Advertisement

Ecological Research

, Volume 27, Issue 3, pp 521–527 | Cite as

Resource productivity and availability impacts for food-chain length

  • Hideyuki Doi
Miyadi Award

Abstract

Ecologists have focused on food-chain length (FCL) for the past eight decades as an index of food-web structure. Here, I review the hypotheses determining FCL with a focus on resource productivity and availability effects on FCL. First, I introduce the mainstream hypotheses to explain FCL variations: productivity, ecosystem size, and disturbance. For the existing productivity and productive space hypotheses, I stress the importance of using resource availability to estimate the productivity effect on FCL. Using a FCL dataset from 15 ponds, I tested the resource stoichiometry effect on FCL for ponds with between carbon:nitrogen ratio of primary producers and FCL. Moreover, I provide a perspective for studying resource availability and stoichiometry effects on FCL and of the alternative hypotheses of productive-space and ecosystem size. Finally, I suggest the future directions of the FCL study: a resource subsidy and climate change effects on FCL and food-web structure.

Keywords

Food web Primary production Ecosystem size Subsidy Ecological stoichiometry 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This paper is based on the awarded lecture for the 14th Denzaburo Miyadi Award at the 58th Annual Meeting of the Ecological Society of Japan, March 18, 2010. I appreciate the assistance of all advisors and colleagues for my previous studies. I want to especially mention my supervisor and advisors; Helmut Hillebrand, Eisuke Kikuchi, Shin-ichi Nakano, Daniel E. Schindler, and Yasuhiro Takemon. I thank Helmut Hillebrand and Takafumi Nakazawa, and Gaku Takimoto for their comments on an early version of the manuscript. The study supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Postdoctoral Fellowship for Research Abroad.

