Ecological Research

, Volume 27, Issue 3, pp 649–655 | Cite as

Does interspecific competition with a stronger competitor explain the rarity of an endangered snake on a Mediterranean island?

  • Luca Luiselli
  • Massimo Capula
  • Lorenzo Rugiero
  • Daniele Salvi
  • Godfrey C. Akani
Original Article

Abstract

Interspecific competition has been demonstrated to be an important shaping force for snake communities worldwide, but relatively few studies have investigated its occurrence and extent with island assemblages of snakes. In Sardinia (Mediterranean Sea), two species of whip snakes (Colubridae) co-occur, one of them being abundant and widespread (Hierophis viridiflavus) and the other being localized and critically endangered (Hemorrhois hippocrepis). A previous hypothesis suggested that the latter species would be confined to suboptimal habitats by the former species, which is a stronger competitor for food. As a consequence, He. hippocrepis would not only be rare but would also be smaller in body size in Sardinia than in other regions of its range where Hi. viridiflavus does not occur. In 1999–2010, we studied habitat selection, food habits, and body sizes of these two snakes in sympatric populations, applying a suite of statistical tools including null models and Monte Carlo simulations. We observed that dietary habits were different between species (compared to Hi. viridiflavus, He. hippocrepis more frequently preyed upon rodents and less frequently on lizards, and within rodent prey, more frequently upon Rattus and less frequently upon Mus), but not in a way compatible with competitively induced trophic niche partitioning. The two species were similar in terms of prey size and predator-size–prey-size relationships. They also differed in habitat selection (maquis was the preferred habitat for both, but Hi. viridiflavus was found significantly more often than He. hippocrepis in grasslands, cultivations, and artificial pinewoods) but again in a non-competitively directed way. In addition, there was no evidence for the hypothesis that He. hippocrepis was confined to suboptimal habitats. Body sizes were similar between species (with males being significantly larger than females), and Sardinian He. hippocrepis were not smaller than conspecifics inhabiting regions without Hi. viridiflavus. Overall, our study showed that the two species differed in some aspects of their ecology, but these differences could not be due to competitive interactions. The conservation implications of these results are also discussed.

