Ecological Research

, Volume 25, Issue 5, pp 1033–1044 | Cite as

Spatial and temporal patterns of soil respiration over the Japanese Archipelago: a model intercomparison study

  • Akihiko Ito
  • Kazuhito Ichii
  • Tomomichi Kato
Original Article


We used terrestrial ecosystem models to estimate spatial and temporal variability in and uncertainty of estimated soil carbon dioxide (CO2) efflux, or soil respiration, over the Japanese Archipelago. We compared five carbon-cycle models to assess inter-model variability: Biome-BGC, CASA, LPJ, SEIB, and VISIT. These models differ in approaches to soil carbon dynamics, root respiration estimation, and relationships between decomposition and environmental factors. We simulated the carbon budget of natural ecosystems over the archipelago for 2001–2006 at 1-day time steps and 2-min (latitude and longitude) spatial resolution. The models were calibrated using measured flux data to accurately represent net ecosystem CO2 exchange. Each model successfully reproduced seasonal changes and latitudinal gradients in soil respiration. The five-model average of estimated total soil respiration of Japanese ecosystems was 295 Tg C year−1, with individual model estimates ranging from 210 to 396 Tg C year−1 (1 Tg = 1012 g). The differences between modeled estimates were more evident in summer and in warmer years, implying that they were mainly attributable to differences in modeling the temperature dependence of soil respiration. There was a large discrepancy between models in the estimated contribution of roots to total soil respiration, ranging from 3.9 to 48.4%. Although model calibration reduced the uncertainty of flux estimates, substantial uncertainties still remained in estimates of underground processes from these terrestrial carbon-cycle models.


Carbon cycle Forest ecosystem Global warming Model simulation Uncertainty Underground process 



This study was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (no. 19310017) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) and the A3 Foresight Program (CarboEastAsia: Capacity building among ChinaFlux, JapanFlux, and KoFlux to cope with climate change protocols by synthesizing measurement, theory, and modeling in quantifying and understanding of carbon fluxes and storages in East Asia) by the JSPS.


