Advertisement

Ecological Research

, Volume 27, Issue 2, pp 359–367 | Cite as

Possible ecological implications of floating microbial assemblages lifted from the lakebed on an Antarctic lake

  • Yukiko Tanabe
  • Sakae Kudoh
Original Article

Abstract

Microbial assemblages can be found drifting/floating in lake water and being washed ashore in continental Antarctica. Two field studies in early and late January 2008 measured the light utilization properties and photosynthetic responses of these assemblages, which were then compared with those of pelagic and benthic microbial communities to evaluate the ecological implications of this phenomenon. The nutrient concentrations were low in the lake water, indicating oligotrophic conditions. Based on microscopic and pigment analysis, both the floating and benthic communities were mainly composed of Oedogonium sp. (Chlorophyceae), followed by cyanobacteria, diatoms, and dinoflagellates. Floating assemblages had a firmer and denser structure, and possessed more rich carotenoids than the benthic community. Measurements of photosynthesis conducted in early January indicated that the activities of the floating assemblages were considerably low. In late January almost all floating assemblages on the lakeshore turned white because of freezing and drying by the ambient temperature decrease, and had no photosynthetic signals. These results suggest that the floating assemblages could spontaneously lift off from the lakebed because of the bubbles created by photosynthesis and then repeatedly roll, flip, sink, or float depending on buoyancy. In addition, this phenomenon seemed to greatly change the cycling of matter by transporting the lake’s photosynthetic products to the surrounding ecosystems, then give the benthic subsurface communities in dark regions a chance to reactivate such as gap regeneration in the case of climax forest, and also allow the floating assemblages to restart photosynthesis at the top of the lakebed by resinking.

Keywords

Lake Oligotrophic Photosynthesis Material cycling Production Ecosystem Antarctica Arctic Polar 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge all the members of the 49th Japanese Antarctic Research Expedition, especially its summer party leader, Dr. S. Imura, for their support. The authors also thank Ms. A. Sugimoto for assistance with nutrient analysis.

