Advertisement

Ecological Research

, Volume 26, Issue 3, pp 595–603 | Cite as

Effect of Stipa tenacissima L. on the structure of plant co-occurrence networks in a semi-arid community

  • Hugo Saiz
  • Concepción L. Alados
Original Article

Abstract

Network approaches can increase our understanding of both changes in ecosystems and the role that individual species play in such changes. In ecology, networks have been applied mainly to the study of food webs and mutualistic interactions, with few studies on plant communities. This study used a network approach to examine a semi-arid plant community along a Stipa tenacissima abundance gradient at two locations in SE Spain: (1) an open shrub land where S. tenacissima is a highly competitive species, and (2) an alpha steppe where S. tenacissima forms the end stable successional community. In alpha steppe, the influence of slope was also examined. We detected that S. tenacissima influenced the network structuring process, and that network organization changed along the gradient. In open shrub land, when S. tenacissima became abundant, it dominated the community and other species disappeared. This resulted in a reduction of the number of links that S. tenacissima established. At the alpha-steppe, S. tenacissima coexists with other species, developing more links as it becomes more abundant. On gentle slope zones of alpha steppe, S. tenacissima is more competitive and becomes dominant for high abundance values, reducing its links with other species. The organization of networks varied similarly in both locations. When plant species reduce their abundance and number, links are more heterogeneously distributed in networks. This leads to a concentration of most of the links around a few species, particularly S. tenacissima, which is the most abundant in this case. We conclude that, in order to study plant communities, it is convenient to consider the properties of individual components together with the interaction between them.

Keywords

Ecological network Spatial network Plants association Stipa tenacissima Semi-arid environment Cabo de Gata-Níjar Natural Park Spain 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The research was made possible by the financial support of CEBCE project Ref. CGL 2008-0065 of the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación. H.S. was supported by a grant JAEPre from the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC). We thank Bruce MacWhirter for critically reading and providing helpful suggestions on the manuscript, and Ángel de Frutos, Yamir Moreno, Yolanda Pueyo and two anonymous referees for their helpful suggestions.

Supplementary material

11284_2011_818_MOESM1_ESM.doc (102 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 101 kb)

