Ecological Research

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 109–118 | Cite as

Effects of body size, age and maturity stage on diet in a large shark: ecological and applied implications

  • Luis O. Lucifora
  • Verónica B. García
  • Roberto C. Menni
  • Alicia H. Escalante
  • Natalia M. Hozbor
Original Article


Ontogenetic diet shifts are a widespread phenomenon among vertebrates, although their relationships with life history traits are poorly known. We analyzed the relative importance of body size, age and maturity stage as determinants of the diet of a marine top predator, the copper shark, Carcharhinus brachyurus, by examining stomach contents using a multiple-hypothesis modeling approach. Copper sharks shifted their diet as size and age increased and as they became sexually mature, incorporated larger prey as they grew, and had a discrete shift in diet with body size, with only individuals larger than ≈200 cm total length able to prey on chondrichthyans. Body size was the most important trait explaining the consumption of chondrichthyans, while age determined the consumption of pelagic teleosts. Pelagic teleosts were consumed mostly by medium-aged sharks, a result, probably, of a risk-reducing feeding strategy at young ages coupled with either a senescence-related decline in performance or a change in sensory capabilities as sharks age. Copper sharks of all sizes were able to cut prey in pieces, implying that gape limitation (i.e., the impossibility of eating prey larger than a predator’s mouth) did not play a role in producing the diet shift. Our results suggest that, contrary to the current practice of setting minimum but not maximum size limits in catches, any plan to conserve or restore the ecological function of sharks, through their predatory control of large prey, should aim to maintain the largest individuals.


Predation Ontogenetic niche shift Life history Shark fisheries Patagonia 



Field work was supported by CONICET (Argentina) (scholarship to L.O.L.). L.O.L. and V.B.G. were supported by the Pew Charitable Trusts through the Pew Global Shark Assessment. We thank the fishermen and fish processing plants from Bahía San Blas (Tiburón I, Deró, Penélope, La Barca, Atlántida and La Filetera) for allowing us the access to sample sharks. We thank Claudia Bremec and Diego Giberto for help in the identification of invertebrate prey, and Marti Anderson for advice for conducting the NPMANOVA analysis. We thank Julia Baum, Ariel Farías, Alejandro Frid, Boris Worm and two anonymous reviewers for valuable comments that greatly improved the manuscript. Field work procedures of this study comply with the laws of Argentina.