  1. Andrén O, Paustian K (1987) Barley straw decomposition in the field: a comparison of models. Ecology 68:1190–1200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bauer J, Herbst M, Huisman L, Weihermüller L, Vereecken H (2008) Sensitivity of simulated soil heterotrophic respiration to temperature and moisture reduction functions. Geoderma 145:17–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bekku YS, Sakata T, Nakano T, Koizumi H (2009) Midday depression in root respiration of Quercus crispula and Chamaecyparis obtusa: its implication for estimating carbon cycling in forest ecosystems. Ecol Res 24:865–871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bond-Lamberty B, Wang C, Gower ST (2004) A global relationship between the heterotrophic and autotrophic components of soil respiration? Global Change Biol 10:1756–1766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boone RD, Nadelhoffer KJ, Canary JD, Kaye JP (1998) Roots exert a strong influence on the temperature sensitivity of soil respiration. Nature 396:570–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell JL, Law BE (2005) Forest soil respiration across three climatologically distinct chronosequences in Oregon. Biogeochemistry 73:109–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cornwell WK, Cornelissen JHC, Amatangelo K, Dorrepaal E, Eviner VT, Godoy O, Hobbie SE, Hoorens B, Kurokawa H, Pérez-Harguindeguy N, Quested HM, Santiago LS, Wardle DA, Wright IJ, Aerts R, Allison SD, van Bodegom P, Brovkin V, Chatain A, Callaghan TV, Díaz S, Garnier E, Gurvich DE, Kazakou E, Klein JA, Read J, Reich PB, Soudzilovskaia NA, Vaieretti MV, Westoby M (2008) Plant species traits are the predominant control on litter decomposition rates within biomes worldwide. Ecol Lett 11:1065–1071CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Cox PM, Betts RA, Jones GD, Spall SA, Totterdell IJ (2000) Acceleration of global warming due to carbon-cycle feedbacks in a coupled climate model. Nature 408:184–187CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Davidson EA, Janssens IA (2006) Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change. Nature 440:165–173CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Davidson EA, Belk E, Boone RD (1998) Soil water content and temperature as independent or confounded factors controlling soil respiration in a temperate mixed hardwood forest. Global Change Biol 4:217–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dirmeyer PA, Gao X, Zhao M, Guo Z, Oki T, Hanasaki N (2006) GSWP-2. Multimodel analysis and implications for our perception of the land surface. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 87:1381–1397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Friedl MA, McIver DK, Hodges JCF, Zhang XY, Muchoney D, Strahler AH, Woodcock CE, Gopal S, Schneider A, Cooper A, Baccini A, Gao F, Schaaf C (2002) Global land cover mapping from MODIS: algorithms and early results. Remote Sens Environ 83:287–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Greenhouse Gas Inventory Office of Japan (2009) National Greenhouse Gas Inventory Report of Japan, pp 504. National Institute for Environmental Studies, Japan, TsukubaGoogle Scholar
  14. Gu L, Hanson PJ, Post WM, Liu Q (2008) A novel approach for identifying the true temperature sensitivity from soil respiration measurements. Global Biogeochem Cycles 22, GB4009. doi: 10.1029/2007GB003164
  15. Gurney KR, Baker D, Rayner P, Denning S (2008) Interannual variations in continental-scale net carbon exchange and sensitivity to observing networks estimated from atmospheric CO2 inversions for the period 1980 to 2005. Global Biogeochem Cycles 22, GB3025. doi: 10.1029/2007GB003082
  16. Hakkenberg R, Churkina G, Rodeghiero M, Börner A, Steinhof A, Cescatti A (2008) Temperature sensitivity of the turnover times of soil organic matter in forests. Ecol Appl 18:119–131CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hanson PJ, Edwards NT, Garten CT, Andrews JA (2000) Separating root and soil microbial contributions to soil respiration: a review of methods and observations. Biogeochem 48:115–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hashimoto S (2005) Q10 values of soil respiration in Japanese forests. J For Res 10:409–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hibbard KA, Law BE, Reichstein M, Sulzman J (2005) An analysis of soil respiration across northern hemisphere temperate ecosystems. Biogeochem 73:29–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hirata R, Saigusa N, Yamamoto S, Ohtani Y, Ide R, Asanuma J, Gamo M, Hirano T, Kondo H, Kosugi Y, Li SG, Nakai Y, Takagi K, Tani M, Wang H (2008) Spatial distribution of carbon balance in forest ecosystem across East Asia. Agr For Meteorol 148:761–775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ichii K, Suzuki T, Kato T, Ito A, Hajima T, Ueyama M, Sasai T, Hirata R, Saigusa N, Ohtani Y, Takagi K (2009) Multi-model analysis of terrestrial carbon cycles in Japan: reducing uncertainties in model outputs among different terrestrial biosphere models using flux observations. Biogeosci Discuss 6:8455–8502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2007) Climate Change 2007: the physical science basis. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  23. Ise T, Moorcroft PR (2006) The global-scale temperature and moisture dependencies of soil organic carbon decomposition: an analysis using a mechanistic decomposition model. Biogeochem 80:217–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ito A (2008) The regional carbon budget of East Asia simulated with a terrestrial ecosystem model and validated using AsiaFlux data. Agric For Meteorol 148:738–747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ito A, Oikawa T (2002) A simulation model of the carbon cycle in land ecosystems (Sim-CYCLE): a description based on dry-matter production theory and plot-scale validation. Ecol Model 151:147–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ito A, Inatomi M, Mo W, Lee M, Koizumi H, Saigusa N, Murayama S, Yamamoto S (2007) Examination of model-estimated ecosystem respiration by use of flux measurement data from a cool-temperate deciduous broad-leaved forest in central Japan. Tellus 59B:616–624Google Scholar
  27. Janssens IA, Pilegaard K (2003) Large seasonal changes in Q10 of soil respiration in a beech forest. Global Change Biol 9:911–918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jones C, McConnell C, Coleman K, Cox P, Falloon P, Jenkinson D, Powlson D (2005) Global climate change and soil carbon stocks; predictions from two contrasting models for the turnover of organic carbon in soil. Global Change Biol 11:154–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Khomik M, Arain MA, Liaw KL, McCaughey JH (2009) Debut of a flexible model for simulating respiration–soil temperature relationship: Gamma model. J Geophys Res 114:G03004. doi: 10.1029/2008JG000851 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kirschbaum MUF (1995) The temperature dependence of soil organic matter decomposition, and the effects of global warming on soil organic C storage. Soil Biol Biochem 27:753–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lee MS, Nakane K, Nakatsubo T, Koizumi H (2005) The importance of root respiration in annual soil carbon fluxes in a cool-temperate deciduous forest. Agric For Meteorol 134:95–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lee MS, Mo WH, Koizumi H (2006) Soil respiration of forest ecosystems in Japan and global implications. Ecol Res 21:828–839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Liang N, Nakadai T, Hirano T, Qu L, Koike T, Fujinuma Y, Inoue G (2004) In situ comparison of four approaches to estimating soil CO2 efflux in a northern larch (Larix kaempferi Sarg.) forest. Agric ForMeteorol 123:97–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lloyd J, Taylor JA (1994) On the temperature dependence of soil respiration. Funct Ecol 8:315–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mariko S, Nishimura N, Mo W, Matsui Y, Kibe T, Koizumi H (2000) Winter CO2 flux from soil and snow surfaces in a cool temperate deciduous forest, Japan. Ecol Res 15:363–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Martin JG, Bolstad PV (2009) Variation of soil respiration at three spatial scales: components within measurements, intra-site variation and patterns on the landscape. Soil Biol Biochem 41:530–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Medvigy D, Wofsy SC, Munger JW, Hollinger DY, Moorcroft PR (2009) Mechanistic scaling of ecosystem function and dynamics in space and time: Ecosystem Demography model version 2. J Geophys Res 114:G01002. doi: 10.1029/2008JG000812 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mo W, Lee MS, Uchida M, Inatomi M, Saigusa N, Mariko S, Koizumi H (2005) Seasonal and annual variations in soil respiration in a cool-temperate deciduous broad-leaved forest in Japan. Agr For Meteorol 134:81–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Morisada K, Ono K, Kanomata H (2004) Organic carbon stock in forest soils in Japan. Geoderma 119:21–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ohashi M, Gyokusen K, Saito A (2000) Contribution of root respiration to total soil respiration in a Japanese cedar (Cryptomeria japonica D. Don) artificial forest. Ecol Res 15:323–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ostle NJ, Smith P, Fisher R, Woodward FI, Fisher JB, Smith JU, Galbraith D, Levy P, Meir P, McNamara NP, Bardgett RD (2009) Integrating plant–soil interactions into global carbon cycle models. J Ecol 97:851–863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Parton WJ, Stewart JWB, Cole CV (1988) Dynamics of C, N, P and S in grassland soils: a model. Biogeochem 5:109–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Peng S, Piao S, Wang T, Sun J, Shen Z (2009) Temperature sensitivity of soil respiration in different ecosystems in China. Soil Biol Biochem 41:1008–1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Potter CS, Randerson JT, Field CB, Matson PA, Vitousek PM, Mooney HA, Klooster SA (1993) Terrestrial ecosystem production: a process model based on global satellite and surface data. Global Biogeochem Cycles 7:811–841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Raich JW, Potter CS (1995) Global patterns of carbon dioxide emissions from soils. Global Biogeochem Cycles 9:23–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Raich JW, Potter CS, Bhagawati D (2002) Interannual variability in global soil respiration, 1980–94. Global Change Biol 8:800–812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Reichstein M, Beer C (2008) Soil respiration across scales: the importance of a model-data integration framework of data interpretation. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 171:344–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Reichstein M, Rey A, Freibauer A, Tenhunen J, Valentini R, Banza J, Casals P, Cheng Y, Grünzweig JM, Irvine J, Joffre R, Law BE, Loustau D, Miglietta F, Oechel W, Ourcival JM, Pereira JS, Peressotti A, Ponti F, Qi Y, Rambal S, Rayment M, Romanya J, Rossi F, Tedeschi V, Tirone G, Xu M, Yakir D (2003) Modeling temporal and large-scale spatial variability of soil respiration from soil water availability, temperature and vegetation productivity indices. Global Biogeochem Cycles 17:1104. doi: 10.1029/2003GB002035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rustad LE, Campbell JL, Marion GM, Norby RJ, Mitchell MJ, Hartley AE, Cornelissen JHC, Gurevitch J, GCTE-NEWS (2001) A meta-analysis of the response of soil respiration, net nitrogen mineralization, and aboveground plant growth to experimental ecosystem warming. Oecologia 126:543–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Saigusa N, Ichii K, Murakami H, Hirata R, Asanuma J, Den H, Han SJ, Ide R, Li SG, Ohta T, Sasai T, Wang SQ, Yu GR (2009) Impact of meteorological anomalies in the 2003 summer on gross primary productivity in East Asia. Biogeosci Discuss 6:8883–8921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sampson DA, Janssens IA, Curiel Yuste J, Ceulemans R (2007) Basal rates of soil respiration are correlated with photosynthesis in a mixed temperate forest. Global Change Biol 13:2008–2017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sato H, Ito A, Kohyama T (2007) SEIB–DGVM: a new Dynamic Global Vegetation Model using a spatially explicit individual-based approach. Ecol Model 200:279–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sitch S, Smith B, Prentice IC, Arneth A, Bondeau A, Cramer W, Kaplan JO, Levis S, Lucht W, Sykes MT, Thonicke K, Venevsky S (2003) Evaluation of ecosystem dynamics, plant geography and terrestrial carbon cycling in the LPJ dynamic global vegetation model. Global Change Biol 9:161–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Thornton PE, Running SW (1999) An improved algorithm for estimating incident daily solar radiation from measurements of temperature, humidity, and precipitation. Agric For Meteorol 93:211–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Thornton PE, Law BE, Gholz HL, Clark KL, Falge E, Ellsworth DS, Goldstein AH, Monson RK, Hollinger D, Falk M, Chen J, Sparks JP (2002) Modeling and measuring the effects of disturbance history and climate on carbon and water budgets in evergreen needleleaf forests. Agric For Meteorol 113:185–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhou T, Shi P, Hui D, Luo Y (2009a) Global pattern of temperature sensitivity of soil heterotrophic respiration (Q10) and its implications for carbon-climate feedback. J Geophys Res 114:G02016. doi: 10.1029/2008JG000850 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhou T, Shi P, Hui D, Luo Y (2009b) Spatial patterns in temperature sensitivity of soil respiration in China: estimation with inverse modeling. Sci China Ser C 52:981–989Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Ecological Society of Japan 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Institute for Environmental StudiesTsukubaJapan
  2. 2.Faculty of Symbiotic Systems ScienceFukushima UniversityFukushimaJapan
  3. 3.QUEST, Department of Earth ScienceUniversity of BristolBristolUK

Personalised recommendations