Advertisement

Ecological Research

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 691–692 | Cite as

Plant responses to heterogeneous environments: scaling from shoot modules and whole-plant functions to ecosystem processes

  • Akira Mori
  • Ülo Niinemets
Special Feature Plant responses to heterogeneous environments

Plant individuals are characterized by modular architecture, consisting of hierarchically positioned similar basic semi-autonomous units termed “modules” that have species- and plant functional-type-specific morphological and physiological characteristics (White 1979; Harper 1985; Silvertown and Gordon 1989; Prusinkiewicz 2000; Kawamura 2010). The basic units underlying the modular organization can be buds, metamers, shoots, branches, or ramets depending on plant functional type (Barthélémy and Caraglio 2007; Kawamura 2010). The plants exhibit a characteristic acclimation “behavior” by changing the size, shape, number, and within-plant arrangement of such modular units in response to variation in local distribution and availability of resources required. Although the degree of plastic changes of the module attributes is genetically and mechanically restricted, module-level plasticity plays a key role in whole-plant acclimation to local resource heterogeneity (White 1979; Silvertown...

Keywords

Phenotypic Plasticity Carbon Gain Plant Functional Type Functional Diversification Resource Capture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Dr. Kouki Hikosaka and to all anonymous reviewers for their invaluable and insightful comments on all manuscripts in this special issue.

References

  1. Anten NPR (2002) Evolutionarily stable leaf area production in plant populations. J Theoret Biol 217:15–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anten NPR, Hirose T (2001) Limitations on photosynthesis of competing individuals in stands and the consequences for canopy structure. Oecologia 129:186–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barthélémy D, Caraglio Y (2007) Plant architecture: a dynamic, multilevel and comprehensive approach to plant form, structure and ontogeny. Ann Bot 99(16):375–407CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Duursma RA, Mäkelä A (2007) Summary models for light interception and light-use efficiency of non-homogeneous canopies. Tree Physiol 27:859–870PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Harper JL (1985) Modules, branches, and the capture of resources. In: Jackson JBC, Buss LW, Cook RE (eds) Population biology, evolution of clonal organisms. Yale University Press, New Haven, pp 1–33Google Scholar
  6. Ishii H, Asano S (2010) The role of crown architecture, leaf phenology and photosynthetic activity in promoting complementary use of light among coexisting species in temperate forests. Ecol Res. doi: 10.1007/s11284-009-0668-4
  7. Ishii H, Yoshimura K, Mori A (2009) Convergence of leaf display and photosynthetic characteristics of understory Abies amabilis and Tsuga heterophylla in an old-growth forest in southwestern Washington State, USA. Tree Physiol 29:989–998CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Karban R (2008) Plant behavior and communication. Ecol Lett 11:727–739CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kawamura K (2010) A conceptual framework for the study of modular responses to local environmental heterogeneity within the plant crown and a review of related concepts. Ecol Res. doi: 10.1007/s11284-009-0688-0
  10. Kennedy MC (2010) Functional-structural models optimize the placement of foliage units for multiple whole-canopy functions. Ecol Res. doi: 10.1007/s11284-009-0658-6
  11. Lagergren A, Eklundh L, Grelle A, Lundblad M, Mölder M, Lankreijer H, Lindroth A (2004) Net primary production and light use efficiency in a mixed coniferous forest in Sweden. Plant Cell Environ 28:412–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Leverenz JW, Hinckley TM (1990) Shoot structure, leaf area index and productivity of evergreen conifer-stands. Tree Physiol 6:135–149PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Mori AS, Hasegawa SF (2007) Structural characteristics of Abies mariesii saplings in a snowy subalpine parkland in central Japan. Tree Physiol 26:141–148Google Scholar
  14. Mori A, Takeda H (2004) Functional relationships between crown morphology and within-crown characteristics of understory saplings of three co-dominant conifers in a subalpine forest in central Japan. Tree Physiol 24:661–670PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Mori AS, Mizumachi E, Sprugel DG (2008) Morphological acclimation to understorey environments in Abies amabilis, a shade- and snow-tolerant conifer species of the Cascade Mountains, Washington, USA. Tree Physiol 28:815–824PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Niinemets Ü (2010) A review of light interception in plant stands from leaf to canopy in different plant functional types and in species with varying shade tolerance. Ecol Res. doi: 10.1007/s11284-010-0712-4
  17. Prusinkiewicz P (2000) Simulation modelling of plants and plant ecosystems. Commun ACM 43:85–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Silvertown JW, Gordon DM (1989) A framework for plant behavior. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 20:349–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Valladares F, Niinemets Ü (2007) The architecture of plant crowns: form design rules to light capture and performance. In: Pugnaire F, Valladares F (eds) Functional plant ecology. Taylor and Francis, New York, pp 101–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Valladares F, Gianoli E, Gómez JM (2007) Ecological limits to plant phenotypic plasticity. New Phytol 176:749–763CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Valldares F, Skillman JB, Pearcy RW (2002) Convergence in light capture efficiencies among tropical forest understory plants with contrasting crown architectures: a case of morphological compensation. Am J Bot 89:1275–1284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. White J (1979) The plant as a metapopulation. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 10:109–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Ecological Society of Japan 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Environment and Information SciencesYokohama National UniversityYokohamaJapan
  2. 2.Institute of Agricultural and Environmental SciencesEstonian University of Life SciencesTartuEstonia

Personalised recommendations