References

  1. Eilers PHC, Peeters JCH (1988) A model for the relation ship between light intensity and the rate of photosynthesis in phytoplankton. Ecol Model 42:199–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Garcia-Pichel F, Sherry ND, Castenholz RW (1992) Evidence for an ultra-violet sunscreen role of the extracellular pigment scytonemin in the terrestrial cyanobacterium Chlorogloeopsis sp. Photochem Photobiol 56:17–23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Heath CW (1988) Annual primary productivity of an Antarctic continental lake: phytoplankton and benthic algal mat production strategies. Hydrobiologia 165:77–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Heukelem LV, Thomas CS (2001) Computer-assisted high-performance liquid chromatography method development with applications to the isolation and analysis of phytoplankton pigments. J Chromatogr A 910:31–49PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hodgson DA, Vyverman W, Verleyen E, Sabbe K, Leavitt PR, Taton A, Squier AH, Keely BJ (2004) Environmental factors influencing the pigment composition of in situ benthic microbial communities in east Antarctic lakes. Aquat Microb Ecol 37:247–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Izaguirre I, Mataloni G, Allende L, Vinocure A (2001) Summer fluctuations of microbial planktonic communities in a eutrophic lake—Cierva Point, Antarctica. J Plankton Res 23:1095–1109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kudoh S, Tsuchiya Y, Ayukawa E, Imura S, Kanda H (2003a) Ecological studies of aquatic moss pillars in Antarctic lakes 1. Macro structure and carbon, nitrogen and chlorophyll a contents. Polar Biosci 16:11–22Google Scholar
  8. Kudoh S, Watanabe K, Imura S (2003b) Ecological studies of aquatic moss pillars in Antarctic lakes. 2: temperature and light environment at the moss habitat. Polar Biosci 16:33–42Google Scholar
  9. Kudoh S, Tanabe Y, Matsuzaki M, Imura S (2009) In situ photochemical activity of the phytobenthic communities in two Antarctic lakes. Polar Biol 3:262–271Google Scholar
  10. Matsumoto GI, Tani Y, Seto K, Tazawa T, Yamamuro M, Watanabe T, Nakamura T, Takemura T, Imura S, Kanda H (2010) Holocene paleolimnological changes in Lake Skallen Oike in the Syowa Station area of Antarctica inferred from organic components in a sediment core (Sk4C-2). J Paleolimnol 44:677–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. McMinn A, Hegseth EN (2004) Quantum yield and photosynthetic parameters of marine microalgae from the southern Arctic Ocean, Svalbard. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 84:865–871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Moorehead DL, Burkins MB, Doran PT, Fountain AG, Lyons WB, McKnight DM, Priscu JC, Virginia RA, Wall DH (1999) Ecological legacies: production, persistence and influence on Soil and lake ecosystems of the Antarctic Dry Valleys. Bioscience 49(12):1009–1019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Morris DP, Zagarese H, Williamson CE, Balseiro EG, Hargreaves BR, Modenutti B, Moeller R, Queimalinos C (1995) The attenuation of solar UV radiation in lakes and the role of dissolved organic carbon. Limnol Oceanogr 40:1381–1391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pearce DA, Galand PE (2008) Microbial biodiversity and biogeography. In: Vincent WF, Laybourn-Parry J (eds) Polar lakes and rivers. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 213–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Quesada A, Vincent WF (1997) Strategies of adaptation by Antarctic cyanobacteria to ultraviolet radiation. Eur J Phycol 32(4):335–342Google Scholar
  16. Quesada A, Fernandez-Valiente E, Hawes I, Howard-Williams C (2008) Benthic primary production in polar lakes and rivers. In: Vincent WF, Laybourn-Parry J (eds) Polar lakes and rivers. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 179–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sabbe K, Hodgson DA, Verleyen E, Taton A, Wilmotte A, Vanhoutte K, Vyverman W (2004) Salinity, depth and the structure and composition of microbial mats in continental Antarctic lakes. Freshw Biol 49:296–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Tanabe Y, Kudoh S (2009) Relationship between bathymetric features determined by a convenient method, and the water quality/aquatic organism of Antarctic lakes. Jpn J Limnol 70(3):191–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tanabe Y, Kudoh S, Imura S, Fukuchi M (2008) Phytoplankton blooms under dim and cold conditions in freshwater lakes of East Antarctica. Polar Biol 31:199–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tanabe Y, Ohtani S, Kasamatsu N, Fukuchi M, Kudoh S (2010) Photophysiological responses of phytobenthic communities to the strong light and UV in Antarctic shallow lakes. Polar Biol 33(1):85–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tanabe Y, Shitara T, Kashino Y, Hara Y, Kudoh S (2011) Utilizing the effective xanthophyll cycle for blooming of Ochromonas smithii and O. itoi (Chrysophyceae) on the snow surface. PLoS ONE 6(2):e14690PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tang EPY, Tremblay R, Vincent WF (1997) Cyanobacterial dominance of polar freshwater ecosystems: are high-latitude mat-formers adapted to low temperature? J Phycol 33:171–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Vincent WF, Quesada A (1994) Ultraviolet radiation effects on cyanobacteria: implications for Antarctic microbial ecosystems. Antarct Res Ser 62:111–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Vincent WF, Vincent CL (1982) Nutritional state of the plankton in Antarctic coastal lakes and the inshore Ross Sea. Polar Biol 1:159–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Vincent WF, Rae R, Laurion I, Howard-Williams C, Priscu JC (1998) Transparency of Antarctic ice-covered lakes to solar UV radiation. Limnol Oceanogr 43:618–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Vincent WF, Hobbie JE, Laybourn-Parry J (2008) 1 Introduction to the limnology of high-latitude lake and river ecosystems. In: Vincent WF, Laybourn-Parry J (eds) Polar lakes and rivers. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Vopel K, Hawes I (2006) Photosynthetic performance of benthic microbial mats in Lake Hoare. Antarct Limnol Oceanogr 51(4):1801–1812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wilson AT (1965) Escape of algae from frozen lakes and ponds. Ecology 46(3):376CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Ecological Society of Japan 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Institute of Polar ResearchTachikawaJapan
  2. 2.Graduate School of Frontier SciencesThe University of TokyoKashiwaJapan
  3. 3.Department of Polar ScienceThe Graduate University for Advanced Studies (SOKENDAI)TachikawaJapan

Personalised recommendations