Individual behavioral variation in predator–prey models
- 353 Downloads
The role of individual behavioral variation in community dynamics was studied. Behavioral variation in this study does not refer to differences in average responses (e.g., average response between presence and absence of antipredator behavior). Rather it refers to the variation around the average response that is not explained by trivial experimental treatments. First, the effect of behavioral variation was examined based on Jensen’s inequality. In cases of commonly used modeling framework with type II functional response, neglecting behavioral variation (a component of encounter rate) causes overestimation of predation effects. The effect of this bias on community processes was examined by incorporating the behavioral variation in a commonly used consumer-resource model (Rosenzweig–MacArthur model). How such a consideration affects a model prediction (paradox of enrichment) was examined. The inclusion of behavioral variation can both quantitatively and qualitatively alter the model characteristics. Behavioral variation can substantially increase the stability of the community with respect to enrichment.
KeywordsJensen’s inequality Adaptive behavior Paradox of enrichment
I thank Ben Bolker, Chris Jensen, and an anonymous reviewer for their insightful comments.
- Abrams PA, Vos M (2003) Adaptation, density dependence, and the abundances of trophic levels. Evol Ecol Res 5:1113–1132Google Scholar
- Anholt BR, Werner E, Skelly DK (2000) Effect of food and predators on the activity of four larval ranid frogs. Ecology 81:3509–3521Google Scholar
- Bolker BM, Pacala SW, Levin SA (2000) Moment methods for stochastic processes in continuous space and time. In: Dieckmann U, Law R, Metz JAJ (eds) The geometry of ecological interactions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 388–411Google Scholar
- Caro T (2005) Antipredator defenses in birds and mammals. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- Hastings A (1997) Population biology. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Holling CS (1959) Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism. Can Entomol 91:385–398Google Scholar
- Murdoch WW, Nisbet RM, McCauley E, deRoos AM, Gurney WSC (1998) Plankton abundance and dynamics across nutrient levels: tests of hypotheses. Ecology 79:1339–1356Google Scholar
- Murdoch WW, Briggs CJ, Nisbet RM (2003) Consumer-resource dynamics. Monographs in population biology. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Stephens DW, Krebs JR (1986) Foraging theory. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Tuljapurkar S, Caswell H (1997) Structured-population models in marine, terrestrial, and freshwater systems. Thomson, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Turchin P (2003) Complex population dynamics: a theoretical/empirical synthesis. Monographs in population biology. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar