Ecological Research

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 335–344 | Cite as

Relative influence of habitat heterogeneity, climate, human disturbance, and spatial structure on vertebrate species richness in Spain

Original Article


Many factors affect the distribution of species richness. This study examines the relative influence of habitat heterogeneity, climate, human disturbance, and spatial structure on the species-richness distribution of terrestrial vertebrates (amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals) in mainland Spain. The results indicate that spatial structure and environment exert similar influences on species richness. For all four taxa, species richness increases southward and northward, being lower in the center of the country, when controlled for other variables. This may be the result of a peninsular effect, as found in other studies, and reflect the importance of historical events on species richness in the Iberian Peninsula. Climate is more important than habitat heterogeneity in determining species richness. Temperature is positively correlated with amphibian, reptile, and bird species richness, while mammalian species richness is highest at intermediate temperatures. This effect is stronger in ectotherms than among endotherms, perhaps reflecting physiological differences. Precipitation positively correlates with bird and mammalian species richness, but has no effect on ectotherm species richness. Amphibian species richness increases with altitudinal range, and bird species richness with habitat diversity. Human population density is positively correlated with bird and mammalian species richness, but does not affect ectotherm species richness, while amphibian and bird species richness is highest at moderate levels of human land alteration (farmland). However, unexplained variance remains, and we discuss that the effects of environmental variables on species richness may vary geographically, causing different effects to be obscured on a national scale, diminishing the explanatory power of environmental variables.


Amphibians Biodiversity Birds Distribution Mammals Reptiles 


  1. Allen AP, Brown JH, Gillooly JF (2002) Global biodiversity, biochemical kinetics, and the energetic-equivalence rule. Science 237:1545–1548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrews P, O’Brien E (2000) Climate, vegetation, and predictable gradients in mammal species richness in southern Africa. J Zool 251:205–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Araújo MB (2003) The coincidence of people and biodiversity in Europe. Global Ecol Biogeogr 12:5–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Araújo MB, Lobo JM, Moreno JC (2007) The effectiveness of Iberian protected areas in conserving terrestrial biodiversity. Conserv Biol 21:1423–1432PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Atauri JA, de Lucio JV (2001) The role of landscape structure in species richness distribution of birds, amphibians, reptiles and lepidopterans in Mediterranean landscapes. Landscape Ecol 16:147–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Badgley C, Fox DL (2000) Ecological biogeography of North American mammals: species density and ecological structure n relation to environmental gradients. J Biogeogr 27:1437–1467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Balmford A, Moore JL, Brooks T, Burgess ND, Hansen LA, Williams P, Rahbek C (2001) Conservation conflicts across Africa. Science 291:2616–2619PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blondel J, Mourer-Chauviré C (1998) Evolution and history of the western Palearctic avifauna. Trends Ecol Evol 13:488–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Böhning-Gaese K (1997) Determinants of avian species richness at different spatial scales. J Biogeogr 24:49–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boone RB, Krohn WB (2000) Partitioning sources of variation in vertebrate species richness. J Biogeogr 27:457–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Borcard D, Legendre P, Drapeau P (1992) Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. Ecology 73:1045–1055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brown JH (1995) Macroecology. Chicago University Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  13. Buckley LB, Jetz W (2007) Environmental and historical constraints on global patterns of amphibian richness. Proc R Soc B 274:1167–1173PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Burgess NB, Balmford A, Cordeiro NJ, Fjeldså J, Küper W, Rahbek C, Sanderson EW, Scharlemann JPW, Sommer JH, Williams PH (2007) Correlations among species distributions, human density and human infrastructure across the high biodiversity tropical mountains of Africa. Biol Conserv 134:164–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bustamante J, Seoane J (2004) Predicting the distribution of four species of raptors (Aves: Accipitridae) in southern Spain: statistical models work better than existing maps. J Biogeogr 31:295–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carrascal LM, Lobo JM (2003) Respuestas a viejas preguntas con nuevos datos: estudio de los patrones de distribución de la avifauna española y consecuencias para su conservación. In: Martí R, del Moral JC (eds) Atlas de las aves reproductoras de España. Dirección General de Conservación de la Naturaleza-SEO, Madrid, pp 651–668Google Scholar
  17. Chown SL, van Rensburg BJ, Gaston KJ, Rodrigues ASL, van Jaarsveld AS (2003) Energy, species richness, and human population size: conservation implications at a national scale. Ecol Appl 13:1233–1241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Clarke A, Gaston KJ (2006) Climate, energy and diversity. Proc R Soc B 273:2257–2266PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Colwell RK, Lees DC (2000) The mid-domain effect: geometric constraints on the geography of species richness. Trends Ecol Evol 15:70–76PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Conrad O (2005) SAGA 2.0.0b (system for automated geoscientific analyses). Geographisches Institut, GöttingerGoogle Scholar
  21. Currie DJ, Mittelbach GG, Cornell HV, Field R, Guégan J-F, Hawkins BA, Kaufman DM, Kerr JT, Oberdoff T, O’Brien E, Turner JRG (2004) Predictions and tests of climate-based hypotheses of broad-scale variation in taxonomic richness. Ecol Lett 7:1121–1134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Davies RG, Orme CDL, Storch D, Olson VA, Thomas GH, Ross SG, Ding T-S, Rasmussen PC, Bennett PM, Owens IPF, Blackburn TM, Gaston KJ (2007) Topography, energy and the global distribution of bird species richness. Proc R Soc B 274:1189–1197PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Díaz-Paniagua C (2001) Introducción al estado de conservación de los anfibios de Andalucía. In: Franco Ruiz A, Rodríguez de los Santos M (eds) Libro rojo de los vertebrados amenazados de Andalucía. Consejería de Medio Ambiente, Junta de Andalucía, Seville, pp 37–38Google Scholar
  24. Ding T-S, Yuan H-W, Geng S, Hoh C-N, Lee P-F (2006) Macro-scale bird species richness patterns of East Asian mainland and islands: energy, area and isolation. J Biogeogr 33:683–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Diniz-Filho JAF, Bini LM, Hawkins BA (2003) Spatial autocorrelation and red herrings in geographical ecology. Global Ecol Biogeogr 12:53–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Endler JA (1995) Multiple-trait coevolution and environmental gradients in guppies. Trends Ecol Evol 10:22–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Evans KL, Gaston KJ (2005) People, energy and avian species richness. Global Ecol Biogeogr 14:187–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Evans KL, Warren PH, Gaston KJ (2005) Species-energy relationships at the macroecological scale: review of the mechanisms. Biol Rev 80:1–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ferrer X, Carrascal LM, Gordo O, Pino J (2006) Sesgo en el esfuerzo de muestreo ornitológico debido a las preferencias humanas: un análisis con la avifauna de Cataluña (1900–2002). Ardeola 53:213–227Google Scholar
