Ecological Research

, Volume 25, Issue 6, pp 1161–1169 | Cite as

Differences in distribution patterns around river confluences among hydrophilic vegetation groups

  • Takeshi Osawa
  • Hiromune Mitsuhashi
  • Hideyuki Niwa
  • Atushi Ushimaru
Original Article

Abstract

In riparian areas, the distribution patterns of plant species are generally considered to depend on their flooding tolerance. Areas around river confluences are known to experience frequent and/or strong flooding events and provide diverse habitats for plants in riparian areas. However, the degree to which hydrophilic vegetation types increase their distribution around confluences may depend on their flooding tolerance. To test this hypothesis, we compared patch numbers and total areas of ten vegetation groups between confluences and single-flow areas. The vegetation groups were classified on the basis of life form and morphology of dominant species. Additionally, we compared total area of natural bare ground (an index of flooding disturbance) between confluences and single-flow areas. We found that patch numbers of annual grass, forb, and vine, perennial grass and forb, and riparian forest vegetation, as well as total areas of annual forb and vine, perennial grass and forb, bamboo and riparian forest vegetation, and natural bare ground, were greater around river confluences than in single-flow areas. On the other hand, patch numbers of shrub vegetation and total areas of annual grass, perennial vine, willow, and shrub vegetation decreased around confluences. These results suggest that confluences enhance diverse, but not all, types of habitat for hydrophilic vegetation. Thus, river confluences are a key element in maintaining diverse riparian vegetation.