  1. Acevedo-Gutiérrez A (2002) Interactions between marine predators: dolphin food intake is related to the number of sharks. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 240:267–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson MJ (2001) A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Aust Ecol 26:32–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arim M, Bozinovic F, Marquet PA (2007) On the relationship between trophic position, body mass and temperature: reformulating the energy limitation hypothesis. Oikos 116:1524–1530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arnold SJ (1993) Foraging theory and prey-size relations in snakes. In: Seigel RA, Collins JT (eds) Snakes: ecology and behaviour. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 87–116Google Scholar
  5. Bascompte J, Melián CJ, Sala E (2005) Interaction strength combinations and the overfishing of a marine food web. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 102:5443–5447PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bethea DM, Buckel JA, Carlson JK (2004) Foraging ecology of the early life stages of four sympatric shark species. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 268:245–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bishop SDH, Francis MP, Duffy C, Montgomery JC (2006) Age, growth, maturity, longevity and natural mortality of the shortfin mako shark (Isurus oxyrinchus) in New Zealand waters. Mar Freshw Res 57:143–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bjorndal KA (1997) Foraging ecology and nutrition of sea turtles. In: Lutz PL, Musick JA (eds) The biology of sea turtles. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 199–231Google Scholar
  9. Carlson JK, Baremore IE (2003) Changes in biological parameters of Atlantic sharpnose shark Rhizoprionodon terraenovae in the Gulf of Mexico: evidence for density-dependent growth and maturity? Mar Freshw Res 54:227–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chapman DD, Gruber SH (2002) A further observation of the prey-handling behavior of the great hammerhead shark, Sphyrna mokarran: predation upon the spotted eagle ray, Aetobatus narinari. Bull Mar Sci 70:947–952Google Scholar
  11. Chiaramonte GE (1998) Shark fisheries in Argentina. Mar Freshw Res 49:601–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chiaramonte GE, Pettovello AD (2000) The biology of Mustelus schmitti in southern Patagonia, Argentina. J Fish Biol 57:930–942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cliff G, Dudley SFJ (1991) Sharks caught in the protective gill nets off Natal, South Africa. 4. The bull shark Carcharhinus leucas Valenciennes. S Afr J Mar Sci 10:253–270Google Scholar
  14. Cliff G, Dudley SFJ (1992) Sharks caught in the protective gill nets off Natal, South Africa. 6. The copper shark Carcharhinus brachyurus (Günther). S Afr J Mar Sci 12:663–674Google Scholar
  15. Cooper AB, Pettorelli N, Durant SM (2007) Large carnivore menus: factors affecting hunting decisions by cheetahs in the Serengeti. Anim Behav 73:651–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cortés E (1998) Demographic analysis as an aid in shark stock assessment and management. Fish Res 39:199–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cousseau MB, Perrotta RG (2000) Peces marinos de Argentina. Biología, distribución, pesca. Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo Pesquero, Mar del PlataGoogle Scholar
  18. Compagno L, Dando M, Fowler S (2005) A field guide to the sharks of the world. Harper Collins, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Crawley MJ (2005) Statistics: an introduction using R. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  20. de Roos AM, Boukal DS, Persson L (2006) Evolutionary regime shifts in age and size at maturation of exploited fish stocks. Proc R Soc B 273:1876–1880Google Scholar
  21. Ebert DA (2002) Ontogenetic changes in the diet of the sevengill shark (Notorynchus cepedianus). Mar Freshw Res 53:517–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Engen S, Stenseth NC (1989) Age-specific optimal diets and optimal foraging tactics: a life-history approach. Theor Pop Biol 36:281–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fishelson L, Montgomery LW, Myrberg AH Jr (1987) Biology of surgeonfish Acanthurus nigrofuscus with emphasis on changeover in diet and annual gonadal cycles. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 39:37–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Forsman A (1991) Variation in sexual size dimorphism and maximum body size among adder populations: effects of prey size. J Anim Ecol 60:253–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Franklin AB, Shenk TM, Anderson DR, Burnham KP (2001) Statistical model selection: an alternative to null hypothesis testing. In: Shenk TM, Franklin AB (eds) Modeling in natural resource management: development, interpretation, and application. Island Press, Washington, pp 75–90Google Scholar
  26. Frid A, Baker GG, Dill LM (2008) Do shark declines create fear-related systems? Oikos 117:191–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hairston NG Jr, Hairston NG Sr, (1993) Cause-effect relationships in energy flow, trophic structure, and interspecific interactions. Am Nat 142:379–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Heithaus MR (2004) Predator-prey interactions. In: Carrier JC, Musick JA, Heithaus MR (eds) Biology of sharks and their relatives. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 487–521Google Scholar
  29. Heithaus MR (2005) Habitat use and group size of pied cormorants (Phalacrocorax varius) in a seagrass ecosystem: possible effects of food abundance and predation risk. Mar Biol 147:27–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Heithaus MR, Dill LM (2002) Food availability and tiger shark predation risk influence bottlenose dolphin habitat use. Ecology 83:480–491Google Scholar
