Ecological Research

, Volume 27, Issue 2, pp 475–479 | Cite as

Relative contribution of delaying senescence to growth compensation after defoliation

Note and Comment

Abstract

Delaying senescence as a response to tissue losses has been reported in some studies, but there is no information about its influence in growth compensation. We performed a first test of the relative contribution of delaying senescence after defoliation to growth compensation in Dactylis glomerata L. by means of an iterative growth analysis modified to estimate tissue losses to senescent leaves. We show that Dactylis glomerata overcompensated for relative growth rate after defoliation, mainly by slowing down senescence, and to a lesser extent by increasing the newly assimilated mass allocated to leaves.

Keywords

Defoliation Senescence Growth compensation RGR Dactylis glomerata 

References

  1. Anten NPR, Ackerly DD (2001a) Canopy-level photosynthetic compensation after defoliation in a tropical understorey palm. Funct Ecol 15:252–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anten NPR, Ackerly DD (2001b) A new method of growth analysis for plants that experience periodic losses of leaf mass. Funct Ecol 15:804–811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anten NPR, Martinez-ramos M, Ackerly DD (2003) Defoliation and growth in an understory palm: quantifying the contributions of compensatory responses. Ecology 84:2905–2918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beddows AR (1959) Dactylis glomerata L. J Ecol 47:223–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bloor JMG, Barthes L, Leadley PW (2008) Effects of elevated CO2 and N on tree-grass interactions: an experimental test using Fraxinus excelsior and Dactylis glomerata. Funct Ecol 22:537–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Knapp AK, Seastedt TR (1986) Detritus accumulation limits productivity of tallgrass prairie. Bioscience 36:662–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. McIntire EJB, Hik DS (2002) Grazing history versus current grazing: leaf demography and compensatory growth of three alpine plants in response to a native herbivore (Ochotona collaris). J Ecol 90:348–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. McNaughton SJ (1983) Compensatory plant growth as a response to herbivory. Oikos 40:329–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Meyer GA (1998) Mechanisms promoting recovery from defoliation in goldenrod (Solidago altissima). Can J Bot 76:450–459Google Scholar
  10. Mingo A, Oesterheld M (2009) Retention of dead leaves by grasses as a defense against herbivores. A test on the palatable grass Paspalum dilatatum. Oikos 118:753–757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Rawnsley RP, Donaghy DJ, Fulkerson WJ, Lane PA (2002) Changes in the physiology and feed quality of cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata L.) during regrowth. Grass Forage Sci 57:203–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Van Staalduinen MA, Anten NPR (2005) Differences in the compensatory growth of two co-occurring grass species in relation to water availability. Oecologia 146:190–199PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Van Staalduinen MA, Dobarro I, Peco B (2010) Interactive effects of clipping and nutrient availability on the compensatory growth of a grass species. Plant Ecol 208:55–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Volaire F (2002) Drought survival, summer dormancy and dehydrin accumulation in contrasting cultivars of Dactylis glomerata. Physiol Plant 116:42–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Yordanov I, Goltsev V, Stefanov D, Chernev P, Zaharieva I, Kirova M, Gecheva V, Strasser RJ (2008) Preservation of photosynthetic electron transport from senescence-induced inactivation in primary leaves after decapitation and defoliation of bean plants. J Plant Physiol 165:1954–1963PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Ecological Society of Japan 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de EcologíaUniversidad Autónoma de MadridMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations