, Mr. Yusuke Fukui, Ms. Rie Fukui, Mr. Naoto Yokoyama, Ms. Chika Soda, Mr. Takuya Matsumoto, Mr. Ryoji Nakagawa, and Mr. Shuhei Kanemitsu. This research was partially supported both by a Grant-in-Aids for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture, Japan, and by the Mitsui & Co., Ltd. Environment Fund.

References

  1. Aubinet M, Grelle A, Ibrom A, Rannik U, Moncrieff J, Foken T, Kowalski AS, Martin PH, Berbigier P, Bernhofer Ch, Clement R, Elbers J, Granier A, Grunwald T, Morgenstern K, Pilegaard K, Rebmann C, Snijders W, Valentini R, Vesala T (2000) Estimates of the annual net carbon and water exchange of forests: the EUROFLUX methodology. Adv Ecol Res 30:113–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baldocchi D, Meyers T (1998) On using eco-physiological, micrometeorological and biochemical theory to evaluate carbon dioxide, water vapor and trace gas fluxes over vegetation: a perspective. Agric For Meteorol 90:1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carle J, Vuorinen P, Lungo AD (2002) Status and trends in global forest plantation development. For Prod J 52:2–13Google Scholar
  4. Dai Y, Dickinson R, Wang Y-P (2004) A two-big-leaf model for canopy temperature, photosynthesis, and stomatal conductance. J Clim 17:2281–2299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Depury DG, Farquhar GD (1997) Simple scaling of photosynthesis from leaves to canopies without the errors of big-leaf models. Plant Cell Environ 20:537–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Falge E, Tenhunen J, Baldocchi D, Aubinet M, Bakwin P, Berbigier P, Bernhofer C, Bonnefond JM, Burba G, Clement R, Davis KJ, Elbers JA, Falk M, Goldstein AH, Grelle A, Granier A, Grnűwald T, Guðmundsson J, Hollinger D, Janssens IA, Keronen P, Kowalski AS, Katul G, Law BE, Malhi Y, Mayers T, Monson RK, Moors E, Munger JW, Oechel W, Paw UKT, Pilegaard K, Rannik Ü, Rebmann C, Suyker A, Thorgeirsson H, Tirone G, Turnipseed A, Wilson K, Wofsy S (2002) Phase and amplitude of ecosystem carbon release and uptake potentials as derived from FLUXNET measurements. Agric For Meteorol 113:75–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Farquhar GD, von Caemmerer S, Berry JA (1980) A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta 149:78–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Foken T, Wichura B (1996) Tools for quality assessment of surface-based flux measurements. Agric Meteorol 78:83–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Friend A (2002) Modelling canopy CO2 fluxes: are “big-leaf” simplifications justified? Global Ecol Biogeogr 10:603–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harley PC, Thomas RB, Reynolds JF, Strain BR (1992) Modelling photosynthesis of cotton grown in elevated CO2. Plant Cell Environment 15:271–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kosugi Y, Katsuyama M (2007) Evapotranspiration over a Japanese cypress forest. II. Comparison of the eddy covariance and water budget methods. J Hydrol 334:305–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kosugi Y, Matsuo N (2006) Seasonal fluctuations and temperature dependence of leaf gas exchange parameters of co-occurring evergreen and deciduous trees in a temperate broad-leaved forest. Tree Physiol 26:1173–1184PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kosugi Y, Shibata S, Kobashi S (2003) Parameterization of the CO2 and H2O gas exchange of several temperate deciduous broad-leaved trees at the leaf scale considering seasonal changes. Plant Cell Environment 26:285–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kosugi Y, Tanaka H, Takanashi S, Matsuo N, Ohte N, Shibata S, Tani M (2005) Three years of carbon and energy fluxes from Japanese evergreen broad-leaved forest. Agric For Meteorol 132:329–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kosugi Y, Takanashi S, Matsuo N, Tanaka K, Tanaka H (2006) Impact of leaf physiology on gas exchange in a Japanese evergreen broad-leaved forest. Agric For Meteorol 139:182–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kosugi Y, Takanashi S, Tanaka H, Ohkubo S, Tani M, Yano M, Katayama T (2007) Evapotranspiration over a Japanese cypress forest. I. Eddy covariance fluxes and surface conductance characteristics for three years. J Hydrol 337:269–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lai CT, Katul G, Ellsworth D, Oren R (2000) Modelling vegetation-atmosphere CO2 exchange by a coupled Eulerian–Lagrangian approach. Bound Layer Meteorol 95:91–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lohammer T, Larsson S, Linder S, Falk SO (1980) FAST-simulation models of gaseous exchange in Scots Pine. Ecol Bull 32:505–523Google Scholar
  19. Matsumoto K, Kosugi Y, Katsuyama M, Tani M, Ohkubo S, Takanashi S (2011) Estimation of bedrock infiltration on a weathered granitic mountain covered by Japanese cypress forest using water-budget and eddy covariance methods. Int J Eros Control Eng 4:10–20Google Scholar
  20. McNaughton KG, Jarvis PG (1991) Effects of spatial scale on stomatal control of transpiration. Agric For Meteorol 54:279–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Miyama T, Kominami Y, Tamai K, Nobuhiro T, Goto Y (2003) Automated foliage chamber method for long-term measurement of CO2 flux in the uppermost canopy. Tellus B 55:322–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Miyamoto K, Okuda S, Inagaki Y, Noguchi M, Itou T (2012) Within- and between-site variations in leaf longevity in hinoki cypress (Chamaecyparis obtusa) plantations in southwestern Japan. J For Res. doi: 10.1007/s10310-012-0346-1 Google Scholar