  31. Heithaus MR, Dill LM (2006) Does tiger shark predation risk influence foraging habitat use by bottlenose dolphins at multiple spatial scales? Oikos 114:257–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Heithaus MR, Frid A, Wirsing AJ, Dill LM, Fourqurean JW, Burkholder D, Thomson J, Berjder L (2007) State-dependent risk-taking by green sea turtles mediates top-down effects of tiger shark intimidation in a marine ecosystem. J Anim Ecol 76:837–844PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Helfman GS, Clark JB (1986) Rotational feeding: overcoming gape-limited foraging in anguillid eels. Copeia 1986:679–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hemida F, Seridji R, Labidi N, Bensaci J, Capapé C (2002) Records of Carcharhinus spp. (Chondrichthyes: Carcharhinidae) from off the Algerian coast (southern Mediterranean). Acta Adriat 43:83–92Google Scholar
  35. Herrel A, Gibb AC (2006) Ontogeny of performance in vertebrates. Physiol Biochem Zool 79:1–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Herrel A, O’Reilly JC (2006) Ontogenetic scaling of bite force in lizards and turtles. Physiol Biochem Zool 79:31–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hines AH, Whitlach RB, Thrush SF, Hewitt JE, Cummings VJ, Dayton PK, Legendre P (1997) Nonlinear foraging response of a large marine predator to benthic prey: eagle ray pits and bivalves in a New Zealand sandflat. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 216:191–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Huber DR, Weggelaar CL, Motta PJ (2006) Scaling of bite force in the blacktip shark Carcharhinus limbatus. Zoology 109:109–119PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kardong KV (1996) Evolution of aging: theoretical and practical implications from rattlesnakes. Zoo Biol 15:267–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. King JR, Murphy ME (1985) Periods of nutritional stress in the annual cycles of endotherms: fact or fiction? Am Zool 25:955–964Google Scholar
  41. Kitowski I (2003) Age-related differences in foraging behavior of Montagu’s harrier Circus pygargus males in south-east Poland. Acta Ethol 6:35–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lind AJ, Welsh HH Jr, (1994) Ontogenetic changes in foraging behaviour and habitat use by the Oregon garter snake, Thamnophis atratus hydrophilus. Anim Behav 48:1261–1273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lisney TJ, Bennett MB, Collin SP (2007) Volumetric analysis of sensory brain areas indicates ontogenetic shifts in the relative importance of sensory systems in elasmobranchs. Raffles Bull Zool 14(Suppl):7–15Google Scholar
  44. Lowe CG, Wetherbee BM, Crow GL, Tester AL (1996) Ontogenetic dietary shifts and feeding behavior of the tiger shark, Galeocerdo cuvier, in Hawaiian waters. Environ Biol Fish 47:203–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lucas Z, Stobo WT (2000) Shark-inflicted mortality on a population of harbour seals (Phoca vitulina) at Sable Island, Nova Scotia. J Zool 252:405–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lucifora LO, Menni RC, Escalante AH (2005a) Reproduction, abundance and feeding habits of the broadnose sevengill shark Notorynchus cepedianus in north Patagonia, Argentina. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 289:237–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lucifora LO, Menni RC, Escalante AH (2005b) Reproduction and seasonal occurrence of the copper shark, Carcharhinus brachyurus, from north Patagonia, Argentina. ICES J Mar Sci 62:107–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lucifora LO, García VB, Menni RC, Escalante AH (2006) Food habits, selectivity, and foraging modes of the school shark, Galeorhinus galeus. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 315:259–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Magurran AE (2004) Measuring biological diversity. Blackwell, MaldenGoogle Scholar
  50. McArdle BH, Anderson MJ (2001) Fitting multivariate models to community data: a comment on distance-based redundancy analysis. Ecology 82:290–297Google Scholar
  51. McCormick MI (1998) Ontogeny of diet shift by a microcarnivorous fish, Cheilodactylus spectabilis: relationship between feeding mechanics, microhabitat selection and growth. Mar Biol 132:9–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Menni RC (1983) Los peces en el medio marino. Editorial Hemisferio Sur, Buenos AiresGoogle Scholar
  53. Motta PJ, Wilga CD (2001) Advances in the study of feeding behaviors, mechanisms and mechanics of sharks. Environ Biol Fish 60:131–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Muñoz-Chápuli R (1984) Ethologie de la reproduction chez quelques requins de l’Atlantique Nord-Est. Cybium 8:1–14Google Scholar
  55. Myers RA, Ottensmeyer CA (2005) Extinction risk in marine species. In: Norse EA, Crowder LB (eds) Marine conservation biology: the science of maintaining the sea’s biodiversity. Island Press, Washington, pp 58–79Google Scholar
  56. Myers RA, Worm B (2005) Extinction, survival or recovery of large predatory fishes. Phil Trans R Soc B 360:13–20PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Myers RA, Baum JK, Shepherd TD, Powers SP, Peterson CH (2007) Cascading effects of the loss of apex predatory sharks from a coastal ocean. Science 315:1846–1850PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Okey TA, Banks S, Born AF, Bustamante RH, Calvopiña M, Edgar GJ, Espinoza E, Fariña JM, Garske LE, Reck GK, Salazar S, Shepherd S, Toral-Granda V, Wallem P (2004) A trophic model of a Galápagos subtidal rocky reef for evaluating fisheries and conservation strategies. Ecol Model 172:383–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Page B, McKenzie J, Goldsworthy SD (2005) Dietary resource partitioning among sympatric New Zealand and Australian fur seals. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 293:283–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pauly DA, Christensen V, Guénette S, Pitcher TJ, Sumaila UR, Walters CJ, Watson R, Zeller D (2002) Towards sustainability in world fisheries. Nature 418:689–695PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Pitcher TJ, Parrish JK (1993) Functions of shoaling behaviour in teleosts. In: Pitcher TJ (ed) Behaviour of teleosts fishes. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 363–439Google Scholar