References

  1. Alados CL, Pueyo Y, Giner ML, Navarro T, Escos J, Barroso F, Cabezudo B, Emlen JM (2003) Quantitative characterization of the regressive ecological succession by fractal analysis of plant spatial patterns. Ecol Model 163:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alados CL, Pueyo Y, Barrantes O, Escós J, Giner L, Robles AB (2004) Variations in landscape patterns and vegetation cover between 1957 and 1994 in a semiarid Mediterranean ecosystem. Landsc Ecol 19:543–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alados CL, Gotor P, Ballester P, Navas D, Escos JM, Navarro T, Cabezudo B (2006) Association between competition and facilitation processes and vegetation spatial patterns in alpha steppes. Biol J Linn Soc 87:103–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amaral LAN, Scala A, Barthélémy M, Stanley HE (2000) Classes of small-world networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:11149–11152PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Armas C, Kikvidze Z, Pugnaire FI (2009) Abiotic conditions, neighbour interactions, and the distribution of Stipa tenacissima in a semiarid mountain range. J Arid Environ 73:1084–1089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bascompte J (2007) Networks in ecology. Basic Appl Ecol 8:485–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boccaletti S, Latora V, Moreno Y, Chavez M, Hwang DU (2006) Complex networks: structure and dynamics. Phys Rep 424:175–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bruno JF, Stachowicz JJ, Bertness MD (2003) Inclusion of facilitation into ecological theory. Trends Ecol Evol 18:119–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burkle L, Irwin R (2009) The importance of interannual variation and bottom-up nitrogen enrichment for plant-pollinator networks. Oikos 118:1816–1829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cale WG, Henebry GM, Yeakley JA (1989) Inferring process from pattern in natural communities. Bioscience 39:600–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Callaway RM, Delucia EH, Moore D, Nowak R, Schlesinger WH (1996) Competition and facilitation: contrasting effects of Artemisia tridentata on desert vs. montane pines. Ecology 77:2130–2141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cammeraat LH, Willott SJ, Compton SG, Incoll LD (2002) The effects of ants’ nests on the physical, chemical and hydrological properties of a rangeland soil in semi-arid Spain. Geoderma 105:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cohen JE (1993) Improving food webs. Ecology 74:252–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Debinski DM, Holt RD (2000) A survey and overview of habitat fragmentation experiments. Conserv Biol 14:342–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dunne JA, Williams RJ, Martinez ND (2002) Food-web structure and network theory: the role of connectance and size. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:12917–12922PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Erdos P (1959) Graph theory and probability. Can J Math 11:34–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Escudero A, Albert MJ, Pita JM, Perez-Garcia F (2000) Inhibitory effects of Artemisia herba-alba on the germination of the gypsophyte Helianthemum squamatum. Plant Ecol 148:71–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goodall DW (1952) Some considerations in the use of point quadrats for the analysis of vegetation. Aust J Sci Res Bull 5:1–41Google Scholar
  19. Greenlee JT, Callaway RM (1996) Abiotic stress and the relative importance of interference and facilitation in Montane bunchgrass communities in Western Montana. Am Nat 148:386–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Haase P, Pugnaire FI, Incoll LD (1995) Seed production and dispersal in the semi-arid tussock grass Stipa tenacissima L during masting. J Arid Environ 31:55–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hall SJ, Raffaeli D (1993) Food webs: theory and reality. Adv Ecol Res 24:187–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Holzapfel CA, Mahall BE (1999) Bidirectional facilitation and interference between shrubs and annuals in the Mojave Desert. Ecology 80:1747–1761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Johnson JC, Luczkovich JJ, Borgatti SP, Snijders TAB (2009) Using social network analysis tools in ecology: Markov process transition models applied to the seasonal trophic network dynamics of the Chesapeake Bay. Ecol Model 220:3133–3140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jordán F (2009) Keystone species and food webs. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 364:1733–1741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jordán F, Osvath G (2009) The sensitivity of food web topology to temporal data aggregation. Ecol Model 220:3141–3146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jordano P (1987) Patterns of mutualistic interactions in pollination and seed dispersal: connectance, dependence asymmetries, and coevolution. Am Nat 129:657–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jordano P, Bascompte J, Olesen JM (2003) Invariant properties in coevolutionary networks of plant–animal interactions. Ecol Lett 6:69–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kefi S, Rietkerk M, Alados CL, Pueyo Y, Papanastasis VP, ElAich A, De Ruiter PC (2007) Spatial vegetation patterns and imminent desertification in Mediterranean arid ecosystems. Nature 449:213–217PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Maestre FT, Cortina J (2004) Do positive interactions increase with abiotic stress? A test from a semi-arid steppe. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 271:S331–S333Google Scholar
  30. Maestre FT, Bautista S, Cortina J, Bellot J (2001) Potential for using facilitation by grasses to establish shrubs on a semiarid degraded steppe. Ecol Appl 11:1641–1655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Maestre FT, Bautista S, Cortina J (2003) Positive, negative, and net effects in grass–shrub interactions in Mediterranean semiarid grasslands. Ecology 84:3186–3197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. May RM (1974) Stability and complexity in model ecosystems. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  33. Montoya JM, Pimm SL, Sole RV (2006) Ecological networks and their fragility. Nature 442:259–264PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Olesen JM, Bascompte J, Dupont YL, Jordano P (2006) The smallest of all worlds: pollination networks. J Theor Biol 240:270–276PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Olesen JM, Bascompte J, Elberling H, Jordano P (2008) Temporal dynamics in a pollination network. Ecology 89:1573–1582PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Oyonarte C, Perez-Pujalte A, Gil C, Sanchez G (1999) Cartografía y delimitación de unidades geomorfoedáficas en el Parque Natural de Cabo de Gata-Níjar. Junta de Andalucía, SevillaGoogle Scholar
  37. Paine RT (1966) Food web complexity and species diversity. Am Nat 100:65–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pascual M, Dunne JA (2006) Ecological networks: linking structure to dynamics in food webs. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  39. Passera CB (1999) Propuestas metodológicas para la gestión de ambientes forrajeros naturales de zonas áridas y semiáridas. Universidad de GranadaGoogle Scholar
  40. Peinado M, Alcaraz F, Martinez-Parras JM (1992) Vegetation of southeastern Spain. Cramer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  41. Pimm SL, Lawton JH, Cohen JE (1991) Food web patterns and their consequences. Nature 350:669–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pugnaire FI, Haase P, Puigdefábregas J (1996) Facilitation between higher plant species in a semiarid environment. Ecology 77:1420–1426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rietkerk M, Boerlijst MC, Van Langevelde F, HilleRisLambers R, Van de Koppel J, Kumar L, Prins HHT, De Roos AM (2002) Self-organization of vegetation in arid ecosystems. Am Nat 160:524–530PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Scheffer M, Carpenter S, Foley JA, Folke C, Walker B (2001) Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature 413:591–596PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sole RV, Montoya JM (2001) Complexity and fragility in ecological networks. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 268:2039–2045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Soriano A, Sala OE, Perelman SB (1994) Patch structure and dynamics in a Patagonian arid steppe. Plant Ecol 111:127–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tielborger K, Kadmon R (2000) Temporal environmental variation tips the balance between facilitation and interference in desert plants. Ecology 81:1544–1553Google Scholar
  48. Tilman D (1994) Competition and biodiversity in spatially structured habitats. Ecology 75:2–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tilman D, Lehman CL, Yin C (1997) Habitat destruction, dispersal, and deterministic extinction in competitive communities. Am Nat 149:407–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tomaselli R (1981) Main physiognomic types and geographic distribution of shrub systems related to Mediterranean climates. In: di Castri F, Goodall DW, Specht RL (eds) Mediterranean-type shrublands. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 123–130Google Scholar
  51. Vázquez DP, Blüthgen N, Cagnolo L, Chacoff NP (2009) Uniting pattern and process in plant–animal mutualistic networks: a review. Ann Bot 103:1445–1457PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Verdu M, Valiente-Banuet A (2008) The nested assembly of plant facilitation networks prevents species extinctions. Am Nat 172:751–760PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Ecological Society of Japan 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pyrenean Institute of Ecology (CSIC)ZaragozaSpain

Personalised recommendations