  30. Gaston KJ, Blackburn TM (2000) Patterns and processes in macroecology. Blackwell, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gaston KJ, Evans KL (2004) Birds and people in Europe. Proc R Soc B 271:1649–1655PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. González-Taboada F, Nores C, Álvarez MA (2007) Breeding bird species richness in Spain: assessing diversity hypothesis at various scales. Ecography 30:241–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Guisan A, Hofer U (2003) Predicting reptile distributions at the mesoscale: relation to climate and topography. J Biogeogr 30:1233–1243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hanski I (1998) Metapopulation dynamics. Nature 396:41–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hawkins BA, Field R, Cornell HV, Currie DJ, Guégan J-F, Kaufman DM, Kerr JT, Mittelbach GG, Oberdoff T, O’Brien EM, Porter EE, Turner JRG (2003) Energy, water, and broad-scale geographic patterns of species richness. Ecology 84:3105–3117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hawkins BA, Diniz-Filho JAF, Bini LM, De Marco P, Blackburn TM (2007) Red herrings revisited: spatial autocorrelation and parameter estimation in geographical ecology. Ecography 30:375–384Google Scholar
  37. Hurlbert AH, Haskell JP (2003) The effect of energy and seasonality on avian species richness and community composition. Am Nat 161:83–97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jetz W, Rahbek C (2001) Geometric constraints explain much of the species richness pattern in African birds. Proc Natl Acad Sci 98:5661–5666PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jetz W, Rahbek C (2002) Geographic range size and determinants of avian species richness. Science 297:1548–1551PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kerr JT, Packer L (1997) Habitat heterogeneity as a determinant of mammal species richness in high-energy regions. Nature 385:252–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kleidon A, Mooney HA (2000) A global distribution of biodiversity inferred from climatic constraints: results from a process-based modeling study. Global Change Biol 6:507–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lee P-F, Ding T-S, Hsu F-H, Geng S (2004) Breeding bird species richness in Taiwan: distribution on gradients of elevation, primary productivity and urbanization. J Biogeogr 31:307–314Google Scholar
  43. Legendre P (1993) Spatial autocorrelation: trouble or new paradigm? Ecology 74:1659–1673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lennon JJ, Greenwood JJD, Turner JRG (2000) Bird diversity and environmental gradients in Britain: a test of the species-energy hypothesis. J Anim Ecol 69:581–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lichstein JW, Simons TR, Shriner SA, Franzreb KE (2002) Spatial autocorrelation and autoregressive models in ecology. Ecol Monogr 72:445–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Luck GW (2007) The relationships between net primary productivity, human population density and species conservation. J Biogeogr 34:201–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Martí R, del Moral JC (eds) (2003) Atlas de las aves reproductoras de España. Dirección General de la Conservación de la Naturaleza-Sociedad Española de Ornitología, MadridGoogle Scholar
  48. McKinney ML, Lockwood JL (1999) Biotic homogenization: a few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction. Trends Ecol Evol 14:450–453PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McPherson JM, Jetz W (2007) Type and spatial structure of distribution data and the perceived determinants of geographical gradients in ecology: the species richness o African birds. Global Ecol Biogeogr 16:657–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Miller JR, Wiens JA, Hobbs NT, Theobald DM (2003) Effects of human settlement on bird communities in lowland riparian areas of Colorado (USA). Ecol Appl 13:1041–1059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente (2003) Base de datos de los vertebrados de España. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, MadridGoogle Scholar
  52. Moreno-Rueda G, Pizarro M (2006) La disposición de las reservas naturales y la protección de los vertebrados terrestres en la provincia de Granada (SE de España). Zool Baetica 17:59–84Google Scholar
  53. Moreno-Rueda G, Pizarro M (2007) The relative influence of climate, environmental heterogeneity, and human population on the distribution of vertebrate species richness in south-eastern Spain. Acta Oecol 32:50–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Moreno-Rueda G, Pizarro M (2008) Temperature differentially mediates species richness of birds of different biogeographic types. Ardea 96:115–120Google Scholar
  55. Nogués-Bravo D, Martínez-Rica J (2004) Factors controlling the spatial species richness pattern of four groups of terrestrial vertebrates in an area between two different biogeographic regions in northern Spain. J Biogeogr 31:629–640Google Scholar
  56. Owen JG (1988) On productivity as a predictor of rodent and carnivore diversity. Ecology 69:1165–1169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Palomo LJ, Gisbert J (eds) (2002) Atlas de los mamíferos terrestres de España. Dirección General de Conservación de la Naturaleza-SECEM-SECEMU, MadridGoogle Scholar
  58. Pautasso M (2007) Scale dependence of the correlation between human population presence and vertebrate and plant species richness. Ecol Lett 10:16–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pianka ER (2000) Evolutionary ecology, 6th edn. Benjamin/Cummings, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  60. Pleguezuelos JM, Márquez R, Lizana M (eds) (2002) Atlas y libro rojo de los anfibios y reptiles de España. Dirección General de Conservación de la Naturaleza-Asociación Herpetológica Española, MadridGoogle Scholar
  61. Pulliam HR (2000) On the relationship between niche and distribution. Ecol Lett 3:349–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Qian H, Wang X, Wang S, Li Y (2007) Environmental determinants of amphibian and reptile species richness in China. Ecography 30:471–482Google Scholar