Keywords

Serpentes Niche partitioning Null models Mediterranean islands Whip snakes 

References

  1. Akani GC, Barieenee IF, Capizzi D, Luiselli L (1999) Snake communities of moist forest and derived savanna sites of Nigeria: biodiversity patterns and conservation priorities. Biodivers Conserv 8:629–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blondel J, Chesset B, Frochot D (1988) Bird species impoverishment, niche expansion, and density inflation in Mediterranean island habitats. Ecology 69:1899–1917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bombi P, Capula M, D’Amen M, Luiselli L (2011) Climate change threatens the survival of highly endangered Sardinian populations of the snake Hemorrhois hippocrepis. Anim Biol 61:239–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bruno S, Hotz H (1976) Coluber hippocrepis auf der Insel Sardinien (Reptilia, Serpentes, Colubridae). Salamandra 12:69–86Google Scholar
  5. Bruno S, Maugeri S (1977) Rettili d’Italia. Giunti Martello editore, FlorenceGoogle Scholar
  6. Bruno S, Maugeri S (1990) Serpenti d’Italia e d’Europa. Editoriale Giorgio Mondadori, MilanGoogle Scholar
  7. Capizzi D, Luiselli L (1996) Feeding relationships and competitive interactions between phylogenetically unrelated predators (owls and snakes). Acta Oecol 17:265–284Google Scholar
  8. Capizzi D, Luiselli L, Capula M, Rugiero L (1995) Feeding habits of a Mediterranean community of snakes in relation to prey availability. Revue d’Ecologie (Terre et Vie) 50:353–363Google Scholar
  9. Capizzi D, Capula M, Rugiero L, Luiselli L (2008) Dietary patterns of two sympatric Mediterranean snakes (Hierophis viridiflavus and Zamenis longissimus) along a gradient of habitat alteration. Herpetol J 18:141–146Google Scholar
  10. Capula M, Luiselli L, Rugiero L, Evangelisti F, Anibaldi C, Trujillo Jesus V (1997) Notes on the food habits of Coluber hippocrepis nigrescens from Pantelleria island: a snake that feeds on both carrion and living prey. Herpetol J 7:67–70Google Scholar
  11. Case TJ, Bolger DT (1991) The role of interspecific competition in the biogeography of island lizards. Trends Ecol Evol 6:135–139PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Corti C, Luiselli L, Filippi E, Capula M (2000) Distribution, natural history and morphometrics of the critically endangered Coluber hippocrepis populations of Sardinia: a review, with additional data and conservation implications. Amphib Reptil 21:279–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Corti C, Capula M, Luiselli L, Razzetti E, Sindaco R (2010) Fauna D’Italia, Reptilia, vol XIV. Edizioni Calderini de Il Sole 24 Ore, MilanoGoogle Scholar
  14. Crowell KL, Pimm SL (1977) Competition and niche shifts of mice introduced onto small islands. Oikos 27:251–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fahd S (2001) Biogéographie, Morphologie et Ecologie des ofidiens du Rif (Nord du Maroc). Unpublished PhD Thesis, University ‘Abdelmalek Essaadi’, Tetuan, MoroccoGoogle Scholar
  16. Filippi E, Luiselli L (2000) Status of the Italian snake—fauna and assessment of conservation threats. Biol Conserv 93:219–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Filippi E, Luiselli L (2006) Changes in community composition, habitats and abundance of snakes after 10+ years in a protected area in Italy: conservation implications. Herpetol J 16:29–36Google Scholar
  18. Fornasiero S, Corti C, Luiselli L, Zuffi MAL (2007) Sexual size dimorphism, morphometry and phenotypic variation in the Whip snake Hierophis viridiflavus from a central Mediterranean area. Revue d’Ecologie (Terre et Vie) 62:73–85Google Scholar
  19. Gotelli NJ, Graves GC (1996) Null models in ecology. Smithsonian Inst. Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  20. Greensdale PJM (1971) Interspecific competition and frequency changes among ants in Solomon Islands coconut plantations. J Appl Ecol 8:323–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hasegawa M, Moriguchi H (1989) Geographic variation in food habits, body size, and life history traits of the snakes of the Izu Islands. In: Matsui M, Hikida T, Goris RC (eds) Current herpetology in East Asia. Herpetological Society of Japan, Kyoto, pp 414–432Google Scholar
  22. Lawlor LR (1980) Structure and stability in natural and randomly constructed competitive communities. Am Nat 116:394–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lehsten V, Harmand P (2006) Null models or species co-occurrence patterns: assessing bias and minimum iteration number for the sequential swap. Ecography 29:786–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Luiselli L (2006a) Resource partitioning and interspecific competition in snakes: the search for general geographical and guild patterns. Oikos 114:193–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Luiselli L (2006b) Ecological modelling of convergence patterns between European and African ‘whip’ snakes. Acta Oecol 30:62–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Luiselli L, Capizzi D (1997) Influences of area, isolation and habitat features on distribution of snakes in Mediterranean fragmented woodlands. Biodivers Conserv 6:1339–1351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Luiselli L, Corti C, Salvi D, Capula M (2010) Hemorrhois hippocrepis (Linnaeus, 1758). In: Corti C, Capula M, Luiselli L, Razzetti E, Sindaco R (eds) Fauna D’Italia, Reptilia, vol XIV. Edizioni Calderini de Il Sole 24 Ore, Milano, pp 499–504Google Scholar
  28. Magurran AE (1988) Ecological diversity and its measurement. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  29. Naulleau G (1987) Les Serpents de France. Rev Fr Aquariol Herpetol 11 (suppl. 3–4):1–56Google Scholar
  30. Pianka ER (1986) The ecology and natural history of desert lizards. Princeton Univ, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  31. Pleguezuelos JM, Fahd S (2004) Body size, diet and reproductive ecology of Coluber hippocrepis in the Rif (Northern Morocco). Amphib Reptil 25:287–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pleguezuelos JM, Moreno M (1990) Alimentacion de Coluber hippocrepis en el SE de la Peninsula Iberica. Amphib Reptil 11:325–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pleguezuelos JM, Márquez R, Lizana M (2002) Atlas y Libro Rojo de los Anfibios y Reptiles de España. Dirección General de la Conservación de la naturaleza—Associación Herpetológica Española, MadridGoogle Scholar
  34. Puddu F, Viarengo M, Erminio C (1988) Animali di Sardegna: gli Anfibi e i Rettili. Edizioni Della Torre, CagliariGoogle Scholar
  35. Saint Girons H (1975) Coexistence de Vipera aspis et de Vipera berus en Loire-Atlantique: un problème de compétition interspécifique. Revue d’Ecologie (Terre et Vie) 29:590–613Google Scholar
  36. Salvi D, Bombi P (2010) Reptiles of Sardinia: updating the knowledge on their distribution. Acta Herpetol 5:161–177Google Scholar
  37. Scali S, Mangiacotti M, Bonardi A (2008) Living on the edge: habitat selection of Hierophis viridiflavus. Acta Herpetol 3:85–97Google Scholar
  38. Schoener TW (1974) Resource partitioning in ecological communities. Science 185:27–39PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shine R (1980) Ecology of eastern Australian whipsnakes of the genus Demansia. J Herp 14:381–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Simpson EH (1949) Measurement of diversity. Nature 163:688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tanaka K, Ota H (2002) Natural history of two colubrid snakes, Elaphe quadrivirgata and Rhabdophis tigrinus, on Yakushima Island, southwestern Japan. Amphib Reptil 23:323–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Toft CA (1985) Resource partitioning in amphibians and reptiles. Copeia 1985:1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Yamamoto N, Yokoyama J, Kawata M (2007) Relative resource abundance explains butterfly biodiversity in island communities. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 104:10524–10529PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Ecological Society of Japan 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luca Luiselli
    • 1
  • Massimo Capula
    • 2
  • Lorenzo Rugiero
    • 1
  • Daniele Salvi
    • 3
  • Godfrey C. Akani
    • 4
  1. 1.Centre of Environmental Studies DemetraRomeItaly
  2. 2.Herpetological SectionMuseo Civico di ZoologiaRomeItaly
  3. 3.Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos (CIBIO)VairãoPortugal
  4. 4.Department of Applied and Environmental BiologyRivers State University of Science and TechnologyPort HarcourtNigeria

Personalised recommendations