  62. Price TD, Grant PR (1984) Life history traits and natural selection for small body size in a population of Darwin’s finches. Evolution 38:483–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Punzo F, Chávez S (2003) Effects of aging on spatial learning and running speed in the shrew (Cryptotis parva). J Mammal 84: 1112–1120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Pyke GH, Pulliam HR, Charnov EL (1977) Optimal foraging: a selective review of theory and tests. Q Rev Biol 52:137–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Reznick DN, Ghalambor CK (2005) Can commercial fishing cause evolution? Answers from guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 62:791–801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Robbins CT (1983) Wildlife feeding and nutrition. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  67. Rutz C, Whittingham MJ, Newton I (2006) Age-dependent diet choice in an avian top predator. Proc R Soc B 273:579–586PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Scharf FS, Buckel JA, Juanes F, Conover DO (1997) Estimating piscine prey size from partial remains: testing for shifts in foraging mode by juvenile bluefish. Environ Biol Fish 49:377–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Scharf FS, Juanes F, Sutherland MS (1998) Inferring ecological relationships from the edges of scatter diagrams: comparison of regression techniques. Ecology 79:448–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Scharf FS, Juanes F, Rountree RA (2000) Predator size-prey size relationships of marine fish predators: interspecific variation and effects of ontogeny and body size on trophic-niche breadth. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 208:229–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Shepherd TD, Myers RA (2005) Direct and indirect fishery effects on small coastal elasmobranchs in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Ecol Lett 8:1095–1104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Simpfendorfer CA, Goodreid A, McAuley RB (2001) Size, sex and geographic variation in the diet of the tiger shark, Galeocerdo cuvier, from Western Australian waters. Environ Biol Fish 61:37–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Smale MJ (1991) Occurrence and feeding of three shark species, Carcharhinus brachyurus, C. obscurus and Sphyrna zygaena, on the Eastern Cape coast of South Africa. S Afr J Mar Sci 11:31–42Google Scholar
  74. Sminkey TR, Musick JA (1995) Age and growth of the sandbar shark, Carcharhinus plumbeus, before and after population depletion. Copeia 1995:871–883Google Scholar
  75. Stevens JD, Bonfil R, Dulvy NK, Walker PA (2000) The effects of fishing on sharks, rays, and chimaeras (chondrichthyans), and the implications for marine ecosystems. ICES J Mar Sci 57:476–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Strong WR Jr, Snelson FF Jr, Gruber SH (1990) Hammerhead shark predation on stingrays: an observation of prey handling by Sphyrna mokarran. Copeia 1990:836–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Taniuchi T (1990) The role of elasmobranchs in Japanese fisheries. In: Pratt HL Jr, Gruber SH, Taniuchi T (eds) Elasmobranchs as living resources: advances in the biology, ecology, systematics, and the status of the fisheries. NOAA Tech Rep NMFS 90:415–426Google Scholar
  78. Thrush SF, Pridmore RD, Hewitt JE, Cummings VJ (1991) Impact of ray feeding disturbances on sandflat macrobenthos: do communities dominated by polychaetes or shellfish respond differently? Mar Ecol Prog Ser 69:245–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. VanBlaricom GR (1982) Experimental analyses of structural regulation in a marine sand community exposed to oceanic swell. Ecol Monogr 52:283–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Venables WN, Ripley BD (2002) Modern applied statistics with S-Plus, 4th edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  81. Walter JP, Ebert DA (1991) Preliminary estimates of age of the bronze whaler Carcharhinus brachyurus (Chondrichthyes: Carcharhinidae) from southern Africa, with a review of some life history parameters. S Afr J Mar Sci 10:37–44Google Scholar
  82. Ward P, Myers RA (2005) Shifts in open-ocean fish communities coinciding with the commencement of commercial fishing. Ecology 86:835–847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Werner EE, Gilliam JF (1984) The ontogenetic niche and species interactions in size-structured populations. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 15:393–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Whitney NM, Crow GL (2007) Reproductive biology of the tiger shark (Galeocerdo cuvier) in Hawaii. Mar Biol 151:63–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wirsing AJ, Heithaus MR, Dill LM (2007) Fear factor: do dugongs (Dugong dugon) trade food for safety from tiger sharks (Galeocerdo cuvier)? Oecologia 153:1031–1040PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Wood S (2006) Generalized additive models: an introduction with R. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Ecological Society of Japan 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luis O. Lucifora
    • 1
  • Verónica B. García
    • 1
  • Roberto C. Menni
    • 2
    • 3
  • Alicia H. Escalante
    • 3
    • 4
  • Natalia M. Hozbor
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of BiologyDalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada
  2. 2.Departamento Científico Zoología VertebradosMuseo de La PlataLa PlataArgentina
  3. 3.Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET)Buenos AiresArgentina
  4. 4.Departamento de BiologíaUniversidad Nacional de Mar del PlataMar del PlataArgentina
  5. 5.Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo PesqueroMar del PlataArgentina

Personalised recommendations