  63. Quinn GP, Keough MJ (2002) Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  64. Rahbek C (2005) The role of spatial scale and the perception of large-scale species-richness patterns. Ecol Lett 8:224–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rahbek C, Graves GR (2001) Multiple assessment of patterns of avian species richness. Proc Natl Acad Sci 98:4534–4539PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Ramírez A, Tellería JL (2003) Efectos geográficos y ambientales sobre la distribución de las aves forestales ibéricas. Graellsia 59:219–231Google Scholar
  67. Rangel TFLVB, Diniz-Filho JAF, Bini LM (2006) Towards an integrated computational tool for spatial analysis in macroecology and biogeography. Global Ecol Biogeogr 15:321–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Rangel TFLVB, Bini LM, Diniz-Filho JAF, Pinto MP, Carvalho P, Bastos RP (2007) Human development and biodiversity conservation in Brazilian Cerrado. Appl Geogr 27:14–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Real R, Barbosa AM, Porras D, Kin MS, Márquez AL, Guerrero JC, Palomo LJ, Justo ER, Vargas JM (2003) Relative importance of environment, human activity and spatial situation in determining the distribution of terrestrial mammal diversity in Argentina. J Biogeogr 30:939–947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rey-Benayas JM, de la Montaña E (2003) Identifying areas of high-value vertebrate diversity for strengthening conservation. Biol Conserv 114:357–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Ricklefs RE (2004) A comprehensive framework for global patterns of biodiversity. Ecol Lett 7:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Rodríguez MA, Belmontes JA, Hawkins BA (2005) Energy, water and large-scale patterns of reptile and amphibian species richness in Europe. Acta Oecol 28:65–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Rosenzweig ML (1995) Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  74. Ruggiero A, Kitzberger T (2004) Environmental correlates of mammal species richness in South America: effects of spatial structure, taxonomy and geographic range. Ecography 27:401–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Soares C, Brito JC (2007) Environmental correlates for species richness among amphibians and reptiles in a climate transition area. Biodiver Conserv 16:1087–1102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry, 3rd edn. Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  77. Storch D, Evans KL, Gaston KJ (2005) The species-area-energy relationship. Ecol Lett 8:487–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Suárez-Seoane S, Osborne PE, Baudry J (2002) Responses of birds of different biogeographic origins and habitat requirements to agricultural land abandonment in northern Spain. Biol Conserv 105:333–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Tews J, Brose U, Grimm V, Tielbörger K, Wichmann MC, Schwager M, Jeltsch F (2004) Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: the importance of keystone structures. J Biogeogr 31:79–92Google Scholar
  80. Tognelli MF, Kelt DA (2004) Analysis of determinants of mammalian species richness in South America using spatial autoregressive models. Ecography 27:427–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Turner JRG, Lennon JJ, Lawrenson JA (1988) British bird species distributions and the energy theory. Nature 335:539–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. van Rensburg BJ, Chown SL, Gaston KJ (2002) Species richness, environmental correlates, and spatial scale: a test using south African birds. Am Nat 159:566–577PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Vázquez JB, Gaston KJ (2006) People and mammals in Mexico: conservation conflicts at a national scale. Biodivers Conserv 15:2397–2414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Waide RB, Willig MR, Steiner CF, Mittelbach GG, Gough L, Dobson SI, Juday GP, Parmenter R (1999) The relationship between productivity and species richness. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 30:257–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Watkinson AR, Gill JA, Freckleton RP (2003) Macroecology and microecology: linking large-scale patterns of abundance to population processes. In: Blackburn TM, Gaston KJ (eds) Macroecology: concepts and consequences. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 256–273Google Scholar
  86. Whittaker RJ, Willis KJ, Field R (2001) Scale and species richness: towards a general hierarchical theory of species diversity. J Biogeogr 28:453–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Whittaker RJ, Nogués-Bravo D, Araújo MB (2007) Geographical gradients of species richness: a test of the water-energy conjecture of Hawkins et al. (2003) using European data for five taxa. Global Ecol Biogeogr 16:76–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wiens JJ, Donoghe MJ (2004) Historical biogeography, ecology and species richness. Trends Ecol Evol 19:639–644PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Willig MR, Kaufman DM, Stevens RD (2003) Latitudinal gradients of biodiversity, patterns, processes, scale, and synthesis. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:273–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Willis KJ, Whittaker RJ (2002) Species diversity-scale matters. Science 295:1245–1248PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Wright DH (1983) Species-energy theory, an extension of species-area theory. Oikos 41:496–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Woodward FI, Kelly CM (2003) Why are species not more widely distributed? Physiological and environmental limits. In: Blackburn TM, Gaston KJ (eds) Macroecology: concepts and consequences. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 239–255Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Ecological Society of Japan 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Konrad Lorenz Institut für Vergleichende VerhaltensforschungÖsterreischische Academie der WissenschaftenWienAustria
  2. 2.Departamento de Biología Animal, Facultad de CienciasUniversidad de GranadaGranadaSpain

Personalised recommendations