References

  1. Arim M, Bozinovic F, Marquet PA (2007a) On relationship between trophic position, body mass, and temperature: the energy limitation hypothesis. Oikos 116:1524–1530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arim M, Marquet PA, Jaksic FM (2007b) On the relationship between productivity and food-chain length at different ecological levels. Am Nat 169:62–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ayal Y, Groner E (2009) Primary consumer body size and food-chain length in terrestrial Communities. Israel J Ecol Evol 55:329–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barton BT, Schmitz OJ (2009) Experimental warming transforms multiple predator effects in a grassland food web. Ecol Lett 12:1317–1325PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barton B, Beckerman AP, Schmitz OJ (2009) Climate warming strengthens indirect interactions in an old-field food web. Ecology 90:2346–2351PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boyce DG, Lewis MR, Worm B (2010) Global phytoplankton decline over the past century. Nature 466:591–596PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown CJ, Fulton EA, Hobday AJ, Matear RJ, Possingham HP, Bulman C, Christensen V, Forrest RE, Gherke PC, Gribble NA, Griffiths SP, Lozano-Montes H, Martin JM, Metcalf S, Okey TA, Watson R, Richardson AJ (2010) Effects of climate-driven primary production change on marine food webs: implications for fisheries and conservation. Global Change Biol 16:1194–1212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cohen JE, Newman CM (1992) Community area and food-chain length: theoretical predictions. Am Nat 138:1542–1554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dickman EM, Newell JM, Gonzalez MJ, Vanni MJ (2008) Light, nutrients, and food-chain length constrain planktonic energy transfer efficiency across multiple trophic levels. Pro Nat Acad Sci USA 105:18408–18412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Doi H (2009) Spatial patterns of autochthonous and allochthonous resources to aquatic food webs. Popul Ecol 51:57–64Google Scholar
  11. Doi H, Chang KH, Ando T, Imai H, Nakano S, Kajimoto A, Katano I (2008) Drifting plankton from a reservoir subsidize downstream food webs and alter community structure. Oecologia 156:363–371Google Scholar
  12. Doi H, Chang KH, Ando T, Imai H, Ninomiya I, Nakano S (2009) Resource availability and ecosystem size predict food-chain lengths in pond ecosystems. Oikos 118:138–144Google Scholar
  13. Doi H, Cherif M, Iwabuchi T, Katano I, Stegen JC, Striebel M (2010) Integrating elements and energy through the metabolic dependencies of gross growth efficiency and the threshold elemental ratio. Oikos 119:752–765Google Scholar
  14. Doi H, Chang KH, Nakano S (2011) Nitrogen and carbon isotope fractionations of zooplankton consumers in ponds: potential effect of seston stoichiometry. Mar Freshw Res 62:66–71Google Scholar
  15. Elser JJ, Andersen T, Baron JS, Bergström AK, Jansson M, Kyle M, Nydick KR, Steger L, Hessen DO (2009) Shifts in lake N:P stoichiometry and nutrient limitation driven by atmospheric nitrogen deposition. Science 326:835–837PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Elton C (1927) Animal Ecology. Sidgwick and Jackson, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Hillebrand H, Matthiesen B (2009) Biodiversity in a complex world: consolidation and progress in functional biodiversity research. Ecol Lett 12:1405–1419PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Holt RD (1996) Food webs in space: an island biogeographic perspective. In: Polis GA, Winemiller KO (eds) Food webs: integration of patterns and dynamics. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 313–323Google Scholar
  19. Holt RD (2002) Food webs in space: on the interplay of dynamic instability and spatial processes. Ecol Res 17:261–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hutchinson GE (1959) Homage to Santa Rosalia; or, why are there so many kinds of animals? Am Nat 93:145–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Cambridge Univ. Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Jenkins B, Kitching RL, Pimm SL (1992) Productivity, disturbance and food-web structure at a local spatial scale in experimental container habitats. Oikos 65:249–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kaunzinger CMK, Morin PJ (1998) Productivity controls food-chain properties in microbial communities. Nature 395:495–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kishi D, Murakami M, Nakano S, Maekawa K (2005) Water temperature determines strength of top-down control in a stream food web. Freshw Biol 50:1315–1322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kondoh M, Ninomiya K (2009) Food-chain length and adaptive foraging. Pro Royal Soc B 276:3113–3121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lawton JH (1999) Are there general laws in ecology? Oikos 84:177–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Marczak LB, Thompson RM, Richardson JS (2007) Meta-analysis: trophic level, habitat and productivity shape the food-web effects of resource subsidies. Ecology 88:140–148PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McHugh PA, McIntosh AR, Jellyman PG (2010) Dual influences of ecosystem size and disturbance on food-chain length in streams. Ecol Lett 13:881–890PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Melillo JM, McGuire AD, Kicklighter DW, Moore B III, Vorosmarty CJ, Schloss AL (1993) Global climate change and terrestrial net primary production. Nature 363:234–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Milly PCD, Dunne KA, Vecchia AV (2005) Global pattern of trends in streamflow and water availability in a changing climate. Nature 438:347–350PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nakano S, Murakami M (2001) Reciprocal subsidies: dynamic interdependence between terrestrial and aquatic food webs. Pro Nat Acad Sci USA 98:166–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. O’Reilly CM, Alin SR, Pilsnier PD, Cohen AS, McKee BA (2003) Climate change decreases aquatic ecosystem productivity of Lake Tanganyika, Africa. Nature 424:766–768PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pimm SL (1982) Food web. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  34. Pimm SL, Lawton JH (1977) The number of trophic levels in ecological communities. Nature 275:542–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Polis GA, Anderson WB, Holt RB (1997) Toward an integration of landscape ecology and food-web ecology: the dynamics of spatially subsidized food webs. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 28:289–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Post DM (2002) The long and short of food-chain length. Trends Ecol Evol 17:269–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Post DM (2007) Testing the productive-space hypothesis: rational and power. Oecologia 153:973–984PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Post DM, Pace ML, Hairston NG Jr (2000) Ecosystem size determines food-chain length in lakes. Nature 405:1047–1049PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Post DM, Doyle MW, Sabo JL, Finlay JC (2007) The problem of boundaries in defining ecosystems: a potential landmine for uniting geomorphology and ecology. Geomorphology 89:111–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Power ME, Parker MS, Wootton JT (1996) Disturbance and food-chain length in rivers. In: Polis GA, Winemiller KO (eds) Food webs: integration of patterns and dynamics. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 286–297Google Scholar
  41. Sabo JL, Finlay JC, Post DM (2009) Food chain in freshwaters. The Year in Ecol Conser Biol 1162:187–220Google Scholar
  42. Sabo JL, Finlay JC, Kennedy T, Post DM (2010) The role of discharge variation in scaling of drainage area and food-chain length in rivers. Science 330:965–967PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schoener TW (1989) Food webs from the small to the large. Ecology 70:1559–1589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Slobodkin LB (1961) Growth and regulation of animal populations. Holt, Rinehart and Wilson, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  45. Spencer M, Warren PH (1996) The effects of habitat size and productivity on food-web structure in small aquatic microcosms. Oikos 75:419–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sterner RW, Elser JJ (2002) Ecological stoichiometry: the biology of elements from molecules to the biosphere. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  47. Sterner RW, Bajpai A, Adams T (1997) The enigma of food-chain length: absence of theoretical evidence for dynamic constraints. Ecology 78:2258–2262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Takimoto G, Spiller DA, Post DM (2008) Ecosystem size, but not disturbance, determines food-chain length on islands of the Bahamas. Ecology 89:3001–3007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Thompson RM, Townsend CR (2005) Energy availability, spatial heterogeneity and ecosystem size predict food-web structure in streams. Oikos 108:137–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tilman D (1996) Biodiversity: population versus ecosystem stability. Ecology 77:360–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Urabe J, Kyle M, Makino W, Yoshida Y, Andersen T, Elser JJ (2002) Reduced light increases herbivore production due to stoichiometric effects of light: nutrient balance. Ecology 83:619–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Vander Zanden JM, Fetzer WW (2007) Global patterns of aquatic food-chain length. Oikos 116:1378–1388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Vander Zanden MJ, Shuter BJ, Lester N, Rasmussen JB (1999) Patterns of food-chain length in lakes: a stable isotope study. Am Nat 154:406–416PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Walters AW, Post DM (2008) An experimental disturbance alters fish size structure but not food-chain length in streams. Ecology 89:3261–3267PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wetzel RG (2001) Limnology Lake and River Ecosystems 3rd edn. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Ecological Society of Japan 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Chemistry and Biology of the Marine EnvironmentCarl-von-Ossietzky University OldenburgWilhelmshavenGermany
  2. 2.Institute for Sustainable Sciences and Development, 701-3, ASoMHiroshima UniversityHigashihiroshimaJapan

Personalised recommendations