  23. Monteith JL, Unsworth MH (1990) Principles of environmental physics. Edward Arnold, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Ohkubo S, Kosugi Y (2007) Amplitude and seasonality of storage fluxes for CO2, heat and water vapor in a temperate Japanese cypress forest. Tellus B60:11–20Google Scholar
  25. Ohkubo S, Kosugi Y, Takanashi S, Mitani T, Tani M (2007) Comparison of the eddy covariance and automated closed chamber methods for evaluating nocturnal CO2 exchange in a Japanese cypress forest. Agric For Meteorol 142:50–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Raulier F, Bernier PY, Ung C-H (1999) Canopy photosynthesis of sugar maple (Acer saccharum): comparing big-leaf and multilayer extrapolations of leaf-level measurements. Tree Physiol 19:407–420PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Reichstein M, Tenhunen JD, Roupsard O, Ourcival JM, Rambel S, Miglietta F, Peressotti A, Pecchiari M, Tirone G, Valentini R (2002) Severe drought effects on ecosystem CO2 and H2O fluxes at three Mediterranean evergreen sites: revision of current hypotheses? Global Change Biol 8:999–1017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Richardson AD, Black TA, Ciais P, Delbart N, Friedl M, Gobron N, Hollinger DY, Kutsch WL, Longdoz B, Luyssaert S, Migliavacca M, Montagnani L, Munger JW, Moors E, Piao S, Rebmann C, Reichstein M, Saigusa N, Tomelleri E, Vargas R, Varlagin A (2010) Influence of spring and autumn phenological transitions on forest ecosystem productivity. Phil Trans R Soc B 365:3227–3246PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Saigusa N, Yamamoto S, Murayama S, Kondo H (2005) Inter-annual variability of carbon budget components in an AsiaFlux forest site estimated by long-term flux measurements. Agric For Meteorol 134:4–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Saigusa N, Yamamoto S, Hirata R, Ohtani Y, Ide R, Asanuma J, Gamo M, Hirano T, Kondo H, Kosugi Y, Li SG, Nakai Y, Takagi K, Tani M, Wang H (2008) Temporal and spatial variations in the seasonal patterns of CO2 flux in boreal, temperate, and tropical forests in East Asia. Agric For Meteorol 148:700–713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schuepp PH, Leclerc MY, MacPherson JI, Desjardins RL (1990) Footprint prediction of scalar fluxes from analytical solutions of the diffusion equation. Bound Layer Meteorol 50:335–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sharpe PJH, DeMichele DW (1977) Reaction kinetics of poikilotherm development. J Theor Biol 64:649–670PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Suni T, Berninger F, Vesala T, Markkanen T, Hari P, Mäkelä A, Ilvesniemi H, Hänninen H, Nikinmaa E, Huttula T, Laurilaş T, Aurelaş M, Shibistova O, Lloyd J (2003) Air temperature triggers the recovery of evergreen boreal forest photosynthesis in spring. Global Change Biol 9:1410–1426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Takagi K, Fukuzawa K, Liang N, Kayama M, Nomura M, Hojyo H, Sugata S, Shibata H, Fukazawa T, Takahashi Y, Nakaji T, Oguma H, Mano M, Akibayashi Y, Murayama T, Koike T, Sasa K, Fujinuma Y (2009) Change in CO2 balance under a series of forestry activities in a cool-temperate mixed forest with dense undergrowth. Global Change Biol 15:1275–1288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Takanashi S, Kosugi Y, Tanaka Y, Yano M, Katayama T, Tanaka H, Tani M (2005) CO2 exchange in a temperate Japanese cypress forest compared with that in a cool-temperate deciduous broad-leaved forest. Ecol Res 20:313–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ueyama M, Kai A, Ichii K, Hamotani K, Kosugi Y, Monji N (2011) The sensitivity of carbon sequestration to harvesting and climate conditions in a temperate cypress forest: observations and modeling. Ecol Model 222:3216–3225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wade TG, Riitters KH, Wickham JD, Jones KB (2003) Distribution and causes of global forest fragmentation. Conserv Ecol 7. http://www.consecol.org/vol7/iss2/art7/
  38. Wang YP, Leuning R, Cleugh HA, Coppin PA (2001) Parameter estimation in surface exchange models using nonlinear inversion: how many parameters can we estimate and which measurements are most useful? Global Change Biol 7:495–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wilson KB, Baldocchi DD (2000) Seasonal and interannual variability of energy fluxes over a broadleaved temperate deciduous forest in North America. Agric For Meteorol 100:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yu GR, Wen XF, Sun XM, Tanner BD, Lee X, Chen JY (2006) Overview of ChinaFLUX and evaluation of its eddy covariance measurement. Agric For Meteorol 137:125–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Ecological Society of Japan 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yoshiko Kosugi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Satoru Takanashi
    • 2
  • Masahito Ueyama
    • 3
  • Shinjiro Ohkubo
    • 4
  • Hiroki Tanaka
    • 1
  • Kazuho Matsumoto
    • 5
  • Natsuko Yoshifuji
    • 1
  • Mioko Ataka
    • 1
  • Ayaka Sakabe
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Forest Hydrology, Division of Environmental Science and Technology, Graduate School of AgricultureKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
  2. 2.Department of Meteorological EnvironmentForestry and Forest Products Research InstituteTsukubaJapan
  3. 3.Graduate School of Life and Environmental SciencesOsaka Prefecture UniversitySakaiJapan
  4. 4.NARO Hokkaido Agricultural Research CenterSapporoJapan
  5. 5.Faculty of AgricultureUniversity of the RyukyusOkinawaJapan

Personalised recommendations