Keywords

Disturbance Flooding Vegetation type River ecosystem 

References

  1. Aguiar FC, Ferreira MT, Albuquerque A, Bernez I (2005) Invasibility patterns of knotgrass (Paspalum distichum) in Portuguese riparian habitats. Weed Technol 19:509–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baek MS, Lim KS, Cho DS, Lee DW (1997) Distribution of stream-edge vegetation in the Balan stream as related to soil environments. Korean J Ecol 20:451–459Google Scholar
  3. Benda L, Andras K, Miller D, Bigelow P (2004a) Confluence effects in rivers: interactions of basin scale, network geometry, and disturbance regimes. Water Resour Res 40:W05402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benda L, Poff NL, Miller D, Dunne T, Reeves G, Pess G, Pollock M (2004b) The network dynamics hypothesis: how channel networks structure riverine habitats. Bioscience 54:413–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burkart M (2001) River corridor plants (Stromtalpflanzen) in Central European lowland: a review of a poorly understood plant distribution pattern. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 10:449–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information theoretic approach. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  7. Cho HJ, Cho KH (2005) Responses of riparian vegetation to flooding disturbance in a sand stream. KSCE J Civil Eng 9:49–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. De Serres B, Roy AG, Biron PM, Best JL (1999) Three-dimensional structure of flow at a confluence of river channels with discordant beds. Geomorphology 26:313–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. He JB, Bogemann GM, van de Steeg HG, Rijnders J, Voesenek L, Blom C (1999) Survival tactics of Ranunculus species in river floodplains. Oecologia 118:1–8CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hyogo Prefecture (2007) Research about the natural environment of river. Hyogo Prefecture, AtlusGoogle Scholar
  11. Jenson SK, Domingue JO (1988) Extracting topographic structure from digital elevation data for geographic information system analysis. Photogram Eng Rem Sens 54:1593–1600Google Scholar
  12. Johnson SL, Swanson FJ, Grant GE, Wondzell SM (2000) Riparian forest disturbances by a mountain flood: the influence of floated wood. Hydrol Process 14:3031–3050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kozlowski TT (1997) Responses of woody plants to flooding and salinity. Tree Physiol Monogr 1Google Scholar
  14. Naiman R, Decamps H (1997) The ecology of interfaces: riparian zones. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 28:621–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Naiman RJ, Decamps H, Pollock M (1993) The role of Riparian corridors in maintaining regional biodiversity. Ecol Appl 3:209–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nakagoshi N, Kondo T (2002) Ecological land evaluation for nature redevelopment in river areas. Landsc Ecol 17:83–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nakamura F, Shin N, Inahara S (2007) Shifting mosaic in maintaining diversity of floodplain tree species in the northern temperate zone of Japan. For Ecol Manag 241:28–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Niiyama K (1987) Distribution of salicaceous species and soil texture of habitats along the Ishikari River. Jpn J Ecol 37:163–174 (in Japanese with English summary)Google Scholar
  19. Niiyama K (1990) The role of seed dispersal and seedling traits in colonization and coexistence of Salix species in a seasonally flooded habitat. Ecol Res 5:317–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ohtsuka T, Sakura T, Ohsawa M (1993) Early herbaceous succession along a topographical gradient on forest clear-felling sites in mountainous terrain, central Japan. Ecol Res 8:329–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Osawa T, Mitsuhashi H, Niwa H, Ushimaru A (2010a) Enhanced diversity at network nodes: river confluences increase vegetation-patch diversity. Open Ecol J (in press)Google Scholar
  22. Osawa T, Mitsuhashi H, Ushimaru A (2010b) River confluences enhance riparian plant species diversity. Plant Ecol 209:95–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pollock MM, Naiman RJ, Hanley TA (1998) Plant species richness in riparian wetlands: a test of biodiversity theory. Ecology 79:94–105Google Scholar
  24. Qian H, Ricklefs RE (2008) Global concordance in diversity patterns of vascular plants and terrestrial vertebrates. Ecol Lett 11:547–553CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. R Development Core Team (2008) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://developer.r-project.org/
  26. Rhoads BL, Kenworthy ST (1995) Flow structure at an asymmetrical stream confluence. Geomorphology 11:273–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Salo J, Kalliola R, Hakkinen I, Makinen Y, Niemela P, Puhakka M, Coley PD (1986) River dynamics and the diversity of Amazon lowland forest. Nature 322:254–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Satake Y, Ohi J, Kitamura S, Watari S, Tominari T (1981) Wild flowers of Japan III. Heibonsya, Tokyo (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  29. Satake Y, Ohi J, Kitamura S, Watari S, Tominari T (1982a) Wid flowers of Japan I. Heibonsya, Tokyo (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  30. Satake Y, Ohi J, Kitamura S, Watari S, Tominari T (1982b) Wild flowers of Japan II. Heibonsya, Tokyo (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  31. Satake Y, Hara H, Watari S, Tominari T (1989a) Wild flower of Japan, woody I. Heibonsya, Tokyo (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  32. Satake Y, Hara H, Watari S, Tominari T (1989b) Wild flower of Japan, woody II. Heibonsya, Tokyo (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  33. Van der Maarel E (2005) Vegetation ecology. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  34. van Eck W, van de Steeg HM, Blom C, de Kroon H (2004) Is tolerance to summer flooding correlated with distribution patterns in river floodplains? A comparative study of 20 terrestrial grassland species. Oikos 107:393–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Vervuren PJA, Blom C, de Kroon H (2003) Extreme flooding events on the Rhine and the survival and distribution of riparian plant species. J Ecol 91:135–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Whited DC, Lorang MS, Harner MJ, Hauer FR, Kimball JS, Stanford JA (2007) Climate, hydrologic disturbance, and succession: drivers of floodplain pattern. Ecology 88:940–953CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Wilson JP, Gallant JC (2000) Terrain analysis: principles and applications. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Ecological Society of Japan 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Takeshi Osawa
    • 1
    • 2
  • Hiromune Mitsuhashi
    • 3
  • Hideyuki Niwa
    • 4
  • Atushi Ushimaru
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate School of Human Development and EnvironmentKobe UniversityKobeJapan
  2. 2.National Institute for Agro-Environmental ScienceTsukubaJapan
  3. 3.The Museum of Nature and Human Activities HyogoSandaJapan
  4. 4.Graduate School of Global Environmental StudiesKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations